Eichelberg C et al. (2006) Frozen section for the management of intraoperatively detected palpable tumor lesions during nerve-sparing scheduled radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49: 1011–1018
In men scheduled to undergo nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, intraoperative findings of palpable subcapsular tumor usually indicate that the ipsilateral neurovascular bundle should be resected. Eichelberg et al. used intraoperative frozen-section analysis to assess such tumors, and found that the ipsilateral neurovascular bundle can be spared in almost half of patients with palpable tumors, without sacrificing oncologic efficacy.
A single surgeon performed 608 consecutive nerve-sparing radical prostatectomies, during which 83 palpable tumors were detected (13.7%). Intraoperative frozen-section analysis revealed carcinoma in 77 of 83 (93%) tumors. In 48 (58%) tumors, frozen sections showed no capsular involvement, and the ipsilateral neurovascular bundle was spared. Final histopathology revealed positive surgical margins in 8 of 48 tumors: in 5 cases, the ipsilateral side had positive margins (equivalent to a false-negative rate of 6% for detecting capsular involvement), and in 3 patients, the contralateral margins were positive. Interestingly, in 30 of 35 (86%) cases in which the neurovascular bundle was resected because frozen-section analysis showed tumor contact with the capsule, final histopathology showed no tumor in the additionally resected tissues. Overall, positive-margin rates were similar in palpable versus nonpalpable tumors (15.7% versus 14.3%).
Although intraoperative frozen-section analysis would leave some patients with positive surgical margins, for some men, the improved continence and potency achievable with nerve-sparing surgery might outweigh the increased risk of recurrence associated with positive margins. These risks and benefits should be adequately discussed with the patient before surgery, say the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
The role of frozen-section analysis in nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Nat Rev Urol 3, 405 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0546
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0546