Table 2 Summary of findings of short-term (before 40 weeks’ post menstrual age or discharge from neonatal intensive care unit) and long-term (after 40 weeks’ postmenstrual age or from follow up to outpatient clinic after discharge) outcomes between the high-dose and low-dose vitamin D supplementation for preterm infants.

From: Short-term and long-term effects of vitamin D supplementation for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

B. Long-term outcomes

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks (95% CI)

Relative effect (95% CI)

No. of Participants (studies)

Quality of the evidence (GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

 

Low dose

High dose

    

Serum 25(OH)D level (ng/mL)

 

The mean serum 25(OH)D level in the high-dose groups was 15.62 higher (13.35 to 17.88 higher)

MD 15.62 (13.35 to 17.88)

739 (13 studies)

low

 

Vitamin D deficiency

495 per 1000

205 per 1000 (125 to 275)

RD −0.29 (−0.37 to −0.22)

449 (5 studies)

moderate

 

Vitamin D excess

0 per 1000

40 per 1000 (0 to 80)

RD 0.04 (0.00 to 0.08)

302 (4 studies)

low

 

Skeletal hypomineralization

293 per 1000

113 per 1000 (13 to 213)

RD −0.18 (−0.28 to −0.08)

168 (4 studies)

low

 

Weight gain velocity (g/day)

 

The mean weight gain velocity in the high-dose groups was 2.57 higher (1.10 to 4.04 higher)

MD 2.57 (1.10 to 4.04)

112 (2 studies)

low

 

Length gain velocity (cm/wk)

 

The mean length gain velocity in the high-dose groups was 1.01 higher (0.22 to 1.80 higher)

MD 1.01 (0.22 to 1.80)

112 (2 studies)

low

 

Head circumference gain velocity (cm/wk)

 

The mean head circumference gain velocity in the high-dose groups was 0.57 higher (0.13 lower to 1.02 higher)

MD 0.57 (0.13 to 1.02)

112 (2 studies)

low

 

Respiratory distress syndrome

281 per 1000

241 per 1000 (121 to 371)

RD −0.04 (−0.16 to 0.09)

250 (2 studies)

low

 

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

281 per 1000

261 per 1000 (171 to 351)

RD −0.02 (−0.11 to 0.07)

316 (5 studies)

low

 

Late-onset sepsis

203 per 1000

213 per 1000 (103 to 323)

RD 0.01 (−0.10 to 0.12)

185 (2 studies)

very low

 

Mortality

186 per 1000

56 per 1000 (0 to 166)

RD −0.13 (−0.25 to −0.02)

114 (2 studies)

low

 

Length of hospital stay (day)

 

The mean hospital day in the high-dose groups was 2.15 lower (4.60 lower to 0.30 higher)

MD −2.15 (−4.60 to 0.30)

243 (4 studies)

moderate

 

B. Long-term outcomes

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks (95% CI)

Relative effect (95% CI)

No. of participants (studies)

Quality of the evidence (GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

 

Low dose

High dose

    

25(OH)D (ng/mL)

 

The mean 25(OH)D in the high-dose groups was 1.21 higher (4.72 lower to 7.13 higher)

MD 1.21 (−4.72 to 7.13)

142 (4 studies)

low

 

Vitamin D deficiency

350 per 1000

120 per 1000 (0 to 300)

RD −0.23 (−0.40 to -0.05)

80 (1 study)

low

 

Vitamin D excess

25 per 1000

55 per 1000 (0 to 115)

RD 0.03 (−0.04 to 0.09)

80 (1 study)

low

 

Bone mineral density (mg/cm2)

 

The mean bone mineral density in the high-dose groups was 0.33 higher (5.47 lower to 6.12 higher)

MD 0.33 (−5.47 to 6.12)

107 (2 studies)

very low

 

Mortality

294 per 1000

164 per 1000 (0 to 374)

RD −0.13 (−0.33 to 0.08)

64 (1 study)

low

 

Cognitive impairment

364 per 1000

304 per 1000 (14 to 584)

RD −0.06 (−0.35 to 0.22)

42 (1 study)

low

 

Language impairment

571 per 1000

451 per 1000 (141 to 751)

RD −0.12 (−0.43 to 0.18)

41 (1 study)

low

 

Neurodevelopmental impairment

435 per 1000

305 per 1000 (15 to 585)

RD −0.13 (−0.42 to 0.15)

43 (1 study)

low

 
  1. CI confidence interval, MD mean difference, RD risk difference, 25(OH)D25-hydroxyvitamin D
  2. aThe basis for the assumed risk (e.g., the median control group risk across studies) is provided in the footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
  3. b GRADEPro GDT, a web-based tool, was used to create a “Summary of Findings” table to report the certainty of evidence.
  4. High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimated effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimated effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimated effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.