Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Myelodysplasias

Long-term outcome of anemic lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes without 5q deletion refractory to or relapsing after erythropoiesis-stimulating agents

Abstract

A large proportion of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) respond to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), but most responses are transient. We updated a previously reported cohort of lower-risk MDS patients treated with ESA and analyzed outcomes after ESA failure. In 120 patients with primary resistance and 66 patients with relapse after an initial response to ESA, the 5-year cumulative incidence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after failure was 18.9% and 11.6%, respectively (P=0.20). Median overall survival (OS) after failure was 40.1 and 44.9 months (P=0.35), respectively. We further categorized patients as ‘early failures’ (including resistance and relapse after <6 months of response), or ‘later failures’ (that is, relapse after 6 months). The 5-year cumulative incidence of AML and median OS after failure in early and later failure were 21.6% and 9% (P=0.02) and 36.7 and 54.3 months (P=0.02), respectively. Early failure to ESA and a baseline diagnosis of refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-1 were independent prognostic factors for AML progression and, along with trisomy 8, for shorter OS. Median OS from treatment onset was 40, 90.7 and 65.8 months in early failure, later failure and no relapse, respectively (P=0.001). Lower-risk MDS with early failure to ESA have a relatively unfavorable outcome, and should be offered alternative treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR et al. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol 1982; 51: 189–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 1997; 89: 2079–2088.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Negrin R, Stein R, Krantz S, Lindberg G, Vardiman J et al. Erythroid response to treatment with G-CSF plus erythropoietin for the anaemia of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: proposal for a predictive model. Br J Haematol 1997; 99: 344–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Park S, Grabar S, Kelaidi C, Beyne-Rauzy O, Picard F, Bardet V et al. Predictive factors of response and survival in myelodysplastic syndrome treated with erythropoietin and G-CSF: the GFM experience. Blood 2008; 111: 574–582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jädersten M, Malcovati L, Dybedal I, Della Porta MG, Invernizzi R, Montgomery SM et al. Erythropoietin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment associated with improved survival in myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3607–3613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg PL, Sun Z, Miller KB, Bennett JM, Tallman MS, Dewald G et al. Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes patients with erythropoietin with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: results of a prospective randomized phase III trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1996). Blood 2009; 114: 2393–2400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelaidi C, Park S, Brechignac S, Mannone L, Vey N, Dombret H et al. Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies (GFM). Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion before the lenalidomide era; the GFM experience with EPO and thalidomide. Leuk Res 2008; 32: 1049–1053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schanz J, Tüchler H, Solé F, Mallo M, Luño E, Cervera J et al. New comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system for primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia after MDS derived from an international database merge. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 820–829.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kantarjian H, Pinto A, Schiffer CA, Nimer SD et al. Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2000; 96: 3671–3674.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD et al. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood 2006; 108: 419–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H et al WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan E, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peto R, Peto J . Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc Ser A 1972; 135: 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fine J, Gray R . A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 94: 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cox DR . Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1972; 34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Greenberg P, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sole F, Bennett JM, Garcia-Manero G et al. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), developed by the International Prognostic Working Group for Prognosis in MDS (IWG-PM). Leuk Res 2011; 35 (Suppl 1): 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia-Manero G, Shan J, Faderl S, Cortes J, Ravandi F, Borthakur G et al. A prognostic score for patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 2008; 22: 538–543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Della Porta MG, Malcovati L, Boveri E, Travaglino E, Pietra D, Pascutto C et al. Clinical relevance of bone marrow fibrosis and CD34-positive cell clusters in primary myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 754–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malcovati L, Porta MG, Pascutto C, Invernizzi R, Boni M, Travaglino E et al. Prognostic factors and life expectancy in myelodysplastic syndromes classified according to WHO criteria: a basis for clinical decision making. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7594–7603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zipperer E, Pelz D, Nachtkamp K, Kuendgen A, Strupp C, Gattermann N et al. The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation comorbidity index is of prognostic relevance for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica 2009; 94: 729–732.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Professor Sylvie Chevret (Hospital St Louis, Paris), who independently reviewed all the biostatistical procedures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Fenaux.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Results partly presented at the 52nd American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, December 2010.

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Leukemia website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelaidi, C., Park, S., Sapena, R. et al. Long-term outcome of anemic lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes without 5q deletion refractory to or relapsing after erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Leukemia 27, 1283–1290 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.16

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.16

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links