Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

DNA methylation episignature for Smith-Magenis and Potocki-Lupski syndromes: a mirror perspective

Abstract

Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) and Potocki-Lupski syndrome (PTLS) are reciprocal genomic disorders caused by deletions and duplications of the 17p11.2 chromosomal region, respectively. This study aimed to identify and validate DNA methylation episignatures specific to SMS and PTLS, and to investigate their reciprocal relationship and shared molecular features with other neurodevelopmental disorders. Genome-wide DNA methylation was analyzed in individuals with an SMS (n = 26) or PTLS (n = 27) phenotype associated with copy number variation, and SMS patients with RAI1 sequence variants using the Infinium EPIC array. Differentially methylated CpG sites were identified and used to develop support vector machine (SVM)-based classifiers, which demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for both syndromes. The analysis revealed a mirror-like episignature, with SMS showing predominant hypomethylation and PTLS displaying hypermethylation at shared loci. Functional correlation with other neurodevelopmental disorders highlighted significant overlap with known episignatures, including those associated with MEF2C-related disorders. Notably, individuals with RAI1 sequence variants did not exhibit the same DNA methylation patterns, suggesting that the epigenetic alterations are primarily driven by copy number changes. These findings establish SMS and PTLS as distinct yet interconnected epigenetic entities, offering valuable diagnostic biomarkers and insights into the molecular pathophysiology of 17p11.2-associated neurodevelopmental disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Copy number variants (CNVs) across chromosome 17p11.2 in individuals with SMS and PTLS.
Fig. 2: The discovery of the PTLS episignature.
Fig. 3: The discovery of the SMS episignature.
Fig. 4: Comparison of the PTLS and SMS episignatures.
Fig. 5: Adding RAI1 cases as testing to the SMS and PTLS episignature.
Fig. 6: The relationships between the SMS, PTLS and 99 other EpiSignTM disorders.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The deposition of individual epigenomic or any other personally identifiable data that has not previously been made publicly available for samples in the EpiSign Knowledge Database (EKD) is prohibited from deposition in publicly accessible databases due to institutional and ethical restrictions. Specifically, these include data and samples submitted from external institutions to London Health Sciences EKD that are subject to institutional material and data transfer agreements, data submitted to London Health Sciences for episignature assessment under Research Services Agreements, and research study cohorts under Institutional Research Ethics Approval (Western University REB 106302 and REB 116108). EpiSign is a commercial software and is not publicly available.

