Abstract
Purpose
Comparative evaluation of ‘flap on’ and ‘flap off’ techniques of Epi-LASIK in low-to-moderate myopia.
Methods
Sixteen eyes of eight consecutive patients with myopia ⩽6 D were selected for this prospective, randomized, comparative, interventional case series. Epi-LASIK surgery was performed in all eyes. In one eye of each patient, the epithelial flap was retained after excimer laser ablation (flap on). In the fellow eye, the epithelial flap was discarded (flap off) after ablation. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), spherical equivalent (SEQ), postoperative pain score, time to epithelization, and corneal haze were recorded on postoperative visits.
Results
The mean preoperative SEQ in the two groups was −3.61±1.32 D (flap on) and −3.49±1.86 D (flap off; P=0.752). The mean follow-up period was 8.5±4.9 months. The mean pain score was comparable on all postoperative days except the second postoperative day when the group with flap off had a lesser mean pain score (P=0.053).
Time for epithelial healing was 3.63±0.52 days in cases with flap off and 4.13±0.64 days in cases with flap on (P=0.113). Eyes with flap off had a better UCVA on the first postoperative day (0.19±0.11 logMAR) compared with eyes with flap on (0.41±0.28logMAR; P=0.032). There was no significant difference in UCVA, BSCVA, SEQ, contrast sensitivity, corneal haze, and higher order aberrations at any other postoperative visit.
Conclusions
There is no difference between flap on and flap off techniques of Epi-LASIK with regards to overall outcome of surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Pallikaris IG, Katsanevaki VJ, Kalyvianaki MI, Naoumidi II . Advances in subepithelial excimer refractive surgery techniques: Epi-LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2003; 14: 207–212.
Matsumoto JC, Chu YS . Epi-LASIK update: overview of techniques and patient management. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2006; 46: 105–115.
Anderson NJ, Beran RF, Schneider TL . Epi-LASEK for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1343–1347.
Katsanevaki VJ, Kalyvianaki MI, Kavroulaki DS, Pallikaris IG . One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 1111–1117.
Gamaly TO, El Danasoury A, El Maghraby A . A prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in eyes prone to haze. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: S1015–S1020.
Dai J, Chu R, Zhou X, Chen C, Qu X, Wang X . One-year outcomes of epi-LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg 2006; 22: 589–595.
Dai J, Chu R, Zhou X, Chen C, Rao SK, Lam DS . Histopathological study of epithelial flaps in epi-LASIK. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 637–638.
Tanioka H, Hieda O, Kawasaki S, Nakai Y, Kinoshita S . Assessment of epithelial integrity and cell viability in epithelial flaps prepared with the epi-LASIK procedure. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1195–1200.
Katsanevaki VJ, Naoumidi II, Kalyvianaki MI, Pallikaris G . Epi-LASIK: histological findings of separated epithelial sheets 24 h after treatment. J Refract Surg 2006; 22: 151–154.
Pallikaris IG, Naoumidi II, Kalyvianaki MI, Katsanevaki VJ . Epi-LASIK: comparative histological evaluation of mechanical and alcohol-assisted epithelial separation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1496–1501.
O'Doherty M, Kirwan C, O'Keeffe M, O'Doherty J . Postoperative pain following epi-LASIK, LASEK, and PRK for myopia. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 133–138.
Torres LF, Sancho C, Tan B, Padilla K, Schanzlin DJ, Chayet AS . Early postoperative pain following Epi-LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, comparative, bilateral study. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 126–132.
Wang QM, Fu AC, Yu Y, Xu CC, Wang XX, Chen SH et al. Clinical investigation of off-flap epi-LASIK for moderate to high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 2390–2394.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was presented as a poster in the annual conference of the American Academy of Ophthalmology at New Orleans in November 2007
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, N., Kaushal, S., Jhanji, V. et al. Comparative evaluation of ‘flap on’ and ‘flap off’ techniques of Epi-LASIK in low-to-moderate myopia. Eye 23, 1786–1789 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.367
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.367
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Subjective pain, visual recovery and visual quality after LASIK, EpiLASIK (flap off) and APRK — a consecutive, non-randomized study
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (2013)
