Fig. 2: UBA1ms leads to a decrease in UBA1 protein in SF3B1K700E cells.

A Sashimi plots of the UBA1ms region from total RNA sequencing of SF3B1WT and SF3B1K700E K562 cells from previously published data [39]. B qPCR analysis of UBA1ms relative to 18S in SF3B1WT and SF3B1K700E K562 cells (n = 3). Mean ± SEM relative expression. Unpaired t-test. C qPCR analysis of UBA1WT and UBA1ms transcript levels in SF3B1K700E K562 cells after treatment with actinomycin D (ActD) for the indicated time points (n = 3). Results were normalized to 0 h, and MYC was included as a fast-degrading transcript control. Mean ± SEM relative expression, One-phase decay nonlinear curve fit (dotted line). D qPCR analysis of UBA1WT and UBA1ms in SF3B1WT and SF3B1K700E K562 cells after treatment with cycloheximide (CHX) for 4 h (n = 3). The fraction of UBA1 splice forms is shown within the bars. Mean ± SEM relative expression. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. E Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR-amplified mis-spliced region of UBA1 (top) and ABCB7 (bottom) in SF3B1WT and SF3B1K700E K562 cells. The lower bands correspond to the PCR product of canonically spliced RNA, and the upper bands to mis-spliced RNA. Representative image from three experimental repeats. F Representative polysome profiles of SF3B1WT and SF3B1K700E K562 cells recorded at 254 nm. Pooled monosome and polysome fractions are indicated. G qPCR analysis of total UBA1, UBA1WT, and UBA1ms RNA transcript distribution in monosome and polysome fractions from SF3B1WT and SF3B1K700E K562 cells (n = 5). Housekeeping gene transcript distribution can be found in Supplementary Fig. 2C. Mean ± SEM fraction. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. H Immunoblot analysis and I quantification of UBA1 isoforms in whole cell lysates from SF3B1WT and SF3B1K700E K562 cells (n = 3). Actin was used as a loading control for total UBA1 and UBA1b; Lamin B1 was used as a loading control for nuclear UBA1a, and relative signals were normalized by lane normalization. Mean ± SEM relative signal intensity. Unpaired t-test with Holm-Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ns not significant.