Fig. 2: Kaplan–Meier survival analysis corresponding to failure criteria 2 for the phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy (PEcK) and the phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and trabecular micro-bypass stent (ICE-1) groups. | Eye

Fig. 2: Kaplan–Meier survival analysis corresponding to failure criteria 2 for the phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy (PEcK) and the phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, and trabecular micro-bypass stent (ICE-1) groups.

From: Outcomes of phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation performed with dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy or trabecular micro-bypass stent insertion

Fig. 2

There is no statistically significant difference between the survival functions (log-rank test, p = 0.41).

Back to article page