Table 2 Comparison of the study population with children receiving conventional therapies from the 2 European registers.

From: A nationwide experience of biological treatments in children with eosinophilic esophagitis

 

EOSINOBIO (N = 36)

pEEr

(N = 582)

p

EoE Connect (N = 254)

p

Demographics

 Age at EoE diagnosis (year)

  \(\bullet\) mean ± SD

7.4 ( ± 4.4)

  

11.9 ( ± 3.9)

N/A

  \(\bullet\) median [IQR]

7.5 [3.0; 11.0]

10.5 [5.7; 17.3]

N/A

Male gender (%)

27 (75.0)

355/582 (61.0)

0.09

206 (84.1)

0.44

Comorbidities

 Atopic dermatitis

17 (47.2)

153 (26.3)

0.006

57 (22.4)

0.0014

 Food allergy

23 (63.9)

187 (32.1)

<0.0001

N/A

N/A

 Asthma

26 (72.2)

151 (25.9)

<0.0001

79 (31.1)

<0.0001

 Allergic rhinitis

14 (38.9)

203 (34.9)

0.6

124 (48.8)

0.3

Symptoms at diagnosis

 Food impaction

24 (66.6)

99 (17.0)

<0.0001

111 (46.1)

0.009

 Dysphagia

21 (58.3)

145 (25.0)

<0.0001

141 (58.5)

0,7

 Vomiting

17 (47.2)

93 (16.0)

<0.0001

47 (19.5)

<0.0001

 Regurgitations

12 (33.3)

N/A

N/A

24 (10.0)

<0.0001

 Abdominal pain

12 (33.3)

87 (15.0)

0.0035

33 (13.7)

0.0016

 Failure to thrive

12 (33.3)

76 (13.0)

0.0007

26 (10.8)

0.0001

Endoscopic findings at diagnosis

 Peak of eosinophils/HPF, median [IQR]

  ▪ Proximal

20 [13; 40]a

43 [40; 51]

N/A

N/A

N/A

  ▪ Mid

20 [15; 40]b

40 [36; 49]

  ▪ Distal

25 [15; 40]c

45 [37; 65]

 EREFS score median ± IQR

3.0 ± 1.0d

N/A

N/A

3.0 ± 2.0f

N/A

 Edema

14 (43.8)d

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 Ring

11 (34.4)d

134 (23.0)

0.3

N/A

N/A

 Exudate

21 (67.7)c

221 (38.0)

0.0002

N/A

N/A

 Furrows

20 (64.5)c

187 (32.0)

0.06

N/A

N/A

 Stricture

9 (27.3)e

N/A

N/A

16 (6.9)

0.0002

  1. Values are presented as number/total number (%) unless otherwise as indicated.
  2. Bold values are considered significant.
  3. EoE eosinophilic esophagitis, EREFS edema, rings, exudates, furrows and stricture, hpf high power field, IQR inter-quartile range, SD standard deviation, N/A not applicable or not available.
  4. Missing data:
  5. aCalculated on 30 patients,
  6. bCalculated on 29 patients,
  7. cCalculated on 31 patients,
  8. dCalculated on 32 patients,
  9. eCalculated on 33 patients,
  10. fCalculated on 210 patients.