Abstract
An ultrahigh-intensity femtosecond laser can establish a longitudinal electric field stronger than 1013 Vm−1 within a plasma, accelerating particles potentially to GeV over a sub-millimetre distance. Laser-accelerated protons with high brightness and picosecond duration are highly desired for applications including proton imaging and flash radiotherapy, while a major limitation is the relatively low proton energy achieved yet, primarily due to the lack of a controllable acceleration structure. Here, we report the generation of protons with a cutoff energy exceeding 110 MeV, achieved by irradiating a multi-petawatt femtosecond laser on a conduction-restricted nanometre polymer foil with a finite lateral size. The enduring obstacles in achieving ultrahigh laser contrast and excellent laser pointing accuracy were successfully overcome, allowing the effective utilization of size-reduced nanometre foils. A long acceleration structure could be maintained in such a quasi-isolated foil since the conduction of cold electrons was restricted and a strong Coulomb field was established by carbon ions. Our achievement paves the road to enhance proton energy further, well meeting the requirements for applications, through a controllable acceleration process using well-designed nano- or micro-structured targets.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Plasma without a breakdown threshold can support an acceleration gradient six orders of magnitude higher than that in conventional accelerators1. When a driving laser propagates inside a gas-density plasma, its wakefield can form a well-controlled bubble structure, resulting in the successful acceleration of electrons to around 10 GeV on a decimetre scale2,3. For the acceleration of protons with a much larger mass-to-charge ratio, solid-density plasmas are usually utilized as they can support a stronger electric field4,5. The accelerated protons with ultralow transverse emittance and picosecond duration have been applied for the production of high-energy-density matter6, measurement of transient electromagnetic field7, and flash radiotherapy of cancer at an ultrahigh dose rate8. However, limitations, including the lack of a long acceleration structure9, deflection of protons by the self-generated magnetic field10, and dephasing of the fastest protons during acceleration11, lead to a proton energy below 100 MeV in experiments12,13,14 except one very recent work reporting the generation of 150-MeV protons15. Improving the energy of laser-accelerated protons is thus essential for applications, especially for the instantaneous radiography of dense objects and clinical therapy of deep-seated tumours16.
To increase the proton energy, a series of efforts has been made in the past two decades1. Among them, the utilization of structured targets has been intensively studied, and several effective designs have been demonstrated. A straightforward solution is modifying the target front surface to enhance the laser-plasma coupling, and different coating structures, including surface grating17, carbon nanotube foam18, and arrays of microwire19 or microtube20, have been attempted. Another method is modulating the acceleration field in the target rear surface by adopting hydrogen-rich micro-dots21, hemispherical pits22, or helical coils23. Besides, a number of experiments have employed mass-limited targets to improve the proton quality, which can be roughly categorized into two schemes. The first utilizes isolated high-repetition targets, like microspheres24,25,26, and cryogenic hydrogen jets27, where protons are accelerated mainly via the mechanism of collisionless shock acceleration24 or Coulomb explosion25,26. The second scheme uses foils with a reduced transverse size to enhance the target normal sheath acceleration (TNSA) of protons, since the laterally spreading electrons would be reflected around the foil edges28,29 and reaccelerated to higher energies if a sub-picosecond driving laser10,30,31,32,33,34 was employed. Several experiments have also tried a femtosecond driving laser with a relatively low power of less than 200 TW, demonstrating a robust enhancement of proton energy35,36,37.
The major challenge in further improving the proton energy by irradiating a petawatt femtosecond laser on structured targets is to preserve the nano- or micro-structures before the arrival of the main pulse. High temporal contrast of laser is a prerequisite for such experiments since the intensity of prepulse should be suppressed below the damage threshold of the targets, which is relatively low due to the structures38. Another difficulty is to maintain an excellent laser pointing accuracy within a few microns28, which is crucial to precisely align the focal spot on the structures of targets. Moreover, since the peak intensity of a multi-petawatt laser can be orders of magnitude higher than that of terawatt pulses, proton acceleration may occur via a novel and complex mechanism, and a proper understanding of the acceleration process is critical for the optimization of laser parameters and the design of target structures.
