Main

Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas are uncommon and account for only 5–10% of urothelial carcinomas.1 Radical nephroureterectomy with excision of an ipsilateral bladder cuff is the standard therapy for patients with a normal contralateral kidney.2 Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas that invade the muscle wall usually have a very poor prognosis, even if radical nephroureterectomy is performed appropriately.1 The 5-year specific survival is <50% for pT2/ pT3 and <10% for pT4.3, 4 According to the most recent classifications, the primarily recognized prognostic factors are tumor stage and grade.1 Gender, age and the initial location of the tumor within the upper urinary tract are no longer accepted as prognostic factors.1 Lymphovascular invasion,5, 6, 7 tumor necrosis,8, 9 tumor architecture10 and concomitant carcinoma in situ11, 12 are associated with higher risks of recurrent disease and cancer-specific mortality. Molecular markers such as microsatellite instabilities,13 E-cadherin, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and a telomerase RNA component14 have been shown to be useful for prognosis, although none of the markers has been externally validated.1

Cancer stem-like cells/tumor-initiating cells are a small population of cancer cells that have the properties of tumor-initiating ability, self-renewal and differentiation. Cancer stem-like cells/tumor-initiating cells are more resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy than non-cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell populations via various mechanisms,15 suggesting that the existence of these cells is a prognostic factor in cancer patients. In this study, we investigated two cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell markers. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1(ALDH1) is a cytosolic isoform of ALDH, and high levels of its activity are seen not only in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells but also in solid cancers (eg, breast,16, 17 colorectal,18 pancreas,19 bladder20 and prostate21 cancers). Furthermore, expression of ALDH1 is a predictor of poor clinical outcome in the breast,16, 22 lung,23 pancreatic19 and bladder20 cancers. Sex determining region-Y-related high mobility group box (SOX) 2 is a transcription factor that is involved in the maintenance of embryonic stem cell pluripotency and in multiple developmental processes. It is overexpressed in certain poorly differentiated subtypes of cancer (eg, lung,24, 25 breast,26, 27 and colorectal28, 29 cancers). SOX2 is not only a prognostic indicator in these cancers but also a candidate for cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell-targeting T-cell-based immunotherapy.30

The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the relationship between cancer stem-like cells/tumor-initiating cells and prognosis in upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma by using the putative markers, ALDH1 and SOX2, with full clinicopathological data and follow-up. We also analyzed the association between cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell marker expression and recurrence, especially intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy.

Materials and methods

Patients

We reviewed the clinical pathology archives of 181 consecutive patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy and were diagnosed as having upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas at the Sapporo Medical University Hospital from June 1995 through May 2010. Patients with a previous history of bladder cancer and patients with concomitant bladder cancer were excluded. Finally, a total of 125 patients were enrolled in this study. Informed consent was obtained from the patients to use the surgical specimens remaining after pathological diagnosis for the investigational study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Clinical Research at our university (No. 22–131). All hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides were reviewed, and all of these specimens showed urothelial carcinoma. The median age at operation of the 89 male and 36 female patients was 69 years (range 32–88). Median follow-up was 69 months (range 6–192). All hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides were reviewed, and clinical stage was assigned using the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Renal Pelvis and Ureter Cancer (7th edition, 2010).31 The patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of the 125 patients

Immunohistochemistry and Scoring

Sections (4 μm) of the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were immunostained after heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) using an autoclave with a monoclonal antibody against ALDH1 (dilution 1:1000; BD Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA) and a polyclonal antibody against SOX2 (dilution 1:100; Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA, USA). Subsequent incubations with a secondary biotinylated antibody, avidin-conjugated peroxidase complex and chromogen were done on a Ventana NexES (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). The slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin, rinsed, dehydrated through graded alcohols into nonaqueous solution, and cover-slipped with mounting media. Negative controls had the primary antibody replaced by buffer. All specimens were reviewed independently using light microscopy in at least five areas at × 400 magnification by investigators who were blinded to clinicopathological data (TT and YH). For ALDH1, tumors presenting at least one ALDH1-positive cancer cell were considered to be ALDH1 positive.16, 32 For SOX2, nuclear staining was considered positive.33 We previously reported that the SOX2-positive rates in lung cancer were 15%, 45% and 40% in <1%, 1–10% and >10% of tumors, respectively.33 On the basis of these results, we used a 10% cutoff point for both negative and positive specimens. Breast and lung cancer tissues were used as positive controls for ALDH1 and SOX2, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

We tested the relationships between ALDH1/SOX2 and the other clinicopathological parameters, ie, the pathological T stage, pathological N stage, tumor grade and lymphovascular invasion by χ2 tests. Cancer-specific survival, overall survival, recurrence-free survival and intravesical recurrence-free survival were assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between two groups were compared using the log-rank test. For the test of intravesical recurrence-free survival, 16 patients with stage IV disease were excluded. The subgroups with two positive, one positive and no positive immunohistochemistry results for ALDH1 and SOX2 expression were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses according to the Cox proportional hazards regression model, with cancer-specific survival as the dependent variable, were used to evaluate the expression of ALDH1 and SOX2 as potential independent prognostic factors. A value of P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The calculations were performed using JMP™ software.

