Abstract
Purpose
To assess the value of histopathologic investigations of vitreous biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of fungal endophthalmitis compared with that of conventional smear and fungal culture.
Methods
In this prospective study, 10 patients with clinically suspected fungal endophthalmitis of any etiology underwent intravitreal sampling and vitrectomy for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Infused vitreous biopsy samples were centrifuged and mixed with blood serum for hematoxylin and eosin and periodic-acid Schiff staining, whereas the remaining samples were submitted for smear and fungal culture. All slides were reviewed by an attending pathologist.
Results
Vitreous specimens were obtained from 10 eyes of 10 patients. Positive histological diagnoses of fungal endophthalmitis from vitreous biopsies were made in seven cases (70%). The sensitivity of histological detection of fungi was higher than conventional smear (50%) or culture (40%); all these techniques are complementary.
Conclusions
Specific histopathological detection of pathogenic fungi in clinical vitreous specimens could be helpful for the diagnosis of suspected fungal endophthalmitis. Positive histopathology results were seen in the majority of samples; however, difficulties in determining related fungal etiology limit its application.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Chakrabarti A, Shivaprakash MR, Singh R, Tarai B, George VK, Fomda BA et al. Fungal endophthalmitis: fourteen years' experience from a center in india. Retina 2008; 28: 1400–1407.
Edwards JE Jr, Foos RY, Montgomerie JZ, Guze LB . Ocular manifestations of candida septicemia: review of seventy-six cases of hematogenous candida endophthalmitis. Medicine 1974; 53: 47–75.
Rao NA, Hidayat AA . Endogenous mycotic endophthalmitis: variations in clinical and histopathologic changes in candidiasis compared with aspergillosis. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132: 244–251.
Kunimoto DY, Das T, Sharma S, Jalali S, Majji AB, Gopinathan U et al. Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of isolates: Part i. Postoperative endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis research group. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 128: 240–242.
Sharma S, Jalali S, Adiraju MV, Gopinathan U, Das T . Sensitivity and predictability of vitreous cytology, biopsy, and membrane filter culture in endophthalmitis. Retina 1996; 16: 525–529.
Malinowski SM . The vitreous trap: a simple, surgeon-controlled technique for obtaining undiluted vitreous and subretinal specimens during pars plana vitrectomy. Retina 2010; 30: 828–829.
Davis JL, Miller DM, Ruiz P . Diagnostic testing of vitrectomy specimens. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140: 822–829.
Marticorena J, Romano V, Gomez-Ulla F . Sterile endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections. Mediat Inflamm 2012; 2012: 928123.
Arevalo JF . Retinal and Choroidal Manifestations of Selected Systemic Diseases 1st edn. Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
Binder MI, Chua J, Kaiser PK, Procop GW, Isada CM . Endogenous endophthalmitis: an 18-year review of culture-positive cases at a tertiary care center. Medicine 2003; 82: 97–105.
Barza M, Pavan PR, Doft BH, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA, Han DP et al. Evaluation of microbiological diagnostic techniques in postoperative endophthalmitis in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115: 1142–1150.
Bharathi MJ, Rameshkumar G, Ramakrishnan R, Venugopal Reddy YC, Shivkumar C, Ramesh S . Comparative evaluation of uniplex, nested, semi-nested, multiplex and nested multiplex PCR methods in the identification of microbial etiology of clinically suspected infectious endophthalmitis. Curr Eye Res 2013; 38: 550–562.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, K., Fang, F. & Li, H. Reliability of vitreous histological detection of pathogenic fungi in the diagnosis of fungal endophthalmitis. Eye 29, 424–427 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.278
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.278