In this article, we demonstrate an enhanced acceleration of protons from a structured nanometre-thick polymer foil driven by a multi-petawatt femtosecond laser. The temporal contrast and pointing stability of the petawatt laser were well controlled, and the transverse shape of the polymer foils was tailored with a 100-kHz, μJ femtosecond laser. From a 100-nm-thick, 30-μm-wide foil, 110-MeV protons were successfully measured by several detection methods and unambiguously confirmed by the CR-39 plate in a stack detector. With the help of two- and three-dimensional (3D) particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations, we revealed that such energetic protons were accelerated by a hybrid mechanism of radiation pressure and Coulomb repulsion, the latter of which was enhanced in laser-tailored foils by suppressing the conduction of cold electrons. Our experimental result, thus, clearly demonstrated the enhancement of proton energy by employing conduction-restricted nanometre targets. Furthermore, our work indicates that the current technology is ready to support the desired interaction of a petawatt femtosecond driving laser with structured foils, and further improving the proton quality can be realized by employing well-designed targets with controllable acceleration structures.
Results
We utilized the CoReLS 4-PW Ti:Sapphire laser with 32-J energy and 24-fs duration on the target as the driver of protons. To obtain an ultraclean laser pulse, techniques including the cross-polarized wave, optical parametric chirped-pulse amplification, and double plasma mirror were employed, achieving a temporal contrast higher than 1012 up to 2 ps before the main pulse39. The pointing stability of the focal spot was also improved to a standard deviation of several microns (Supplementary Fig. 3) by reducing the vibration of optical components and aligning the whole surface of plasma mirrors. For the targets, we chose 100-nm-thick polymer (F8BT) foils with relatively high mechanical and optical damage thresholds, whose size and shape were tailored by ablating the needless region using a 100-kHz, μJ femtosecond laser to restrict the conduction of surface current. As displayed in Fig. 1, electrons and protons, accelerated from a conduction-restricted foil irradiated by a petawatt laser, were detected online by an electron spectrometer and two Thomson parabola spectrometers (TPSs), respectively. After the optimization of the laser and target parameters according to the results of TPSs, a stacked detector was inserted to simultaneously measure the spatial profile and spectrum of the protons40. Details of the laser manipulation, target fabrication, and data analyses are given in Methods.
a An ultrahigh-contrast, multi-petawatt laser irradiated on the centre of a conduction-restricted nanometre foil at an incident angle of 20° to accelerate protons within tens of microns. The accelerated protons at 0° and 30° to the laser axis were measured online by two Thomson parabola spectrometers. An electron spectrometer was installed in the normal direction of the target rear surface (20°). b Microscope photo of a conduction-restricted square foil with a transverse width D of 80 μm. c For the selective shot, one stack detector, composed of aluminium, copper, and CR-39 plates as well as radiochromic films (RCFs), was inserted to measure the spatial profile and spectrum of the protons simultaneously. The insets are results from a 30-μm-wide foil.
Generation of over-110 MeV protons
An enhancement of the proton cutoff energy was investigated by employing conduction-restricted foils with the structure shown in Fig. 1b. The energy-dependent spatial profiles of the protons were obtained directly from the RCFs in a single-shot stack measurement (Supplementary Fig. 13). Different from the case of planar targets, patterns caused by protons with large divergence angles were observed on the first RCF when the conduction-restricted foils were used (Fig. 2a–c), consistent with previous works36. These patterns, induced by protons accelerated from the edges (Fig. 2b) or supporting stalks (Fig. 2c) of the conduction-restricted foils, imply that the laser contrast in our experiment has been improved enough to ensure the survival of the foil structure before the arrival of the main pulse. The asymmetric profiles of these patterns indicate that the laser focal spot was not perfectly aligned on the foil centre, due to the shot-to-shot fluctuation of laser pointing. Despite this, the acceleration of over-110 MeV protons from a 30-μm-wide foil was realized, as depicted in Fig. 2d–f. The proton profiles measured by the RCF, radioactivation, and CR-39 plate agreed well with each other, manifesting the emission of high-energy protons at angles between the laser axis and the target normal direction. It should be noted that the result from CR-39 can provide a faultless proton cutoff energy, since RCF is also sensitive to electrons, and gamma-rays can introduce noises on the radioactivation measurement40. For instance, one may measure signals in the RCF with a Bragg-peak energy of 120 MeV, which are induced by electrons in the laser direction according to the CR-39 result (Supplementary Fig. 19).
a–c Raw data of the first (Bragg peak of 10-MeV protons) RCF using 100-nm-thick foil targets: planar (a), D = 80 μm (b), and D = 30 μm (c). D is the transverse width of a foil, and 0° is the laser propagation direction. d–f Signals of protons with an energy around 110 MeV measured by RCF, radioactivation, and CR-39, respectively, corresponding to the layer numbers 55, 53 and 56 in Supplementary Table 1. A D = 30 μm foil was utilized, and the electron signals in the RCF were negligible in this laser shot. g Unfolded proton spectra of the three targets obtained from the RCF measurement. For D = 30 μm, the results from radioactivation and CR-39 are also shown together. Both the front and rear surfaces of the last CR-39 plate were analysed to deduce the spectral intensities at approximately 110 MeV. The shaded regions indicate the uncertainties induced from the calibrations of RCF and imaging plate (IP).
