Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rb inactivation promotes genomic instability by uncoupling cell cycle progression from mitotic control

Abstract

Advanced human cancers are invariably aneuploid, in that they harbour cells with abnormal chromosome numbers1,2. However, the molecular defects underlying this trait, and whether they are a cause or a consequence of the malignant phenotype, are not clear. Mutations that disable the retinoblastoma (Rb) pathway are also common in human cancers1. These mutations promote tumour development by deregulating the E2F family of transcription factors leading to uncontrolled cell cycle progression3. We show that the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2 is a direct E2F target and, as a consequence, is aberrantly expressed in cells with Rb pathway defects. Concordantly, Mad2 is overexpressed in several tumour types, where it correlates with high E2F activity and poor patient prognosis. Generation of Rb pathway lesions in normal and transformed cells produces aberrant Mad2 expression and mitotic defects leading to aneuploidy, such that elevated Mad2 contributes directly to these defects. These results demonstrate how chromosome instability can arise as a by-product of defects in cell cycle control that compromise the accuracy of mitosis, and suggest a new model to explain the frequent appearance of aneuploidy in human cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Mad2 is an E2F target.
Figure 2: Deregulating the Rb/E2F pathway produces aberrant Mad2 expression.
Figure 3: Abnormal Mad2 expression in human tumours.
Figure 4: Cells with defective Rb or elevated Mad2 display chromosomal instability.
Figure 5: Aberrant Mad2 expression contributes to the mitotic defects associated with Rb loss.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 (2000)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Albertson, D. G., Collins, C., McCormick, F. & Gray, J. W. Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors. Nature Genet. 34, 369–376 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dyson, N. The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev. 12, 2245–2262 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jallepalli, P. V. & Lengauer, C. Chromosome segregation and cancer: cutting through the mystery. Nature Rev. Cancer 1, 109–117 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cahill, D. P. et al. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 392, 300–303 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cleveland, D. W., Mao, Y. & Sullivan, K. F. Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112, 407–421 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, H. Regulation of APC-Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 706–714 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalitsis, P., Earle, E., Fowler, K. J. & Choo, K. H. Bub3 gene disruption in mice reveals essential mitotic spindle checkpoint function during early embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 14, 2277–2282 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dobles, M., Liberal, V., Scott, M. L., Benezra, R. & Sorger, P. K. Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell 101, 635–645 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Michel, L. S. et al. MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature 409, 355–359 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cahill, D. P. et al. Characterization of MAD2B and other mitotic spindle checkpoint genes. Genomics 58, 181–187 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernando, E. et al. Molecular analyses of the mitotic checkpoint components hsMAD2, hBUB1 and hBUB3 in human cancer. Int. J. Cancer 95, 223–227 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wassmann, K. & Benezra, R. Mad2 transiently associates with an APC/p55Cdc complex during mitosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 11193–11198 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ren, B. et al. E2F integrates cell cycle progression with DNA repair, replication, and G(2)/M checkpoints. Genes Dev. 16, 245–256 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nahlé, Z. et al. Direct coupling of the cell cycle and cell death machinery by E2F. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 859–864 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Narita, M. et al. Rb-mediated heterochromatin formation and silencing of E2F target genes during cellular senescence. Cell 113, 703–716 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanchez-Carbayo, M. et al. Molecular profiling of bladder cancer using cDNA microarrays: defining histogenesis and biological phenotypes. Cancer Res. 62, 6973–6980 (2002)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Arber, N. et al. Antisense to cyclin D1 inhibits the growth and tumorigenicity of human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 57, 1569–1574 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dalbagni, G., Presti, J., Reuter, V., Fair, W. R. & Cordon-Cardo, C. Genetic alterations in bladder cancer. Lancet 324, 469–471 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alaminos, M. et al. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression associated with MYCN in human neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 63, 4538–4546 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schuldiner, O. & Benvenisty, N. A DNA microarray screen for genes involved in c-MYC and N-MYC oncogenesis in human tumors. Oncogene 20, 4984–4994 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van 't Veer, L. J. et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415, 530–536 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lentini, L., Pipitone, L. & Di Leonardo, D. Functional inactivation of pRB results in aneuploid mammalian cells after release from a mitotic block. Neoplasia 4, 380–387 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spruck, C. H., Won, K. A. & Reed, S. I. Deregulated cyclin E induces chromosome instability. Nature 401, 297–300 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Okuda, M. et al. Nucleophosmin/B23 is a target of CDK2/cyclin E in centrosome duplication. Cell 103, 127–140 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stemmann, O., Zou, H., Gerber, S. A., Gygi, S. P. & Kirschner, M. W. Dual inhibition of sister chromatid separation at metaphase. Cell 107, 715–726 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Michel, L. et al. Complete loss of the tumor suppressor MAD2 causes premature cyclin B degradation and mitotic failure in human somatic cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4459–4464 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zou, H., McGarry, T. J., Bernal, T. & Kirschner, M. W. Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science 285, 418–422 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lanni, J. S. & Jacks, T. Characterization of the p53-dependent postmitotic checkpoint following spindle disruption. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1055–1064 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Darzynkiewicz, Z., Gong, J., Juan, G., Ardelt, B. & Traganos, F. Cytometry of cyclin proteins. Cytometry 25, 1–13 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Narita for providing the shRb construct, M. Lu for the bladder tissue microarray, S. Menendez for technical assistance and A. Kel for the use of the SiteScan program. We thank the Molecular Cytology and the Flow Cytometry Core Laboratories at Memorial Sloan-Kettering and P. McCloskey from CSHL flow cytometry facility for technical assistance. Also, we thank S. Gangadharan, R. Dickins, S. Gonzalez, N. Abumrad, B. Stillman and P. P. Pandolfi for reading the manuscript. We also thank all the members of the Lowe and Cordon-Cardo laboratories for discussions. This work was supported by program project grants from the NCI (S.W.L. and C.C.C.), Clinical Investigator Research Development Awards (L.M. and R.B.), DOD-Breast Cancer Research Program fellowship award (Z.N.), a Fundacion Caja Madrid-CNIO-MSKCC fellowship (E.H. and M.A.), a Fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports (E.D.R.), a US NCI postdoctoral training grant (M.T.H.) and gifts from the Laurie Strauss Leukemia Foundation and the Herbert J. Siegel philanthropic fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott W. Lowe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure S1

