Fig. 1: Kaplan–Meier survival analysis corresponding to failure criteria 1 for the phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy (PEcK) and the phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and trabecular micro-bypass stent (ICE-1) groups. | Eye

Fig. 1: Kaplan–Meier survival analysis corresponding to failure criteria 1 for the phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy (PEcK) and the phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and trabecular micro-bypass stent (ICE-1) groups.

From: Outcomes of phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation performed with dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy or trabecular micro-bypass stent insertion

Fig. 1

There is no statistically significant difference between the survival functions (log-rank test, p = 0.12).

Back to article page