Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Prostate cancer

Treatment triggers for patients on active surveillance

Active surveillance (AS) is an option for low-risk prostate cancer. Accurate risk assessment is paramount to select patients for definitive intervention and to avoid overtreatment. Although inaccurate, PSA and Gleason score changes remain common treatment triggers. Biopsy before AS is initiated could avoid misclassification and the need for serial biopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Mohler, J. et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J. Natl Compr. Canc. Netw. 8, 240–262 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klotz, L. et al. Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 126–131 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loblaw, A. et al. Comparing prostate specific antigen triggers for intervention in men with stable prostate cancer on active surveillance. J. Urol. 184, 1942–1946 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ross, A. E. et al. Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 2810–2816 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coen, J. J. et al. Watchful waiting for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era: what have been the triggers for intervention? BJU Int. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09652.x.

  6. Jeldres, C. et al. Validation of the contemporary Epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer in European men. Eur. Urol. 54, 1306–1313 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein, J. I. et al. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 271, 368–374 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bastian, P. J. et al. Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications. Eur. Urol. 55, 1321–1330 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roemeling, S. et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancers detected in three subsequent rounds of a screening trial: characteristics, PSA doubling times, and outcome. Eur. Urol. 51, 1244–1250 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, D. W. Beyond PSA: utility of novel tumor markers in the setting of elevated PSA. Urol. Oncol. 27, 315–321 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipen J. Parekh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hilton, W., Parekh, D. Treatment triggers for patients on active surveillance. Nat Rev Urol 8, 126–127 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.235

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.235

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing