Abstract
Background
To evaluate the spontaneous change in size over the time of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (IFTMHs) using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Methods
This retrospective observational study included 24 eyes of 24 consecutive patients waiting for IFTMH surgery. On OCT horizontal B-scan passing through the center of the fovea, the minimum linear diameter (MLD), the basal diameter (BD), and the presence of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) were evaluated. The mean total and daily MLD and BD variations were calculated as both absolute and percentage values.
Results
The MLD and BD size increase was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The MLD size increase was significantly greater for small (<250 μm) versus both medium (≥250 to ≤400 μm) and large (>400 μm) IFTMHs in all analysis: the total absolute (P = 0.0248), the daily absolute (P = 0.0186), the total percentage (P = 0.0020), and the daily percentage (P = 0.0008) variations. For the BD, the significance between the same groups was achieved only in the daily percentage change (P = 0.0220). The presence of VMA did not influence the amount of MLD and BD increase. The rate of increase was dependent on the size of hole at presentation (MLD: small: 1.67 microns per day; medium: 0.61 microns per day; large: 0.44 microns per day).
Conclusions
Both MLD and BD increase over the time in IFTMHs. There is a significantly greater rate of increase in hole size in smaller holes compared with larger. Therefore, prioritisation for small IFTMH may be justified.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
McCannel CA, Ensminger JL, Diehl NN, Hodge DN. Population-based incidence of macular holes. Ophthalmol. 2009;116:1366–9.
Forsaa VA, Lindtjørn B, Kvaløy JT, Frøystein T, Krohn J. Epidemiology and morphology of full-thickness macular holes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96:397–404.
Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Akiba J, Konno S, Trempe CL. Prognosis of stage 2 macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119:571–5.
Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Akiba J, Trempe CL. Natural outcomes of stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 idiopathic macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:517–20.
Kim JW, Freeman WR, El-Haig W, Maguire AM, Arevalo JF, Azen SP.Baseline characteristics, natural history, and risk factors to progression in eyes with stage 2 macular holes. Results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmol. 1995;102:1818–29.
Chew EY, Sperduto RD, Hiller R, Nowroozi L, Seigel D, Yanuzzi LA, et al. Clinical course of macular holes: the eye disease case-control study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:242–6.
Casuso LA, Scott IU, Flynn HW, Gass DM, Smiddy WE, Lewis ML, et al. Longterm follow-up of unoperated macular holes. Ophthalmol. 2001;108:1150–5.
Madi HA, Dinah C, Rees J, Steel DH. The case mix of patients presenting with full-thickness macular holes and progression before surgery: implications for optimum management. Ophthalmol. 2015;233:216–21.
Sugiyama A. Reappraisal of spontaneous clousure rate of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes. Open Ophthalmol J. 2012;6:73–74.
Tornambe PE. Macular hole genesis: the hydration theory. Retina. 2003;23:421–4.
Schubert HD, Kuang K, Kang F, Head MW, Fischbarg J. Macular holes: migratory gaps and vitreous as obstacles to glial closure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997;235:523–9.
Ip MS, Baker BJ, Duker JS, Reichel E, Baumal CR, Gangnon R, et al. Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:29–35.
Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig MW, Kampik A. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:390–3.
Kusuhara S, Teraoka Escano MF, Fujii S, Nakanishi Y, Tamura Y, Nagai A, et al. Prediction of postoperative visual outcome based on hole configuration by optical coherence tomography in eyes with idiopathic macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:709–16.
Ruiz-Moreno JM, Arias L, Araiz J, García-Arumí J, Montero JA, Pinero DP. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study of macular structure as prognostic and determining factor for macular hole surgery outcome. Retina. 2013;33:1117–22.
Wakely L, Rahman R, Stephenson J. A comparison of several methods of macular hole measurement using optical coherence tomography, and their value in predicting anatomical and visual outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1003–7.
Madi HA, Masri I, Steel DH. Optimal management of idiopathic macular holes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:97–116.
Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, de Smet MD, Gaudric A, Reichel E, et al. The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmol. 2013;120:2611–9.
Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:654–9.
Wendel RT, Patel AC, Kelly NE, Salzano TC, Wells JW, Novack GD. Vitreous surgery for macular holes. Ophthalmol. 1993;100:1671–6.
OH H. Idiopathic macular hole. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:150–8.
Cheng L, Azen SP, El-Bradey MH, Toyoguchi M, Chaidhawangul S, Rivero ME, et al. Effects of preoperative and postoperative epiretinal membranes on macula hole closure and visual restoration. Ophthalmol. 2002;109:1514–20.
Gupta B, Laidlaw DA, Williamson TH, Shah SP, Wong R, Wren S. Predicting visual success in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1488–91.
Haritoglou C, Neubauer AS, Reiniger IW, Priglinger SG, Gass CA, Kampik A. Longterm functional outcome of macular hole surgery correlated to optical coherence tomography measurements. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;35:208–13.
Kim SH, Kim HK, Yang JY, Lee SC, Kim SS. Visual recovery after macular hole surgery and related prognostic factors. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018;32:140–6.
Gass JD. Idiopathic senile macular hole. Its early stages and pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:629–39.
Philippakis E, Amouval F, Couturier A, Boulanger-Scemama E, Gaudric A, Tadayoni R. Size and vitreomacular attachment of primary full-thickness macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:951–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berton, M., Robins, J., Frigo, A.C. et al. Rate of progression of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes before surgery. Eye 34, 1386–1391 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0654-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0654-1
This article is cited by
-
Makulaforamen: Differenzialdiagnose, Behandlungsoptionen und neue Leitlinienempfehlungen
Die Ophthalmologie (2024)
-
Makulaforamen und vitreomakuläre Traktion
Die Ophthalmologie (2023)
-
Optical coherence tomography features and risk of macular hole formation in the fellow eye
BMC Ophthalmology (2021)
