Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Peculiar many-body effects revealed in the spectroscopy of highly charged quantum dots

Abstract

Coulomb interactions between electrons lead to the observed multiplet structure and breakdown of the Aufbau principle for atomic d and f shells1. Nevertheless, these effects can disappear in extended systems. For instance, the multiplet structure of atomic carbon is not a feature of graphite or diamond. A quantum dot is an extended system containing 106 atoms for which electron–electron interactions do survive and the interplay between the Coulomb energy, J, and the quantization energy, ΔE, is crucial to Coulomb blockade2,3,4,5. We have discovered consequences of Coulomb interactions in self-assembled quantum dots by interpreting experimental spectra with an atomistic calculation. The Coulomb effects, evident in the photon emission process, are tunable in situ by controlling the quantum dot charge from +6e to −6e. The same dot shows two regimes: J≤ΔE for electron charging yet JΔE for hole charging. We find a breakdown of the Aufbau principle for holes; clear proof of non-perturbative hole–hole interactions; promotion–demotion processes in the final state of the emission process, effects first predicted a decade ago6; and pronounced configuration hybridizations in the initial state. The level of charge control and the energy scales result in Coulomb effects with no obvious analogues in atomic physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Charging diagram of single InAs/GaAs quantum dot A.
Figure 2: Calculated photoluminescence (PL) spectra for different exciton charges for the dot with circular base.
Figure 3: Calculated leading configurations for charged excitons.
Figure 4: Measured photoluminescence spectra from dot A for different exciton charges.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goeppert Mayer, M. Rare-earth and transuranic elements. Phys. Rev. 60, 184–187 (1941).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yacoby, A., Heiblum, M., Mahalu, D. & Shtrikman, H. Coherence and phase sensitive measurements in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4047–4050 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tarucha, S., Austing, D. G., Tokura, Y., van der Wiel, W. G. & Kouwenhoven, L. P. Direct Coulomb and exchange interaction in artificial atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2485–2488 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller, B. T. et al. Few-electron ground states of charge-tunable self-assembled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 56, 6764–6769 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reuter, D. et al. Coulomb-interaction-induced incomplete shell filling in the hole system of InAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 026808 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wojs, A. & Hawrylak, P. Theory of photoluminescence from modulation-doped self-assembled quantum dots in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 55, 13066–13071 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Warburton, R. J. et al. Optical emission from a charge-tunable quantum ring. Nature 405, 926–929 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bayer, M. et al. Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 65, 195315 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Finley, J. J. et al. Quantum-confined Stark shifts of charged exciton complexes in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 70, 201308(R) (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, L.-W. & Zunger, A. Linear combination of bulk bands method for large-scale electronic structure calculations on strained nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 59, 15806–15818 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bester, G., Wu, X., Vanderbilt, D. & Zunger, A. Importance of second-order piezoelectric effects in zinc-blende semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 187602 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shumway, J., Franceschetti, A. & Zunger, A. Correlation versus mean-field contributions to excitons, multiexcitons, and charging energies in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 63, 155316 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Resta, R. Thomas–Fermi dielectric screening in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 16, 2717–2722 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Franceschetti, A., Wang, L.-W., Fu, H. & Zunger, A. Short-range versus long-range electron–hole exchange interactions in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 58, R13367–R13370 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. He, L., Bester, G. & Zunger, A. Electronic phase diagrams of carriers in self-assembled quantum dots: Violation of Hund’s rule and the Aufbau principle for holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 246804 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ediger, M. et al. Fine structure of negatively and positively charged excitons in semiconductor quantum dots: Electron–hole asymmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 036808 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bester, G. & Zunger, A. Compositional and size-dependent spectroscopic shifts in charged self-assembled InxGa1−xAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 68, 073309 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Warburton, R. J. et al. Coulomb interactions in small charge-tunable quantum dots: A simple model. Phys. Rev. B 58, 16221–16231 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karrai, K. et al. Hybridization of electronic states in quantum dots through photon emission. Nature 427, 135–138 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by EPSRC (UK), US Department of Energy SC-BES under Contract No. DE-AC36-99GO10337 LAB-03-17, DAAD and SFB 631 (Germany) and SANDiE (EU).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.E. carried out the experimental work under the supervision of R.J.W. and K.K; G.B. carried out the theoretical work in A.Z.’s group; A.B. fabricated the heterostructure in P.M.P.’s group. M.E., G.B., K.K., A.Z. and R.J.W. worked jointly on the interpretation of the results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to G. Bester or R. J. Warburton.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ediger, M., Bester, G., Badolato, A. et al. Peculiar many-body effects revealed in the spectroscopy of highly charged quantum dots. Nature Phys 3, 774–779 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys748

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys748

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing