Table 2 Characteristics of the included studies.

From: Patient reported pain following tooth extraction with different autologous platelet concentrates. Systematic review

Authors, year, country

Study type (level of evidence) - Risk of bias

Population Characteristics

Sites involved

Groups

Concentrates preparation

Outcomes Measured

Pain results

Favoured protocol

Funding

Yari et al., [42], Iran

RCT (II) - Moderate

Sites: 62

Males: 28

Females: 34

Age: 22.5 ± 3.2

Mandibular Third Molars

Sites: 15

Protocol: Control

Sites: 15

Protocol: A-PRF

Sites: 16

Protocol: A-PRF+

Sites: 16

Protocol: L-PRF

L-PRF: 2800 rpm x 12 min (TD 4, HereXi Instruments Inc.)

A-PRF: 1500 rpm x 14 min (TD 4, HereXi Instruments Inc.)

A-PRF + : 1300 rpm x 8 min (TD 4, HereXi Instruments Inc.)

soft tissue healing, pain, analgesic use, trismus, facial swelling, and alveolar osteitis.

VAS Scores at 1, 2 and 3 days:

Control: 48 ± 11.86, 36.13 ± 7.72, 17.38 ± 7.72

L-PRF: 38.13 ± 5.43, 30.31 ± 3.04, 10.63 ± 4.42

A-PRF: 34.38 ± 5.25, 23.69 ± 7.72, 7.88 ± 4.29

A-PRF + : 34.69 ± 5.62, 25 ± 6.58, 9.13 ± 4.36

A-PRF and A-PRF +

None

Riaz et al., [41], India

Cohort Study (III) - High

Sites: 20

Males: 3

Females: 7

Age: 26.5 (18– 35)

Mandibular Third Molars

Sites: 5

Protocol: PRF

Sites: 5

Protocol: A-PRF

Sites: 10

Protocol: Control

A-PRF: 1500 rpm x 14 min (REMI C-852, Remielektrotechnik Ltd, Vasai, India)

PRF: 3000 rpm x 10 min (REMI C-852, Remielektrotechnik Ltd, Vasai, India)

Pain, swelling, and mouth opening (VAS for pain, flexible tape for swelling, interincisal distance for mouth opening).

VAS Scores at 1, 3 and 7 days:

PRF control: 2.6, 2.0, 1.6

PRF: 2.4, 1.4, 0.6

A-PRF control: 3.0, 2.4, 1.4

A-PRF: 2.6, 1.4, 0.4

A-PRF

None

Verma et al., [40], India

Cohort Study (III) - High

Sites: 40

Males: 13

Females: 7

Age: (21–48)

Mandibular Third Molars

Sites: 20

Protocol: PRF

Sites: 20

Protocol: PRP

NR

Pain using 1-10 rating communicated by patient, trismus, and swelling

Pain scores mean of 15 days:

PRF: 3.83 ± 0.456

PRP: 3.42 ± 0.536

none

NR

Ustaoğlu et al., [39], Turkey

RCT (II) - Low

Sites: 57

Males: 28

Females: 29

Age: 35.4 ± 5.6

Anterior and Premolar teeth

Sites: 19

Protocol: Control

Sites: 19

Protocol: T-PRF

Sites: 19

Protocol: L-PRF

L-PRF: 2700 rpm x 12 min (Intra-Spin System, L-PRF kit, Intra-Lock, Boca-Raton, FL, USA)

T-PRF: 2800 rpm x 12 min (Intra-Spin System, L-PRF kit, Intra-Lock, Boca-Raton, FL, USA)

Pain VAS and the number of analgesics taken for 3 days post-extraction.

Landry Wound Healing Index (LWHI) and H2O2 epithelization test.

Intraoral periapical radiographs were obtained and analyzed using fractal dimension analysis to assess bone healing.