Results

Expression and Localization of ALDH1 and SOX2

Scattered ALDH1-positive cells were observed in 34 (27%) of the 125 cases (Figure 1b). The ALDH1 expression was strongly present in the cytoplasm. SOX2 expression was mainly positive in cells located in the peripheral regions of tumor nests, and diffuse cytoplasmic and nuclear staining was observed in 24 cases (19%) (Figure 1d). We examined the mRNA expression of ALDH1 and SOX2 by RT-PCR (Supplementary Information) and compared it with immunohistochemical expression of these genes in the same nine tissues. The concordance rates between the two methods were 78% for ALDH1 and 89% for SOX2 (Supplementary Figure S1). The rates of SOX2-positive cells were <1%, 1–10% and >10% in 19% (n=24), 62% (n=77) and 19% (n=24) of the cases, respectively. The percentages of ALDH1- and SOX2-positive cancer cells were counted and subjected to statistical analysis. The frequencies of the expression of cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell markers are shown in Table 2. In cases that were both ALDH1- and SOX2-positive, the tumor cells were ALDH1- or SOX2-positive or double-positive. Immunohistochemical staining of ALDH1 and SOX2 in a representative double-positive case is shown in Supplementary Figure S2.

Figure 1
figure 1

Representative immunohistochemical staining of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) and sex determining region-Y-related high mobility group box 2 (SOX2). (a) Negative ALDH1 expression in tumor cells, (b) positive ALDH1 expression in tumor cells, (c) negative SOX2 expression in tumor cells and (d) positive SOX2 expression in tumor cells.

Table 2 Frequency of positive expression of cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell (CSC/TIC) markers

Associations Between Expression of ALDH1 and SOX2 and Clinicopathological Variables (Table 3)

ALDH1 expression was linked to lymph node metastasis (P=0.047) and lymphovascular invasion (P=0.038). SOX2 expression was significantly associated with more advanced pathological T stage (P=0.032), more advanced pathological N stage (P=0.019), and as well as with a trend toward to higher tumor grade (P=0.017).

Table 3 ALDH1/SOX2 expression and pathological factors in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma

Association of ALDH1 and/or SOX2 with Survival and Recurrence

The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of patients with ALDH1-negative and -positive tumors were 74% and 36%, respectively (Figure 2a). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of patients with SOX2-negative and -positive tumors were 72 and 46%, respectively (Figure 2b). There were significant differences in cancer-specific survival between patients with ALDH1-negative tumors and those with ALDH1-positive tumors (P<0.001, Figure 2a), and between patients with SOX2-negative tumors and those with SOX2-positive tumors (P=0.003, Figure 2b). Thus, both ALDH1 and SOX2 expression correlated with cancer-specific survival. The subgroups with no positive, one positive or two positive immunohistochemistry results for ALDH1 and SOX2 expression had estimated 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of 80%, 49%, and 22%, respectively (P<0.001, Figure 2c).

Figure 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves for cancer-specific survival rates according to (a) aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) expression status, (b) sex determining region-Y-related high mobility group box 2 (SOX2) expression status and (c) combined expression status of ALDH1 and SOX2.

Kaplan–Meier plots and log-rank tests showed that the upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma patients with ALDH1-positive tumor cells had significantly shorter overall survival, than those whose tumors were ALDH1-negative (P<0.001). The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with ALDH1-negative and -positive tumors were 63% and 31%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with SOX2-negative and -positive tumors were 62% and 36%, respectively. There was a significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P=0.019).

The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of patients with ALDH1-negative and -positive tumors were 43% and 24%, respectively (Figure 3a). There was a significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the two groups (P=0.024). In contrast, no difference was observed in recurrence-free survival between patients with SOX2-negative tumors and those with SOX2-positive tumors (Figure 3b). During the follow-up, 34 (32%) of 106 patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for stage ≤III disease had intravesical recurrence. Of the 34 patients, 13 (38%) had systemic recurrence and 8 (24%) died of UC. Neither ALDH1 nor SOX2 expression correlated with intravesical recurrence-free survival (Figures 3c and d).

Figure 3
figure 3

Kaplan–Meier curves for recurrence-free survival rates according to (a) aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) expression status and (b) sex determining region-Y-related high mobility group box 2 (SOX2) expression status, and for intravesical recurrence-free survival rates according to (c) ALDH1 expression status and (d) SOX2 expression status.

In univariate analysis, the pathological T stage, pathological N stage, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, ALDH1 and SOX2 were associated with a poor prognosis (Table 4). In multivariate analysis, the independent factors of prognosis were the pathological N stage (P=0.005), tumor grade (P=0.014) and ALDH1 expression (P=0.002) (Table 4).

