Abstract
Background/Objectives
To investigate demographic enrolment characteristics in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) trials.
Subjects/Methods
Clinicaltrials.gov was searched with “age-related macular degeneration” to identify RCTs with double, triple, or quadruple masking. Trial (e.g., study location, phase, masking, trial initiation year, and sponsor origin) and patient demographic data were collected. Sex-based AMD disease burdens were retrieved from the Global Burden of Disease database to calculate pooled female population-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs). Equitable trial enrolment was defined as PPR between 0.8–1.2. Demographic proportions were evaluated across trial characteristics using the Kruskal–Wallis test (alpha = 0.05) followed by post hoc comparisons. Secondary outcomes included absolute number of enrolled female, racial, and ethnic groups, and the association of trial characteristics with these demographics.
Results
We included 106 trials (77,939 patients; 46.3% female), spanning 1990–2020. The pooled female PRR was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82, 0.94). PPR values were inconclusive studies with quadruple blinding; phase I, III, IV, or not applicable status; foreign (non-US) site; US-only and foreign-only sponsor; and an initiation year before 2010. There was no significant difference in PPR between sublevels of analysed trial characteristics. Of the 74 (69.8%) trials that adequately detailed race, White participants comprised the largest group (N = 57,917; 82% of total participants). Thirty-seven (34.9%) trials adequately detailed ethnicity. The absolute enrolment of race and ethnic groups did not generally exhibit significant difference between sublevels of analysed trial characteristics.
Conclusions
Female enrolment was commensurate to their disease burden across all trial characteristics. Race and ethnicity were under-reported. Future trials should prioritise equitable study enrolment strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 18 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $14.39 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Lim LS, Mitchell P, Seddon JM, Holz FG, Wong TY. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet. 2012;379:1728–38.
More P, Almuhtaseb H, Smith D, Fraser S, Lotery AJ. Socio-economic status and outcomes for patients with age-related macular degeneration. Eye. 2019;33:1224–31.
Shughoury A, Sevgi DD, Ciulla TA. Molecular genetic mechanisms in age-related macular degeneration. Genes. 2022;13:1233.
Yuk J-S, Hwang JH. Menopause and the risk of developing age-related macular degeneration in Korean women. J Clin Med. 2022;11:1899.
Pennington KL, DeAngelis MM. Epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration (AMD): associations with cardiovascular disease phenotypes and lipid factors. Eye Vis. 2016;3:34.
Miao Z, Pei-Chen D, Jing-Hong L, Xiao-Feng Z, Chen-Wei P. Geographic distributions of age-related macular degeneration incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105:1427.
Chang MA, Bressler SB, Munoz B, West SK. Racial differences and other risk factors for incidence and progression of age-related macular degeneration: Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2395–402.
Aninye IO, Digre K, Hartnett ME, Baldonado K, Shriver EM, Periman LM, et al. The roles of sex and gender in women’s eye health disparities in the United States. Biol Sex Differ. 2021;12:57.
Lin X, Lou L, Miao Q, Wang Y, Jin K, Shan P, et al. The pattern and gender disparity in global burden of age-related macular degeneration. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;31:1161–70.
Tao BK, Vosoughi AR, He B, Ling J, Xia M, Rocha G, et al. Representational disparity of sex, race, and ethnicity in presbyopia clinical trials: a cross-sectional study. Eye. 2023;37:3871–3.
Tao B, Xie J, Xia M, Marzban S, Vosoughi A, Ahuja N, et al. Diversity in enrollment to clinical trials for cataract medicine and surgery: a meta-analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024;50:460–7.
Berkowitz ST, Groth SL, Gangaputra S, Patel S. Racial/ethnic disparities in ophthalmology clinical trials resulting in US Food and Drug Administration Drug Approvals from 2000 to 2020. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139:629–37.
Bowe T, Salabati M, Soares RR, Huang C, Singh RP, Khan MA, et al. Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in diabetic macular edema clinical trials. Ophthalmol Retin. 2022;6:531–3.
Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1204–22.
About the topic of race. United States Census Bureau; Suitland, Maryland, United States: 2023. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html.
Blakeslee L, Caplan Z, Meyer JA, Rabe MA, Roberts AW. Age and sex composition: 2020. United States Census Buruea; Suitland, Maryland, United States: 2023. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2023/decennial/c2020br-06.html.
