Abstract
Quasi-phase matching (QPM) is a technique extensively utilized in nonlinear optics for enhancing the efficiency and stability of frequency conversion processes. However, the conventional QPM relies on periodically poled ferroelectric crystals, which are limited in availability. The 3R phase of molybdenum disulfide (3R-MoS2), a transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDc) with the broken inversion symmetry, stands out as a promising candidate for QPM, enabling efficient nonlinear process. Here, we experimentally demonstrate the QPM at nanoscale, utilizing van der Waals stacking of 3R-MoS2 layers with specific orientation to realize second harmonic generation (SHG) enhancement beyond the non QPM limit. We have also demonstrated enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) via QPM of 3R-MoS2 homo-structure, enabling more efficient generation of entangled photon pairs. The tunable capacity of 3R-MoS2 van der Waals stacking provides a platform for tuning phase-matching condition. This technique opens interesting possibilities for potential applications in nonlinear process and quantum technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The approach of QPM was first proposed in the 1970s as a theoretical concept and bloomed in the 1980s with the advent of periodic poling of nonlinear crystals. The conventional method applies a periodically varying electric field into ferroelectric crystals1, such as lithium niobate (LiNbO3), lithium tantalate (LiTaO3), and potassium titanyl phosphate (KTiOPO4), which have been fabricated with a periodic grating structure2,3,4. This is accomplished through the use of microstructural electrodes that apply a strong electric field to the crystal for a specified duration, resulting in a permanent reversal of crystal orientation and the opposite nonlinear coefficient’s polarity solely beneath the electrode fingers5. The periodic reversal occurs at coherence length within the crystal, where the phase mismatch between the interacting fields would lead to periodic constructive and destructive interference. Upon reversal of the domain, the effects of the phase mismatch are rewound and a positively constructive nonlinear interaction is restored6,7. There are a few long-standing challenges for traditional QPM techniques. Firstly, traditional QPM relies on ferroelectric nonlinear crystal materials, which introduces limitations in terms of operating conditions due to limited choice of ferroelectric crystals and their strong optical dispersion and birefringence1. Secondly, ferroelectric crystals are typically sensitive to environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, or mechanical stress, which gradually degrade the domain structure and eventually reduce the efficiency of the nonlinear crystal over time8. Thirdly, the bulkiness of ferroelectric crystals and challenges in integration with photonic chips, along with the complex fabrication process requiring the precise poling and grating formation, raise cost and complexity of the batch fabrication.
Ongoing efforts aim to address these challenges through new materials and fabrication techniques for integrated QPM devices. Two dimensional (2D) layered materials stand out as a promising candidate for QPM due to their thinness and ease of integration. These ultra-thin crystals exhibit a favorite SHG to weight ratio9,10,11 and giant optical nonlinearity12,13,14,15 which can be orders of magnitude stronger than that of equivalent bulk materials16,17, and offer a range of advantages over traditional ferroelectric materials. Two of the most common crystal structures observed in transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDc) are the 2H and 3 R phase18,19,20. The nonlinearity of these 2H TMDc stacks is nullified for even number layers, while odd-numbered layers retain some nonlinearity, which is generally weaker than that of a single monolayer. A different stacking structure is found in the 3 R polytype, which exhibits a periodic translational symmetry that repeats every three layers while maintaining a consistent orientation across those layers (Fig. 1a). This polytype has been successfully used to enhance the total nonlinear gain of the TMDc nano-crystals by preserving the broken inversion symmetry and, therefore, constructively building up the atomic nonlinear dipole with increasing layer thickness18,19,20. Thus, unlike the 2H phase where the SHG signal does not scale with the number of layers, for the 3 R phase, the intensity of SHG signal shows a quadratic relation, as would be expected for a phase-matched interaction21. Although quadratic at the outset, the enhancement slowly reverses trend as the number of layers grows and the phase mismatch increases, until a coherence length is reached where the SHG signal reaches a plateau due to reaching the non QPM limit22.
a Schematic of second harmonic generation (SHG) through a 3R-MoS2 flake, with a thickness of t. A fundamental pump with a wavelength at \(\lambda\) is incident onto the flake, generating a second-harmonic (SH) signal with a wavelength at \(\lambda /2\). b Schematic of van der Waals stacking of two 3R-MoS2 flakes, with a twist angle \(\theta\). The top flake, bottom flake, and the stack area are labeled as B, A and AB, respectively. Each flake has a coherence length of \({t}_{c}\). c Simulated SHG as a function of thickness t, for two scenarios: (1) non QPM (black line) and (2) QPM (pink line). For non QPM scenario, the SHG adds constructively (destructively) at a thickness of odd (even) times of the coherence length \({t}_{c}\). For the QPM scenario, multiple layers of 3R-MoS2 (each layer with the same thickness of \({t}_{c}\)) are stacked together. The orientation angles of the odd and even number of layers are set to be 0° and 60°, respectively.
In this paper, we demonstrate nanoscale QPM on 2D TMDc crystals by superimposing 3R polytype samples into particular QPM stacking order reminiscent of periodic poling. Twisting the relative orientation of the stacks, we demonstrate a significant enhancement in conversion efficiency beyond regular stacks of similar combined thickness. Our subsequent endeavors of its reverse process SPDC by employing QPM approach demonstrated the efficient generation of entangled photon pairs in TMDs. This technique of using van der Waals stacking of 3R-MoS2 enables fine-tuning of the phase-matching condition and provides a larger interaction length to realize efficient and tunable nonlinear optical processes, with potential applications in areas such as frequency conversion23, optical switching, and quantum communications24,25,26. This research direction offers an alternative to QPM with periodically poled crystals and opens up promising applications based on the second harmonic (SH) generation and entangled photon pairs generation in 2D materials. It also identifies the need to find suitable 2D materials for nonlinear optics with stability, controllable layer numbers, and strong second order nonlinear coefficients for future high-performance optoelectronic and integrated devices.
Results
Modeling of QPM by van der Waals stacking
Figure 1 shows the theoretical model of a unique QPM enabled by van der Waals stacking, using 3R-MoS2 as an example. The SHG signal of 3R-MoS2 increases with the increase of its thickness until the coherence length (\({t}_{c}\)) is reached, where the phase mismatch is caused by the difference in refractive index for the seed and the second harmonic fields (Fig. 1a). In the limit of negligible absorption of the fundamental, from the model used in the referenced study the SHG signal with phase mismatch model can be expressed as22,27:
where\(\,\omega\) is the frequency of fundamental pump, \({\chi }^{(2)}\) is the second order susceptibility term, \({d}_{{{{\rm{eff}}}}}=2{\chi }^{(2)}\), t is the sample thickness, \({n}_{\omega }\) and \({n}_{2\omega }\) are the refractive indices of 3R-MoS2 at the fundamental wavelength (FW) field and its SH, respectively. The difference in refractive index induces a wavevector mismatch of \({{\Delta }}{{{\bf{k}}}}=\,{{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{{{{\bf{2}}}}{{{\boldsymbol{\omega }}}}}-{{{\bf{2}}}}{{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{{{{\boldsymbol{\omega }}}}}\), where \({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{{{{\bf{2}}}}{{{\boldsymbol{\omega }}}}}\) and \({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{{{{\boldsymbol{\omega }}}}}\) are the wavevectors of SH wave and FW, respectively. As the propagation length increases, the locally generated SH becomes progressively out of phase. The total SH intensity increases until the wave reaches a thickness equal to the coherence length (\({t}_{c}=\pi /{{{\boldsymbol{\triangle }}}}{{{\boldsymbol{k}}}}\)), where the phase mismatch equals to one pi and after which the converted field has opposite phase, therefore destructively interfering with waves from previous planes and reducing the SH intensity.
By stacking two van der Waals flakes A and B with a twist angle, the SHG signal with QPM model can be expressed as (Supplementary Note 1):
where \({t}_{1}\) and \({t}_{2}\) are the thicknesses of A and B, respectively, and \(\theta\) is the twist angle between A and B (Fig. 1b).
In accordance with theory of QPM, enhancement is maximized when using a stack AB of two identical 3R-MoS2 layers with thickness \({t}_{c}\). When the phases of the fundamental and SH waves are perfectly matched at coherence length \({t}_{c}\)28,29, a constructive interference of the SH field is restored and the SH field continues to grow throughout the second 3R-MoS2 layer. Considering the hexagonal structure and three-fold symmetry of 3R-MoS2, the interference of SH waves generated from an AB stack shows a three-fold rotational symmetry as a function of \(\theta\). When \(\theta\) is equal to 60° (or, equivalently, 180° or 240°) the stack exhibits fourfold enhancement of SHG intensity when \(\theta\) is equal to 60° (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Our proposed approach involves stacking multiple layers of 3R-MoS2 with thickness of \({t}_{c}\), with each layer oriented at an angle of 60° to the previous layer (Fig. 1c), creating a periodic modulation of the nonlinear susceptibility along the growth direction, facilitating QPM of the interacting waves.
QPM using two layers of 3 R-MoS2 with tunable twist angle \(\theta\)
In experiments, mechanically exfoliated 3R-MoS2 samples (see Methods) were used to demonstrate the QPM by van der Waals stacking. Supplementary Fig. 1b shows the measured SHG intensity from a specific 3R-MoS2 flake (thickness 396 nm) as a function of the pumping power. The extracted power law index of the linear fitting function is 1.92, consistent with the expected quadratic power dependence of the SHG emission22. The transmitted SHG through a 3R-MoS2 flake is highly dependent on sample thickness and both interference and phase-matching effects must be taken into account22. Owning to the finite reflectivity at the boundary interfaces, the transmissivity of the FW light is modulated by a Fabry-Pérot-like interference and varies periodically with the thickness of the 3R-MoS2 (Supplementary Fig. 1c black curve), leading to a pattern of peaks at regular intervals (Supplementary Note 2). These periodical peaks are modulated by the QPM envelope (Supplementary Fig. 1c red curve). In order to realize the QPM by van der Waals stacking with maximized SHG intensity, the pump wavelength was set to 1550 nm (0.80 eV) yielding SHG centered at 775 nm (1.60 eV), which can enable a constructive interference for samples with thickness of \({t}_{c}\), or multiples of \({t}_{c}\) after stacking. At the same time, the energies of SHG and pumping photons are below the optical gap of MoS2, avoiding absorption losses. In addition, 1550 nm is a significantly used wavelength in communication applications and hence is of interest. The measured SHG intensity was strongly dependent on the sample thickness (Supplementary Fig. 1d), which was well fitted by simulation model considering the contributions from both inference and phase-matching effects (Supplementary Note 3). The coherence length \({t}_{c}\) for 3R-MoS2 for 1550 nm to 775 nm (and vice versa) conversion was extracted to be 572 ± 5 nm, where the SHG conversion efficiency η is extracted to be \(4.64\times {10}^{-6}\) (under power density \(30\) GW/cm²) (Supplementary Note 4). The estimation based on that predicts that near-unity SHG efficiency can be achieved with ~494 3R-MoS₂ flakes (280 µm thickness), offering a potentially more compact alternative to PPLN crystals requiring device lengths of 2–3 cm (Supplementary Note 5)30. Our experiments identified a damage threshold power density of 34.82 GW/cm² at 1550 nm, corresponding to damaging threshold power of 35 mW (Supplementary Note 6). This value is comparable to the previously reported damage threshold (around 30 GW/cm²) for multi-layer TMD samples22. The poling condition of 3R-MoS₂ van der Waals stacks is determined by the desired phase-matching wavelength, with coherence length tc calculated based on corresponding refractive indices (Supplementary Fig. 4c, Supplementary Note 7). Our analysis shows a phase-matching bandwidth of approximately 640 nm at the pump wavelength 1550 nm (Supplementary Note 8). Employing a longer pump wavelength could potentially broaden this bandwidth by shifting the SHG signal away from the exciton resonance of 3R-MoS2 (around 680 nm).
Then we tested the QPM as a function of twist angle \(\theta\), by using two 3R-MoS2 samples, A and B, of thickness ~\({t}_{c}\) placed onto sapphire substrates. The position of the bottom sample A (facing up – where the sample flake sitting on top of the sapphire substrate and the beam transmits through the flake then the sapphire substrate) was fixed, and the top sample B (facing down- the beam transmits through the sapphire substrate then the flake) was positioned and rotated using a nano precision stage, by keeping a constant air gap of ~10 μm between A and B during the rotation (Fig. 2a). At each twist angle (10° intervals), the transmitted SHG intensities were measured from three areas, AB, A and B (Fig. 2b). Since A is stationary, its SHG is not expected to vary as a function of twist angle and its SHG pattern hence appears as a circle. The SHG signal of B alone exhibits a sinusoidal pattern with six-petal polar plot with lobes corresponding to the increased SHG efficiency when the armchair axes of the crystals align with the FW field polarization, and SHG suppression when the zigzag directions align with polarization instead31. The SHG from stacked area AB showed clear three-fold symmetry (Fig. 2b), indicating the occurrence of QPM with peaks when the crystal lattices of the two samples are aligned (\(\theta\) = 60°) and troughs occur when they are anti-aligned (0°), consistent with theoretical predication (Supplementary Fig. 1a). We also used the transfer matrix method to fit the measured SH intensity from area AB (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Note 9) and the air gap was extracted to be 9.72 µm, consistent with our experimental setting. Simulations of the airgap length (Supplementary Fig. 4a) confirm minimal influence of cavity effect, further supporting the observed enhancement (Supplementary Note 10).
a Part i: Schematic of the measurement setup. The sample is pumped by a femtosecond laser at wavelength of 1550 nm, which goes through a long-pass filter, a \(\lambda /2\) waveplate and a near infrared (NIR) objective lens. The SHG signal is collected by an identical NIR objective lens, passing through a linear polarizer before being sent to a spectrometer. Part ii: Zoom in schematic of the two 3R-MoS2 flakes in experiments. By rotating the \(\lambda /2\) waveplate, the polarization of incident laser was initially set to be along the armchair direction of the A flake, whose position was fixed. The top flake B was rotated on top of bottom flake A, by keeping a consistent physical gap of approximately 9.72 µm between flakes A and B. b Polar plot for the measured SHG from three sample areas, bottom flake A (blue dots), top flake B (purple dots) and overlapping area AB (orange dots), as a function of the twist angle \(\theta\). The thickness values of flakes A and B are 576 and 553 nm, respectively, close to the coherence length \({t}_{c}\). The corresponding solid lines are the simulation curves. The simulation is based on the model in Supplementary Note 9, and air gap is estimated as ~9.72 µm.
Experimental demonstration of QPM via 3R-MoS2 stacking
To further confirm QPM enabled by van der Waals stacking, two 3R-MoS2 flakes A and B (with the thickness close to \({t}_{c}\)) were physically stacked together without airgap, with a twist angle \(\theta\) of 60° (Fig. 3a). The thickness of A, B and AB were measured to be 576, 564 and 1140 nm, respectively (Fig. 3a inset). Angle resolved SHG was also performed to precisely determine the crystal orientation and the twist angle between the two flakes32. The measured polar plots in Fig. 3b confirm that the lattice of the A and B are aligned at a twist angle of 60°, at which a maximum SHG was observed from the AB homo-structure. The maximum SHG signal from AB was measured to be 3.8 times higher than that from the two individual flakes A and B, consistent with the theoretical prediction - the final SHG intensity increases quadratically with the number (N) of stacks (SHG \(\propto\) N2) (Supplementary Fig. 2e, Supplementary Note 1). For optimal QPM in two-layer 3R-MoS₂ stack, flake thicknesses should ideally be close to the coherence length, with a tolerance range (Supplementary Fig. 4b, Supplementary Note 10). Deviations from this range can significantly reduce the efficiency of SHG. More importantly, the recovery of SHG at the total combined thickness of the two 3R-MoS2 flakes is a clear indication of the QPM condition being satisfied where, without intervention, zero SHG signal would otherwise be observed. Similarly, a stack with a non-optimal twist angle of 45° was also fabricated and characterized for comparison (Supplementary Fig. 2). Angle resolved SHG experiments were also conducted to confirm the 45° stacked angle (Supplementary Fig. 2b). The measured maximum SHG intensity from 45°-twisted-AB stack was 2.7 times of SHG from an individual flake with thickness close to \({t}_{c}\) (Supplementary Fig. 2b), also consistent with theoretical prediction (Supplementary Fig. 2e). Supplementary Fig. 2e shows the comparison summary of the measured and simulated SHG intensities of the A, B and AB areas, from three 3R-MoS2 homo-structures with twisted angles of 60°, 45° and 0°. This twisted homo-structure by van der Waals stacking offers a unique approach of periodic poling, enabling the high performance of nonlinear optoelectronic devices. Our angle resolved SHG measurement (Fig. 3b) on thick 3 R MoS2 did not show the previously reported observation of two longer petals than the other four. We attributed the difference to be mainly from the sample thickness. Our flakes have the thickness close to tc (~572 nm), significantly thicker than those used in previous studies19,22. Consequently, the unequal SHG response observed in thinner flakes could be attenuated in our thicker samples. Any remaining asymmetry due to staggered stacking might contribute a small enhancement to two of the petals, which could potentially fall within the range of system error (around 5%).
a Optical microscope image of a 3R-MoS2 homo-structure, formed by stacking two 3R-MoS2 flakes, with a twist angle of 60°. The blue (purple) filled area highlights a uniform area with a measured thickness of 576 nm (564 nm) from bottom (top) flake A (B). The orange filled area highlights the homo-structure region AB with a measured thickness of 1140 nm. Inset: Measured height vs distance profile along the red dashed line. b Measured (dots) and simulated (solid line) co-polarized SHG as a function of the polarization angle of incident laser, from three areas A (blue), B (purple) and AB (orange) of the 3R-MoS2 homo-structures with twist angles of 60°. The homo-structure with 60° twist angle is shown in (a). In experiment, the polarization of the incident laser was initially set to be along the armchair direction of the flake and controlled by rotating the \(\lambda /2\) waveplate. A linear polarizer was used to select the polarization component of the SH radiation parallel to the polarization of the pump beam. c Measured (black dots) enhancement factor as a function of the stack number (N) on the stacked van der Waals homostructure and the simulated curve \(f\left(N\right)={N}^{2}\)(Navy). The error bars represent the measurement uncertainty (standard deviations) obtained from more than ten data takes.
To further realize the integrated devices, we have successfully demonstrated a three-layered stack of 3R-MoS2 (each layer with thickness close to \({t}_{c}\)) through a meticulous design with quadratic enhancement of SHG by means of constructive interference of the SH waves (Supplementary Fig. 4d inset). Layer 1 and layer 2 were stacked together to form a homo-structure with a twist angle of 60°, as shown in Fig. 3a. Layer 3 has a measured thickness of 570 nm, close to the coherence length \({t}_{c}\). Layer 3 could be rotated with a tunable angle \({\theta }_{3}\), as there is a physical gap of ~9.30 µm between layer 3 and layer 2 in experiment. The measured SHG from three-layer-stacked area showed clear three-fold symmetry (Supplementary Fig. 4d), indicating the occurrence of QPM constructive interference when the lattices of the third sample align with the bottom layer (\({\theta }_{3}\) = 0°) and destructive when they are anti-aligned (60°), which can be well fitted by our QPM modeling (Supplementary Fig. 4d, Supplementary Note 11). Comparing with the SHG from a single layer with a thickness of length \({t}_{c}\), the measured maximum SHG intensity from the three-layer-stacked area showed an enhancement factor of 7.5, which is slightly lower than the expected enhancement factor of 9 when three layers are physically stacked without any airgap as indicated by Fig. 1c. This discrepancy could be attributed to the presence of airgap and the divergence of collimation path. Nonetheless, an enhancement of 7.5 relative to a single layer is an outstanding indication of the recovery of quadratic enhancement in repeated QPM stacks and the preservation of coherent superposition of the SH waves generated in the different layers, substantially improving the overall efficiency of the SHG process. To further validate the established model and eliminate the influence of airgap, we stacked a three-stack 3R-MoS2 homostructure (Supplementary Fig. 4e). Experimental measurements revealed a roughly ninefold enhancement in the combined SH signal from the three-layer homostructure region compared to the single flake. This finding aligns well with the theoretical calculations SHG ∝ N2 (Fig. 3c). In recent research by engineers exploring robotic arm manipulation for large-scale periodic poling of TMDs offers a promising future for van der Waals stacks, enabling precise control over layer sequence, twist angle, and large-scale, automated fabrication of complex devices with tailored properties (Supplementary Note 12)33. This could lead to significant miniaturization of SHG crystals, which would be useful for microchip integration and space applications.
Enhanced SPDC via QPM of 3R-MoS2 homo-structure
Following the successful demonstration of SHG enhanced through QPM, we subsequently conducted an experiment of its reverse process, SPDC. SPDC is solely a quantum process where a single photon \({\gamma }_{p}\) with higher energy undergoes a nonlinear interaction within the crystal, yielding the entangled photon pairs, known as the signal photon \({\gamma }_{s}\) and idler photon \({\gamma }_{i}\), in accordance with the conservation of energy and momentum (Fig. 4a). Recently, SPDC was observed from low-dimensional thin materials25,26,34,35, however, their conversion efficiencies are relatively low compared with conventional periodically poled structures with QPM36,37. Therefore, van der Waals QPM could be a potential way to increase their efficiencies. The SPDC process was observed on the 3R-MoS2 homo-structure with 60° stacked angle with respect to the preceding one, as depicted in Fig. 3a, using a continuous-wave laser at 775 nm (Fig. 4b). Detailed description of the setup can be found in Methods. We tested the photon pair correlations via the Hanbury, Brown and Twiss interferometry by employing a 50/50 multi-mode fiber coupler, whose outputs were connected to a pair of single photon avalanche diodes (SPADs), and photon arrivals were recorded using a Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting (TCSPC) system. Figure 4c presents the second-order correlation function \({g}^{(2)}(\tau )\) measured from the 3R-MoS2 stacked area AB, individual 3R-MoS2 area A and B, and a sapphire substrate, where a prominent peak at zero delay time was only observed for the 3R-MoS2 samples38. The two-photon correlation peak has a peak-to-background ratio well above 2 at zero time delay (\({g}^{(2)}(0)\) ~ 4.5 from the 3R-MoS2 stacked area AB, ~ 3.2 and ~ 2.8 from individual 3R-MoS2 area A and B), providing a definitive indication of SPDC signature of correlated photon pair generation25,39,40.
a Schematic of SPDC process on 3R-MoS2 van der Waals stacking. A single photon \({\gamma }_{p}\) with higher energy (1.60 eV) undergoes a nonlinear interaction in 3R-MoS2 homo-structure with the stacked angle 60° (respect to the preceding 3R-MoS2 sample in Fig. 3a) and each layer at thickness of \({t}_{c}\), generating the entangled photon pair with lower energy (0.8 eV), known as the signal photon \({\gamma }_{s}\) and idler photon \({\gamma }_{i}\). b Schematic of custom-built setup for photon-pair correlation measurements (orange pump photons and purple SPDC signals): 775 nm continuous wave (CW) pump generated from a single-frequency fiber laser, polarized beamsplitter (PBS), half-wave plate (HWP) for pump power control, spherical lenses, bandpass filter at 1550 nm with a 12 nm full-width at half-maximum, fiber coupler, and 50:50 fiber beamsplitter, SPAD; single-photon avalanche diode, time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) system. c Normalized second-order correlation functions \({g}^{\left(2\right)}(\tau )\) from 3R-MoS2 stack (i), 3R-MoS2 area B (ii), area A (iii), and sapphire substrate (gray square dots) measured at 15 mW for 10 min with 1 ns binning time. d Comparison of power-dependent coincidence rate of the A (blue), B (purple) and AB areas (orange) of the 3R-MoS2 homo-structure (with respect to the preceding sample in Fig. 3a) measured for 10 min. The extracted slopes are 0.00771, 0.00168, 0.00188 for AB, A and B respectively. The error bars represent the standard deviations of SPAD counts per each measurement.
Pump power dependent measurements were further conducted on A, B and AB areas. The linear relation was observed revealing the underlying nature of SPDC25 and the extracted slope of AB is approximately fourfold higher than those from individual A and B (Fig. 4d). Considering the QPM scheme, there is a similar trend of photon pair generation rate of stack AB as compared to those on individual flake A and B, which mirrored the observed SHG intensity enhancement. This is consistent with the theoretical model that SPDC efficiency proportionally correlates to the SHG intensity (Supplementary Note 13). As a consequence, the photon pairs generation can be phase matched at coherence length \({t}_{c}\,\)(Supplementary Note 13) and we experimentally demonstrated that the SPDC process can be engineered through QPM. As the number of flakes increases, the linewidth of the resonance narrows, consistent with the findings of ref. 41. Our study further extends these observations, and the bandwidth of SPDC is estimated to be approximately 289 nm, 189 nm and 138 nm with the flake thickness at \({t}_{c}\), \(2{t}_{c}\) and \(3{t}_{c}\) respectively (Supplementary Note 8).
Discussion
We demonstrated a promising way to generate QPM by van der Waals stacking. Experimental results highlight the potential of fabricating an incredibly small and lightweight van der Waals nonlinear crystal with QPM and a superior SHG to weight ratio, surpassing their bulky 3D counterparts32. Through both contact and non-contact measurements at 1550 nm, along with the subsequent angle resolved orientation measurements, QPM between the two layers of 3R-MoS2 (both thickness close to coherence length \({t}_{c}\)) has been demonstrated, realizing QPM and strongly enhanced SHG greatly beyond the non QPM limit. These demonstrations exhibit strong agreement with the derived angle resolved QPM model. Additionally, the homo-structures with a tunable twist angle SHG responses correlates well with the periodically poled QPM model, making 3R-MoS2 as a remarkable candidate for 2D material SHG devices, such as a two-layer SHG crystal with tunable phase-matching condition generated by van der Waals stacking with a tuanble twist angle. We have also demonstrated enhanced SPDC via QPM of 3R-MoS2 homo-structure. This accomplishment further corroborates the successful improvement of nonlinearity via QPM techniques. The periodic modulation of the optical properties in the van der Waals stacking provides an innovative and general way to realize QPM without the requirement of any ferroelectric crystals. The adjustability of the twist angle in van der Waals stacking QPM holds significant promise in engineering SPDC-based quantum devices aimed at producing tailored quantum states like Bell and N00N states for applications in quantum optics and communication42. To give an example, crafting such a device would necessitate the precise configuration of two sets of nonlinear material, each with a specific thickness, and arranged such that their crystal axes are perpendicular to one another – orthogonal quasi-phase matching (OQPM)43. It is very challenging to use conventional periodic poling to realize OQPM, but it would be much easier for van der Waals stacking QPM to create OQPM with twist angles of (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°,0°, 30°, 60°, 90°…). It can enable efficient energy transfer and enhances nonlinear optical properties, thereby making these 2D crystals a promising platform for nonlinear optical applications such as a typical frequency doubling crystal, interferometric auto correlators, biological indicators44, the generation of squeezed states45, quantum information processing24,25 and a whole host of other applications.
Methods
Sample fabrication
Bulk 3R-MoS2 crystal was grown using chemical-vapor transport technique18. The 3R-MoS2 flakes were mechanically exfoliated onto PDMS gel film, and then dry transferred onto 400-μm-thick sapphire substrates. Sapphire substrates were preferred over traditional silicon substrates due to their transparency. Thickness was measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and phase shift interferometer (PSI) for thinner exfoliated flake (up to 10 nm), along with optical contrast. The thicker flakes (10 nm–2000 nm) were characterized using Vertical Scanning Interferometry (VSI) and the surface profiler. The thickness profile was acquired from high-precision data acquisition components to measure the thickness of the distinct regions through physical contact.
Thickness characterization
Data has been collected across almost 300 sample regions with thicknesses ranging from roughly 21 nm to 1444 nm, characterized by VSI and Surface profiler. Thin sample thicknesses were determined using AFM (Bruker) and processed via Nanoscope. The determination of thicker sample thicknesses was accomplished through employment of Surface Profiler in conjunction with VSI.
Angle resolved phase matching measurement
The custom-built angle resolved phase matching setup consists of a 100 fs tunable pulsed laser (Spectra-Physics Mai Tai) operating with an OPO to output the fundamental pump wavelength at 1550 nm, a broadband \(\lambda /2\) waveplate, a polarizer, and a rotatable 6-DOF nanopositioning stage (SmarAct SmarPod) to align the two flakes for QPM. The\(\,\lambda /2\) waveplate served to align the polarization of pump beam with the armchair axis of the bottom crystal which was held static on the translation stage. The samples were excited and measured via two identical ×50 near infrared (NIR) infinity corrected objective lenses (NA = 0.42), and the signal was collected in the transmission mode. The polarizer was put at the emission side to select the polarization component of the second harmonic (SH) radiation parallel to the polarization of the pump beam. The top crystal was mounted and positioned using the nano precision stage and the two samples were aligned to be parallel and brought within 9–11 μm of each other. The distance was determined by measuring the distance between their focus planes. The foci of the top and bottom objectives were positioned in between the two samples to obtain the highest SH intensity of the stacked region. The alignment process involved positioning the sapphire chips in parallel and focusing onto the overlapping stacked area to achieve maximum SH signal. The bottom objective lens was then aligned to optimize the SH signal. The focus was kept the same throughout the measurements. Detection of the SH signal was accomplished using a spectrometer (Andor Kymera-spectrograph and iDuS 416-CCD) with an 800 nm short pass filter to block the fundamental pump beam. The measurements were taken from three characterization areas, top sample, bottom sample and the stacked area while the top sample was rotated at 10° intervals. The signal from the bottom sample, which theoretically should remain constant was monitored to ensure consistency and to identify and rectify any misalignment. The angle resolved SHG was also conducted to confirm the lattice orientation. Both λ/2 waveplate and polarizer are mounted on electronic rotation mounts allowing synchronized positioning for copolarization.
Van der Waals stacking device fabrication
Before stacking, the top flake was on a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) soft substrate with the nano precision stage and the other bottom flake was on a sapphire rigid substrate. Prior to the transfer, the angle resolved QPM measurement was also conducted in order to the alignment of stacked orientation of the two flakes.
Spontaneous parametric down-conversion
To capture the two-photon correlation properties, a custom-built SPDC setup with two SPADs (PDM-IR, Micro Photon Devices) and one TCSPC with 1 ps resolution (HydraHarp 400, PicoQuant) was implemented. A 1550 nm continuous-wave laser (NKT Koheras ADJUSTIK) was sent to a fiber amplifier (NKT Koheras BOOSTIK). The 775 nm pump laser was generated through SHG from a periodically poled Potassium titanyl phosphate (PPKTP) crystal placed into a bow-tie cavity, and the pump field was filtered from residual fundamental using a 1000 nm short pass filter. After controlling the power of the pump beam through a polarizing beamsplitter and a 780 nm λ/2 waveplate, the pump was focused onto the sample by a B-coated Best Form spherical lens (f = 75 mm). Subsequently, a C-coated high NA aspheric lens (f = 20 mm, NA = 0.54) was used to collect the signals. The residual pump beam was initially filtered through two AR coated mirrors (99% transmission at 775 nm and 99% reflection at 1550 nm). Further filtering of the SPDC signal from the pump and photoluminescence photons was achieved using two 1550 nm bandpass filters with a full-width at half-maximum of 12 nm and two 1500 nm high pass filters. The SPDC signal was coupled into a \(1\times 2\) 50:50 multimode fiber optic coupler (Thorlabs, TM50R5F1B) using a mode-matching lens (f = 40 mm, AR at 1550 nm) and a fiber collimator (Thorlabs, F240FC-1550). The outputs of the fiber coupler were connected to two SPADs operating in free-running mode with 50 µs hold-off time. We employed a TCSPC system to record arrival of each photon onto the two SPADs and performed data post-analysis using 1 ns bin time window to reveal photon pair correlations.
Due to the nature of the single photon avalanche diodes (SPADs), a hold-off time must be configured in free-running mode to suppress after pulsing, which results in a lowered the duty cycle of the SPADs. To rule out the loss of efficiency caused by the hold-off time, we used the following formulas for coincidence count rate (\({C}_{{correct}}\) [s−1]) and SPAD count rate (\({{N}_{i}}_{{correct}}\) [s−1]) to correct for the detectors’ deadtime46:
where \({C}_{{raw}}\) is the measured coincidence count rate reading. \({N}_{i}\) and \({\tau }_{i}\) are the measurements of SPAD count rate and hold-off time respectively. In our experiment, the hold-off time was set to be 50 µs.
Data availability
Relevant data supporting the key findings of this study are available within the article and the Supplementary Information file. All raw data generated during the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
References
Missey, M. J., Dominic, V., Powers, P. E. & Schepler, K. L. Periodically poled lithium niobate monolithic nanosecond optical parametric oscillators and generators. Opt. Lett. 24, 1227–1229 (1999).
Sundheimer, M., Bosshard, C., Van Stryland, E., Stegeman, G. & Bierlein, J. Large nonlinear phase modulation in quasi-phase-matched KTP waveguides as a result of cascaded second-order processes. Opt. Lett. 18, 1397–1399 (1993).
Yu, N. E., Ro, J. H., Cha, M., Kurimura, S. & Taira, T. Broadband quasi-phase-matched second-harmonic generation in MgO-doped periodically poled LiNbO3 at the communications band. Opt. Lett. 27, 1046–1048 (2002).
Shao, M., Liang, F., Yu, H. & Zhang, H. Pushing periodic-disorder-induced phase matching into the deep-ultraviolet spectral region: theory and demonstration. Light.: Sci. Appl. 9, 45 (2020).
Dani, S. S., Tripathy, A., Alluri, N. R., Balasubramaniam, S. & Ramadoss, A. A critical review: impact of electrical poling on longitudinal piezoelectric strain coefficient. Mater. Adv. 3, 8886–8921 (2022).
Armstrong, J., Bloembergen, N., Ducuing, J. & Pershan, P. S. Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric. Phys. Rev. 127, 1918 (1962).
Franken, P. & Ward, J. Optical harmonics and nonlinear phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 23 (1963).
Rathod, V. T. A review of acoustic impedance matching techniques for piezoelectric sensors and transducers. Sensors 20, 4051 (2020).
Cui, C., Xue, F., Hu, W. & Li, L. Two-dimensional materials with piezoelectric and ferroelectric functionalities. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2, 18 (2018).
Cao, X. X. et al. Volume‐confined fabrication of large‐scale single‐crystalline molecular ferroelectric thin films and their applications in 2D materials. Adv. Sci. 11, 2305016 (2024).
Sovizi, S. et al. Plasma processing and treatment of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides: tuning properties and defect engineering. Chem. Rev. 123, 13869–13951 (2023).
Malard, L. M., Alencar, T. V., Barboza, A. P. M., Mak, K. F. & De Paula, A. M. Observation of intense second harmonic generation from MoS2 atomic crystals. Phys. Rev. B 87, 201401 (2013).
Janisch, C. et al. Extraordinary second harmonic generation in tungsten disulfide monolayers. Sci. Rep. 4, 5530 (2014).
Trolle, M. L., Tsao, Y.-C., Pedersen, K. & Pedersen, T. G. Observation of excitonic resonances in the second harmonic spectrum of MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 92, 161409 (2015).
Wang, G. et al. Giant enhancement of the optical second-harmonic emission of WSe2 monolayers by laser excitation at exciton resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 097403 (2015).
Autere, A. et al. Optical harmonic generation in monolayer group-VI transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 98, 115426 (2018).
Wagoner, G., Persans, P., Van Wagenen, E. & Korenowski, G. Second-harmonic generation in molybdenum disulfide. JOSA B 15, 1017–1021 (1998).
Zhao, M. et al. Atomically phase-matched second-harmonic generation in a 2D crystal. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16131–e16131 (2016).
Shi, J. et al. 3R MoS2 with broken inversion symmetry: a promising ultrathin nonlinear optical device. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701486 (2017).
Trovatello, C. et al. Optical parametric amplification by monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Photonics 15, 6–10 (2021).
Zeng, Z. et al. Controlled vapor growth and nonlinear optical applications of large‐area 3R phase WS2 and WSe2 atomic layers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1806874 (2019).
Xu, X. et al. Towards compact phase-matched and waveguided nonlinear optics in atomically layered semiconductors. Nat. Photonics 16, 698–706 (2022).
Bednyakov, P., Shnaidshtein, I. & Strukov, B. Investigation of ferroelectric materials by the thermal noise method: Advantages and limitations. Ferroelectrics 500, 203–217 (2016).
Couteau, C. Spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Contemp. Phys. 59, 291–304 (2018).
Guo, Q. et al. Ultrathin quantum light source with van der Waals NbOCl2 crystal. Nature 613, 53–59 (2023).
Weissflog, M. A. et al. A tunable transition metal dichalcogenide entangled photon-pair source. Nat. Commun. 15, 7600 (2024).
Garmire, E. Overview of nonlinear optics. Nonlinear Opt. Vol 1, 3–52 (2012).
Blinov, L. M. et al. Photoreactive Organic Thin Films (Elsevier, 2002).
Buller, G. & Collins, R. Single-photon generation and detection. Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, 012002 (2009).
Wang, C. et al. Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides. Optica. 5, 1438–1441 (2018).
Lan, Y. et al. Basic concepts and recent advances of crystallographic orientation determination of graphene by Raman spectroscopy. Crystals 8, 375 (2018).
Maragkakis, G. M. et al. Imaging the crystal orientation of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides using polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2, 190026–190028 (2019).
Mannix, A. J. et al. Robotic four-dimensional pixel assembly of van der Waals solids. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 361–366 (2022).
Sultanov, V., Santiago-Cruz, T. & Chekhova, M. V. Flat-optics generation of broadband photon pairs with tunable polarization entanglement. Opt. Lett. 47, 3872–3875 (2022).
Santiago-Cruz, T., Sultanov, V., Zhang, H., Krivitsky, L. A. & Chekhova, M. V. Entangled photons from subwavelength nonlinear films. Opt. Lett. 46, 653–656 (2021).
Dmitriev, V. G., Gurzadyan, G. G. & Nikogosyan, D. N. Handbook of nonlinear optical crystals. Vol. 64 (Springer, 2013).
Hong, H. et al. Twist phase matching in two-dimensional materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 233801 (2023).
Zhang, J. et al. Spatially entangled photon pairs from lithium niobate nonlocal metasurfaces. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq4240 (2022).
Hojo, M., Tani, S., Kobayashi, Y. & Tanaka, K. Coincidence measurements of two quantum-correlated photon pairs widely separated in the frequency domain. Sci. Rep. 13, 8520 (2023).
Okoth, C., Cavanna, A., Santiago-Cruz, T. & Chekhova, M. Microscale generation of entangled photons without momentum conservation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 263602 (2019).
Trovatello, C. et al. Quasi phase matching from periodically poled 3R-stacked transition metal dichalcogenides. In: Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO: Science and Innovations), STh3P-6 (Optica Publishing Group, 2024).
Kim, H., Lee, S. M. & Moon, H. S. Generalized quantum interference of correlated photon pairs. Sci. Rep. 5, 9931 (2015).
Hegazy, S. F., Obayya, S. S. & Saleh, B. E. Orthogonal quasi-phase-matched superlattice for generation of hyperentangled photons. Sci. Rep. 7, 4169 (2017).
Mizuguchi, T. & Nuriya, M. Applications of second harmonic generation (SHG)/sum-frequency generation (SFG) imaging for biophysical characterization of the plasma membrane. Biophys. Rev. 12, 1321–1329 (2020).
Lugiato, L. A., Strini, G. & De Martini, F. Squeezed states in second-harmonic generation. Opt. Lett. 8, 256–258 (1983).
Jin, R.-B. et al. Efficient detection of an ultra-bright single-photon source using superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Opt. Commun. 336, 47–54 (2015).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge funding support from ANU PhD student scholarship (Y.T., H.Q., Z.L., and M.H.), Australian Research Council grant no. DP240101011 (Y.L.), DP220102219 (Y.L.), DP180103238 (Y.L.), LE200100032 (Y.L.) and ARC Centre of Excellence in Quantum Computation and Communication Technology project number CE170100012 (Y.L. and J.J.). The authors further acknowledge the funding support from JSPS grant no. 19H05602 (Y.I.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.L., P.L., and G.G. conceived and supervised the project; Y.T. and Z.L. prepared 3R-MoS2 samples and homo-structure device; Y.T. and K.S. carried out the optical measurements; Y.T., K.S., and Y.L. analyzed the data; H.Q., K.S., G.G., Y.Z., and J.J. built up the SHG optical setup; H.Q. and J.J. built up the SPDC set up and took the SPDC measurements; M.H. took the AFM imaging; Y.I. provided 3R-MoS2 crystal; Y.T., K.S., H.Q. and Y.L. drafted the manuscript and all authors contributed to the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Christiano de Matos and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, Y., Sripathy, K., Qin, H. et al. Quasi-phase-matching enabled by van der Waals stacking. Nat Commun 15, 9979 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53472-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53472-2
This article is cited by
-
A tunable entangled photon-pair source based on a Van der Waals insulator
Nature Communications (2025)
-
Ultrafast all-optical switching in nonlinear 3R-MoS2 van der Waals metasurfaces
npj Nanophotonics (2025)