CRISPR–Cas9 is a groundbreaking genome-editing tool that has transformed biomedical research. Originally derived from a bacterial defense system, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) functions as an adaptive immune mechanism that protects bacteria from viral infections1. This system relies on short RNA sequences from past viral encounters to guide the Cas9 nuclease to specific DNA targets, allowing precise cleavage of foreign genetic material. Scientists have harnessed this mechanism to develop a powerful and versatile tool for targeted genome editing in various organisms, including humans, plants and model organisms used in biomedical research2.
The CRISPR–Cas9 system consists of two key components: a guide RNA (gRNA) and the Cas9 protein1. The gRNA is designed to complement a specific DNA sequence, directing Cas9 to the target site. Upon binding, Cas9 induces a double-strand break (DSB) at the designated location. The cell then repairs the break through one of two major pathways: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), which often results in small insertions or deletions (indels) that can disrupt gene function, or homology-directed repair, which allows precise genetic modifications using a donor DNA template3. These capabilities make CRISPR–Cas9 invaluable for gene knockout studies, correction of disease-causing mutations and the development of gene therapies.
Compared with earlier genome-editing technologies such as zinc finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases, CRISPR–Cas9 offers several advantages, including ease of design, cost-effectiveness and high specificity4. Researchers can rapidly generate gRNAs targeting virtually any genomic sequence, making CRISPR–Cas9 an accessible and powerful tool. Ongoing improvements, such as high-fidelity Cas9 variants, base-editing and prime-editing systems, continue to enhance the precision and efficiency of genome editing, reducing the risk of unintended off-target effects5.
Advances in CRISPR–Cas9 research
This issue highlights several cutting-edge developments in CRISPR–Cas9 research.
Ruis et al. explore the molecular repair mechanisms of DNA breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9. In addition to the well-characterized homology-directed repair and nonhomologous end joining pathways, they introduce a novel repair mechanism known as CRISPR–homology-mediated end joining (HMEJ), which probably operates through a single-strand annealing process 6,7. Given its efficiency in gene targeting, researchers are investigating HMEJ-mediated repair for potential gene therapy applications.
Lee et al. provide an overview of recent advancements in prime editing, a technique that introduces point mutations, insertions or deletions without generating DSBs8. Prime editing uses a Cas9 nickase fused to a reverse transcriptase (MMLV-RT) and guided by a prime-editing gRNA, which contains both a spacer sequence for target recognition and a reverse transcriptase template. Unlike base editors, which are restricted to specific nucleotide conversions (for example, C-to-T and A-to-G) and may induce off-target mutations due to deaminase activity, prime editors enable nearly any base substitution with greater precision and fewer unintended effects. This flexibility makes prime editing a superior option for precise genome modifications.
Kim et al. review the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with CRISPR–Cas9 technology. Their article discusses AI-driven approaches for gRNA design, off-target prediction, optimization of editing efficiency and the development of novel CRISPR systems. With rapid advances in AI, CRISPR–Cas9 technology is expected to achieve even greater precision, efficiency and safety in the near future.
CRISPR–Cas9 in biomedical research
CRISPR–Cas9 has been widely used to study fundamental biological processes, including DNA metabolism, development, physiology and pathology. Cheng et al. review how CRISPR–Cas9 has been utilized as a genome modification tool to introduce knockouts, structural variations and epigenome edits, particularly in a multiplexed manner. In addition to the wild-type Cas9 protein, transcriptional control of genes has been achieved using CRISPR activation and CRISPR interference, which use a nuclease-dead dCas9 enzyme fused with either a transcriptional activator or repressor 9,10. The review also highlights a recent innovation in CRISPR-based cancer therapy, known as cancer-specific INDEL attacker (CINDELA), which selectively induces DSBs at indel mutations in tumor genomes11.
Varshney et al. discuss advances in CRISPR–Cas9 technology for high-throughput mutagenesis, knock-in strategies and large-scale genetic screens in vertebrate organisms. Their review examines how CRISPR–Cas9 has been used in functional genomics research and disease modeling. Furthermore, they introduce efforts to modify higher-order chromatin organization, particularly through the manipulation of topologically associated domains.
CRISPR–Cas9 has also been used to visualize specific genomic loci. Early approaches were limited to detecting repetitive sequences owing to technical constraints. Kwon et al. review innovative strategies developed to overcome these limitations, including signal amplification techniques, background noise reduction and improved genomic resolution. Lastly, Park et al. discuss potential adverse effects of CRISPR–Cas9-based genome labeling, citing reports that CRISPR–dCas9 binding to DNA can cause replication blockage, DNA–RNA hybrid triplex (R-loop) formation, subnuclear localization changes and unintended alterations in gene expression.
Future perspectives
This issue presents a series of review articles that illustrate the diverse applications of CRISPR–Cas9 in biomedical research. As this field continues to evolve, we are witnessing the early stages of a technological revolution with the potential for groundbreaking discoveries. Beyond basic biomedical research, CRISPR–Cas9 has far-reaching applications in medicine, agriculture and biotechnology2. These applications, extensively reviewed elsewhere, include the treatment of genetic disorders, the development of disease-resistant crops and the engineering of microbial strains for industrial use. However, ethical and safety concerns remain, particularly regarding germline editing and unintended genetic consequences12. As researchers continue to refine CRISPR–Cas9 technology, addressing these challenges will be crucial in ensuring its safe and effective application in diverse fields.
References
Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
Adli, M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat. Commun. 9, 1911 (2018).
Xue, C. & Greene, E. C. DNA repair pathway choices in CRISPR–Cas9-mediated genome editing. Trends Genet. 37, 639–656 (2021).
Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A. & Barbas, C. F. 3rd. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 31, 397–405 (2013).
Tao, J., Bauer, D. E. & Chiarle, R. Assessing and advancing the safety of CRISPR–Cas tools: from DNA to RNA editing. Nat. Commun. 14, 212 (2023).
Ivanov, E. L., Sugawara, N., Fishman-Lobell, J. & Haber, J. E. Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 142, 693–704 (1996).
Lin, F. L., Sperle, K. & Sternberg, N. Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 1020–1034 (1984).
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Gilbert, L. A. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell 159, 647–661 (2014).
Qi, L. S. et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152, 1173–1183 (2013).
Kwon, T. et al. Precision targeting tumor cells using cancer-specific InDel mutations with CRISPR–Cas9. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2103532119 (2022).
Brokowski, C. & Adli, M. CRISPR ethics: moral considerations for applications of a powerful tool. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 88–101 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS-R022-D1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Myung, K. Revolution of Biotechnology with CRISPR. Exp Mol Med 57, 1353–1354 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-025-01452-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-025-01452-x