Chen S, Li J, Shu M. Use of participation to prevalence ratio for evaluating the representation status of women in oncology clinical trials. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:479–80.
Togioka BM, Duvivier D, Young E. Diversity and discrimination in healthcare. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
Clark LT, Watkins L, Piña IL, Elmer M, Akinboboye O, Gorham M, et al. Increasing diversity in clinical trials: overcoming critical barriers. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2019;44:148–72.
Schwartz AL, Alsan M, Morris AA, Halpern SD. Why diverse clinical trial participation matters. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1252–4.
Sharma A, Palaniappan L. Improving diversity in medical research. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2021;7:74.
Birnbaum FA. Gender and ethnicity of enrolled participants in U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical trials for approved ophthalmological new molecular entities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2018;110:473–9.
Moore DB. Reporting of race and ethnicity in the ophthalmology literature in 2019. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138:903–6.
QuickFacts. United States Census Bureau; 2023. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222.
Klein R, Klein BEK, Knudtson MD, Wong TY, Cotch MF, Liu K, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in 4 racial/ethnic groups in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:373–80.
Yanagi Y, Foo VHX, Yoshida A. Asian age-related macular degeneration: from basic science research perspective. Eye. 2019;33:34–49.
Fisher DE, Klein BEK, Wong TY, Rotter JI, Li X, Shrager S, et al. Incidence of age-related macular degeneration in a multi-ethnic United States population: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1297–308.
Kaakour A-H, Hua H-U, Rachitskaya A. Representation of race and ethnicity in randomized clinical trials of diabetic macular edema and retinal vein occlusion compared to 2010 US Census Data. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022;140:1096–102.
Sanjiv N, Osathanugrah P, Harrell M, Siegel NH, Ness S, Chen X, et al. Race and ethnic representation among clinical trials for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema within the United States: a review. J Natl Med Assoc. 2022;114:123–40.
Allison K, Patel DG, Greene L. Racial and ethnic disparities in primary open-angle glaucoma clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e218348.
Yu AJ, Masalkhi M, Brown R, Chen B, Chhablani J. Racial and ethnic distribution in diabetic macular edema clinical trials in the United States (2002–2021). Ophthalmol Retina. 2023;7:1035–41.
Murakami Y, Lee BW, Duncan M, Kao A, Huang J-Y, Singh K, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in adherence to glaucoma follow-up visits in a county hospital population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:872–8.
Racette L, Wilson MR, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Primary open-angle glaucoma in Blacks: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:295–313.
Mahr MA, Hodge DO, Erie JC. Racial differences in age-related macular degeneration and associated anti–vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injections among medicare beneficiaries. Ophthalmol Retin. 2018;2:1188–95.
Number of clinical trials by year, country, WHO region and income group (1999-2022). World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2024. https://www.who.int/observatories/global-observatory-on-health-research-and-development/monitoring/number-of-clinical-trials-by-year-country-who-region-and-income-group.
Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL. Committee AMAMoS. Updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals. JAMA. 2021;326:621–7.
Tao BK, Xie JS, Kohly RP, Margolin E. Disease burden descriptions in trial protocols. Lancet. 2024;404:238–9.
Seidler E, Keshaviah A, Brown C, Wood E, Granick L, Kimball A. Geographic distribution of clinical trials may lead to inequities in access. Clin Investig. 2014;4:373–80.
clinicaltrials.gov. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, Maryland, United States https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/about-ctg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualisation: BT, JSX, RK; methodology: BT, JSX; software: BT; validation: all authors; formal analysis: BT; investigation: BT, JSX, VL, MP, JX; resources: BT; data curation: BT, JSX, VL, MP, JX; writing original draft: all authors; writing review & editing: all authors; visualisation: BT; supervision: JSX, CL, PY, NN, WCL, EVN, RM, RK; project administration: BT; funding acquisition: not applicable.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Under article 2.4 of the Tri-Council Policy Statement, institutional review board approval was waived since all data were sources from published primary research and publicly available registries. No identifiable information was generated by this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tao, B.K., Xie, J.S., Leung, V. et al. Enrolment characteristics in age-related macular degeneration clinical trials: a cross-sectional study. Eye 39, 1153–1159 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03572-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03572-6