Abstract
The January 2022 eruption of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai (HTHH) volcano discharged 2,900 teragrams of ejecta, most of which was deposited in the South Pacific Ocean. Here we investigate its impact on the biogeochemistry of the South Pacific Gyre (SPG) using samples collected during the GEOTRACES cruise GP21 in February-April 2022. Surface water neodymium isotopes and rare earth element compositions showed a marked volcanic impact in the western SPG, potentially extending to the eastern region. Increasing trace metal concentrations in surface waters and chlorophyll-a inventories in euphotic layers between the eastern and western SPG further suggest that the volcanic eruption supplied (micro)nutrients potentially stimulating a biological response. We estimate that the HTHH eruption released up to 0.16 kt of neodymium and 32 kt of iron into the SPG, which is comparable to the annual global dust-borne Nd flux and the annual dust-borne Fe flux to the entire SPG, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Volcanic ash deposited into the surface ocean readily releases bioactive trace metals (e.g., iron, Fe; manganese, Mn), which can stimulate phytoplankton growth, either directly via Fe fertilization of waters replete in macronutrients, or indirectly via Fe fertilization of nitrogen fixation in waters where nitrate is depleted and phosphate available in excess1,2,3. Consequently, major volcanic eruptions driving surface ocean Fe fertilization have been linked to atmospheric CO2 drawdown and climatic changes in the past4,5,6,7. Airborne volcanic ash has been suggested as an important atmospheric Fe source for the surface Pacific Ocean, due to the abundance of active and explosive volcanoes surrounding it (Pacific Ring of Fire)3. The estimated input of ash into the Pacific Ocean of 128–221 × 1012 g/yr, is comparable to estimates of mineral dust inputs of non-volcanic origin (39–519 × 1012 g/yr)8, resulting in a total soluble Fe flux of 3–75 × 106 mol/yr to the Pacific Ocean3. Indeed, dispersed ash forms a substantial fraction of the South Pacific Ocean (SPO) pelagic clay deposits, often exceeding 50% by mass, and records episodes of southern hemisphere volcanism3,9. The SPO is dominated by the vast oligotrophic South Pacific Gyre (SPG), which is characterized by extremely low concentrations of nitrate, relatively elevated phosphate, and expected Fe limitation of nitrogen fixation rates10.
The underwater Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai (HTHH) volcano (20.536°S, 175.382°W; 150 m below sea-level), located in the Tonga-Kermadec volcanic arc, erupted violently on 15 January 2022 (Fig. 1a). The eruption is among the largest volcanic activity ever recorded with modern geophysical instrumentation, with a volcanic explosivity index (VEI) of ~611. The eruption produced a large volcanic plume that reached an altitude of up to 57 kilometers12 and resulted in tephra covering an area of at least 600 km in diameter13. The eruption expelled vast (2.9 × 1015 g) amounts of basaltic-andesitic volcanogenic material, such as ash and pumice, into the SPG14. Following the deposition of the ash-laden volcanic plumes of HTHH, satellite observations revealed elevated surface water chlorophyll-a concentrations (Chl-a) in the affected nearby region15,16.
a Map showing the sampling stations from this and previous studies36,37, the locations of the HTHH volcanic eruption, and the pumice encountered during the cruise. Additional tow-fish samples for rare earth elements (REE) and trace metal (TM) measurements were taken between stations 40 and 44. Surface currents in the South Pacific Ocean are adapted from Figure 10.1 in ref. 32. The map is generated using Ocean Data View80. b Volcanic ash particle deposition (mg/m2) between 0 and 18000 meters after 72 h of the HTHH volcanic eruption based on the NOAA HYSPLIT volcanic ash dispersion model67, shown in the area enclosed by the dashed square box in subplot a. Mass loadings after 24 and 48 h of the eruption are shown in Supplementary Fig. 3. (c) Air mass forward trajectories at 1000 (red), 5000 (blue), and 10000 (green) meters above model ground level for 315 hours after the HTHH eruption, based on the NOAA HYSPLIT trajectory model67. Forward trajectories at 20, 100, and 500 meters post-eruption are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. Model details and parameterization of both b and c are given in the Methods section. Our cruise track is depicted by a purple line in subplots b and c. (d) Photograph of floating pumice, with sizes up to several centimeters, taken from the research vessel during the cruise before crossing the Tonga-Kermadec Ridge on 30 March 2022. Photo credit: Maria de los Angeles Amenabar. Additional photos of floating pumice and individual pumice that were collected can be found in Supplementary Fig. 2.
Volcanic ash from the HTHH eruption has the potential to exert widespread effects on the SPG via long-distance (thousands of kilometers) atmospheric transport by prevailing winds17,18,19. Although suspended ash was still observed in the water column around the HTHH volcano months later20, the volcanic ash overall sank rapidly (hours to days) through the water column, depending on particle size21. In contrast, pumice can float for periods of months to years due to its high porosity and trapped gas bubbles and can thus be transported over thousands of kilometers via surface ocean currents22,23. The dispersal of volcanic ash and floating pumice can enhance the impacts of a volcanic eruption on surface ocean biogeochemistry over extended temporal and spatial scales23. However, so far, the large-scale impact of the HTHH eruption on SPG biogeochemistry has not been explored.
Tracing volcanic inputs into the SPG is challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing them from other external sources such as eolian aluminosilicate dust derived from continents24 and weathering inputs from volcanic islands25. However, radiogenic neodymium isotope compositions (143Nd/144Nd, expressed as εNd) and dissolved rare earth element (REE) concentrations in seawater can be used to trace specific sources of trace elements to the ocean26,27,28. The εNd signatures of lithogenic materials vary as a function of age and lithology and surface waters acquire their εNd signatures via aeolian input, volcanic input, and continental weathering input from rivers and submarine groundwater discharge26,29. The REEs are divided into three categories based on their atomic weight: light (LREE), medium (MREE), and heavy (HREE). To eliminate natural abundance variations, REE concentrations in seawater are normalized to Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS) which approximates average continental crust30. The REE patterns in the open ocean increase in abundance from LREE to HREE because of preferential LREE scavenging in seawater, which is known as HREE enrichment (HREE/LREEPAAS > 1)31. The REEs also typically exhibit a cerium (Ce) depletion in comparison to neighboring REEs with similar mass due to Ce oxidation to insoluble forms in seawater, which is referred to as the “Ce anomaly” (Ce/Ce*PAAS < 1)31. The dissolution of lithogenic material weakens the Ce anomaly (Ce/Ce*PAAS closer to 1) and modifies the dissolved HREE/LREE ratio, depending on the composition of the dissolving material.
To investigate the biogeochemical impacts of the HTHH eruption on the surface SPG, we characterized the magnitude and location of the ash deposition using a volcanic ash dispersal model and an air mass trajectory model. The volcanic inputs were traced with dissolved εNd and REE signals in surface seawater and biogeochemical impacts were examined via the concentrations of trace metals (dissolved aluminum (Al), Mn, Fe) and chlorophyll-a, which is a proxy for phytoplankton biomass. Samples were collected along a zonal transect at 26-32.5°S across the entire SPO during GEOTRACES cruise GP21 in February-April 2022 (Fig. 1a). We find that the western SPG exhibited strong (bio)geochemical impacts following the volcanic inputs originating from the HTHH, which likely extended to the central SPG via atmospheric ash dispersal and surface current transport.
Results and discussion
Expedition GP21 and the HTHH eruption
The Pacific GEOTRACES GP21 expedition (Chile to New Caledonia) with the research vessel SONNE (SO289) took place between 23 February and 4 April 2022, which was 39 to 79 days after the HTHH eruption (Fig. 1a). The transect was aligned with the southern limb of the anticyclonic SPG, which is formed by the broad, eastward-flowing South Pacific Current32. Underway data from the upper ocean Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (75 kHz-ADCP) showed that the prevailing surface current velocities were eastward, with typical surface speeds of 10-40 cm per second (Supplementary Fig. 1). However, a small region (166-174°W) in the vicinity of the Tonga-Kermadec Ridge exhibited predominantly westward surface currents. A large amount of floating tephra, mostly pumice, was observed and collected before crossing the Tonga-Kermadec Ridge (~175°W) on 30 March 2022, 73 days after the major HTHH eruption (Fig. 1a, d; Supplementary Fig. 2).