Apart from the spatial profiles, the spectra of the protons were also obtained from the stack results by a differential evolution algorithm (details in Methods). The proton spectra generated from the RCF and the radioactivation measurements were consistent and confirmed by the CR-39 data. A decrease in spectral intensity with proton energy was observed for all the spectra in Fig. 2g, and the cutoff energies for 80-μm- and 30-μm-wide foils were 105 and 112 MeV, respectively, 17% and 24% higher than that of 90 MeV for planar targets. The number of protons with energies higher than 70 MeV from the 30-μm-wide foil reached 5 × 109, five times greater than that from the planar target. While the total number of >5 MeV protons was 4 × 1011 for both cases, showing no enhancement, which is different from the previous results using terawatt lasers33,36. This is because our petawatt laser pulse is strong enough to accelerate all the protons around the focal spot: 4 × 1011 corresponds to the total number of protons resided in the target with a radius of 4.8 μm, larger than the waist width of the focal spot. For the same reason, the energy conversion efficiency from the laser to protons only slightly increased from 3.6% (planar) to 3.7% (D = 30 μm).
The enhanced proton acceleration was also verified by the multi-shot results of the two TPSs (Fig. 3a, b). The data from the TPSs were consistent with those from the RCFs in the stack detector, showing a higher proton cutoff energy Ecut for the conduction-restricted foils. For the 30-μm-wide foils, the averaged Ecut at 0° was 100 MeV, enhanced by 19% compared to the value of 84 MeV from the planar foils. A larger Ecut was measured at 0° rather than 30° for the majority of the shots, since the most energetic protons were emitted at around 10° with respect to the laser axis (Fig. 2f). A robust modulation of the electron spectra, showing a peak at 5 MeV, was observed with the conduction-restricted targets (Fig. 3c), distinctive from the Boltzmann distribution obtained from the planar targets. This is another characteristic in addition to the proton patterns implying the use of a conduction-restricted foil.
a, b Proton cutoff energy Ecut at 0° and 30°, respectively. The results of a total of 58 shots are plotted and the error bars indicate the standard deviation. The dashed lines were obtained from 2D PIC simulations, and a factor of 0.6 was multiplied to correct the dimensional effect. c, d Measured and simulated electron spectra at 20° from various targets, respectively. The shaded regions in c represent the standard errors of 10 (planar) and 5 (D = 50 μm) laser shots.
Simulation of proton acceleration
We performed PIC simulations to investigate the acceleration mechanism of protons under our novel laser and target conditions, and to understand the source of the energy enhancement in conduction-restricted foils. The parameters of the laser and plasma were set according to the experimental conditions, and the detailed setup can be found in Supplementary Sec. C. Considering the 100-μm simulation domain and the 200-fs laser rising edge, and as a simple scheme to understand the physical picture, we first utilized 2D simulations to compare the two cases of planar and D = 30 μm foils, as shown in Fig. 4a–f. In the conduction-restricted foil, the electrons spreading in the transverse direction can be pulled back around the edges of the foil and deflected to the laser direction by the magnetic field near the plasma surface10, resulting in the higher electron energy density at the centre of the foil shown in Fig. 4a. As a result, more sub-10 MeV electrons move forward for the D = 30 μm foil, accounting for the 5-MeV peak in the measured electron spectra (Fig. 3c). These confined electrons, however, only have a limited contribution to the acceleration of the most energetic protons, as they have left behind these protons (Fig. 4c). The enhanced longitudinal electric field is mainly caused by the absence of cold electron refluxing in the conduction-restricted foil (weak Jy in Fig. 4c), decreasing the shielding effect of electrons on the Coulomb field established by the remaining carbon ions. A more explicit relationship can be found in Fig. 4e and f, indicating a close connection between the energy enhancement and the larger net charge for the conduction-restricted foil. As displayed in Fig. 5, the high-energy protons experience a hybrid mechanism of radiation pressure acceleration (RPA) during the laser irradiation and Coulomb repulsion (CR) after the end of the laser pulse. The contribution of the latter increases as the target size decreases, enhancing the proton cutoff energy as shown in Fig. 2g.
a, b Distributions of the electron energy density Den at the simulation time of 520 fs, as well as the trajectories of two representative electrons evolved with time. c, d Distributions of the longitudinal acceleration field Ex and transverse current density Jy at the simulation time of 480 fs. Jy is zoomed in by four times along the x axis to indicate the details. The dark dots represent the positions of the most energetic protons. a and c are the results of a D = 30 μm foil, while b and d are those of a planar target, all with an initial foil position of x = 40 μm. e, f Temporal evolution of the net charge and of the maximum proton energy, respectively. The total charge in the region of 38 μm < x < 43 μm and ∣y∣ < 15 μm is considered. g Isosurfaces (1.5nc) of the carbon and proton densities, as well as the density distribution of electrons at the simulation time of 100 fs. Here, the critical density nc = 1.74 × 1027 m−3 for the 800-nm laser. h Dependence of the maximum proton energy on the target size. The planar targets are treated as D = 500 μm and the error bars indicate the standard deviation. The dashed line shows the calculated proton energy in the Coulomb repulsion model. i Comparison of the measured and simulated proton spectra using a D = 30 μm foil. a–f are obtained from 2D PIC simulations, while g–i are based on a 3D simulation.
We also carried out a 3D simulation for the case of a D = 30 μm foil to correct the underestimated electron spreading in 2D simulations. The separation of protons and carbons is pronounced in Fig. 4g, indicating the effects of carbon ions on the proton acceleration via Coulomb field. Based on a Coulomb repulsion model and using the parameters obtained in the 3D simulation, we can calculate the dependence of the maximum proton energy on the target size, matching well with that measured in experiments (Fig. 4h). Different from 2D simulations, a quantitative spectrum of all the forward protons can be derived here, which shows a reasonable fit compared to the measured spectrum (Fig. 4i), implying the reliability of the laser-plasma interaction in the 3D simulation.
Driven by a multi-petawatt femtosecond laser, the protons in our experiment experience a novel acceleration process compared to the previous works using size-reduced targets30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37. Here, the key difference is the scaling factor of RPA as a0λl/nd, where λl, a0, d and n are the laser wavelength, normalized vector potential, target thickness, and normalized electron density, respectively4. We note that all the earlier experiments30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37 were performed at the condition of a0λl/nd < 0.13, and the protons are mainly accelerated by the sheath field at the target rear. The cutoff energy is determined mainly by the temperature and density of hot electrons5; both can be improved in size-reduced targets if the laser duration τ is larger than the electron recycling period D/c between the target centre and edges28, where c is the speed of light in vacuum. Hence, sub-picosecond driving laser pulses and μm-thick metal foils were usually utilized in these experiments. While in our experiment using 100-nm-thick conduction-restricted foils, the laser with a0 ≈ 37, satisfying a0λl/nd > 1, is strong enough to push the bulk of electrons forward, realizing a proton acceleration dominated by radiation pressure, instead of thermal pressure. Then after the end of the femtosecond laser, the electrostatic pressure stored in the heavy carbon ions, which increases with the decrease in foil size, governs the subsequent acceleration of protons.
Discussion
In our experiment, we utilized an ultraclean petawatt femtosecond laser and a conduction-restricted nanometre foil to accelerate protons. This is a novel approach to realizing laser-driven proton acceleration beyond 100 MeV, with a specific design of target and laser parameters, as well as a distinct acceleration mechanism, in comparison to those in the recent work15 by T. Ziegler et al. In particular, one critical difference can be found in the strict requirement of laser contrast in our experiment to ensure the survival of the initial target structure at the arrival of the main pulse. As a result, the high-energy protons are accelerated by the combination of RPA and Coulomb repulsion without the onset of relativistically induced transparency15. One main advantage of our scheme is the robust acceleration structure. Owing to the ultrahigh laser contrast, the main pulse can directly interact with a solid-density plasma, avoiding the hosing and filamentation instabilities in long preplasmas, which are primary sources of the shot-to-shot fluctuations in acceleration fields. Besides, the short laser duration (24 fs) can suppress the instabilities in RPA, and the Coulomb field established by heavy carbon ions is not so sensitive to variations of electron temperatures. Hence, we measured a stable proton acceleration, despite adjusting the shape and orientation of the foils. As displayed in Fig. 6, the cutoff energies of the protons at 0° and 30° consistently exceeded 85 and 80 MeV, respectively. Apart from protons, carbon ions were simultaneously accelerated to approximately 40 MeV u−1 from the D = 30 μm foils (Supplementary Figs. 11 and 18). Compared to other isolated targets such as microsphere24,25,26 and microtube27, the conduction-restricted foil also has the advantage of a large aspect ratio, ensuring a planar Coulomb repulsion field instead of an isotropic one. Hence, a small divergence angle of the high-energy protons can be maintained (Fig. 2f), which is crucial for the collection and application of protons.
