Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Cytogenetic harvesting of commonly used tumor cell lines

Abstract

Tumor cell lines are widely used both as disease models and, increasingly, as genomic resources for the ascertainment of new cancer genes. Cytogenetic analysis remains a major route to uncovering the cancer genome. However, cancer cell lines vary inexplicably in their harvesting preferences, which must, therefore, be determined by trial and error. This article describes harvesting protocols optimized empirically for 550 commonly used, mainly human, cancer cell lines together with evidence-based procedures to assist in determining conditions for unlisted cell lines and subsidiary protocols for cytogenetic analysis using G-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Morphology.
Figure 2: Spreading.
Figure 3: Authentication.
Figure 4: Characterization.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drexler, H.G. The Leukemia–Lymphoma Cell Line Facts Book (Academic Press, London, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drexler, H.G. Guide to Leukemia-Lymphoma Cell Lines (DSMZ Braunschweig, Germany, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. MacLeod, R.A. et al. Widespread intraspecies cross-contamination of human tumor cell lines arising at source. Int. J. Cancer 83, 555–563 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mrózek, K., Heinonen, K. & Bloomfield, C.D. Clinical importance of cytogenetics in acute myeloid leukaemia. Baillieres Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 14, 19–47 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Swansbury, J. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: background. Methods Mol. Biol. 220, 59–71 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muyrers-Chen, I. et al. Expression of leukemic MLL fusion proteins in Drosophila affects cell cycle control and chromosome morphology. Oncogene 23, 8639–8648 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caspersson, T., Zech, L. & Johansson, C. Differential binding of alkylating fluorochromes in human chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res. 60, 315–319 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seabright, M. Improvement of trypsin method for banding chromosomes. Lancet 1, 1249–1250 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rowley, J.D. Letter: a new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature 243, 290–293 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cremer, T., Lichter, P., Borden, J., Ward, D.C. & Manuelidis, L. Detection of chromosome aberrations in metaphase and interphase tumor cells by in situ hybridization using chromosome-specific library probes. Hum. Genet. 80, 235–246 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lichter, P., Cremer, T., Borden, J., Manuelidis, L. & Ward, D.C. Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries. Hum. Genet. 80, 224–234 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lichter, P. Multicolor FISHing: what's the catch? Trends Genet. 12, 475–479 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ISCN. An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature: report of the Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Birth Defects Orig. Artic. Ser. 21, 1–117 (1985).

  14. Drexler, H.G., Dirks, W.G., Matsuo, Y. & MacLeod, R.A. False leukemia-lymphoma cell lines: an update on over 500 cell lines. Leukemia 17, 416–426 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tosi, S. et al. Characterization of the human myeloid leukemia-derived cell line GF-D8 by multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization, subtelomeric probes, and comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 24, 213–221 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. MacLeod, R.A. et al. Karyotypic dissection of Hodgkin's disease cell lines reveals ectopic subtelomeres and ribosomal DNA at sites of multiple jumping translocations and genomic amplification. Leukemia 14, 1803–1814 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Poulsen, T.S. et al. Detection of illegitimate rearrangement within the immunoglobulin locus on 14q32.3 in B-cell malignancies using end-sequenced probes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 32, 265–274 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uphoff, C.C. & Drexler, H.G. Eradication of mycoplasma contaminations. Methods Mol. Biol. 290, 25–34 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roderick A F MacLeod.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Optimal hypotonic treatments for individual cell lines (PDF 423 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Evidence based assessment of harvesting (PDF 62 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacLeod, R., Kaufmann, M. & Drexler, H. Cytogenetic harvesting of commonly used tumor cell lines. Nat Protoc 2, 372–382 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.29

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.29

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing