Abstract
Spin-orbit torque (SOT) provides a promising mechanism for electrically encoding information in magnetic states. Unlike existing schemes, where the SOT is passively determined by the material and device structures, an active manipulation of the intrinsic SOT polarity would allow for flexibly programmable SOT devices. Achieving this requires electrical control of the current-induced spin polarization of the spin source. Here we demonstrate a proof-of-concept current-programmed SOT device. Using a noncollinear-antiferromagnetic/nonmagnetic/ferromagnetic Mn3Sn/Mo/CoFeB heterostructure at zero magnetic field, we show current-induced switching in the CoFeB layer due to the spin current polarized by the magnetic structure of the Mn3Sn; by properly tuning the driving current, the spin current from the CoFeB further reverses the magnetic orientation of the Mn3Sn, which determines the polarity of the subsequent switching of the CoFeB. This scheme of mutual switching can be achieved in a spin-valve-like simple protocol because each magnetic layer serves as a reversible spin source and target magnetic electrode. It yields intriguing proof-of-concept functionalities for unconventional logic and neuromorphic computing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The electrical control of magnetic states is the foundation of magnetic memory, logic, and computing. The spin-orbit torque (SOT), arising from the spin current produced by an electric current via spin-orbit interactions, offers an efficient approach for controlling the magnetic states1,2,3,4,5. In the conventional scenario that has been used in integrated-circuit demonstrations of non-volatile memory6, the scheme of SOT switching is fixed by the material and device structures5. Moving forward, an effective manipulation over the polarity of SOT switching (clockwise or counter-clockwise under a fixed direction of electric current) can stimulate rich opportunities for information processing beyond the binary data storage. In the existing studies, such a task requires external control panels, such as preset7,8,9 or persistent magnetic fields10,11 and strains from piezoelectric substrates12,13,14,15. These non-electric-current components bring additional complexity to the implementation of SOT devices. Given that the basic elements of SOT are just a magnetic heterostructure and an electric current5, it should in principle be possible to reverse the intrinsic SOT polarity by only programming the electric current in a simple protocol without the assistance of magnetic fields. This goal is of fundamental and practical significance because it represents a thorough exploitation of the interactions between the internal magnetic and electronic structures, which will enable new schemes of SOT switching and flexibly programmable devices that advance the current logic and computing technologies.
To achieve electric current control of the intrinsic SOT polarity, a spin source owning tunable signs of the charge-spin conversion is necessary. A potential solution arises from the magnetic spin Hall effect16 (MSHE) and the resultant magnetic spin Hall torque17,18,19 (MSHT) in noncollinear antiferromagnets (NCAFMs) with chiral-spin structures20,21,22. D019-Mn3Sn (Fig. 1a) is a representative NCAFM exhibiting the MSHE, that is, the current-induced non-equilibrium spins are reversible upon flipping the chiral-spin structure of Mn3Sn (ref. 16). The MSHE makes the field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization possible due to the out-of-plane polarization of the non-equilibrium spins16,17,18,19,23,24. Nevertheless, there remains a major obstacle towards the electric-current control of the MSHE, because the mechanism to achieve field-free switching of the magnetic spin source is still missing.
a Atomic and chiral-spin structures in a kagome plane of the NCAFM D019-Mn3Sn. The blurred color denotes the atoms and magnetic moments in the neighboring kagome plane. b Schematic of the electrical mutual switching in Mn3Sn/Mo/CoFeB. Red, blue, and gray arrows denote the magnetic orientations of Mn3Sn, CoFeB, and non-equilibrium spins with z-component, respectively. NM: nonmagnetic material. c Out-of-plane X-ray diffraction result in a Ru(2 nm)/Mn3Sn(30 nm)/MgO(1.3 nm)/Ru(1 nm) stack. A large thickness of Mn3Sn is used here in order to obtain clear signal. d Optical image of a Hall bar device, which is connected to a current source and a voltmeter for transport measurements. e \({R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}-{H}_{z}\) loops of Mn3Sn/Mo/CoFeB/MgO (black) and Mn3Sn/Mo/MgO (red). The inset shows the zoomed-in region around the switching of CoFeB. f Magnetization M as a function of the in-plane magnetic field \({\mu }_{0}{H}_{x}\) in the same stack of (c).
In this work, we demonstrate electrical mutual switching between the NCAFM Mn3Sn and a ferromagnet (FM) CoFeB, that is, each magnetic layer works as both a reversible spin source and a target magnetic electrode. To be specific, CoFeB with a perpendicular magnetic easy axis undergoes field-free switching induced by the MSHT from Mn3Sn, while Mn3Sn with in-plane magnetic anisotropy can be switched by the spin current from CoFeB, also without external magnetic fields (Fig. 1b). The switching conditions of CoFeB and Mn3Sn are separated in different regimes of electric current. In contrast to previous studies that rely on external tuning knobs beyond a magnetic heterostructure and a current7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15, our mutual switching exclusively implements the interplay between the spin current and the magnetic structures of the FM and the NCAFM, thus leading to a switching protocol as succinct as a spin valve25. We further demonstrate a function of electrical turning on/off for the switching process and polarity-programmable memristive behaviors that arise from the multistep switching of Mn3Sn. These functionalities open up new opportunities that cannot be achieved by conventional SOT switching7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,18,23,26,27 for logic and neuromorphic computing.
Results and discussion
Basic structural, transport, and magnetic properties
Figure 1b illustrates a noncollinear-antiferromagnetic/nonmagnetic/ferromagnetic Mn3Sn/Mo/CoFeB heterostructure and the mechanism of the electrical mutual switching between Mn3Sn and CoFeB. We prepare Ru(2 nm)/Mn3Sn(17 nm)/Mo(tMo)/CoFeB(1 nm)/MgO(1.3 nm)/TaOx(1 nm) stacks on MgO(111) substrates (see Methods), where CoFeB has a perpendicular magnetic easy axis28 and Mn3Sn shows a magnetic easy plane lying in the film plane29. A Mo layer with a thickness of tMo is inserted between Mn3Sn and CoFeB for magnetic separation. The (0001) orientation of Mn3Sn is chosen to produce z-component spins16,17 for the field-free switching of CoFeB. We measure the X-ray diffraction to characterize the crystal structure of Mn3Sn. Only the (0002) and (0004) peaks of Mn3Sn are observed in the 2θ-θ scan (Fig. 1c), indicating that the (0001) kagome plane is formed in the film plane. Moreover, the 60°-periodic Mn3Sn\((20\bar{2}1)\) peaks in the φ scan (Supplementary Fig. 1) confirm the fully epitaxial growth with the relationship of MgO\(\left(111\right)\left[1\bar{1}0\right]\parallel\)Mn3Sn\((0001)[11\bar{2}0]\). We note that Mn3Sn has a chiral-spin structure with a weak net magnetization due to the distorted magnetic moments of the Mn atoms from a perfect triangle. The magnetic orientation of the chiral-spin structure can be represented by the magnetization vector (similarly, the octupole moment) and is controllable by magnetic fields20.
The films are patterned to Hall bar devices (Fig. 1d) with which the magnetic states of CoFeB can be detected via the anomalous Hall effect (AHE)30. Meanwhile, because the AHE in Mn3Sn appears in the transverse direction to the Berry curvature that arises in the kagome plane, the AHE voltage is not observable for the (0001)-oriented Mn3Sn thin films20. Figure 1e shows the Hall resistance RH under an out-of-plane magnetic field Hz. A sharp hysteresis loop with ~100% remanence is observed in Mn3Sn/Mo/CoFeB/MgO, whereas a control sample of Mn3Sn/Mo/MgO shows a linear background from the ordinary Hall effect. This comparison confirms that the jump of RH corresponds to the switching of the perpendicularly magnetized CoFeB without any exchange coupling with Mn3Sn layer (also see Supplementary Fig. 2 for the \(M-{H}_{x}\) loop of Mn3Sn/Mo/CoFeB/MgO). The reversal field of CoFeB is less than 10 mT.
The magnetic property of Mn3Sn is characterized by the in-plane magnetic hysteresis loop in Fig. 1f. The remanence at zero field is ~20% of the saturation magnetization, which is consistent with previous studies on (0001)-oriented Mn3Sn thin films18,31,32 and suggests the multi-domain structure of our Mn3Sn layer at zero magnetic field.
Polarity-reversible field-free switching of CoFeB by the MSHT from Mn3Sn
The prerequisite of electrical mutual switching is to verify a reversible switching polarity of CoFeB by the MSHT from Mn3Sn. In this section, we use a magnetic field to control the magnetic orientation (represented by the net magnetization vector) of the spin source Mn3Sn. The measurement sequence is shown in Fig. 2a. We first initialize Mn3Sn with \({\mu }_{0}{H}_{{{\rm{AFM}}}}^{{{\rm{init}}}}=\pm 1\;{{\rm{T}}}\) and then withdraw the field. Due to the multiple equivalent easy axes within the (0001) kagome plane33, Mn3Sn acquires a multi-domain state that maintains an overall preference of the magnetic orientation along the initialization field34. Next, CoFeB is aligned by \({\mu }_{0}{H}_{{{\rm{FM}}}}^{{{\rm{init}}}}=0,\pm 40\;{{\rm{mT}}}\), followed by withdrawing the field. Subsequently, 100-ms pulse current is applied along the x direction with an in-plane magnetic field \({\mu }_{0}{H}_{x}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}=-10 \sim+10\;{{\rm{mT}}}\) to perform the current-induced switching.
a Sequence of the switching measurements. \({H}_{{{\rm{AFM}}}}^{{{\rm{init}}}}\), \({H}_{{{\rm{FM}}}}^{{{\rm{init}}}}\), and \({H}_{x}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}\) are the AFM initialization field, FM initialization field, and the field applied during the measurement, respectively. 100-ms pulse current is applied to induce the switching. Field-free switching of CoFeB. The magnetic spin source Mn3Sn is initialized by a magnetic field of 1 T along (b) +x, (c) –x, (d) +y, and (e) –y directions, respectively. Open (closed) symbols indicate the data plots during the forward (backward) scan. The error bars indicate the standard deviation errors in three continuous rounds of measurements.
Here we focus on the results at \({\mu }_{0}{H}_{x}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}=0\). Figure 2b, c show the \({R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}-I\) loops of CoFeB switching (critical current density of \(\sim 9\;{{\rm{MA}}}{{{\rm{cm}}}}^{-2}\)) after Mn3Sn is initialized in the opposite directions ±x. The field-free switching cannot be achieved by the weak spin Hall effect of Mo (Supplementary Fig. 3, also see refs. 35,36), but is consistent with the anti-damping MSHT switching via the z-component spins of Mn3Sn. Remarkably, the switching polarity is reversed by flipping the magnetic orientation of Mn3Sn (also see Supplementary Fig. 4a), in sharp contrast to the existing studies in which the field-free switching polarity is immune to the magnetic influence on the NCAFM18,37. We thus verify that the MSHE (that is, the ±z spin polarization is determined by the magnetic orientation of Mn3Sn along ±x) plays a critical role in the observed current-induced switching19. This is further supported by the absence of field-free switching when Mn3Sn is initialized along ±y (Fig. 2d, e), in agreement with a spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance study in Mn3Sn(0001)/NiFe bilayers17 and theoretical calculations16,18. These results verify that Mn3Sn can serve as a reversible magnetic spin source to induce polarity-controllable field-free switching of CoFeB via the MSHT.
As an additional note, while Mn3Sn obtains a net magnetic orientation from \({\mu }_{0}{H}_{{{\rm{AFM}}}}^{{{\rm{init}}}}\), it has a multi-domain structure after withdrawing the field. Taking the configuration of Fig. 2b as an example, under a positive current, the Mn3Sn domains with +x components provide the spins whose polarization is suitable to switch CoFeB from down to up, while other domains with –x components provide opposite spins that do not support such switching. As a whole, we obtain a partially compensated MSHT and a reduced switching ratio of CoFeB containing unswitched domains (also see Supplementary Information). We also note that the intralayer spin-transfer torque in CoFeB, with the possibility of inducing domain wall motion, cannot explain our experimental results in Fig. 2b–e, which, otherwise, should not depend on the initialization along ±x and ±y. To be seen in the next section, similar arguments apply to exclude the spin-transfer torque within Mn3Sn according to Fig. 3b, c. Moreover, the larger bias current in Fig. 3a should not be attributed to the critical current for the spin-transfer torque-induced domain wall motion, because a smaller current in the opposite direction also triggers the switching of CoFeB.
a–c \({R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}-I\) measurements performed in various conditions. Shared conditions of neighboring figures are shown in a legend between the figures. Current range dependence of RH, where the absolute value of the maximum current at positive side, I+ is smaller (larger) than that of the minimum current at negative side, I- in (a, b). CoFeB initialization dependence of RH, where CoFeB is initialized along –z (+z) in (b, c). d In-plane magnetic field \({\mu }_{0}{H}_{x}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}\) dependence of \({I}_{-}\)-biased (left) and \({I}_{+}\)-biased (right) loops. \({\mu }_{0}{H}_{x}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}\) varies from −10 to +10 mT with a step of 2 mT. The switching magnitude \(\Delta {R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}\) is qualitatively described by a scaling arrow with a colored gradient. e Switching ratio of the loops shown in (d) and the difference δ between \({I}_{-}\)-biased and \({I}_{+}\)-biased loops. f tMo dependence of δ at zero magnetic field. The error bars in (e, f) indicate the standard deviation errors in five continuous rounds of measurements. g Key factors of the Mn3Sn switching, where \({H}_{y}^{{{\rm{Oe}}}}\) is an Oersted field along y direction. h Schematic for the switching process of Mn3Sn. Red arrows indicate the net magnetization representing the overall magnetic order of Mn3Sn. Orange arrows denote the effective rotation direction of the net magnetization of Mn3Sn under spin injection. Green arrows denote the rotation of the net magnetization of Mn3Sn driven by the Oersted field.
Electrical control of the MSHT polarity from the magnetic spin source Mn3Sn
The subsequent step towards the electrical mutual switching is to use electric current, instead of magnetic field, to set the magnetic orientation of Mn3Sn. We find that it can be achieved in the same device using the polarized spin current flowing from CoFeB to Mn3Sn, where the critical treatment is just to apply a larger current as a bias at the beginning. Figure 3a, b show the \({R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}-I\) loops, where the electric current is applied in the range of −12 mA ≤I≤ +8 mA and −8 mA ≤I≤ +12 mA, respectively, in the absence of magnetic field. We call the former (latter) an I−(I+)-biased loop. Notably, opposite polarities of the MSHT-induced CoFeB switching are obtained only by changing the bias current direction. Given that the switching polarity is determined by the magnetic orientation of the spin source Mn3Sn (verified by the measurements with a symmetric current range of −8 mA ≤I≤ +8 mA in Fig. 2b, c), the observed phenomena indicate that Mn3Sn is switched in the large current regime of |I| >8 mA (also see Supplementary Fig. 4b).
To elucidate the field-free switching of Mn3Sn, we first figure out the role of the CoFeB layer. Figure 3b, c show the polarity dependence of the CoFeB switching on the CoFeB initialization along –z and +z, respectively (indicated by the sign of RH). We can see that the opposite switching polarities are correlated to the different initialization directions of CoFeB (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Given that the switching polarity is determined by the magnetic orientation of Mn3Sn, this result indicates that CoFeB, while playing a traditional role as the target magnetic electrode being switched, also works as a magnetic spin source to switch Mn3Sn. As a consequence, the intrinsic SOT polarity of the CoFeB switching from Mn3Sn becomes programmable by current. Thermal effects such as demagnetization and magnetoelastic effect cannot explain the dependence of CoFeB on the bias current or CoFeB initialization (see Supplementary Information).
We then investigate the influence of in-plane magnetic fields on the Mn3Sn switching. Figure 3d shows the \({H}_{x}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}\) dependence of \({R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}-I\) loops in I−-biased (left) and I+-biased (right) regimes. Figure 3e summarizes the switching ratio defined as \(\Delta {R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}\left({I}_{+(-)}^{{{\rm{bias}}}}\right)/{R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}^{0}\), where \(\Delta {R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}\left({I}_{+(-)}^{{{\rm{bias}}}}\right)\) and \({R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}^{0}\) are the magnitudes of CoFeB switching in the \({I}_{+}\)(\({I}_{-}\))-biased loop (dashed arrows in Fig. 3a, b) and the \({R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}-{H}_{z}\) loop (Fig. 1e), respectively. The switching ratio varies from −1% to +4% for \({I}_{+}\)-biased loop and −4% to +1% for \({I}_{-}\)-biased loop with a constant difference δ of ~3%. δ by definition represents the portion of Mn3Sn domains that are oriented by the bias current rather than \({H}_{x}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}\). The monotonic variation of the switching ratio can be attributed to the Mn3Sn domains that are gradually oriented as the external magnetic field \({H}_{x}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}\) increases, which is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 5. On the other hand, the switching ratio is suppressed by the constant magnetic field along y (\({H}_{y}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}\)), as the y-oriented Mn3Sn domains do not facilitate the MSHT switching17. Figure 3f shows tMo dependence of δ at zero magnetic field, which increases with tMo in the region of \(0.6\;{{\rm{nm}}}\le {t}_{{{\rm{Mo}}}}\le 1.4\;{{\rm{nm}}}\) and decreases back at \({t}_{{{\rm{Mo}}}}=2\;{{\rm{nm}}}\). This result implies that Mn3Sn can be manipulated only when tMo is larger than a threshold (0.6 nm), and the effect decreases after a certain value of tMo.
Here we propose a possible mechanism of Mn3Sn switching to consistently explain the observations above. Previous studies showed that both spin injection and external magnetic field are indispensable for the current-induced switching in Mn3Sn/heavy metal bilayers38,39,40,41,42,43,44. In our case, the switching of Mn3Sn can be attributed to the combined effect of the sign-fixed z-oriented spins polarized by the perpendicularly magnetized CoFeB and the sign-flippable y-oriented Oersted field from the electric current (Fig. 3g, h, also see Supplementary Information). The z-oriented spins in Fig. 3g are polarized by the perpendicular magnetization of CoFeB, similar to the spin transfer in current-in-plane spin valves25. These spins do not flip sign when the current is reversed. As a result, the switching mechanism in Fig. 3h (demonstrated in ref. 44) can work in our system if Mn3Sn contains certain domains with an easy axis along x (refs. 41,44), which is possible under current-induced effects45. Moreover, the magnitudes of the Oersted field and the injected z-oriented spins scale in the opposite way as tMo increases (Supplementary Fig. 6), which can explain the observed non-monotonic tMo dependence of δ in Fig. 3f. We notice the different switching behaviors in the \({t}_{{{\rm{Mo}}}}=0.6\;{{\rm{nm}}}\) sample compared to those of \({t}_{{{\rm{Mo}}}}\ge 1.2\;{{\rm{nm}}}\) samples in terms of no field-free switching and the opposite switching polarities, which can be interpreted by the randomly oriented Mn3Sn domains due to the chiral-spin rotation39 that appears in the samples with a very thin Mo layer (also see Supplementary Figs. 6b and 7). We have also examined other scenarios by considering the stray field from CoFeB and the non-equilibrium spins from various mechanisms in CoFeB (ref. 25) and Mo (refs. 35,36) bulks as well as at the Mo/CoFeB interface25,46. However, as detailed in Supplementary Table 1, all the other scenarios cannot describe the observed Mn3Sn switching.
Full sequence of the electrical mutual switching
After studying the field-free switching of CoFeB and of Mn3Sn separately, we provide in Fig. 4a a full sequence of the electrical mutual switching in a wider current range of \(-12\;{{\rm{mA}}}\le I\le+12\;{{\rm{mA}}}\). The unchanged sign of RH during the current scan indicates the existence of unswitched CoFeB domains, which is essential for the repeatable mutual switching (otherwise, demagnetization of both magnetic layers will occur in the large current regime). Figure 4b sketches a self-consistent qualitative model of the critical steps in Fig. 4a. Steps (A) to (E) ((F) to (J)) show the forward (backward) process with the electric current increasing (decreasing) from −12 mA to +12 mA (+12 mA to −12 mA) (A) Magnetic states are set by \(I=-12\;{{\rm{mA}}}\), where CoFeB is dominated by –z-oriented domains and the net magnetic orientation of Mn3Sn is switched to –x. (B) Certain CoFeB domains, marked by the red dashed rectangles in Fig. 4b, start to be switched by the MSHT from Mn3Sn. (C) Beyond the critical current \({I}_{{{\rm{C}}}}^{{{\rm{CoFeB}}}}\), CoFeB has already been switched and the reversible Mn3Sn domain in the green dashed rectangle starts to undergo the mechanism in Fig. 3g due to CoFeB dominantly oriented along –z. (D, E) Beyond another larger critical current \({I}_{{{\rm{C}}}}^{{{\rm{Mn}}}3{{\rm{Sn}}}}\), Mn3Sn is switched, so that the net MSHT from Mn3Sn reverses its polarity and further switches CoFeB. The backward steps of (F) to (J) can be understood in a similar way. Since the magnetic domains are randomly dispersed in Mn3Sn and CoFeB, the ensemble effect throughout the film is a reduced magnitude of CoFeB switching (see Supplementary Information). We note that this multi-domain model, supported by magnetic measurements (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 8), provides a reasonable explanation of our experimental results. Further increasing the switching ratio can be potentially achieved by enhancing the x-axis uniaxial anisotropy of Mn3Sn or reducing the switching barrier of CoFeB.
a Full \({R}_{{{\rm{H}}}}-I\) loop measured in the range of \(-12\;{{\rm{mA}}}\le I\le+12\;{{\rm{mA}}}\) without external magnetic fields. \({I}_{{{\rm{C}}}}^{{{\rm{CoFeB}}}({{\rm{Mn}}}3{{\rm{Sn}}})}\) denotes the critical current for switching CoFeB (Mn3Sn). Mn3Sn and CoFeB are initialized along +x and –z directions by magnetic fields, respectively. b Schematics for the electrical mutual switching between CoFeB and Mn3Sn. Panels (A–J) correspond to the states labeled in (a). Red (blue) and green (purple) dashed rectangles indicate the switched (unswitched) CoFeB domains and the switched (unswitched) Mn3Sn domains, respectively. The blue-boxed unswitched CoFeB domains exist on top of the multi-domain structure of Mn3Sn. Dashed arrows indicate the spin flow pointing from its origin to the target. Yellow curved arrows illustrate the torque acting on the target magnetic moments.
Proof-of-concept device functionalities
The electrical mutual switching triggers intriguing functionalities in logic and computing. First, it enables selective turning on and off for the switching process by current. The Mn3Sn domains contributing to the CoFeB switching can be controlled by the electric current and the magnetic field independently as represented in Fig. 3e. Therefore, by tuning the in-plane magnetic field \({\mu }_{0}{H}_{x}^{{{\rm{meas}}}}\) (e.g., ±6 mT in Fig. 3d) to enlarge or reduce the Mn3Sn domains in a typical orientation, the switching process can be precisely turned on and off. Such a controllable switching process (output) by reversing the sign of the input current can be used to design SOT-based logic devices (Fig. 5a (i)).
Another unique application of our electrical mutual switching lies in the neuromorphic computing built on memristive behaviors, where the amount of past electric charge is memorized in its magnetic states5,7. Such behaviors are manifested by the multistep magnetic switching in our device. As plotted in Fig. 5b, the switching magnitude is determined in an analogue way by the magnitude of the applied current. This multistep switching is caused by the nucleation and expansion of Mn3Sn domains dispersed in the film (a common phenomenon in the switching of antiferromagnets34,47,48), which determines the switching of CoFeB via the MSHT (Supplementary Fig. 9). Strikingly, our mutual switching allows one to electrically reverse the polarity of the memristive transition (output) by the bias current direction (input) (Fig. 3a, b, also illustrated in Fig. 5a (ii)). It provides an extra tuning knob for the build blocks of neuromorphic computing, in contrast to the existing schemes whose polarity cannot be electrically programmed7,49.
In summary, we show a proof-of-concept current-induced mutual switching between a NCAFM and a FM, using a spin-valve-like simple protocol consisting of Mn3Sn/Mo/CoFeB. The spin current to switch one magnetic layer arises from the interactions between the intrinsic magnetic structure and the electric current in the other magnetic layer, which is the key to the mutual switching. Particularly, it allows us to control the polarity of the CoFeB switching by electrically flipping the magnetic orientation of Mn3Sn. This distinct switching scheme gives rise to electrically programmable logic and computing functions, paving a way towards innovative spintronic devices.
Methods
Sample preparation
Stacks of Ru(2 nm)/Mn3Sn(30 nm)/MgO(1.3 nm)/Ru(1 nm) were deposited by DC/RF magnetron sputtering on MgO(111) single crystal substrates. Ru and Mn3Sn were deposited at 450 °C and MgO was deposited at room temperature. The deposition was implemented under the base pressure of less than 1 × 10−6 Pa. Subsequently, samples were annealed at 500 °C for 1 h in vacuum. After annealing, capping layers of MgO/Ru and a part of Mn3Sn layer were etched by bias-sputtering, with 17 nm thick Mn3Sn left, followed by depositing Mo(tMo)/CoFeB(1 nm)/MgO(1.3 nm)/TaOx(1 nm) at room temperature. The Mo thickness tMo varied as 0.6, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and 2.0 nm. To obtain a perpendicular magnetic easy axis of CoFeB, the stacks were annealed at 300 °C for 1 h in vacuum. The stacks were fabricated into Hall bars by photolithography with channel width and length being 3 and 20 μm, respectively. Finally, contact pads consisting of Cr(5 nm)/Au(100 nm) were fabricated by standard photolithography and lift-off procedures.
X-ray diffraction
A Cu-Kα1 X-ray with a wavelength of 1.54056 Å was used in our X-ray diffraction measurements on a Bruker X-ray diffractometer.
Transport measurements
Transport measurements were performed on Hall bar devices via the four-probe method shown in Fig. 1d. All the transport measurements except the tMo dependence used a stack consisting of MgO(111) substrate/Ru(2 nm)/Mn3Sn(17 nm)/Mo(1.4 nm)/CoFeB(1 nm)/MgO(1.3 nm)/TaOx(1 nm). In the switching measurements, current pulses with a duration of 100 ms were applied to induce the switching, followed by a constant current of 0.5 mA to measure the Hall voltage.
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are included within the main text or Supplementary Information and are also available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature 476, 189–193 (2011).
Liu, L. et al. Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555–558 (2012).
Fukami, S., Anekawa, T., Zhang, C. & Ohno, H. A spin–orbit torque switching scheme with collinear magnetic easy axis and current configuration. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 621–625 (2016).
Manchon, A. et al. Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019).
Shao, Q. et al. Roadmap of spin–orbit torques. IEEE Trans. Magn. 57, 1–39 (2021).
Natsui, M. et al. Dual-port SOT-MRAM achieving 90-MHz read and 60-MHz write operations under field-assistance-free condition. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 56, 1116–1128 (2021).
Fukami, S., Zhang, C., DuttaGupta, S., Kurenkov, A. & Ohno, H. Magnetization switching by spin–orbit torque in an antiferromagnet–ferromagnet bilayer system. Nat. Mater. 15, 535–541 (2016).
Lau, Y.-C., Betto, D., Rode, K., Coey, J. M. D. & Stamenov, P. Spin–orbit torque switching without an external field using interlayer exchange coupling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 758–762 (2016).
Baek, S. C. et al. Spin currents and spin–orbit torques in ferromagnetic trilayers. Nat. Mater. 17, 509–513 (2018).
Lin, P.-H. et al. Manipulating exchange bias by spin–orbit torque. Nat. Mater. 18, 335–341 (2019).
Peng, S. et al. Exchange bias switching in an antiferromagnet/ferromagnet bilayer driven by spin–orbit torque. Nat. Electron. 3, 757–764 (2020).
Cai, K. et al. Electric field control of deterministic current-induced magnetization switching in a hybrid ferromagnetic/ferroelectric structure. Nat. Mater. 16, 712–716 (2017).
Chen, X. et al. Electric field control of Néel spin–orbit torque in an antiferromagnet. Nat. Mater. 18, 931–935 (2019).
Yan, H. et al. A piezoelectric, strain-controlled antiferromagnetic memory insensitive to magnetic fields. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 131–136 (2019).
Filianina, M. et al. Electric-field control of spin–orbit torques in perpendicularly magnetized W/CoFeB/MgO films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 217701 (2020).
Kimata, M. et al. Magnetic and magnetic inverse spin Hall effects in a non-collinear antiferromagnet. Nature 565, 627–630 (2019).
Kondou, K. et al. Giant field-like torque by the out-of-plane magnetic spin Hall effect in a topological antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 12, 6491 (2021).
Hu, S. et al. Efficient perpendicular magnetization switching by a magnetic spin Hall effect in a noncollinear antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 13, 4447 (2022).
Cao, C. et al. Anomalous spin current anisotropy in a noncollinear antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 14, 5873 (2023).
Nakatsuji, S., Kiyohara, N. & Higo, T. Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature. Nature 527, 212–215 (2015).
Qin, P. et al. Room-temperature magnetoresistance in an all-antiferromagnetic tunnel junction. Nature 613, 485–489 (2023).
Chen, X. et al. Octupole-driven magnetoresistance in an antiferromagnetic tunnel junction. Nature 613, 490–495 (2023).
Chen, X. et al. Observation of the antiferromagnetic spin Hall effect. Nat. Mater. 20, 800–804 (2021).
Nan, T. et al. Controlling spin current polarization through non-collinear antiferromagnetism. Nat. Commun. 11, 4671 (2020).
Fert, A. Nobel Lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1517–1530 (2008).
Yu, G. et al. Switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin–orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 548–554 (2014).
You, L. et al. Switching of perpendicularly polarized nanomagnets with spin orbit torque without an external magnetic field by engineering a tilted anisotropy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10310–10315 (2015).
Ikeda, S. et al. A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB–MgO magnetic tunnel junction. Nat. Mater. 9, 721–724 (2010).
