Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the relationship between socioeconomic status and the extent of visual field loss in POAG and treated OHT patients at their first presentation to Manchester Royal Eye Hospital.
Methods
A cohort of 113 glaucoma patients seen between 1995 and 2005 was reviewed. The clinical parameters intraocular pressure, C : D ratio, family history of glaucoma, visual acuity, extent of visual field loss, and demographic parameters: age, gender, ethnicity, and residential postcode were extracted from hospital records. The socioeconomic status of each patient was estimated from the patient's residential postcode with the ACORN index (group 1: affluent and group 2: socioeconomically deprived).
Results
In comparison to group 1 (n=49), patients in group 2 (n=64) presented with more advanced field loss, lower educational attainment (18 vs 98% with no or unknown qualification), and were less aware of glaucoma in the family (27 vs 17%). Patients with a number of systemic health problems had worse vision, more severe visual field loss, and worse clinical attendance (P<0.05).
Conclusions
The extent of visual field loss in glaucoma patients at first presentation is related to a combination of clinical and socioeconomic factors including the patient's postcode. This finding could be used to target future case-finding resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Chen PP . Blindness in patients with treated open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2003; 110 (4): 726–733.
Evans JR . Causes of Blindness and Partial sight in England and Wales 1990–1991. Studies on Medical and Population Subjects Reports No. 57. HMSO: London, 1995.
Bunce C, Evans J, Fraser S, Wormald R . BD8 certification of visually impaired people. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82 (1): 72–76.
Fraser S, Bunce C, Wormald R . Risk factors for late presentation in chronic glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40 (10): 2251–2257.
Fraser S, Bunce C, Wormald R . Retrospective analysis of risk factors for late presentation of chronic glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83 (1): 24–28.
Fraser S, Bunce C, Wormald R, Brunner E . Deprivation and late presentation of glaucoma: case–control study. BMJ 2001; 322 (7287): 639–643.
Loehrer Sr PJ, Greger HA, Weinberger M, Musick B, Miller M, Nichols C et al. Knowledge and beliefs about cancer in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population. Cancer 1991; 68 (7): 1665–1671.
Smith LK, Thompson JR, Woodruff G, Hiscox F . Social deprivation and age at presentation in amblyopia. J Public Health Med 1994; 16 (3): 348–351.
Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley H, Ezrine S . Socioeconomic status and visual impairment among urban Americans. Baltimore Eye Survey Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109 (5): 637–641.
Tsai JC, McClure CA, Ramos SE, Schlundt DG, Pichert JW . Compliance barriers in glaucoma: a systematic classification. J Glaucoma 2003; 12 (5): 393–398.
Sheldrick JH, Ng C, Austin DJ, Rosenthal AR . An analysis of referral routes and diagnostic accuracy in cases of suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1994; 1 (1): 31–39.
Henson DB, Thampy R . Preventing blindness from glaucoma. BMJ 2005; 331 (7509): 120–121.
CACI. ACORN User Guidehttp://www.caci.co.uk/pdfs/Acorn%20Guide.pdf. [accessed January 2007]. 2006.
Theodossiades J, Murdoch I, Cousens S . Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial. Eye 2004; 18 (5): 483–490.
Patel UD, Murdoch IE, Theodossiades J . Glaucoma detection in the community: does ongoing training of optometrists have a lasting effect? Eye 2006; 20 (5): 591–594.
Livingston PM, Lee SE, De Paola C, Carson CA, Guest CS, Taylor HR . Knowledge of glaucoma, and its relationship to self-care practices, in a population sample. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1995; 23 (1): 37–41.
Dandona R, Dandona L . Socioeconomic status and blindness. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85 (12): 1484–1488.
Owen CG, Carey IM, De Wilde S, Whincup PH, Wormald R, Cook DG . The epidemiology of medical treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension in the United Kingdom: 1994–2003. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90 (7): 861–868.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from the BUPA Foundation. We thank Dr Richard Worlmald, Dr Paul Spry, and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable suggestions to the previous version of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sukumar, S., Spencer, F., Fenerty, C. et al. The influence of socioeconomic and clinical factors upon the presenting visual field status of patients with glaucoma. Eye 23, 1038–1044 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.245
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.245
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Deprivation and the location of primary care optometry services in England
Eye (2024)
-
Determinants of late presentation of glaucoma in Hong Kong
Eye (2023)
-
Measures of multiple deprivation and visual field loss in glaucoma clinics in England: lessons from big data
Eye (2023)
-
Advanced glaucoma at diagnosis: current perspectives
Eye (2020)
-
Impact of socioeconomic status on vision-related quality of life in primary open-angle glaucoma
Eye (2017)