Based on the demonstrated acceleration of protons to over 110 MeV from a D = 30 μm foil, we may further improve the proton quality by advancing the target design. Using foils with a smaller D can enhance the proton cutoff energy, as predicted in Fig. 4h, if we further optimize the laser pointing stability. Employing thicker foils and stronger lasers may efficiently increase the proton energy, which requires a higher laser contrast with the better control on the spatio-temploral coupling of laser pulses and the surface roughness of mirrors41. Here, we emphasize that our scheme is sensitive to the preheating and expansion of the ultrathin foil, since both the RPA and CR require a solid-density plasma to support the acceleration field. As evidence, only low-energy protons without apparent enhancement were observed in the case of a 30-nm-thick foil (Fig. 7), due to the lower plasma density after the expansion of the foil. Besides the proton energy, some applications also pursue quasi-monoenergetic spectra42, which may be realized by a double-layer target consisting of a substrate and a proton-rich coating (Supplementary Fig. 26). For the material of the substrate, diamond-like carbon is more suitable than metal due to its higher damage threshold. One limitation of the current scheme is the available repetition rate at Hz scale, while a kHz source may be achieved using a liquid sheet target and double laser pulses. A transient micro-foil is first obtained by tailoring the plain sheet with a Laguerre-Gaussian prepulse (Supplementary Fig. 27), and then the protons are accelerated by the main laser pulse43.
Our experiment reveals that current technologies have been developed to support the usage of multi-petawatt femtosecond lasers with sufficient temporal contrast and pointing stability for structured nanometre foils. Such powerful lasers are promising to further realize a controllable and ideal proton acceleration in well-designed 3D-structured targets, which can already be routinely fabricated through e-beam lithography44 or 3D print based on the two-photon polymerization technique45. Moreover, driven by a multi-petawatt femtosecond laser, unprecedented electric and magnetic fields with designed configurations can be established inside the 3D-structured plasma, providing a compact platform for the study of high-energy-density physics and laboratory astrophysics, such as magnetic reconnection46, resonant x-ray emission47 and gamma-ray burst48.
Methods
Laser system
The 4-PW Ti:sapphire laser at the Center for Relativistic Laser Science (CoReLS) was utilized to accelerate protons. In the front end, a cross-polarized wave (XPW) system and an optical parametric chirped-pulse amplification (OPCPA) stage were employed. The compression gratings were carefully aligned to reduce the rising edge and spatio-temporal coupling of the laser. After compression, the laser contrast was further enhanced by more than five orders of magnitude in a double plasma mirror (DPM) system39. In the target chamber, the cleaned p-polarized laser pulse was focused by an f/2.8 off-axis parabolic mirror (OAP) on a target of a polymer foil at an incidence angle of 20°. The on-target laser energy and duration were 32 ± 2J and 24 ± 2 fs, respectively. Using a random-pinhole attenuator to attenuate the full-energy laser after the triggering of the DPM, we measured the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the focal spot as 3.6 ± 0.6 μm, with the energy concentration of 22% in the FWHM (Supplementary Fig. 1). Hence, the laser peak intensity I was about 3 × 1021 Wcm−2, corresponding to a normalized vector potential of a0 ≈ 37. Here \({a}_{0}=8.5\times 1{0}^{-10}\scriptstyle\sqrt{I({{{{\rm{Wcm}}}}}^{-2})}{\lambda }_{l}({\rm{\mu m}})\). To finely match the focal spot and the size-reduced foil, the laser pointing stability was improved by reducing the vibration of the optical components. Moreover, before every full-energy shot, one test shot using an attenuated laser with μJ energy after the DPM was first performed, and the position of the focal spot was confirmed according to the tiny damaged hole on the foil.
Conduction-restricted target
We chose nanometre-thick polymer (F8BT, C35H42N2S) foil as the target due to its high damage threshold exceeding 1012 Wcm−2 for femtosecond prepulse. The foils were fabricated through spin coating, with the thicknesses and mass density (1.2 g·cm−3) calibrated by the X-ray reflectivity measurement. The plasma density is 210nc if all the atoms are ionized. We utilized a 100-kHz, μJ, 250-fs laser to tailor the free-standing foil on the target holder, whose transverse size and shape could be simply modified by adjusting the movement of the laser focus on the foil surface. For the square target, four stalks with widths of <15 μm remained to support the conduction-restricted foil (Supplementary Fig. 4). Thanks to the isolated structure preventing the propagation of surface shock, a higher survival rate of nearby targets was observed after a laser shot on a conduction-restricted foil.
Diagnostics
The accelerated electrons and protons were measured online by one electron spectrometer (ES) and two TPSs, respectively. The ES, composed of a 0.6-T magnet to deflect the electrons and a phosphor screen (Lanex Fast B) to record the signals (Supplementary Fig. 10), was installed inside the vacuum chamber. A microchannel plate (MCP) and a charge-coupled device (CCD) were equipped in the TPS to detect the trajectory of the protons and carbon ions. Quantitative spectra of proton and carbon ions were obtained according to previous calibrations40. The main limitations of TPSs are the tiny acceptance angle (Supplementary Table 3) and the low resolution in the high-energy region. Hence, a stack detector is essential to accurately characterize the accelerated protons.
The stack detector, composed of aluminium, copper, CR-39 and RCF, was prepared with the help of the Monte Carlo code FLUKA49. In the stack (Supplementary Table 1), twenty-one pieces of RCFs (Gafchromic) were employed with the proton Bragg peaks equally separated by 5 MeV. To eliminate the potential noise on the RCFs caused by laser-accelerated electrons40, seven copper plates were used for the radioactivation measurement. Considering that secondary gamma-rays and neutrons can also radioactivate copper, we assembled seven pieces of CR-39 (Track Analysis Systems Ltd.) to unambiguously verify the proton cutoff energy at the expense of a low saturation fluence.
During the experiment, the prepared stack, installed on a linear stage, was inserted before the selected laser shot and aligned parallel to the target rear surface with a gap of 14 mm. After the shot, we quickly removed the stack from the vacuum chamber and placed the copper plates on a BAS-MS imaging plate (Fujifilm). After a 20-min exposure, the IP was scanned with a resolution of 100 μm, a dynamic range of L = 5, and a sensitivity of S = 4000. The RCFs, after waiting for longer than 24 h, were also scanned by a 48-bit colour scanner (Perfection V750 Pro, Epson) in transmission mode. The CR-39 plates were first etched for 4 h in a 6.25N NaOH solution at 70 °C, and then scanned by an upright microscope (BX53M, Olympus) to record the pits on the front and rear surfaces.
To determine the proton spectra from the stack data, we applied a differential evolution algorithm to find the best fit between the calculated values from the assumed spectra and the measured values, including the total deposited energy (TDE) in each RCF or photo-stimulated luminescence (PSL) value of every IP. The deposited energy curves of the RCFs and the nuclear reaction yields of the copper plates were obtained from the FLUKA simulations (Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7) and utilized in the calculations. The measured TDE and PSL values were calculated from the optical densities (OD) in the red channel of the RCFs and the count values of the IPs, respectively. Here, uncertainties were introduced from the calibrations of RCF and IP we utilized40, which have been included in Fig. 2g. The spectral intensities of the protons were also deduced from the front and rear surfaces of the last two CR-39 plates, demonstrating good consistency with those measured by the RCF and radioactivation methods. Note that due to the scattering effect, protons with the same initial energy will have a broadened energy distribution when they reach the CR-39 surface (Supplementary Fig. 8), which should be considered during the calculation.
Particle-in-cell simulation
To investigate the underlying physics in proton acceleration, we performed PIC simulations using the code Smilei50. For Figs. 3 and 4a–f, 2D simulations were carried out with a box of 128λl × 192λl in the x- and y-axes, respectively. An 800-nm laser travelling at 20° to the x-axis was shined on a plasma composed of 105nc electrons, 15nc protons, and 15nc fully ionized carbon ions. The laser with a normalized vector potential of a0 = 35, a waist width of 3.2 μm, a duration of 24 fs, and a rising edge from 1017 Wcm−2 (Supplementary Fig. 20), was set according to the experiment. The transverse widths of the plasmas were 192λl, 100λl, 64λl, and 36λl for the planar, D = 80 μm, 50 μm, and 30 μm foils, respectively. For Fig. 4g–i, a 3D PIC simulation for the 30-μm-wide foil was performed with similar laser and plasma parameters but a reduced grid resolution. A preplasma was directly set instead of the laser rising edge used in the 2D simulation. More details can be found in Supplementary Sec. C.