a, Schematic diagrams of the MAD2L1 and Cyclin A (CCNA) promoter regions, indicating the theoretical E2F binding sites (black boxes). b, Table containing the nucleotide sequence and location of the predicted E2F binding sites in the Mad2 promoter (PDF 48 kb)

Supplementary Figure S2

Immunohistochemistry of Mad2 and Ki-67 in highly proliferating organs (a), and in some transitional cell carcinomas of the bladder (b), illustrating that Mad2 expression is low or negative in some proliferative tissues - it is not simply a proliferation marker (PDF 1618 kb)

Supplementary Figure S3

a, Mad2 immunofluorescence staining (FITC) of Mad2-transduced IMR90 fibroblasts, showing a highly positive multinucleated cell. b, g-tubulin staining (FITC) in Mad2- and vector-infected IMR90 cells, demonstrating that Mad2-transduced cells don’t display major centrosomal amplification (PDF 1588 kb)

Supplementary Figure S4

a, Table containing the average time required to complete two defined mitotic stages in vector, shRB, E1A, and Mad2 transduced cells. Western Blot analyses of cyclin B1 (cycB) (b) and securin/Pds1 (c) in HCT116 and IMR90, released after a double thymidine blockade, showing that cyclin B and securin degradation are delayed in shRb, E1A or Mad2 transduced cells. d, Western blot for E2F and E1A in HCT116 cells ectopically expressing E2F, E1A or a vector control together with either a Mad2 hairpin (sh-Mad2) or a hairpin control (sh-con). E1A or E2F levels are not altered in the presence of shMad2 (PDF 156 kb)

Supplementary Video A

Normal cell division in vector-transduced NIH-3T3 cells by phase-contrast. (MOV 3133 kb)

Supplementary Video B

Normal chromosomal segregation in vector-transduced NIH-3T3 cells by green fluorescence. (MOV 272 kb)

Supplementary Video C

Prolonged or failed cytokinesis in 3T3 cells transduced with shRb. (MP4 231 kb)

Supplementary Video D

Prolonged chromosome segregation due to a cytokinesis problem in 3T3 cells transduced with shRb. (MP4 103 kb)

Supplementary Video E

Cytokinesis failure in Mad2-transduced 3T3 cells. (MP4 605 kb)

Supplementary Video F

Cytokinesis failure followed by reattachment and multinucleation in a Mad2-transduced 3T3 (MP4 309 kb)

Supplementary Video G

Small fragment of DNA material lost during chromosome segregation in an E1A-expressing NIH-3T3 cell . (MOV 381 kb)

Supplementary Video H

Asymmetrical chromosome segregation in Mad2-transduced 3T3 cells. (MOV 808 kb)

Supplementary Video I

Problems in chromosome alignment followed by abnormal segregation in shRb-expressing HCT116 cells. (MOV 631 kb)

Supplementary Video J

Chromosomes pulling towards the poles of the spindle for a prolonged period of time, ending in a completely aberrant segregation. Mad2-transduced HCT116 cells. (MOV 972 kb)

Supplementary Figure and Video Legends (DOC 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hernando, E., Nahlé, Z., Juan, G. et al. Rb inactivation promotes genomic instability by uncoupling cell cycle progression from mitotic control. Nature 430, 797–802 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02820

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02820

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing