Abstract
In response to the 2021 Hospital Price Transparency Regulation by The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), we evaluated hospital-reported price transparency and variability for testosterone (T) testing across the United States (US). Using the Turquoise database, hospitals disclosing free or total T test prices were identified. Hospital characteristics were compared between price reporters and non-reporters. Multivariable regression identified reporting predictors and assessed price variability by test and payer type. Of 6700 hospitals, 51.7% reported at least one T test price. Reporting was more common among larger hospitals (median 100 vs. 75 beds, p < 0.001), non-profits (62.7 vs. 44.3%, p < 0.001), and those with higher compliance scores (4.5 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Regional variation was significant (p < 0.001), but no urban-rural differences were observed (p = 0.71). Median prices were $84.90 (Interquartile range $44.0, $138.0) for total T and $92.27 ($49.17, $144.35) for free T, varying by payer: $79.43 ($40.82, $131.32) for commercial insurance and $98.00 ($54.65, $148.84) for self-pay. On multivariable analysis, hospitals in competitive markets and with more beds tended to have lower prices, while hospital ownership did not significantly affect pricing. Despite the legislation, nearly half of hospitals fail to report prices, driving significant price variation and limiting informed consumer choices.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data utilized in this study, derived from the Turquoise Hospital database and based on hospital-reported pricing information, is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Mulhall JP, Trost LW, Brannigan RE, Kurtz EG, Redmon JB, Chiles KA, et al. Evaluation and management of testosterone deficiency: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:423–32.
Salonia A, Capogrosso P, Boeri L, Cocci A, Corona G, Dinkelman-Smit M, et al. European association of urology guidelines on male sexual and reproductive health: 2025 update on male hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, and Peyronie’s disease. Eur Urol. 2025;88:76–102.
Kaltenboeck A, Foster S, Ivanova J, Diener M, Bergman R, Birnbaum H, et al. The direct and indirect costs among U.S. privately insured employees with hypogonadism. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2438–47.
Moskovic DJ, Araujo AB, Lipshultz LI, Khera M. The 20-year public health impact and direct cost of testosterone deficiency in U.S. men. J Sex Med. 2013;10:562–9.
Grabner M, Bodhani A, Khandelwal N, Palli S, Bonine N, Khera M. Clinical characteristics, health care utilization and costs among men with primary or secondary hypogonadism in a US commercially insured population. J Sex Med. 2017;14:88–97.
Chernew ME, Hicks AL, Shah SA. Wide state-level variation in commercial health care prices suggests uneven impact of price regulation. Health Aff. 2020;39:791–9.
Whaley C, Schneider Chafen J, Pinkard S, Kellerman G, Bravata D, Kocher R, et al. Association between availability of health service prices and payments for these services. JAMA. 2014;312:1670–6.
Anzai Y, Delis K, Pendleton RC. Price transparency in radiology-a model for the future. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17:194–9.
Wu SJ, Sylwestrzak G, Shah C, DeVries A. Price transparency for MRIs increased use of less costly providers and triggered provider competition. Health Aff. 2014;33:1391–8.
Medicare and Medicaid Programs. CY 2020 hospital outpatient PPS policy changes and payment rates and ambulatory surgical center payment system policy changes and payment rates. Price transparency requirements for hospitals to make standard charges public/ [Internet]. Department of Health and Human Services; 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 1] p. 65524–606. (Federal Registrar). Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-11-27/pdf/2019-24931.pdf
Gul ZG, Sharbaugh DR, Guercio CJ, Pelzman DL, Jones CA, Hacker EC, et al. Large variations in the prices of urologic procedures at academic medical centers 1 year after implementation of the price transparency final rule. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2249581.
Hart SA, Khan A, Booth GS, Wiencek JR. Tennessee hospital noncompliance with price transparency legislation for 8 common laboratory tests. Am J Clin Pathol. 2024;162:450–4.
Burkhart RJ, Hecht CJ 2nd, Acuña AJ, Kamath AF. Less than one-third of hospitals provide compliant price transparency information for total joint arthroplasty procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480:2316–26.
Petterson MB, Willis MH, Rosenberg JK, Boutin RD. Charges for shoppable musculoskeletal imaging examinations: CMS transparency compliance and variability among 250 U.S. hospitals. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022;218:1102–3.
Green RL, Dunham P, Kling SM, Kuo LE. Not clearing the air: hospital price transparency for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Res. 2022;280:501–9.
Cram P, Cram E, Antos J, Sittig DF, Anand A, Li Y. Availability of prices for shoppable services on hospital internet sites. Am J Manag Care. 2021;27:e426–8.
Brant A, Lewicki P, Rhodes S, Zhu A, Shoag J. Trends in hospital price transparency after implementation of the CMS final rule. Health Serv Res. 2024;59:e14329.
Jiang JX, Polsky D, Littlejohn J, Wang Y, Zare H, Bai G. Factors associated with compliance to the hospital price transparency final rule: a national landscape study. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37:3577–84.
Williams DJ, Holmes M. Rural health care costs: are they higher and why might they differ from urban health care costs? N C Med J. 2018;79:51–5.
Linde S, Egede LE. Hospital price transparency in the United States: an examination of chargemaster, cash, and negotiated, price variation for 14 common procedures. Med Care. 2022;60:768–74.
Nikpay S, Golberstein E, Neprash HT, Carroll C, Abraham JM. Taking the pulse of Hospitals’ response to the new price transparency rule. Med Care Res Rev. 2022;79:428–34.
Funding
No funding for this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Writing – MD. Conceptualization – NS & NT. Methodology and Formal Analysis – SR; Reviewing and Editing – MD, NS, SM, SR, AB, KT, HS, RAG, AL, NT.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was not required for this study because it involved the use of de-identified data and did not involve any direct interaction with human participants or access to identifiable private information.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
DeMasi, M., Sellke, N., Mortach, S. et al. Testosterone testing in the United States: limited price transparency and significant variability. Int J Impot Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01152-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01152-0