Coulomb repulsion calculation
The enhancement of the proton cutoff energy in conduction-restricted foils comes from the stronger Coulomb field established by the larger net charge. In the RPA stage, almost all the electrons inside the focal spot region on the nanometre foil are pushed away; then, in the planar foil, the majority of these electrons are pulled back by the ions after the end of the laser, while a portion of the net charge is compensated by the refluxing of cold electrons along the target surfaces. In the conduction-restricted foil, however, the refluxing is suppressed, and the net positive charge \(\eta Z{n}_{{{{\rm{C}}}}}e\pi {w}_{0}^{2}d\) improves the proton cutoff energy from E0 to E0 + ΔE, where the carbon density nC = 30nc, Z = 6, and ηZ ≈ 1 according to the approximately 15% more net charge as shown in Fig. 4e. We can assume this positive charge equally distributes along the transverse directions of the foil, and the most energetic proton locates at x = D/2 after the charge equilibrium time. Then ΔE can be estimated by the potential of the proton as \(\int_{-D/2}^{D/2}\int_{-D/2}^{D/2}\frac{\sigma }{4\pi {\epsilon }_{0}}{({D}^{2}/4+{y}^{2}+{z}^{2})}^{-1/2}dydz\), where ϵ0 is the permittivity in vacuum. Considering \(\sigma=\eta Z{n}_{{{{\rm{C}}}}}e\pi {w}_{0}^{2}d/{D}^{2}\) and \(\int_{-1}^{1}\int_{-1}^{1}{(1+{y}^{2}+{z}^{2})}^{-1/2}dydz=3.17\), we have ΔE = 3.17σD/8πϵ0 ∝ D−1. From the 3D PIC simulation for the D = 30 μm foil, we can estimate E0 = 88.9 MeV and obtain the dependence of E0 + ΔE on D−1 as shown in Fig. 4h.
Data availability
Source Data file has been deposited in Figshare under accession code DOI link51. Additional data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Code availability
The open-source code Smilei is available at https://github.com/SmileiPIC/Smilei. The detailed setup of the simulations that supported the plots and other findings of this study is presented in the Supplementary Information.
References
Albert, F. et al. 2020 roadmap on plasma accelerators. New J. Phys. 23, 031101 (2021).
Gonsalves, A. et al. Petawatt laser guiding and electron beam acceleration to 8 GeV in a laser-heated capillary discharge waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 084801 (2019).
Aniculaesei, C. et al. The acceleration of a high-charge electron bunch to 10 GeV in a 10-cm nanoparticle-assisted wakefield accelerator. Matter Radiat. Extremes 9, 014001 (2024).
Daido, H., Nishiuchi, M. & Pirozhkov, A. S. Review of laser-driven ion sources and their applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 056401 (2012).
Macchi, A., Borghesi, M. & Passoni, M. Ion acceleration by superintense laser-plasma interaction. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 751 (2013).
Patel, P. et al. Isochoric heating of solid-density matter with an ultrafast proton beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 125004 (2003).
Schaeffer, D. B. et al. Proton imaging of high-energy-density laboratory plasmas. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 045007 (2023).
Kroll, F. et al. Tumour irradiation in mice with a laser-accelerated proton beam. Nat. Phys. 18, 316–322 (2022).
Wan, Y. et al. Physical mechanism of the transverse instability in radiation pressure ion acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 234801 (2016).
Nakatsutsumi, M. et al. Self-generated surface magnetic fields inhibit laser-driven sheath acceleration of high-energy protons. Nat. Commun. 9, 280 (2018).
Keppler, S. et al. Intensity scaling limitations of laser-driven proton acceleration in the TNSA-regime. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013065 (2022).
Wagner, F. et al. Maximum proton energy above 85 MeV from the relativistic interaction of laser pulses with micrometer thick CH2 targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 205002 (2016).
Kim, I. J. et al. Radiation pressure acceleration of protons to 93 MeV with circularly polarized petawatt laser pulses. Phys. Plasmas 23, 070701 (2016).
Higginson, A. et al. Near-100 MeV protons via a laser-driven transparency-enhanced hybrid acceleration scheme. Nat. Commun. 9, 724 (2018).
Ziegler, T. et al. Laser-driven high-energy proton beams from cascaded acceleration regimes. Nat. Phys. 20, 1211–1216 (2024).
Fuchs, J. et al. Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase. Nat. Phys. 2, 48–54 (2006).
Ceccotti, T. et al. Evidence of resonant surface-wave excitation in the relativistic regime through measurements of proton acceleration from grating targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185001 (2013).
