Abstract
Aim
It has been previously shown that community refinement of glaucoma referrals is an efficient way to investigate and treat glaucoma suspects. The potential for false negatives has not been explored previously and we describe a scheme in which effort has been made to both assess and control for this, and report on its success.
Methods
Trained optometrists were recruited to examine and investigate the patients referred with suspected glaucoma, with a view to decreasing false-positive rates in accordance with an agreed protocol. The randomly selected notes of 100 patients referred onward to the Hospital Eye Service (HES) by trained, accredited optometrists, and the notes and optic disc images of 100 randomly selected patients retained in the community were examined in order to determine the efficiency and safety of the scheme.
Results
The scheme resulted in a 53% reduction in the total number of referrals to HES with a cost saving of £117 per patient. Analysis of patients referred resulted in a diagnosis of glaucoma or retention of patients in HES with suspected glaucoma in 83% and a good correlation between the hospital and optometric measurements. Analysis of notes and optic nerve images of patients not referred indicated no compromise on patient safety.
Conclusion
This study suggests that suspected glaucoma can be successfully refined in the community with benefits to both the patient and the hospital. We also suggest that such a scheme may be safe as well as cost-effective, a conclusion that has not as yet been reached by any other study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Harrison RJ, Wild JM, Hobley AJ . Referral patterns to an ophthalmic outpatient clinic by general practitioners and ophthalmic opticians and the role of these professionals in screening for ocular disease. BMJ 1988; 297: 1162–1167.
Bell RD, O’Brien C . Accuracy of referral to a glaucoma clinic. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1997; 17: 7–11.
Collaborative Normal Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 126: 487–497.
Tuck MW, Crick RP . Efficiency of referral for suspected glaucoma. BMJ 1991; 302: 998–1000.
Bell RD, O-Brien C . The diagnostic outcome of new glaucoma referrals. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1997; 17: 3–6.
Vernon SA, Ghosh G . Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice? Eye 2001; 15: 458–463.
National Eye Care Service Steering Group 2004. http://www.vision2020uk.org.uk/core_files/220404eyecare%20report.doc.
Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, Xian WX, Wright L, Courtney P . Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol 1993; 77: 17–21.
Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR . Prevalence of open angle glaucoma in Australia – The Blue Mountains eye study. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 1661–1669.
Henson DB, Spencer AF, Harper R, Cadman EJ . Community refinement of glaucoma referrals. Eye 2003; 17: 21–26.
Hernandez A, Rabindranath K, Fraser C, Vale L, Blanco AA, Burr JM . Screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies. J Glaucoma 2008; 17: 159–168.
Thomas R, Parikh R, Paul P, Muliyil J . Population based screening versus case detection. Ind J Ophthalmol 2002; 50: 233–237.
Morgan JE, Sheen NJ, North RV, Choong Y, Ansari E . Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 879–884.
Spencer IC, Spry PG, Gray SF, Baker IA, Menage MJ, Easty DL et al. The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: study design. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995; 15: 391–394.
Foster PJ, Burhmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ . The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 238–242.
Nice Guidelines. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG85FullGuideline.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Devarajan, N., Williams, G., Hopes, M. et al. The Carmarthenshire Glaucoma Referral Refinement Scheme, a safe and efficient screening service. Eye 25, 43–49 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.136
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.136
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Reassurance on false negatives in the Manchester COVID19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)
Eye (2022)
-
Defining stable glaucoma: a Delphi consensus survey of UK optometrists with a specialist interest in Glaucoma
Eye (2021)
-
Project Panopia: cost-effective model for glaucoma referral refinement from community optometrists without the need for repeat testing
Eye (2021)
-
Ophthalmic nurse practitioner assessment of glaucoma: evaluating agreement within an initiative to enhance capacity in glaucoma clinics
Eye (2021)
-
Care pathways for glaucoma detection and monitoring in the UK
Eye (2020)