The NOAA HYSPLIT volcanic ash dispersion model indicated that volcanic ash particles were mainly deposited in the western region of the SPG (20°−50°S, 175°E −150°W), south of the HTHH volcano, within 3 days of the eruption (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Fig. 3). This area covered the western extent of the GP21 transect. NOAA HYSPLIT forward air mass trajectories for 13 days following the HTHH eruption indicated a general eastward atmospheric transport of volcanic ash across the entire SPG (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig. 4), which overlapped with the GP21 cruise track.
Radiogenic Nd isotopic compositions and REE patterns in surface waters
Surface seawater εNd values exhibited pronounced and systematic variability (Fig. 2a). The εNd values decreased from −0.9 at the Chilean coast to −6.2 at the eastern boundary of the SPG (90°W), followed by a gradual increase to +0.9 near the Tonga-Kermadec Arc. The most unradiogenic (negative) εNd signal (−6.2) at 90°W is consistent with a reported surface value at a nearby location (εNd = −6.4; station EGY: 32°S, 91.4°W)33 and reflects the influence of surface currents. Specifically, as the South Pacific Current approaches South America, the Humboldt Current system between the SPG and the Chilean coast transports subantarctic water equatorward at approximately 90°W34. The surface water in the Subantarctic Zone of the southeastern Pacific Ocean carries an εNd signal ranging between −5.7 and −8.435 resulting in the unradiogenic εNd signal at ~90°W along the GP21 section. The surface εNd signal became more radiogenic (positive) between 90°W ( − 6.2) and the Chilean coast (−0.9; Fig. 2a). This was accompanied by a pronounced increase in Nd concentration from ~4 to ~20 pmol/kg (Fig. 2b) and a weakening of the Ce anomaly towards the Chilean coast (Fig. 2c). Collectively these geochemical seawater signatures were due to lithogenic input from the Chilean coast, where outcropping continental rocks and sediments exhibit highly radiogenic εNd signatures (0 to +5) due to their volcanic nature33.
a εNd, b Nd concentration measured by isotope dilution method, c Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS) normalized Ce anomaly (Ce/Ce*PAAS), calculated as 2×CePAAS/(LaPAAS+PrPAAS), d PAAS normalized heavy REE enrichment relative to light REE (HREE/LREEPAAS), calculated as (YbPAAS+LuPAAS)/(PrPAAS+NdPAAS). Data from this study are shown in pink. The location of the pumice is indicated by a red arrow pointing downwards. The region of ash deposition within 3 days of the eruption, based on the NOAA HYSPLIT volcanic ash dispersion model (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 3), is shown in the transparent gray box. In a and b, the external 2 SD of the εNd values and Nd concentrations are smaller than symbol size. Previously reported data for station SX-22 (20°S, 170°W)36 are shown in green triangle up, station SX-20 (30°S, 170°W)36 in green triangle down, and station GeoB17019 (15°S, 174°E)37 in blue square. In c and d, the error bars are derived from the propagation of measurement errors (2 SD) of each element.
Within the SPG, the surface water εNd signal became more radiogenic from the eastern edge of the gyre at 90°W ( − 6.2) towards the Tonga-Kermadec Arc at 180°W ( + 0.9) (Fig. 2a). The εNd signature in the western SPG ( ~ 0 to +1) was more radiogenic than reported surface εNd signatures at nearby locations. This includes two stations at 170°W (SX-22: 20°S; SX-20: 30°S) sampled in January 2005 (εNd = −1.9 and −2.3)36 and one station at 174°E (GeoB17019: 15°S) sampled in September-October 2012 (εNd = −1.7)37. The more positive values observed in our study indicate pronounced external inputs into the surface ocean prior to our sampling in the western SPG that were enriched in radiogenic εNd. However, surface water Nd concentrations in the western SPG remained consistently low (~4 pmol/kg), at levels comparable to previous measurements36,37 (Fig. 2b). It can be posited that scavenging and/or exchange processes occurred to maintain a constant Nd concentration while modifying the Nd isotopic composition. This will be discussed in greater detail in a later section (Rapid release and scavenging of Nd following the volcanic input). Accompanying the εNd increases, the Ce anomaly weakened (Fig. 2c) while the HREE enrichment strengthened (Fig. 2d) from eastern to western SPG.
Potential sources of external inputs to SPG surface waters
The positive correlation between Ce anomaly and HREE enrichment values (R2 = 0.56, p < 0.05; Fig. 3) in the SPG (170°E-90°W) indicates that the radiogenic source of external inputs in the western SPG were characterized by a weaker (or absent) Ce anomaly and stronger HREE enrichment. Possible external source materials for the surface water of the western SPG include volcanic material of the HTHH eruption, such as ash or pumice, weathering of basaltic volcanic islands, aeolian dust from Australia, and/or shallow hydrothermal inputs along the Tonga-Kermadec Arc, each of which have particular εNd signatures and REE ratios (Table 1).
The REE data of the collected pumice, Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai (HTHH) lava42, PAAS, Australian dust81,82, Ocean Island Basalt (OIB)40 and coastal seawater of two representative volcanic islands in the Pacific Ocean, Papua New Guinea (PNG)28 and Tahiti38, are included. The calculations for Ce/Ce*PAAS and HREE/LREEPAAS are consistent with those in Fig. 2. Australian dust data contains data from various major dust sources from Australia, namely the Murray–Darling Basin81, Queensland, Paroo, Eyre Peninsula, and Channel Country82. The green arrow represents the change in REE patterns from OIB40 to Tahitian coastal surface seawater (sample ID: t324)38 and PNG coastal surface seawater near Sepik River mouth (station EUC-Fe-28)28 due to seawater scavenging. The blue arrow indicates the change of REE patterns in surface seawater from eastern to western South Pacific Gyre as a result of volcanic material dissolution. The error bar for HTHH lava represents the standard deviation (SD) of five lava samples, while the error bars for surface water and pumice are derived from the propagation of measurement errors (2 SD) of each element. The dashed blue line and dotted blue lines represent the linear regression of Ce/Ce*PAAS and HREE/LREEPAAS in the surface water of the South Pacific Gyre (this study) and the 95% confidence interval of the regression, respectively.
The dissolution of volcanogenic materials and also the weathering of basaltic volcanic islands38 result in the release of Nd with a highly radiogenic signature. This is because oceanic crust, such as mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORBs), ocean island basalts (OIBs), and island arc rocks all have positive εNd values between ~0 and +1039. Consistent with that, our pumice sample collected near the Tonga-Kermadec arc yielded a highly radiogenic εNd signature of +7.5. The weathering of volcanic islands, for example Papua New Guinea, also supplies radiogenic Nd, resulting in εNd values of both surface and subsurface waters in the equatorial Western Pacific reaching up to +0.737. However, basalts formed in different tectonic settings have distinct chemical characteristics, primarily determined by the source type, tectonic environment and magma generation processes40. These factors lead to systematic compositional differences between MORBs and OIBs. Therefore, the Primitive Mantle-normalized REE pattern of the pumice closely resembled that of normal MORBs40, and differed from that of OIBs40 (Supplementary Fig. 5). In addition, basalts formed within island arcs exhibit geochemical diversity as a function of different mantle origins and/or varying melting processes, which result in distinguishable elemental compositions41. Lavas from different Tonga-Kermadec islands display distinctive REE patterns42, and our collected pumice has a Primitive Mantle-normalized REE pattern similar to that of the lava from the HTHH volcano (Supplementary Figs. 5, 6). Therefore, the geochemical composition of our collected pumice strongly suggests that it originated from the HTHH eruption.
When the REE concentrations were normalized to PAAS, the pumice and HTHH lava exhibited a more pronounced enrichment in HREE (Fig. 4a) and no Ce anomaly compared to surface seawater (Fig. 4b). This is consistent with the REE characteristics of the external source to the western SPG and explains the correlated changes in Ce anomaly and HREE enrichment in the surface waters between 90°W and 170°E (Fig. 3). OIBs exhibit a pronounced enrichment of MREEs, a crustal Ce signal (without anomaly), and little fractionation between light and heavy REEs (i.e. no HREE enrichment) (Fig. 4). Volcanic island weathering imprints an OIB-like REE pattern in local fresh or brackish waters at the island-ocean interface, although this signal is typically rapidly lost in coastal seawaters due to scavenging25,28,38. Overall, input of volcanic island weathering cannot account for the observed changes in REE ratios of surface seawater in the SPG (Fig. 3). Therefore, it can be concluded that volcanic island weathering was not the source of the material driving the observed geochemical changes.
Subplots (a) and (b) are identical, with the y-axis in (a) presented in a linear scale, while the y-axis in (b) employs a logarithmic scale. Surface seawater REE data from stations 14 and 43 were chosen to represent the samples from the eastern and western South Pacific Gyre, respectively. REE data for mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) and ocean island basalts (OIB) are from Sun and McDonough40, where those values are based on a literature review and internal consistency of elemental ratios. N-MORB represents normal MORB and E-MORB represents enriched MORB. REE data for Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai (HTHH) lava are from Ewart et al. 42 where the error bar represents the standard deviation of five lava samples. REE data for Tahitian rocks are from Cordier et al. 83 which is shown as a representative of volcanic island basalt in the South Pacific. The REE pattern of these basalts normalized to Primitive Mantle is available in Supplementary Fig. 5.
Another possible external source to the western SPG is Australian dust43,44. However, the εNd signatures of the Australian dust (−29 to +2)43 are generally too unradiogenic to account for the observed radiogenic signature (+1) near the Kermadec arc. In addition, Australian dust has an overall shale-like REE pattern lacking a Ce anomaly and a HREE enrichment in contrast to surface seawater (Fig. 3). Furthermore, our western part of the transect is located at a distance from the region receiving long-range dust transport from Australia, which follows a southeastward trajectory44. Therefore, it is unlikely that Australian dust is a major component of the external source.
Shallow hydrothermal vents (<500 m depth) along the Tonga-Kermadec arc potentially increase Fe concentrations in the photic layer through vertical transport45. Although dissolved εNd may show a slightly more radiogenic signature within hydrothermal plumes (one εNd unit shift)46, REEs are typically immediately immobilized near the vents upon contact between hot fluids and cold bottom waters47. Furthermore, no significant excess of 3helium (3Hexs), a conservative tracer for hydrothermal plumes48, was detected at our station above the Monowai Seamount on the Kermadec ridge. The measured 3He levels were even lower than the background 3He value (~ 2.38 fmol/kg) (Fig. 5c). In addition, hydrothermal fluids commonly exhibit a pronounced, positive europium (Eu) anomaly (Eu/Eu* > 1)49. The absence of a positive Eu anomaly in the water column near the Tonga-Kermadec arc (Fig. 5b) suggests a negligible shallow water hydrothermal input. Moreover, εNd signatures become more radiogenic from depths of 600 m towards the surface (Fig. 5a), suggesting external inputs into surface seawaters from above rather than vertical supply from below.
Station 40 is on the flank of the Monowai seamount. The external 2 SD of the εNd is smaller than symbol size. PAAS normalized Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu*PAAS) is calculated as 2*EuPAAS/(GdPAAS +SmPAAS). Error bars for Eu anomaly are derived from the propagation of measurement errors (2 SD) of each element. Helium (He) isotope data are not available for station 42 in the upper 600 m.
In summary, we conclude that the dissolution of volcanogenic material originating from the HTHH eruption, which occurred 39 to 79 days prior to our sampling, is predominantly responsible for the radiogenic εNd signature, weak Ce anomaly and strong heavy REE enrichment observed in the western SPG along GP21. The area of the strongest geochemical signal largely overlaps with the main region of post-eruption volcanic ash deposition as well as the location of floating pumice (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. 3). In addition, surface currents may redistribute the volcanic input signal up to 600-2400 km away in 70 days. The gradual change in εNd signatures and REE ratios between the western and eastern SPG may be indicative of the eastward extension of the influence of the volcanic eruption through atmospheric ash dispersion (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig. 4) and/or the predominant direction of the surface ocean currents (Fig. 1a).
Rapid release and scavenging of Nd following the volcanic input
The SPG is known for the lowest surface water REE concentrations in the global ocean, likely due to its remoteness with a limited amount of terrestrial inputs and a lack of vertical supply due to strong water column stratification50. Despite the clear evidence for partial dissolution of volcanogenic materials discussed above, surface water Nd concentrations in the western SPG remained consistently low (~4 pmol/kg) at levels comparable to previous measurements36,37 (Fig. 2b). Assuming an initial surface seawater Nd concentration of ~4 pmol/kg with an εNd value ~−2 in the western SPG, an addition of 0.9-1.9 pmol/kg (of seawater) of Nd from the volcanogenic material with an εNd value of +7.5 is required to obtain a surface εNd value of ~0 to +1. In the absence of subsequent scavenging from the surface water51, this would result in a 22–46% increase in Nd concentration. Given that the samples were collected 9-10 weeks after the eruption, subsequent particle scavenging was likely to have occurred, which had offset the increase in concentration. The preferential removal of Nd and other LREEs during particle scavenging, following the dissolution of volcanic material, resulted in a downward shift in the Ce/Ce* to HREE/LREE slope. This explains the deviation of the linear regression between Ce anomaly and HREE enrichment from the pumice endmember (Fig. 3).
Surface layer Nd residence times were suggested to range from 1–4 years in the eastern Indian Ocean and eastern Atlantic Ocean39,52. However, the mean residence time of Nd in the mixed layer is dependent on various factors such as REE inventory, supply rate or export flux, and particle density39,53. Trace metals are shown to exhibit a markedly shorter residence time in response to large dust deposition events due to enhanced particle scavenging54,55,56. Similarly, ash particles have residence times ranging from hours to days in the mixed layer, depending on their particle sizes21. Following ash deposition, the rapid downward flux of these particles may facilitate rapid Nd scavenging, resulting in a short residence time of REE in the mixed layer. This enables the surface water REE pattern to be rapidly altered in response to local external sources (Fig. 3).
Trace metal fertilization and biological response in the SPG
The concentrations of surface dissolved Al (dAl), Mn (dMn) and Fe (dFe) all increased between the eastern and western SPG (Fig. 6 a,b), accompanying the overall increase in εNd values (Fig. 2a). Previous studies have attributed elevated dFe concentrations in the western South Pacific to (i) shallow inputs of Fe of hydrothermal origin from the vents along the Tonga-Kermadec arc45,57, or (ii) direct interaction of seawater with the islands or Australian continent, which can subsequently be advected elsewhere by currents10,58. However, as discussed above, volcanic material was the dominant external source of trace metals in the western SPG during our cruise, with a greater influence than other external sources. In addition, a comparison of surface trace metal concentrations in the western SPG between our western transect and other two earlier GEOTRACES cruises, GP13 and GP19, revealed elevated levels in the region 175°E-175°W for our cruise, with a notable increase in dAl over an extended area (Supplementary Fig. 7). It must be acknowledged that the temporal gap between our sampling and the eruption (9–10 weeks) requires consideration. For instance, approximately two to three months after the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption, Achterberg et al.21 observed no elevated surface dFe in offshore waters of the Iceland Basin. This midsized eruption, however, emitted tephra in an amount (~3.8 × 1014 g) that was one magnitude lower than the major HTHH eruption (~2.9 × 1015 g)14. Consequently, the HTHH eruption appeared to exert a stronger and more far-reaching geochemical impact in comparison to those previously observed for midsized eruptions.
a Surface dissolved manganese (dMn) and aluminum (dAl) concentrations; b surface dissolved iron (dFe) concentration and TChl-a inventory in the euphotic layer; c–f cross plots of surface dAl, dMn, dFe, and TChl-a inventory versus Nd isotopic composition (εNd). The location of the pumice is indicated by a red arrow pointing downwards. The region of ash deposition within 3 days of the eruption, based on the NOAA HYSPLIT volcanic ash dispersion model (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 3), is shown in the transparent gray box. The external 2 SD of the εNd values are smaller than the symbol size. The error bars of dAl, dMn, and dFe represent 1 SD of repeated measurements of these trace metals, respectively.
In the SPG, the dAl closely followed the change in surface εNd, showing a highly significant positive correlation (n = 19, R2 = 0.88, p < 0.001, Fig. 6c). This suggests that dAl had the same source as the radiogenic εNd, that is, the volcanic aluminosilicate input. However, there was a slight deviation in the increase exhibited by dMn compared to the near linear increase observed by dAl (Fig. 6a). This is documented by its weaker positive correlation with surface εNd (n = 18, R2 = 0.53, p < 0.001, Fig. 6d). In contrast, the concentrations of dFe decreased to very low levels (~0.1 nmol/L) in the main ash deposition area (shaded in Fig. 6b). As a result, we observe insignificant correlations between surface εNd and dFe (n = 18, R2 = 0.11, p = 0.19, Fig. 6e).
Given the time gap of 9–10 weeks between the HTHH eruption and our observation in the western SPG, the observed differences between dAl, dFe, and dMn can be attributed to their scavenging behavior and biological requirements, which result in a markedly shorter residence time for dFe compared to dAl and dMn59. In open ocean surface waters, dAl distributions are primarily controlled by aeolian inputs, as it is not known to be actively assimilated by organisms, while dMn is essential for organisms and surface ocean concentrations are further buffered by photochemical reduction60,61. In contrast, dFe is scavenged from seawater more rapidly than dAl or dMn and has a greater requirement for phytoplankton growth than dMn61,62. Dust-seeding mesocosm experiments have indicated that a large dust deposition event can accelerate the export of Fe from the water column through scavenging, while a remarkable increase of dissolved Al and Mn was observed56. Extremely short residence times, with timescales of days to weeks, were reported for Fe in Atlantic surface waters receiving enhanced atmospheric inputs from Saharan origins54,55. Consequently, the more pronounced depletion of dFe in the main ash-deposition area (Fig. 6b), despite the anticipated high input fluxes, is primarily a result of scavenging subsequent to the release and/or biological removal21.
A weak positive correlation was observed between surface εNd and the total chlorophyll-a (TChl-a) inventory in the euphotic layer measured on the research cruise (n = 18, R2 = 0.32; p < 0.05, Fig. 6f). In addition, a positive satellite-derived Chl-a anomaly for March 2022 was evident in the western part of the transect compared to the March average for the period between 2002 and 2023 (Supplementary Fig. 8). Together these indicate a potential increase in phytoplankton growth in response to the volcanic input of dFe via stimulation of N2 fixation, particularly in the western SPG, as shown in Fig. 6b. It should be noted, however, that the time interval after the eruption may have precluded the observation of the most elevated phytoplankton biomass in the western SPG. Given that multiple sources of trace metals are known in the western SPG, confidently ascribing this elevated phytoplankton biomass to volcanic dFe fertilization over and above other sources is challenging. However, as discussed above, volcanic input was identified as the dominant TM source to surface waters, therefore we consider a linkage between volcanic input from the HTHH eruption into the western SPG and the enhanced TChl-a inventory a plausible scenario.
Constraints on volcanic Nd and Fe supply to the SPG
Extrapolating the Nd concentration in the pumice (4.18 µg/g) to the total ejecta of the HTHH eruption (2.9 ×1015 g)14, the ejecta contain a total of 1.2 × 1010 g of Nd. The NOAA HYSPLIT volcanic ash dispersion model indicated a mass loading area coverage of 5.4 × 106 km2 three days after the eruption (Fig. 1b), which can be considered to represent the lower boundary of the ash depositional area. Meanwhile, our data demonstrate a significant increase of 2–3 εNd units between stations 33 and 44 (152°W to 172°E) in the western SPG. Based on this longitudinal coverage and the latitudinal range of 30° (20°S to 50°S) indicated by the HYSPLIT model (Fig. 1b), we can estimate the upper limit of the depositional area to be 1.2 × 107 km2. On the basis of an estimated overall release of 0.9–1.9 pmol/kg Nd within the surface mixed layer (~50 m), we calculate a total release of 0.4–1.6 × 108 g of Nd. The upper limit is comparable to, although slightly lower than, the annual global dust input of Nd (2–4 × 108 g/yr)63,64. It represents 1.3 % of the total Nd contained in the ejecta from HTHH, which is lower than the estimated fraction of soluble Nd in dust (2–50 %)64. Although Nd scavenging is clearly evident based on the lack of a Nd concentration enrichment in surface waters of the depositional area, this release still had a significant impact on the Nd isotope composition and REE characteristics of surface waters, making them sensitive tracers of volcanic activity in the present and past ocean.
Volcanic ash also rapidly supplies significant amounts of soluble Fe to seawater, with a global mean estimate of 200 ± 50 nmol Fe/g ash for subduction zone volcanic ash3. Multiplying this mean value by the total amount of ejecta from the HTHH eruption (2.9 × 1015 g)14 results in a potential release of 5.8 ± 1.5 × 108 mol (3.2 ± 0.8 × 1010 g) of Fe. This estimate likely represents an upper limit, as some types of ejecta, such as pumice, release Fe less efficiently than volcanic ash upon contact with seawater65. However, the long-lived buoyancy of pumice potentially promotes a continuous release of Fe into surface waters for months to years before finally sinking22,23. The long-term Fe release efficiency of pumice to surface seawater should be further investigated to test this possibility. This estimate is comparable to the Fe fertilization amount from the similar giant eruption of Mount Pinatubo in June 1991 (VEI 6; 7.2 × 108 mol Fe), which was associated with atmospheric carbon/oxygen anomalies7, but it is much larger than the estimated Fe release from previous midsized eruptions, including the Kasatochi eruption in August 2008 (VEI 4; ~ 1 × 108 mol Fe), which stimulated a massive phytoplankton bloom66, and the Eyjafjallajökull eruption in April-May 2010 (VEI 4; 1.8 × 106 mol Fe), which resulted in enhanced major nutrient drawdown21.
The New Zealand – Tonga – Kermadec arc is estimated to emit 20–26 × 1012 g/yr volcanic ash3, corresponding to 30–78 × 105 mol/yr Fe, suggesting that Fe release from HTHH approximates the integrated Fe contribution of the New Zealand – Tonga – Kermadec arc volcanic input over a century. Pavia et al. 24. estimated a dust-borne Fe flux to the central region of the SPG at 3.5–11 μmol/m2/yr. Multiplying this estimate with the surface area of the SPG (37 million km2) yields an estimated dust-borne Fe flux to the SPG of 1.3–4.1 × 108 mol/yr. Consequently, the quantity of Fe released from the HTHH eruption is equivalent to the annual dust-borne Fe flux into the entire SPG. In order to improve the accuracy of biogeochemical models in the Pacific Ocean, it is, therefore, necessary to incorporate the episodic volcanic input of trace metals and to improve parameterization of the key chemical-biological processes that respond to volcanic inputs in the models.
Methods
Volcanic ash dispersion model and trajectory model
The NOAA HYSPLIT volcanic ash dispersion model67 was used to calculate the transport and dispersion of volcanic ash from the Hunga_Tonga-Hunga_Ha’apai (HTHH) volcanic eruption. Information about the HTHH volcano was extracted from the Smithsonian Institution “Volcanoes of the World” database. Archived GDAS (1 degree, global, 2006-present) data was used for meteorology. Eruption source parameters (ESPs) for the HTHH volcanic eruption, as assigned by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), were used for the mass eruption rate. The HYSPLIT model was run for 72 hours with 3 concentration layers after the eruption (15th January 2022, 09:00 UTC) with a 24 hours output interval. Model output displays results of one-hour averages at the given snapshot interval for 3 altitude layers: 6000 m, 12000 m, and 18000 m.
The NOAA HYSPLIT trajectory model67 was used to calculate forward trajectories after the HTHH eruption (15th January 2022, 09:00 UTC) from the eruption location. A maximum of 315 hours can be specified for archive datasets on the website. Archived GDAS (1 degree, global, 2006-present) data was used for meteorology. “Model vertical velocity” that uses the vertical velocity field from meteorological data was chosen for the type of vertical motion method the trajectory model uses in its calculation.
Radiogenic neodymium isotopes sampling and analyses
A total of 28 surface seawater samples were collected for the radiogenic Nd isotope measurements. Approximately 20 L of surface seawater was collected for stations 1-14 using 10 L Niskin bottles attached to a stainless steel CTD rosette. Starting from station 16, ~40 L of surface seawater was collected per sample from a towed, trace-metal-clean near-surface seawater sampling device equipped with acid-washed PVC tubing, and pumping provided by a Teflon diaphragm pump (i.e. tow-fish), either immediately before or after the station, to allow isotopic composition measurements at anticipated low concentrations. Between stations 39 and 44, an additional 17 surface samples (1-2 L) were collected from the tow-fish for REE measurements.
The samples were treated onboard strictly following recommended GEOTRACES protocols68. Each 20 or 40 L sample was filtered through a nitro-cellulose acetate filter (0.45 μm pore diameter) into one or two acid-cleaned LDPE-cubitainers (20 L) with a peristaltic pump within 2 h after collection, and subsequently acidified to pH~1.9 with concentrated, distilled HCl. For the determination of Nd (using isotope dilution) and REE concentrations, 1-2 L aliquots from each filtered sample were collected in acid-cleaned 1 or 2 L PE-bottles and acidified to pH~1.9. To each large volume sample, 25 μL of FeCl3 solution (∼200 mg Fe/mL) was added per 1 L of sample, and the sample was left to equilibrate for 24 h. Ammonia solution (25%, Merck Suprapur®) was next added to increase the pH to 7.8-8.2. After 48 h the trace elements co-precipitated with the iron hydroxide precipitates and settled to the bottom of the cubitainers, and the supernatant was syphoned off. The precipitates were then transferred into 2 L PE-bottles and transported to GEOMAR for analysis.
Precipitates were dissolved and purified for measurement with Multicollector-Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS) in the home laboratory at GEOMAR. Detailed purification procedures can be found in Rahlf et al. 69. Briefly, the precipitates were dissolved in 6 M HCl/ 0.5 M HF and dried down, and then treated with aqua regia at 120 °C for 24 h to remove organic compounds. Then pre-cleaned di-ethyl ether was used to remove most Fe via liquid–liquid extraction. Neodymium was chromatographically separated from matrix elements using first a cation exchange resin AG 50W-X8 (1.4 ml, 200–400μm) and then from the other REE using Eichrom®LN-Spec resin (2 ml, 50–100 μm) on a second chromatographic column. The 143Nd/144Nd ratios were determined using a Neptune Plus MC-ICP-MS at GEOMAR and corrected for instrumental mass bias to 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219 and to 142Nd/144Nd = 1.14187670. The 143Nd/144Nd ratios of all samples were normalized using bracketing analyses of the JNdi-1 standard, with a value of 0.51211571. The total procedural laboratory blanks for water samples (n = 3) were negligible at <20 pg for Nd and contributed a maximum of 0.3 % to the seawater samples. εNd is defined by the equation:
where the 143Nd/144Nd of CHUR (Chondritic Uniform Reservoir) are 0.51263972.
The external reproducibility (2 × standard deviations, 2 SD) of the Nd isotope measurements was assessed by repeated purification and measurement of USGS reference material NOD-A-1 at concentrations matched to those of the samples (12-20 ppb, εNd = −9.35 ± 0.15, n = 7 for repeated purification, n = 35 for repeated measurement), which is used to demonstrate the error of the measured εNd in all figures (2 SD = 0.15). If the internal error (2 × standard errors, 2SE) of a sample was larger than the external error, the internal error is used.
Pumice was rinsed with Milli-Q water (Millipore) three times and then dried and homogenized prior to alkaline fusion following Bayon et al.73. Neodymium in the digestion solution was then purified by chromatography following the same procedure as for seawater. The accuracy and reproducibility of the fusion technique and measurement were monitored by processing reference materials with each batch of samples including USGS reference material BHVO-2 (εNd = +6.80 ± 0.24, n = 3) and AGV-2 (εNd = +2.99 ± 0.13, n = 3). The larger 2 SD from BHVO-2 measurement is used to demonstrate the error of the measured εNd in the pumice (2 SD = 0.24).
Rare earth element concentration analyses
For the precise determination of Nd concentrations, 1 L samples were spiked with a pre-weighed 150Nd spike, after which the Nd was precipitated with FeCl3 solution and purified with cation exchange resin AG 50W-X8 (1.4 ml, 200–400 μm). The Nd concentration was then measured on the Neptune Plus MC-ICPMS via the isotope dilution (ID) method based on 150Nd/144Nd. External reproducibility (2 SD) was better than 0.4 % for Nd according to repeated treatment and measurement of the same sample (n = 4).
The rare earth elements (REEs) were pre-concentrated offline using a SeaFAST system (model M5 from Elemental Scientific) which employs a NOBIAS PA-1 resin column to preconcentrate the REEs and other trace metals74. A 10 ng/g thulium solution (25 μL) was added to each 25 mL acidified seawater sample prior to preconcentration to monitor yields. The same was done with acidified pure Milli-Q water blanks, and reference seawaters (pH~1.9) which were preconcentrated like the samples. Using the M5 SeaFast system, 24 mL of sample was precisely loaded onto the column, the matrix was washed away, and then the REEs were eluted with 400 µL of 1.5 M HNO3. Before measurement, 200 µL of 10 ng/g Re in 0.1% HNO3 were added to each sample as an internal standard and to account for any evaporation of the samples in the meantime. All samples were analyzed on a Thermo Element XR ICP-MS coupled with a CETAC “Aridus 2” desolvating nebulizer to reduce oxide formation. Oxide formation was monitored at the start of each analytical session using single element solutions74 and was negligible at <0.05%.
GEOTRACES inter-calibration seawater samples BATS 15 m and 2000 m75, as well as seawater samples from this cruise (Station 36, 5 m and 5289 m), were repeatedly measured to monitor external reproducibility and accuracy. In this work, the 2 SD of repeated measurements of the surface seawater at station 36 (n = 6) is used to represent the uncertainties of REEs of all the surface samples, which is <10% for all REEs, except for Ce (14.9 %). The average total procedural onboard blank (n = 3) was ≤3.54 % for all REEs, except for Ce (8.59 %), compared to the surface sample containing the lowest REE concentrations along the transect. Blanks, mean values and 2 SD for the reference seawaters are provided in Supplementary Data 1. A comparison of Nd concentrations measured by SeaFast and by the isotope dilution method in this study shows consistency between the two methods for Nd (Nd-SeaFast = 1.01 × Nd-ID, R2 = 0.99; Supplementary Fig. 9).
The REE concentrations of pumice digestion solution was measured on an Agilent 7500cx Quadrupole-ICP-MS at GEOMAR. Oxide formation was corrected by measuring element solutions of barium (Ba), Ce, praseodymium (Pr) + Nd, and samarium (Sm) + europium (Eu) + gadolinium (Gd) + terbium (Tb) at the start of the analytical session. The reproducibility was monitored by repeated measurements of USGS reference material BHVO-2. Mean values and 2 SD for the BHVO-2 measurements are given in Supplementary Data 1.
Surface dissolved manganese (dMn), dissolved iron (dFe), and dissolved aluminum (dAl)
Surface seawater for trace metal measurements was collected from the trace-metal-clean underway tow-fish and filtered through a 0.8/0.2 μm filter cartridge (AcroPak 500, Pall) into pre-cleaned 125 mL LDPE bottles (Nalgene), then acidified with hydrochloric acid (Ultrapure, Romil) for storage and stabilization (pH ~1.9). All sample and standard preparations were completed under a laminar flow bench, and laboratory and analytical work was undertaken in an ISO Class 5 clean lab. All LDPE and FEP bottles used for reagents, standards, and sample preparation were acid washed according to GEOTRACES protocols68.
Dissolved Mn and Fe analytes were initially pre-concentrated and buffered online to pH 6.4 using SeaFast (SC-4 DX; ESI), then measured on the ICP-MS (Element-XR, ThermoFisher) at GEOMAR. The ammonium acetate buffer was prepared using Optima grade (Fisher) glacial acetic acid and ammonium hydroxide. Subboiled distilled nitric acid was used to make up the 1 M elution acid, with a 250 ng L−1 indium spike added to manage any potential drift correction. Additional details about this methodology are reported in Rapp et al.76. Quantification and accuracy of trace metals was assessed using standard addition (R2 = 0.99) as well as certified reference materials (SAFe D2; Cass-6 and Nass-7, National Research Council Canada), achieved to good agreement with reported consensus values (weighted mean absolute percentage error (WMAPE): <5.5% for dFe and <11% for dMn). Several seawater samples were run as duplicates or triplicates and returned relative standard deviations (RSDs) of <6.7% (dFe) and <9% (dMn), which are used to represent the error of each sample. The limit of detection was 0.005 nmol/L for dMn, and 0.05 nmol/L for dFe.
Dissolved Al was analyzed shipboard following the methodology of Ren et al.77. Briefly, a working reagent consisting of 40 mg/L lumigallion and 2 M ammonium acetate (pH ~6) was prepared and stored in dark at the fridge. Working reagent (250 µL) was added into the 5 mL acidified seawater (pH ~1.9), resulting in a final pH of 5.0-5.5. Samples were then placed in an oven at 80 °C for 3 h to accelerate Al-lumogallion complexation. An eight-point calibration line (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 15, 20 nmol/L Al standard additions to surface seawater from South Atlantic Gyre), blank determination and an internal reference sample were pretreated in the same manner as samples and measured daily. All samples were analyzed using a Cary Eclipse fluorimeter; emission and excitation wavelengths were set to 507 − 575 nm, with a 10 nm slit width. Blank contributions were determined as two separate parts, the manifold blank and the reagent blank. The manifold blank was assessed by the average counts of two acidified seawater samples (one surface and one deep water) without reagents. The reagent blank was determined using two different methods: (1) by analyzing three acidified seawater samples spiked with 1x, 2x, and 3x reagent volume and (2) using two calibration series with 1x and 2x reagent volume, respectively. The reagent blank was then assessed from the difference in the intercepts of two series of calibration lines. For each seawater sample, duplicates or triplicates were performed, and the error of each sample is reported as the 1 SD of repeated measurements.
Total chlorophyll-a (TChl-a) concentrations
Seawater samples for phytoplankton pigment analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were collected in 10 L opaque carboys at six depths throughout the euphotic zone. The depths were identified by the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intensity using a PAR sensor and an in vivo fluorescence sensor attached to the CTD (i.e., 100%, 50%, 25%, 10%, 1%, 0.1% surface PAR). Samples (4 L) were filtered onto 25 mm diameter Fisher MF300 GF/F filters and frozen immediately at −80 °C. Upon return to land, pigments were extracted in 90% acetone in plastic vials by homogenization of the filters using glass beads in a cell mill, centrifuged (10 minutes, 4500 g, 4 °C), then the supernatant was filtered through 0.2 μm polytetrafluoroethylene filters (VMR International) and subsequently quantified by reverse-phase HPLC (Dionex UltiMate 3000 LC system, Thermo Scientific)78. Pigment standards were from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) and the International Agency for 14 C Determination (Denmark). The total chlorophyll-a (TChl-a) concentration was calculated as the sum of chlorophyll-a and divinyl chlorophyll-a concentrations. The TChl-a inventory in the euphotic zone was calculated through the trapezoidal integration method.
Helium (He) isotopes
Seawater samples for He isotopes were collected using a copper pipe connected to the Niskin bottle, with water flowing until all bubbles in the tube were purged. Subsequently, the pipe was securely sealed using an electrical drill and a ratchet to ensure a tight seal. Additionally, 0.5 L samples for tritium analyses were collected at full depth at Station 40 to account for tritium concentrations in the deep water, thus correcting the helium isotope measurements. The helium isotopes and tritium samples were analyzed at the University of Bremen following the procedures described by Sültenfuß et al.79.
The helium 3He/4He isotope ratio (R), is expressed relative to the atmospheric ratio (Ra = 1.38 × 10−6), using the delta notation:
The background 3He concentration (~2.38 fM) in the deep ocean was calculated from the background δ3He (~ −1.7 %) and equilibrium He concentrations (~1.75 nM) at the observed in situ salinity (~35 PSU) and temperature (~3.5 °C). The excess of 3He (3Hexs) was then calculated by subtracting the background 3He and 3H levels from the measured 3He concentrations.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Maps and figures were generated using Adobe Illustrator, Ocean Data View80, and Sigmaplot. All the data generated in this study are provided in the Supplementary Data file. All the data generated in this study have been deposited in the PANGAEA database (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.971875) and Figshare repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26389948).
References
Frogner, P., Reynir Gíslason, S. & Óskarsson, N. Fertilizing potential of volcanic ash in ocean surface water. Geology 29, 487 (2001).
Duggen, S., Croot, P., Schacht, U. & Hoffmann, L. Subduction zone volcanic ash can fertilize the surface ocean and stimulate phytoplankton growth: Evidence from biogeochemical experiments and satellite data. Geophys Res Lett. 34, L01612 (2007).
Olgun, N. et al. Surface ocean iron fertilization: The role of airborne volcanic ash from subduction zone and hot spot volcanoes and related iron fluxes into the Pacific Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 25, GB4001 (2011).
Du, J., Mix, A. C., Haley, B. A. & Belanger, C. L. & Sharon. Volcanic trigger of ocean deoxygenation during Cordilleran ice sheet retreat. Nature 611, 74–80 (2022).
Bay, R. C., Bramall, N. & Price, P. B. Bipolar correlation of volcanism with millennial climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6341–6345 (2004).
Cather, S. M., Dunbar, N. W., McDowell, F. W., McIntosh, W. C. & Scholle, P. A. Climate forcing by iron fertilization from repeated ignimbrite eruptions: The icehouse–silicic large igneous province (SLIP) hypothesis. Geosphere 5, 315–324 (2009).
Watson, A. J. Volcanic iron, CO2, ocean productivity and climate. Nature 385, 587–588 (1997).
Mahowald, N. M. et al. Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB4025 (2005).
Dunlea, A. G. et al. Dust, volcanic ash, and the evolution of the South Pacific Gyre through the Cenozoic. Paleoceanography 30, 1078–1099 (2015).
Ellwood, M. J. et al. Insights into the biogeochemical cycling of iron, nitrate, and phosphate across a 5,300 km South Pacific Zonal Section (153°E–150°W). Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 32, 187–207 (2018).
Poli, P. & Shapiro, N. M. Rapid characterization of large volcanic eruptions: measuring the impulse of the hunga tonga ha’apai explosion from teleseismic waves. Geophys Res Lett. 49, e2022GL098123 (2022).
Proud, S. R., Prata, A. T. & Schmauß, S. The January 2022 eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcano reached the mesosphere. Science (1979) 378, 554–557 (2022).
Zhao, W., Sun, C. & Guo, Z. Reawaking of Tonga volcano. Innovation 3, 100218 (2022).
Yuen, D. A. et al. Under the surface: Pressure-induced planetary-scale waves, volcanic lightning, and gaseous clouds caused by the submarine eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcano. Earthq. Res. Adv. 2, 100134 (2022).
Yoon, J.-E., King, D., Longman, J. & Cronin, S. J. Differential response of chlorophyll-a concentrations to explosive volcanism in the western South Pacific. Front Mar. Sci. 10, 1072610 (2023).
Barone, B., Letelier, R. M., Rubin, K. H. & Karl, D. M. Satellite detection of a massive phytoplankton bloom following the 2022 submarine eruption of the hunga tonga‐hunga haʻapai volcano. Geophys Res Lett. 49, e2022GL099293 (2022).
Lettino, A. et al. Eyjafjallajökull volcanic ash in southern Italy. Atmos. Environ. 48, 97–103 (2012).
Woodhouse, M. J., Hogg, A. J., Phillips, J. C. & Sparks, R. S. J. Interaction between volcanic plumes and wind during the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption, Iceland. J. Geophys Res Solid Earth 118, 92–109 (2013).
Huang, T. C., Watkins, N. D., Shaw, D. M. & Kennett, J. P. Atmospherically transported volcanic dust in South Pacific deep sea sedimentary cores at distances over 3000 km from the eruptive source. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 20, 119–124 (1973).
Whiteside, A. et al. Impact of ashes from the 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption on satellite ocean color signatures. Front Mar Sci 9, 1028022 (2023).
Achterberg, E. P. et al. Natural iron fertilization by the Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption. Geophys Res Lett. 40, 921–926 (2013).
Jutzeler, M. et al. On the fate of pumice rafts formed during the 2012 Havre submarine eruption. Nat. Commun. 5, 3660 (2014).
Bryan, S. E. et al. Rapid, long-distance dispersal by pumice rafting. PLoS One 7, e40583 (2012).
Pavia, F. J., Anderson, R. F., Winckler, G. & Fleisher, M. Q. Atmospheric dust inputs, iron cycling, and biogeochemical connections in the south pacific ocean from thorium isotopes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 34, e2020GB006562 (2020).
Sholkovitz, E. R., Elderfield, H., Szymczak, R. & Casey, K. Island weathering: river sources of rare earth elements to the Western Pacific Ocean. Mar. Chem. 68, 39–57 (1999).
Tachikawa, K. et al. The large-scale evolution of neodymium isotopic composition in the global modern and Holocene ocean revealed from seawater and archive data. Chem. Geol. 457, 131–148 (2017).
Lacan, F. & Jeandel, C. Tracing Papua New Guinea imprint on the central Equatorial Pacific Ocean using neodymium isotopic compositions and rare earth element patterns. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 186, 497–512 (2001).
Grenier, M. et al. From the subtropics to the central equatorial Pacific Ocean: Neodymium isotopic composition and rare earth element concentration variations. J. Geophys Res Oceans 118, 592–618 (2013).
Van De Flierdt, T. et al. Neodymium in the oceans: A global database, a regional comparison and implications for palaeoceanographic research. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150293 (2016).
Taylor, S. R. & McLennan, S. M. The Continental Crust, Its Composition and Evolution: An Examination of the Geochemical Record Preserved in Sedimentary Rocks. (Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1985).
Elderfield, H. & Greaves, M. J. The rare earth elements in seawater. Nature 296, 214–219 (1982).
Talley, L. D., Pickard, G. L., Emery, W. J. & Swift, J. H. Pacific Ocean. in Descriptive Physical Oceanography 303–362 (Elsevier, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-4552-2.10010-1.
Jeandel, C., Delattre, H., Grenier, M., Pradoux, C. & Lacan, F. Rare earth element concentrations and Nd isotopes in the Southeast Pacific Ocean. Geochem., Geophysics, Geosystems 14, 328–341 (2013).
Silva, N., Rojas, N. & Fedele, A. Water masses in the Humboldt Current System: Properties, distribution, and the nitrate deficit as a chemical water mass tracer for Equatorial Subsurface Water off Chile. Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Stud. Oceanogr. 56, 1004–1020 (2009).
Basak, C., Pahnke, K., Frank, M., Lamy, F. & Gersonde, R. Neodymium isotopic characterization of Ross Sea Bottom Water and its advection through the southern South Pacific. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 419, 211–221 (2015).
Amakawa, H. et al. Neodymium isotopic composition and concentration in the Southwest Pacific Ocean. Geochem J. 47, 409–422 (2013).
Behrens, M. K., Pahnke, K., Schnetger, B. & Brumsack, H. J. Sources and processes affecting the distribution of dissolved Nd isotopes and concentrations in the West Pacific. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta 222, 508–534 (2018).
Molina-Kescher, M. et al. The influence of basaltic islands on the oceanic REE Distribution: a case study from the tropical South Pacific. Front Mar. Sci. 5, 50 (2018).
Amakawa, H., Alibo, D. S. & Nozaki, Y. Nd isotopic composition and REE pattern in the surface waters of the eastern Indian Ocean and its adjacent seas. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta 64, 1715–1727 (2000).
Sun, S.-S. & McDonough, W. F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol. Soc., Lond., Spec. Publ. 42, 313–345 (1989).
Gill, J. et al. Basalt geochemistry and mantle flow during early backarc basin evolution: havre trough and kermadec Arc, Southwest Pacific. Geochem., Geophysics, Geosystems 22, e2020GC009339 (2021).
Ewart, A., Collerson, K. D., Regelous, M., Wendt, J. I. & Niu, Y. Geochemical evolution within the tonga-kermadec-lau arc-back-arc systems: the role of varying mantle wedge composition in space and time. J. Petrol. 39, 331–368 (1998).
De Deckker, P. An evaluation of Australia as a major source of dust. Earth Sci. Rev. 194, 536–567 (2019).
Wengler, M. et al. A geochemical approach to reconstruct modern dust fluxes and sources to the South Pacific. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta 264, 205–223 (2019).
Bonnet, S. et al. Natural iron fertilization by shallow hydrothermal sources fuels diazotroph blooms in the ocean. Science (1979) 380, 812–817 (2023).
Stichel, T. et al. TAG Plume: Revisiting the Hydrothermal Neodymium Contribution to Seawater. Front Mar. Sci. 5, 96 (2018).
German, C. R., Klinkhammer, G. P., Edmond, J. M., Mura, A. & Elderfield, H. Hydrothermal scavenging of rare-earth elements in the ocean. Nature 345, 516–518 (1990).
de Ronde, C. E. J. et al. Intra-oceanic subduction-related hydrothermal venting, Kermadec volcanic arc, New Zealand. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 193, 359–369 (2001).
Olivarez, A. M. & Owen, R. M. The europium anomaly of seawater: implications for fluvial versus hydrothermal REE inputs to the oceans. Chem. Geol. 92, 317–328 (1991).
Chen, T.-Y., Rempfer, J., Frank, M., Stumpf, R. & Molina-Kescher, M. Upper ocean vertical supply: A neglected primary factor controlling the distribution of neodymium concentrations of open ocean surface waters? J. Geophys Res Oceans 118, 3887–3894 (2013).
Siddall, M. et al. Towards explaining the Nd paradox using reversible scavenging in an ocean general circulation model. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 274, 448–461 (2008).
Rickli, J. et al. Hafnium and neodymium isotopes in surface waters of the eastern Atlantic Ocean: Implications for sources and inputs of trace metals to the ocean. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta 74, 540–557 (2010).
Benaltabet, T., Lapid, G. & Torfstein, A. Response of dissolved trace metals to dust storms, sediment resuspension, and flash floods in oligotrophic oceans. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 37, e2023GB007858 (2023).
Croot, P. L., Streu, P. & Baker, A. R. Short residence time for iron in surface seawater impacted by atmospheric dry deposition from Saharan dust events. Geophys Res Lett. 31, L23S08 (2004).
Sarthou, G. et al. Atmospheric iron deposition and sea-surface dissolved iron concentrations in the eastern Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanographic Res. Pap. 50, 1339–1352 (2003).
Wuttig, K. et al. Impacts of dust deposition on dissolved trace metal concentrations (Mn, Al and Fe) during a mesocosm experiment. Biogeosciences 10, 2583–2600 (2013).
Guieu, C. et al. Iron from a submarine source impacts the productive layer of the Western Tropical South Pacific (WTSP). Sci. Rep. 8, 9075 (2018).
Messié, M. et al. The delayed island mass effect: how islands can remotely trigger blooms in the oligotrophic ocean. Geophys Res Lett. 47, e2019GL085282 (2020).
Jickells, T. D. The inputs of dust derived elements to the Sargasso Sea; a synthesis. Mar. Chem. 68, 5–14 (1999).
Han, Q., Moore, J. K., Zender, C., Measures, C. & Hydes, D. Constraining oceanic dust deposition using surface ocean dissolved Al. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB2003 (2008).
Landing, W. M. & Bruland, K. W. The contrasting biogeochemistry of iron and manganese in the Pacific Ocean. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta 51, 29–43 (1987).
Browning, T. J. & Moore, C. M. Global analysis of ocean phytoplankton nutrient limitation reveals high prevalence of co-limitation. Nat. Commun. 14, 5014 (2023).
Rempfer, J., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F., Dutay, J.-C. & Siddall, M. Modelling Nd-isotopes with a coarse resolution ocean circulation model: Sensitivities to model parameters and source/sink distributions. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta 75, 5927–5950 (2011).
Tachikawa, K., Athias, V. & Jeandel, C. Neodymium budget in the modern ocean and paleo‐oceanographic implications. J. Geophys Res Oceans 108, 3254 (2003).
Hoffmann, L. J. et al. Influence of trace metal release from volcanic ash on growth of Thalassiosira pseudonana and Emiliania huxleyi. Mar. Chem. 132–133, 28–33 (2012).
Langmann, B., Zakšek, K., Hort, M. & Duggen, S. Volcanic ash as fertiliser for the surface ocean. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 3891–3899 (2010).
Stein, A. F. et al. NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 2059–2077 (2015).
Cutter, G. A. et al. Sampling and Sample-Handling Protocols for GEOTRACES Cruises. (GEOTRACES International Project Office, Toulouse, France, 2010). https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-2.
Rahlf, P. et al. Tracing water mass mixing and continental inputs in the southeastern Atlantic Ocean with dissolved neodymium isotopes. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 530, 115944 (2020).
Vance, D. & Thirlwall, M. An assessment of mass discrimination in MC-ICPMS using Nd isotopes. Chem. Geol. 185, 227–240 (2002).
Tanaka, T. et al. JNdi-1: a neodymium isotopic reference in consistency with LaJolla neodymium. Chem. Geol. 168, 279–281 (2000).
Jacobsen, S. B. & Wasserburg, G. J. Sm-Nd isotopic evolution of chondrites. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 50, 139–155 (1980).
Bayon, G. et al. Determination of rare earth elements, Sc, Y, Zr, Ba, Hf and Th in geological samples by ICP‐MS after Tm addition and alkaline fusion. Geostand. Geoanal Res. 33, 51–62 (2009).
Xu, A., Hathorne, E., Laukert, G. & Frank, M. Overlooked riverine contributions of dissolved neodymium and hafnium to the Amazon estuary and oceans. Nat. Commun. 14, 4156 (2023).
van de Flierdt, T. et al. GEOTRACES intercalibration of neodymium isotopes and rare earth element concentrations in seawater and suspended particles. Part 1: Reproducibility of results for the international intercomparison. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 10, 234–251 (2012).
Rapp, I., Schlosser, C., Rusiecka, D., Gledhill, M. & Achterberg, E. P. Automated preconcentration of Fe, Zn, Cu, Ni, Cd, Pb, Co, and Mn in seawater with analysis using high-resolution sector field inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 976, 1–13 (2017).
Ren, J. L., Zhang, J., Luo, J. Q., Pei, X. K. & Jiang, Z. X. Improved fluorimetric determination of dissolved aluminium by micelle-enhanced lumogallion complex in natural waters. Analyst 126, 698–702 (2001).
Van Heukelem, L. & Thomas, C. S. Computer-assisted high-performance liquid chromatography method development with applications to the isolation and analysis of phytoplankton pigments. J. Chromatogr. A 910, 31–49 (2001).
Sültenfuß, J., Roether, W. & Rhein, M. The Bremen mass spectrometric facility for the measurement of helium isotopes, neon, and tritium in water. Isotopes Environ. Health Stud. 45, 83–95 (2009).
Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View. https://odv.awi.de (2023).
Marx, S. K. & Kamber, B. S. Trace-element systematics of sediments in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: Sediment provenance and palaeoclimate implications of fine scale chemical heterogeneity. Appl. Geochem. 25, 1221–1237 (2010).
McGowan, H. A., Kamber, B., McTainsh, G. H. & Marx, S. K. High resolution provenancing of long travelled dust deposited on the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Geomorphology 69, 208–221 (2005).
CORDIER, C. et al. Petrogenesis of Coarse-grained Intrusives from Tahiti Nui and Raiatea (Society Islands, French Polynesia). J. Petrol. 46, 2281–2312 (2005).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge funding for RV SONNE ship-time (SO289) by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Förderkennzeichen 03G0289NA). We thank the captain and crew of RV Sonne for their help and support during cruise SO289. We are highly grateful to Xue-gang Chen for helping to process the Helium isotope data. We also thank Tabea von Keitz, Nikoleta Vitsou, Nijat Adigozalli and Sieglinde Kolbrink for laboratory support. Zuozhu Wen and Julianne Tammen are thanked for assistance at sea. We gratefully acknowledge the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the provision of the HYSPLIT transport and dispersion model and/or READY website (https://www.ready.noaa.gov) used in this publication. We also acknowledge the NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group (OBPG) and the Ocean Biology Distributed Active Archive Center (OB.DAAC) for providing the data and support used to create the map of satellite-derived chlorophyll-a anomalies in this work (https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/l3/order/). Z.Z. and K.G. acknowledge funding support from the BMBF (Förderkennzeichen 03G0289NA).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.Z. and M.F. designed and coordinated the research; M.F. and E.A. acquired and managed the funding; Z.Z. carried out the sampling and analytical work with the help from A.X., E.H., M.G. and Z.S.; K.G. provided dFe and dMn data; T.L. provided dAl data; T.B., Z.Y., and H.L. provided TChl-a data; R.K. contributed to the interpretation of data; Z.Z. wrote the manuscript, and all co-authors reviewed and contributed to the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Matthieu Bressac, Frankie Pavia, and David Santana for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Xu, A., Hathorne, E. et al. Substantial trace metal input from the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai eruption into the South Pacific. Nat Commun 15, 8986 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52904-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52904-3