References

  1. Potocki L, Chen KS, Park SS, Osterholm DE, Withers MA, Kimonis V, et al. Molecular mechanism for duplication 17p11.2- the homologous recombination reciprocal of the Smith-Magenis microdeletion. Nat Genet. 2000;24:84–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moncla A, Piras L, Arbex OF, Muscatelli F, Mattei MG, Mattei JF, et al. Physical mapping of microdeletions of the chromosome 17 short arm associated with Smith-Magenis syndrome. Hum Genet. 1993;90:657–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Slager RE, Newton TL, Vlangos CN, Finucane B, Elsea SH. Mutations in RAI1 associated with Smith-Magenis syndrome. Nat Genet. 2003;33:466–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucas RE, Vlangos CN, Das P, Patel PI, Elsea SH. Genomic organisation of the approximately 1.5 Mb Smith-Magenis syndrome critical interval: transcription map, genomic contig, and candidate gene analysis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9:892–902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Girirajan S, Elsas LJ 2nd, Devriendt K, Elsea SH. RAI1 variations in Smith-Magenis syndrome patients without 17p11.2 deletions. J Med Genet. 2005;42:820–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Potocki L, Bi W, Treadwell-Deering D, Carvalho CM, Eifert A, Friedman EM, et al. Characterization of Potocki-Lupski syndrome (dup(17)(p11.2p11.2)) and delineation of a dosage-sensitive critical interval that can convey an autism phenotype. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80:633–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang F, Potocki L, Sampson JB, Liu P, Sanchez-Valle A, Robbins-Furman P, et al. Identification of uncommon recurrent Potocki-Lupski syndrome-associated duplications and the distribution of rearrangement types and mechanisms in PTLS. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:462–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Linders CC, van Eeghen AM, Zinkstok JR, van den Boogaard MJ, Boot E. Intellectual and behavioral phenotypes of Smith-Magenis syndrome: comparisons between individuals with a 17p11.2 deletion and pathogenic RAI1 variant. Genes. 2023;14:1514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Poisson A, Nicolas A, Bousquet I, Raverot V, Gronfier C, Demily C. Smith-Magenis syndrome: molecular basis of a genetic-driven melatonin circadian secretion disorder. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3533.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Srividhya D, Parambath SV, Sathyanarayanan R, Huligerepura Sosalegowda A, Korlimarla A, Niranjana Murthy AS, et al. Whole exome sequencing of a multiplex family of indian origin identifies variants in the RAI1 and FLII genes within the 17p11.2 region in siblings with autism and Smith Magenis syndrome. Mol Syndromol. 2024;15:537–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. May PA, Blankenship J, Marais AS, Gossage JP, Kalberg WO, Barnard R, et al. Approaching the prevalence of the full spectrum of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in a South African population-based study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37:818–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadikovic B, Aref-Eshghi E, Levy MA, Rodenhiser D. DNA methylation signatures in Mendelian developmental disorders as a diagnostic bridge between genotype and phenotype. Epigenomics. 2019;11:563–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sadikovic B, Levy MA, Kerkhof J, Aref-Eshghi E, Schenkel L, Stuart A, et al. Clinical epigenomics: genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for the diagnosis of Mendelian disorders. Genet Med. 2021;23:1065–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kerkhof J, Rastin C, Levy MA, Relator R, McConkey H, Demain L, et al. Diagnostic utility and reporting recommendations for clinical DNA methylation episignature testing in genetically undiagnosed rare diseases. Genet Med. 2024;26:101075.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rooney K, Sadikovic B. DNA methylation episignatures in neurodevelopmental disorders associated with large structural copy number variants: clinical implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:7862.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Laan L, Rooney K, Trooster TM, Mannens MM, Sadikovic B, Henneman P. DNA methylation episignatures: insight into copy number variation. Epigenomics. 2022;14:1373–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020;22:245–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou W, Triche TJ Jr., Laird PW, Shen H. SeSAMe: reducing artifactual detection of DNA methylation by Infinium BeadChips in genomic deletions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:e123.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Aref-Eshghi E, Bend EG, Colaiacovo S, Caudle M, Chakrabarti R, Napier M, et al. Diagnostic utility of genome-wide DNA methylation testing in genetically unsolved individuals with suspected hereditary conditions. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104:685–700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ho D, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42:1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Peters TJ, Buckley MJ, Statham AL, Pidsley R, Samaras K, Lord R V, et al. De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015;8:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Levy MA, McConkey H, Kerkhof J, Barat-Houari M, Bargiacchi S, Biamino E, et al. Novel diagnostic DNA methylation episignatures expand and refine the epigenetic landscapes of Mendelian disorders. HGG Adv. 2022;3:100075.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Levy MA, Relator R, McConkey H, Pranckeviciene E, Kerkhof J, Barat-Houari M, et al. Functional correlation of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. Hum Mutat. 2022;43:1609–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gu Z, Gu L, Eils R, Schlesner M, Brors B. circlize Implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2811–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cardoso MA, Rizzardi LEA, Kume LW, Groeneveld CS, Trefflich S, Morais DAA, et al. TreeAndLeaf: an R/Bioconductor package for graphs and trees with focus on the leaves. Bioinformatics. 2022;38:1463–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cavalcante RG, Sartor MA. annotatr: genomic regions in context. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2381–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cal S, Quesada V, Llamazares M, Díaz-Perales A, Garabaya C, López-Otín C. Human polyserase-2, a novel enzyme with three tandem serine protease domains in a single polypeptide chain. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:1953–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Agrawal K, Chauhan S, Kumar D. Expression analysis and regulation of GLI and its correlation with stemness and metabolic alteration in human brain tumor. 3 Biotech. 2023;13:10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spineli-Silva S, de Leeuw N, Pontes LB, Leijsten N, Ruiterkamp-Versteeg M, Prota JRM, et al. A nonsense variant in the C-terminal transactivation domain of the EBF3 gene in an individual with intellectual disability and behavioural disorder: case report and literature review. Psychiatr Genet. 2025;35:75–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Aref-Eshghi E, Kerkhof J, Pedro VP, France GD, Barat-Houari M, Ruiz-Pallares N, et al. Evaluation of DNA methylation episignatures for diagnosis and phenotype correlations in 42 mendelian neurodevelopmental disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108:1161–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the individuals, family members and staff from all the units that participated in the study.

Funding

Funding for this study is provided in part by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Ontario Genomics Institute (OGI-188) and Italian Ministry of Health (PNRR-MR1-2022-12376811 and RF-2021-12374963, to MT). Liselot van der Laan was awarded with the AR&D Travel grant from the Amsterdam UMC, which provided financial support for this work. This work was generated in part within the European Reference Network for Rare Malformation Syndromes, Intellectual and Other Neurodevelopmental Disorders (ERN ITHACA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization; LVDL, KS, KK, and BS.; Data Curation; KR, LVDL, KK, MAL, and RR.; Formal analysis; KR, LVDL, KK, MAL, and RR.; Investigation; LVDL, KR, MA, AB, ALA, NBP, AMCG, BRD, GC, CD, DE, VG, BG, DG, and GBF. MK, MN, AN, VO, SO, WGP, AMP, TR, NRP, QS, ST, MT, MAT, AT, UK, IV, JMVH, AMVDKK, PH, MMAMM, and MMVH.; Methodology; LVDL, KR, KK, and BS.; Project administration; BS.; Supervision; BS and MMVH.; Validation; KR, LVDL, BS, and MMVH.; Visualization; LVDL, KK, and KR.; Writing-original draft; LVDL, KK, and KR.; Writing-review and editing; LVLD, KK, BS, and MMVH.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bekim Sadikovic or Mieke M. van Haelst.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

B.S. is a shareholder in EpiSign Inc.

ETHICAL approval

Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals or family members prior to inclusion in this study including for the use of DNA and clinical information. The study was conducted in accordance with the regulations of the Western University Research Ethics Board (REB116108, and REB106302).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van der Laan, L., Karimi, K., Rooney, K. et al. DNA methylation episignature for Smith-Magenis and Potocki-Lupski syndromes: a mirror perspective. Eur J Hum Genet (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01956-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01956-0

Search

Quick links