Yoon, J. et al. Crystal orientation and anomalous Hall effect of sputter-deposited non-collinear antiferromagnetic Mn3Sn thin films. Appl. Phys. Express 13, 013001 (2019).
Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H. & Ong, N. P. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539–1592 (2010).
Hazra, B. K. et al. Generation of out-of-plane polarized spin current by spin swapping. Nat. Commun. 14, 4549 (2023).
Markou, A. et al. Noncollinear antiferromagnetic Mn3Sn films. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 051001 (2018).
Duan, T. F. et al. Magnetic anisotropy of single-crystalline Mn3Sn in triangular and helix-phase states. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 082403 (2015).
Uchimura, T. et al. Observation of domain structure in non-collinear antiferromagnetic Mn3Sn thin films by magneto-optical Kerr effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 172405 (2022).
Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H. & Jungwirth, T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213–1260 (2015).
Mosendz, O. et al. Quantifying spin Hall angles from spin pumping: experiments and theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 046601 (2010).
Han, R. K. et al. Field-free magnetization switching in CoPt induced by noncollinear antiferromagnetic Mn3Ga. Phys. Rev. B 107, 134422 (2023).
Tsai, H. et al. Electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state. Nature 580, 608–613 (2020).
Takeuchi, Y. et al. Chiral-spin rotation of non-collinear antiferromagnet by spin–orbit torque. Nat. Mater. 20, 1364–1370 (2021).
Yan, G. Q. et al. Quantum sensing and imaging of spin–orbit-torque-driven spin dynamics in the non-collinear antiferromagnet Mn3Sn. Adv. Mater. 34, 2200327 (2022).
Higo, T. et al. Perpendicular full switching of chiral antiferromagnetic order by current. Nature 607, 474–479 (2022).
Krishnaswamy, G. K. et al. Time-dependent multistate switching of topological antiferromagnetic order in Mn3Sn. Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024064 (2022).
Pal, B. et al. Setting of the magnetic structure of chiral kagome antiferromagnets by a seeded spin-orbit torque. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo5930 (2022).
Yoon, J.-Y. et al. Handedness anomaly in a non-collinear antiferromagnet under spin–orbit torque. Nat. Mater. 22, 1106–1113 (2023).
Zhang, P., Finley, J., Safi, T. & Liu, L. Quantitative study on current-induced effect in an antiferromagnet insulator/Pt bilayer film. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 247206 (2019).
Amin, V. P., Zemen, J. & Stiles, M. D. Interface-generated spin currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136805 (2018).
Li, S. et al. Nanoscale magnetic domains in polycrystalline Mn3Sn films imaged by a scanning single-spin magnetometer. Nano Lett. 23, 5326–5333 (2023).
Baldrati, L. et al. Mechanism of Néel order switching in antiferromagnetic thin films revealed by magnetotransport and direct imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 177201 (2019).
Krishnaswamy, G. et al. Multidomain memristive switching of Pt38Mn62/[Co/Ni]n multilayers. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 044036 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We thank Y. Sato, N. Caçoilo, K. Gas, and M. Sawicki for their technical support and fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the JSPS Kakenhi (Nos. 19H05622, 21J23061, 22KF0035, 22K14558, 24K16999, 24K22949, 24H00039, and 24H02235), MEXT Initiative to Establish Next-generation Novel Integrated Circuits Centers (X-NICS) (Grant No. JPJ011438), Iketani Science and Technology Foundation (No. 0331108-A), Casio Science and Technology Foundation (Nos. 39-11 and 40-4), and Research Institute of Electrical Communication Cooperative Research Projects. J.-Y.Y. and T.U. acknowledge financial support from GP-Spin at Tohoku University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.-Y.Y., R.T., J.H., and S.F. planned the study. J.-Y.Y., Y.T., and R.T. designed the stacks. J.-Y.Y., R.T., and T.U. prepared the stacks. J.-Y.Y. characterized the basic properties of the stacks. J.-Y.Y. and R.T. fabricated the stack into the devices. J.-Y.Y. performed transport measurements and analysed the data with input from Y.T., R.T., Y.Y., J.I., and S.F. All authors discussed the results. J.-Y.Y., J.H., and S.F. wrote the manuscript with input from the other authors. H.O. and S.F. supervised the research.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yoon, JY., Takeuchi, Y., Takechi, R. et al. Electrical mutual switching in a noncollinear-antiferromagnetic–ferromagnetic heterostructure. Nat Commun 16, 1171 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56157-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56157-6