Table 1 Platform comparison with performance metrics
Platform | Sensing/Actuation modality | Intended application | Performance metrics | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electrical-responsive | Electrochemical sensing | Biomarker detection | LOD: fM to nM level | |
Electrical impedance imaging (EIT) | Anatomical imaging | Input current density: 79.58 mA/cm2 Spatial resolution: 1 mm Conductivity LOD: 0.0075 | ||
Optical- responsive | Colorimetric/ Fluorescence/ SERS | Biomarker detection | LOD: pM Level | |
Photodynamic therapy | Tumor treatment | Laser input: 532-660 nm with 100-560 mW/cm2 for 3-30 min | ||
Photothermal therapy | Tumor treatment | Laser input: 808-971 nm 122.7-500 mW/cm2 for 15 min Heat output: 40 to 48 °C | ||
Ultrasound- responsive | Ultrasound imaging | Anatomical imaging | Axial/lateral resolution: 0.25 to 1 mm Maximum penetration: tens to hundreds mm | |
Sonodynamic therapy | Tumor treatment | Ultrasound input: 1–2 W/cm2 with 1.2–3 MHz for 3-10 min Penetration depth: 70 to 150 mm | ||
Thermal- responsive | Thermal imaging | Anatomical imaging | Precision: ±0.1 to 0.3 °C Spatial resolution: 2.4 mm | |
Thermal dynamic therapy/ Hyperthermia | Tumor treatment | Heat input: sustain 42 °C for 45 min or cycle 37 to 45 °C for 5 h |