Abstract
Purpose
To report the changing trend in the utilisation rate of donated corneas for keratoplasty and to examine the reasons for unutilised corneas in the North East of England.
Methods
Relevant data were retrospectively collected from a local eye retrieval database and the UK Transplant Registry for two separate years; namely, 2006 and 2010.
Results
The utilisation rate of donated corneas for keratoplasty improved from 57% (52/92) in 2006 to 71% (220/312) in 2010 (P=0.012). Over the same period, there was a marked reduction of failed serological test results from 24% (22/92) to 5% (14/312) (P<0.001). The leading reasons for unutilised corneas were failed serological test results (22/92, 24%) in 2006 and inadequate tissue quality (23/312, 7%) in 2010. The rate of tissue contamination remained similar between 2006 (4%) and 2010 (6%) (P=0.80). Eleven (4%) corneas were not transplanted due to recipient-related factors in 2010. Donor corneas of inadequate tissue quality were associated with older age (P=0.04) but not with gender, donation site, consent method, death-to-enucleation interval, death-to-processing interval, and storage time in the eye bank.
Conclusion
There was a substantial improvement in the utilisation rate of corneas donated in the North East of England between 2006 and 2010. The principal reason was a reduction in failed serological test results. High donor age was associated with increased chance of corneas not being used. Utilisation rate of corneas can be further improved if potential modifiable factors are addressed, such as recipient-related factors and microbial contamination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Sundmacher R, Reinhard T . Meeting the demand for quality and safety checked corneal transplants. The role of corneal banks and health care organizations in Germany. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98: 277–284.
Ting DS, Potts J, Lawther T, Jones M, Armitage WJ, Figueiredo FC . Impact of telephone consent and potential for eye donation in the UK: the Newcastle Eye Centre Study. Eye (Lond) 2016; 30: 342–348.
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts. (accessed on 28 July 2015).
http://www.northumberland.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=16002. (accessed on 28 July 2015).
Thomas S, Klapper PE, Mutton KJ, Turner AJ, Tullo AB, Zambrano I et al. Lack of vision, loss of sight: consequences of mandatory HTLV screening in corneal transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2007; 9: 171–172.
Eye Bank Association of America 2013. Available at http://www.restoresight.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2013_Statistical_Report-FINAL.pdf.
Armitage WJ, Jones MN, Zambrano I, Carley F, Tole DM ; NHSBT Ocular Tissue Advisory Group and Contributing Ophthalmologists OTAG Audit Study 12. The suitability of corneas stored by organ culture for penetrating keratoplasty and influence of donor and recipient factors on 5-year graft survival. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 784–791.
Cunningham WJ, Moffatt SL, Brookes NH, Twohill HC, Pendergrast DG, Stewart JM et alNHSBT Ocular Tissue Advisory Group and Contributing Ophthalmologists OTAG Audit Study 12. The New Zealand National Eye Bank study: trends in the acquisition and storage of corneal tissue over the decade 2000 to 2009. Cornea 2012; 31: 538–545.
Armitage WJ, Easty DL . Factors influencing the suitability of organ-cultured corneas for transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 16–24.
Williams KA, Lowe MT, Keane MC, Jones VJ, Loh RS, Coster DJ . The Australian Corneal Graft Registry 2012 Report. Available at http://dspace.flinders.edu.au/xmlui/handle/2328/25860 (accessed on 28 July 2015).
Park CY, Lee JK, Gore PK, Lim CY, Chuck RS . Keratoplasty in the United States: A 10-year review from 2005 through 2014. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 2432–2442.
Tan JC, Holland SP, Dubord PJ, Moloney G, McCarthy M, Yeung SN . Evolving indications for and trends in keratoplasty in British Columbia, Canada, from 2002 to 2011: a 10-year review. Cornea 2014; 33: 252–256.
Keenan TD, Jones MN, Rushton S, Carley FM . National Health Service Blood and Transplant Ocular Tissue Advisory Group and Contributing Ophthalmologists (Ocular Tissue Advisory Group Audit Study 8). Trends in the indications for corneal graft surgery in the United Kingdom: 1999 through 2009. Arch Ophthalmol 2012; 130: 621–628.
Ting DS, Sau CY, Srinivasan S, Ramaesh K, Mantry S, Roberts F . Changing trends in keratoplasty in the West of Scotland: a 10-year review. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 405–408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ting, D., Potts, J., Jones, M. et al. Changing trend in the utilisation rate of donated corneas for keratoplasty in the UK: The North East England Study. Eye 30, 1475–1480 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.145
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.145