VAS scores at 1, 2 and 3 days:

Control: 5.11 ± 1.6, 1.01 ± 1.44, 0

L-PRF: 3.3 ± 2.07, 0.48 ± 0.92, 0

T-PRF: 3.29 ± 1.85, 0.47 ± 0.62, 0

none

None

Bhujbal et al., [38], India

Cohort Study (III) - Moderate

Sites: 40

Males: 7

Females: 13

Age: 26 ± 6.9

Mandibular Third Molars

Sites: 20

Protocol: PRF

Sites: 20

Protocol: PRF

PRP: 1200 rpm x 10 min with citrate phosphate dextrose adenine + 2000rpm x 10 min with calcium chloride

PRF: 3000 rpm x 10 min

Landry’s healing index.

Pain VAS.

Swelling.

Digital panoramic radiographs.

VAS scores at 1, 3 and 7 days:

PRF: 1.8 ± 0.7, 2.2 ± 0.7, 0

PRP: 2.3 ± 0.8. 2.7 ± 1, 0.1 ± 0.2

none

None

Caymaz & Uyanik [37], Turkey

RCT (II) - High

Sites: 54

Males: 12

Females: 15

Age: (18–26)

Mandibular Third Molars

Sites: 27

Protocol: A-PRF

Sites: 27

Protocol: L-PRF

A-PRF: 1500 rpm x 14 min (Elektro-mag M415P, Istanbul, Turkey)

L-PRF: 3000 rpm x 10 min (Elektro-mag M415P, Istanbul, Turkey)

Pain VAS, and the number of analgesic tablets taken.

Trismus and swelling.

VAS scores at 1, 2, 3 and 7 days:

A-PRF: 31.56 ± 5.04, 15.67 ± 3.42, 7.03 ± 1.68, 1.67 ± 0.9

L-PRF: 48.3 ± 5.48, 32.44 ± 4.98, 19.01 ± 3.48, 3.22 ± 1.15

A-PRF

None

Unakalkar et al., [37], India

Cohort Study (III) - Low

Sites: 25

Males: NR

Females: NR

Age: (18–40)

Mandibular Third Molars

Sites: NR

Protocol: PRF

Sites: NR

Protocol: PRP

NR

Pain VAS, trismus, and swelling were

Periodontal health.

Bone healing based on lamina dura score, density score, and trabecular pattern score.

Duration of surgery, volume of local anaesthetic solution, and any intraoperative complications.

VAS scores at 1, 3 and 7 days:

PRF: 6.33 ± 1.11, 4.07 ± 1.71, 1.73 ± 1.28

PRP: 5.93 ± 1.28, 3.73 ± 1.44, 1.47 ± 1.5

none

None

Dutta et al., [35], India

RCT (II) - Moderate

Sites: 40

Males: 27

Females: 13

Age: 27 ± 5 (17–36)

Mandibular Third Molars

Sites: 10

Protocol: Control

Sites: 10

Protocol: HA

Sites: 10

rotocol: PRF

Sites: 10

Protocol: PRP

PRP:2000rpm x 15 min with citrate phosphate dextrose adenine + 3000 rpm x 10 min with calcium chloride

PRF: 3000 rpm x 10 min with Calcium gluconate

Swelling, pain Wong-Baker VAS, dry socket Blum’s criteria, and soft tissue healing.

Bone healing intraoral periapical radiographs.

VAS scores at 1 and 3 days:

Control: 5.4 ± 1.7, 3.6 ± 1.13

PRF: 2.4 ± 0.75, 0.8 ± 0.25

PRP: 2.9 ± 0.91, 1.3 ± 0.41

HA: 5 ± 1.58, 3.6, 1.13

none

None

  1. A table showing a summary of the characteristics and reported variables for each included study in this review.
  2. NR Not reported.
  3. VAS Visual Analogue Scale.
  4. rpm Revolutions Per Minute.
  5. RCT Randomised Controlled Trial.
  6. PRP Platelet-Rich Plasma.
  7. PRF Platelet-Rich Fibrin.
  8. L-PRF Leukocyte-PRF.
  9. A-PRF Advanced-PRF.
  10. T-PRF Titanium-prepared-PRF.
  11. HA Hydroxyapatite.