Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Infection risk assessment for socially structured population using stochastic microexposure model

Abstract

Background

Predicting infection outbreak dynamics within local microenvironments is a challenging task. Some methods assume smaller population pools and often lack the statistical power of inferences. Other methods are designed for larger population pools and cannot be downscaled to accommodate the details of microenvironments, such as a gym or cafeteria. Moreover, typically, individuals have a relatively small circle of friends, family, and co-workers with whom most contacts are taking place, while the external contacts occur sporadically, rendering the population clustered. Practicable infection risk assessment models should account for population size, geometry and occupancy of public places, behavioral and professional patterns that define daily routines, and societal structure.

Objective

We describe a novel methodology and investigate effects of the population social structure, along with other local constraints, on infection outbreak dynamics.

Methods

The study is based on the recently developed stochastic microexposure model (S-MEM). The model has been generalized to describe clustered populations. The methodology is demonstrated for a generic community of several thousand students living on campus. The student population possesses a natural social structure of being clustered into classes.

Results

The results indicate that the social structure has the first order effect on the spread of the infection. Depending on the number, size, and degree of inner- and outer-cluster connections, the outbreak exhibits distinct durations, power, and multiple peaks of infection. Moreover, the contribution of different microenvironments to infection risk evolves during the course of the outbreak.

Impact

  • Social structure plays a major role in infection spread, and therefore should be accounted for in risk prediction tools. Furthermore, the contribution of different microenvironments to infection risk changes with time during the course of an outbreak. An optimal infection spread mitigation policy should, correspondingly, change in time depending on the evolving risk factors; the policy should not be static. The stochastic microexposure model accounts for the social structure of a population at multiple scales, and can predict the dynamic contributions of different microenvironments to infection spread risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Probabilities of infection.
Fig. 2: Predictions of time dynamics.
Fig. 3: Effect of clustering on the infection dynamics.
Fig. 4: Time dynamics of infection spread in clustered society with Poisson distributed interactions.
Fig. 5: Effects of clustering on infection dynamics.
Fig. 6: Relative contribution of various microenvironments to the infection risk for clustered population.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Detailed information on model parameters and calibration can be found in ref. [25].

References

  1. Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A, Containing Pap A Math Phys character. 1927;115:700–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics—II. The problem of endemicity. Bull Math Biol. 1991;53:57–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics—III. Further studies of the problem of endemicity. Bull Math Biol. 1991;53:89–118.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. He S, Peng Y, Sun K. SEIR modeling of the COVID-19 and its dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn. 2020;101:1667–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Weissman GE, Crane-Droesch A, Chivers C, Luong T, Hanish A, Levy MZ, et al. Locally informed simulation to predict hospital capacity needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:21–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calvetti D, Hoover A, Rose J, Somersalo E Bayesian dynamical estimation of the parameters of an SE (A) IR COVID-19 spread model. arXiv preprint arXiv:200504365. 2020.

  7. Clancy D, O’Neill PD. Bayesian estimation of the basic reproduction number in stochastic epidemic models. Bayesian Anal. 2008;3:737–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen Y-C, Lu P-E, Chang C-S, Liu A. Time-Dependent SIR Model for COVID-19 With Undetectable Infected Persons. In IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering. 2020;7:3279–94.

  9. Newman ME. Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys Rev E. 2002;66:016128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma J, van den Driessche P, Willeboordse FH. Effective degree household network disease model. J Math Biol. 2013;66:75–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. RÇŽdulescu A, Williams C, Cavanagh K. Management strategies in a SEIR-type model of COVID 19 community spread. Sci Rep. 2020;10:21256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Salathé M, Jones JH. Dynamics and Control of Diseases in Networks with Community Structure. PLOS Comput Biol. 2010;6:e1000736.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tolles J, Luong T. Modeling epidemics with compartmental models. Jama. 2020;323:2515–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cuevas E. An agent-based model to evaluate the COVID-19 transmission risks in facilities. Comput Biol Med. 2020;121:103827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva PCL, Batista PVC, Lima HS, Alves MA, Guimarães FG, Silva RCP. COVID-ABS: An agent-based model of COVID-19 epidemic to simulate health and economic effects of social distancing interventions. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020;139:110088.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shamil MS, Farheen F, Ibtehaz N, Khan IM, Rahman MS. An agent-based modeling of COVID-19: validation, analysis, and recommendations. Cognitive Comput. 2024:16:1723–34.

  17. Kerr CC, Stuart RM, Mistry D, Abeysuriya RG, Rosenfeld K, Hart GR, et al. Covasim: an agent-based model of COVID-19 dynamics and interventions. PLOS Comput Biol. 2021;17:e1009149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hinch R, Probert WJ, Nurtay A, Kendall M, Wymant C, Hall M, et al. OpenABM-Covid19—An agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17:e1009146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Manzo G. Matthews T. Potentialities and limitations of agent-based simulations. Rev française de sociologie. 2014;55:653–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Troitzsch KG. Analysing simulation results statistically: does significance matter? Interdisciplinary applications of agent-based social simulation and modeling: IGI Global; 2014. p. 88-105.

  21. Milne GJ, Kelso JK, Kelly HA, Huband ST, McVernon J. A small community model for the transmission of infectious diseases: comparison of school closure as an intervention in individual-based models of an influenza pandemic. PLOS ONE. 2008;3:e4005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hussein T, Löndahl J, Thuresson S, Alsved M, Al-Hunaiti A, Saksela K, et al. Indoor Model Simulation for COVID-19 Transport and Exposure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:2927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lelieveld J, Helleis F, Borrmann S, Cheng Y, Drewnick F, Haug G, et al. Model calculations of aerosol transmission and infection risk of COVID-19 in indoor environments. MDPI AG; 2020. p. 1-18.

  24. Vuorinen V, Aarnio M, Alava M, Alopaeus V, Atanasova N, Auvinen M, et al. Modelling aerosol transport and virus exposure with numerical simulations in relation to SARS-CoV-2 transmission by inhalation indoors. Saf Sci. 2020;130:104866.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vecherin S, Chang D, Wells E, Trump B, Meyer A, Desmond J, et al. Assessment of the COVID-19 infection risk at a workplace through stochastic microexposure modeling. J Exposure Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2022;32:712–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang X, Sun G-Q, Zhu Y-X, Ma J, Jin Z. Epidemic dynamics on semi-directed complex networks. Math Biosci. 2013;246:242–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park SY, Kim Y-M, Yi S, Lee S, Na B-J, Kim CB, et al. Coronavirus disease outbreak in call center, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:1666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Stehlé J, Voirin N, Barrat A, Cattuto C, Colizza V, Isella L, et al. Simulation of an SEIR infectious disease model on the dynamic contact network of conference attendees. BMC Med. 2011;9:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Albert R, Barabási A-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys. 2002;74:47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions allowed authors to improve the manuscript. This paper is based upon work supported by the Installation Technology Transfer Program. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the individual authors and not those of the U.S. Army or other sponsor organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SV is the author of the technical ideas and theoretical development of the method, AM is a lead developer of the code and data analyst, CC and BT are public health advisors, CE is installation safety specialist and consultant, and IL is general manager and senior advisor.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergey N. Vecherin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No human or animal subjects were used in the study. The considered cases represent realistic, but virtual scenarios created for a hypothetical student campus.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vecherin, S.N., Meyer, A.C., Cummings, C.L. et al. Infection risk assessment for socially structured population using stochastic microexposure model. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00811-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00811-0

Keywords

Search

Quick links