Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Long-term follow-up of circumscribed iris melanomas treated by proton beam therapy

Abstract

Introduction

Iris melanomas are a rare entity accounting for 2–5% of uveal melanomas. The most frequent primary treatment for circumscribed iris melanomas is irradiation, particularly by proton beam therapy (PBT). Short-term efficacy is encouraging but there is little data on long-term tumour control and side effects.

Objectives

To describe the long-term results in terms of local and systemic control, eye preservation and side-effects after PBT for circumscribed iris melanomas.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of patients treated by PBT between 1998 and 2022. Diffuse iris melanomas, ciliary body melanomas with iris involvement or tumours with extrascleral invasion were excluded.

Results

Of 143 patients treated by PBT, n = 91 were treated five years or more before data update and were included. Median follow-up was 10.7 years (range 1.7–22.7 years). Documented growth was present for 74% of patients. The median clinical largest diameter was 5 mm, and the median ultrasound thickness was 2.1 mm. The tumour invaded the iridocorneal angle in 68% of patients. Overall survival was 94%. Three patients presented with metastatic disease, of which one died of metastasis. Seven deaths were unrelated to iris melanoma. Five (3.5%) patients experienced ocular relapse. The most frequent complications were cataract and raised intraocular pressure (no neovascular glaucoma). Four patients (4.3%) required secondary enucleation.

Conclusion

Long-term follow-up confirms that PBT is an excellent treatment option for localized iris melanomas, with very favourable local tumour control, eye preservation, and overall survival. Relapses are very rare but can occur several years after treatment, warranting a prolonged follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Kaplan Meier curves of appearence of complications after PBT.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidentiality restrictions but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Popovic M, Ahmed IIK, DiGiovanni J, Shields CL. Radiotherapeutic and surgical management of iris melanoma: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62:302–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lumbroso-Le Rouic L, Delacroix S, Dendale R, Levy-Gabriel C, Feuvret L, Noel G, et al. Proton beam therapy for iris melanomas. Eye. 2006;20:1300–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Damato B, Kacperek A, Chopra M, Sheen MA, Campbell IR, Errington RD. Proton beam radiotherapy of iris melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:109–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.01.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thariat J, Rahmi A, Salleron J, Mosci C, Butet B, Maschi C, et al. Proton beam therapy for iris melanomas in 107 patients. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:606–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Willerding GD, Cordini D, Hackl C, Karle B, Lakotka N, Foerster MH, et al. Proton beam radiotherapy of diffuse iris melanoma in 54 patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:812–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabazade S, Herrspiegel C, Gill V, StÃ¥lhammar G. No differences in the long-term prognosis of iris and choroidal melanomas when adjusting for tumor thickness and diameter. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:021–09002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Msika LC, Desjardins L, Cockenpot V, Dendale R, Berges O, Aït Raïs K, et al. Iris melanoma relapsing sixteen years after proton-beam therapy: the importance of lifelong follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2018;13:89–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Marigo FA, Finger PT. Anterior segment tumors: current concepts and innovations. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:569–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shields J, Shields C. Melanocytic tumors of the iris stroma. In: Intraocular tumors A text and atlas. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Saunders; 1992. p. 69–77.

  10. Gollrad J, Boeker A, Vitzthum S, Besserer A, Heufelder J, Gauger U, et al. Proton therapy for 166 patients with iris melanoma: side effects and oncological outcome. Ophthalmol Retin. 2022;6530:00452–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eibenberger K, Heimann H, Gatchalian L, Kacperek A, Hussain R. Side effects of proton beam radiotherapy treatment on iris melanoma. Ophthalmology. 2023;130:958–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sandinha MT, Kacperek A, Errington RD, Coupland SE, Damato B. Recurrence of iris melanoma after proton beam therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:484–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kivela T, Simpson ER, Grossniklaus HE, Jager MJ, Singh AD, Caminal JM, Pavlick AC, et al. PT Finger Uveal melanoma. In: Amin M, editor. AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2017. p. 805–17.

  14. Shields CL, Di Nicola M, Bekerman VP, Kaliki S, Alarcon C, Fulco E, et al. Iris melanoma outcomes based on the American Joint Committee on cancer classification (eighth edition) in 432 patients. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:913–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shields CL, Shah SU, Bianciotto CG, Emrich J, Komarnicky L, Shields JA. Iris melanoma management with iodine-125 plaque radiotherapy in 144 patients: impact of melanoma-related glaucoma on outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:55–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Nathalie Algret (data manager).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LLR: Conceptualization; Supervision; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. XM: Formal analysis; Methodology; Validation; Visualization; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing, SD: Data curation; Formal analysis; Methodology; Validation; Visualization; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. FD: Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. RD: Conceptualization; Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. AM: Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. NC: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Livia Lumbroso-Le Rouic.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lumbroso-Le Rouic, L., Maynadier, X., Goudjil, F. et al. Long-term follow-up of circumscribed iris melanomas treated by proton beam therapy. Eye 39, 2599–2603 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03934-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03934-8

Search

Quick links