Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Sabour S. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional scanning compared to conventional anthropometry for children and adolescents: methodological mistake. Pediatr Res 2017 (e-pub ahead of print 31 May 2017)..
Glock F, Vogel M, Naumann S et al. Validity and intraobserver reliability of three-dimensional scanning compared with conventional anthropometry for children and adolescents from a population-based cohort study. Pediatr Res 2017;81:736–744.
Lin LI . A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255–68.
Lin LI . A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 2000;56:324–25.
Barnhart HX, Haber M, Song J . Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 2002;58:1020–27.
Acknowledgements
This publication is supported by LIFE—Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases. LIFE is supported by the European Union, by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and by funds from the Free State of Saxony in the context of the excellence initiative.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glock, F., Scholz, M., Kuehnapfel, A. et al. Response to Sabour. Pediatr Res 82, 177 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.76
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.76