Abstract
Aims
To determine the nature of intraocular lens (IOL) surface abnormalities seen after the injection of hydrophilic acrylic lenses (Rayner C-flex™ 570C), through their accompanying pre-packaged disposable injectors. Hexagonal and round nozzle injectors from the same lens manufacturer were compared.
Methods
A series of lenses were injected into a petri dish, using two different manufacturer-supplied disposable injectors. The injector nozzle, plunger, and IOL were subsequently examined by light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for defects.
Results
When using the hexagonal nozzle, eight out of nine lenses had linear surface abnormalities along the posterior surface of the IOL in the direction of injection. These abnormalities appeared to be scratches on the surface of the IOL and there were no corresponding defects on the nozzle. A newly introduced injector, with an oval nozzle and a larger compressible plunger, eliminated the vast majority of these surface abnormalities.
Conclusions
Manufacturer-supplied hexagonal nozzle injectors, but not oval nozzle injectors, produce linear scratches on the posterior surface of the IOL. These scratches did not disappear with time in vivo.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Myers TD, Olson RJ . Comparison of the effects of viscoelastic agents on clinical properties of the unfolder lens injection system. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25 (7): 953–958.
Nguyen DQ, Saleh TA, Pandey SK, Bates AK . Irregularities on the surface of single-piece AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32 (3): 495–498.
Milazzo S, Turut P, Blin H . Alterations to the AcrySof intraocular lens during folding. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996; 22 (Suppl 2): 1351–1354.
Vrabec MP, Syverud JC, Burgess CJ . Forceps-induced scratching of a foldable acrylic intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114 (6): 777.
Hesse Y, Freissler KA, Lang GK . Scanning electron microscopic study of 12 lenses of two types of soft acrylic intraocular lenses. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2001; 218 (10): 682–687.
Singh AD, Fang T, Rath R . Cartridge cracks during foldable intraocular lens insertion. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24 (9): 1220–1222.
Stefaniu I, Nita N, Lazar S, Dragan I, Barlea G, Balan L et al. Acrylic IOL implantation with the Monarch II injector. Oftalmologia 2003; 59 (4): 42–45.
Kleinmann G, Marcovich AL, Apple DJ, Mamalis N . Linear deposits on the surfaces of intraocular lenses implanted through a hexagonal cartridge which mimic scratches/cracks on the lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89 (11): 1474–1477.
Habib NE, Singh J, Adams AD, Bartholomew RS . Cracked cartridges during foldable intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996; 22 (5): 630–632.
Faschinger CW . Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27 (6): 845–849.
Faschinger CW . Plastic exfoliations from the cartridge after implantation of a hydrophilic acrylic lens without viscoelastic material. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28 (1): 8–9.
Mencucci R, Dei R, Danielli D, Susini M, Menchini U . Folding procedure for acrylic intraocular lenses: effect on optic surfaces and bacterial adhesion. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30 (2): 457–463.
Tognetto D, Ravalico G . Inflammatory cell adhesion and surface defects on heparin-surface-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses in diabetic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27 (2): 239–244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was presented in part at UKISCRS, Chester, UK, in September 2005 and in part at ASCRS, San Francisco, California, USA, in March 2006
Proprietary interests or research funding: None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harsum, S., Mann, S., Clatworthy, I. et al. An investigation of intraocular lens damage and foreign bodies using an injectable hydrophilic acrylic lens implant. Eye 24, 152–157 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.3
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
A laboratory evaluation of nozzle tip damage in four generations of intraocular lens injector systems using a self-developed damage scale
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
An implantable microfluidic device for self-monitoring of intraocular pressure
Nature Medicine (2014)
-
An investigation of intraocular lens damage and foreign bodies using an injectable hydrophilic acrylic lens implant
Eye (2010)