Table 4 Prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival in univariate and multivariate analyses

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which the relationships between expression of putative cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell markers and the most clinically relevant features of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma were evaluated. We demonstrated that expression of both ALDH1 and SOX2 correlated with cancer-specific survival. In contrast, expression of these markers was not associated with intravesical recurrence-free survival. These findings suggested that cancer stem-like cells/tumor-initiating cells were linked to more aggressive behavior of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma.

We demonstrated that ALDH1 was not only an independent factor for prognosis but also associated with recurrence-free survival, although there was no relationship between ALDH1 expression and intravesical recurrence-free survival. Brandt et al34 found that ALDH1 was significantly upregulated in urothelial cancer stem-like cells compared with non-cancer stem-like cells, indicating a potential mode of chemoresistance in urothelial cancer stem-like cells. Su et al20 reported that high ALDH1 expression was associated with poor prognosis for patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma and was an independent predictor for cancer-specific survival. Various studies have reported that immunohistochemically identified tumor ALDH1 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in breast,16, 22 lung,23 and pancreatic19 cancer patients. Conversely, ALDH1 has a favorable function in ovarian carcinoma and high expression of ALDH1 is a favorable prognostic factor in patients with ovarian cancer.35 In a large study including 1420 patients with colorectal cancer of all stages, no significant correlation could be found between ALDH expression and survival,36 whereas the ALDH1 expression pattern had a significant impact upon survival for G2 T3N0M0 colorectal cancer in another study.37 Our findings suggest that upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma contains ALDH1-positive cancer stem-like cells/tumor-initiating cells like bladder cancer, and that these cells are associated with survival or life-threatening disease, as 62% of the patients with intravesical recurrence were alive without any other recurrence.

Although the roles of SOX2 in cancer cells are still elusive, SOX2 is considered one of the candidate cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell antigens.15 We previously demonstrated that SOX2-overexpressing lung adenocarcinoma cell lines showed higher rates of side population cells and higher tumorigenecity and that SOX2 mRNA knockdown of side population cells by gene-specific siRNA completely abrogated tumorigenecity in vivo.33 In this study, we found that SOX2 was associated with cancer-specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma. Although there has been no report showing the relationship between SOX expression and prognosis in UC, Ben-Porath et al38 reported enriched patterns of gene sets associated with embryotic stem cell identity, including SOX2, in the expression profiles of bladder carcinoma. They demonstrated that high-grade tumors showed an embryotic stem-like gene set enrichment pattern, and concluded that an embryotic stem-like signature was present in poorly differentiated cancers from distinct cells of origin. In the present study, SOX2 expression was significantly associated with tumor grade, pathological T stage and pathological N stage. This may explain why SOX2 expression was an independent factor for survival by univariate analysis but not by multivariate analysis. Several studies have reported that SOX2 is upregulated in various cancers other than urothelial carcinoma, including lung adenocarcinoma,25 gastric carcinoma,39 breast carcinoma,27 head and neck squamous cell carcinomas,40, 41 hepatocellular carcinoma42 and rectal cancer.28 Meanwhile, another study on gastric cancer reported that SOX2 expression was related to better prognosis.43 SOX2 expression is associated with a better outcome in squamous cell lung cancer.44

On the basis of the abilities for tumor initiation, self-renewal and differentiation, various putative cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell markers have been used.45 As these markers (such as side population, CD44+/CD24-, CD133+, ALDH1, SOX2, Oct3/4, etc.) show distinct properties of cancer stem cells, tumor tissues can show heterogeneity when multiple markers are examined. These vary depending on the cancer, and not all tumor cells identified by certain markers are cancer stem-like cells/tumor-initiating cells.46 In this study, 18%, 10% and 9% of the upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma cases had ALDH1posSOX2neg, ALDH1negSOX2pos and ALDH1posSOX2pos tumor cells, respectively (Table 2). Furthermore, the number of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma cells immunohistochemically stained for both ALDH1 and SOX2, which are considered to have more characteristics of cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell, was limited in these cases (Supplementary Figure S2). These results are compatible with reported cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell frequencies, which ranged from 1 in 2500 to 1 in 36 000 in various cancers.47

There are several limitations to our study. First are the limitations inherent to any retrospective study. Second, radical nephroureterectomy was performed by various surgeons over a long time period. Third, immunohistochemistry has inherent limitations such as reproducibility and reliability. Finally, the roles of ALDH1 and SOX2 in upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma require further investigation.

In summary, the current results demonstrate a direct link between the expression of cancer stem-like cell/tumor-initiating cell markers and patient survival in upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma. Our data support the current cancer stem cell hypothesis for upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma, which suggests that therapeutic targeting of cancer stem-like cells/tumor-initiating cells in upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma is a future possibility.