Wang, P. et al. Super-heavy ions acceleration driven by ultrashort laser pulses at ultrahigh intensity. Phys. Rev. X 11, 021049 (2021).
Qin, C. et al. High efficiency laser-driven proton sources using 3D-printed micro-structure. Commun. Phys. 5, 124 (2022).
Strehlow, J. et al. A laser parameter study on enhancing proton generation from microtube foil targets. Sci. Rep. 12, 10827 (2022).
Schwoerer, H. et al. Laser-plasma acceleration of quasi-monoenergetic protons from microstructured targets. Nature 439, 445–448 (2006).
Kaymak, V. et al. Boosted acceleration of protons by tailored ultra-thin foil targets. Sci. Rep. 9, 18672 (2019).
Ferguson, S. et al. Dual stage approach to laser-driven helical coil proton acceleration. New J. Phys. 25, 013006 (2023).
Henig, A. et al. Laser-driven shock acceleration of ion beams from spherical mass-limited targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 095002 (2009).
Ostermayr, T. M. et al. Proton acceleration by irradiation of isolated spheres with an intense laser pulse. Phys. Rev. E 94, 033208 (2016).
Hilz, P. et al. Isolated proton bunch acceleration by a petawatt laser pulse. Nat. Commun. 9, 423 (2018).
Rehwald, M. et al. Ultra-short pulse laser acceleration of protons to 80 MeV from cryogenic hydrogen jets tailored to near-critical density. Nat. Commun. 14, 4009 (2023).
Kluge, T. et al. Enhanced laser ion acceleration from mass-limited foils. Phys. Plasmas 17, 123103 (2010).
Zulick, C. et al. Target surface area effects on hot electron dynamics from high intensity laser–plasma interactions. New J. Phys. 18, 063020 (2016).
Perez, F. et al. Enhanced isochoric heating from fast electrons produced by high-contrast, relativistic-intensity laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 085001 (2010).
Buffechoux, S. et al. Hot electrons transverse refluxing in ultraintense laser-solid interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 015005 (2010).
Tresca, O. et al. Controlling the properties of ultraintense laser–proton sources using transverse refluxing of hot electrons in shaped mass-limited targets. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53, 105008 (2011).
Morace, A. et al. Improved laser-to-proton conversion efficiency in isolated reduced mass targets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 054102 (2013).
Schollmeier, M. et al. Laser-to-hot-electron conversion limitations in relativistic laser matter interactions due to multi-picosecond dynamics. Phys. Plasmas 22, 043116 (2015).
Toncian, T. et al. Optimal proton acceleration from lateral limited foil sections and different laser pulse durations at relativistic intensity. Phys. Plasmas 18, 043105 (2011).
Zeil, K. et al. Robust energy enhancement of ultrashort pulse laser accelerated protons from reduced mass targets. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 56, 084004 (2014).
Fang, Y. et al. Different effects of laser contrast on proton emission from normal large foils and transverse-size-reduced targets. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58, 075010 (2016).
Shou, Y. et al. Brilliant femtosecond-laser-driven hard X-ray flashes from carbon nanotube plasma. Nat. Photon. 17, 137–142 (2023).
Choi, I. W. et al. Highly efficient double plasma mirror producing ultrahigh-contrast multi-petawatt laser pulses. Opt. Lett. 45, 6342–6345 (2020).
Shou, Y. et al. Spatial and spectral measurement of laser-driven protons through radioactivation. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 183 (2023).
Pariente, G., Gallet, V., Borot, A., Gobert, O. & Quéré, F. Space-time characterization of ultra-intense femtosecond laser beams. Nat. Photon. 10, 547–553 (2016).
Zhang, H. et al. Collisionless shock acceleration of high-flux quasimonoenergetic proton beams driven by circularly polarized laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 164801 (2017).
Gao, Y. et al. All-optical method for generating transient microstructured targets in laser ion acceleration. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042031 (2024).
Chlouba, T. et al. Coherent nanophotonic electron accelerator. Nature 622, 476–480 (2023).
Saccone, M. A., Gallivan, R. A., Narita, K., Yee, D. W. & Greer, J. R. Additive manufacturing of micro-architected metals via hydrogel infusion. Nature 612, 685–690 (2022).
Zhang, S. et al. Ion and electron acoustic bursts during anti-parallel magnetic reconnection driven by lasers. Nat. Phys. 19, 909–916 (2023).
Yu, T.-P. et al. Bright betatronlike x rays from radiation pressure acceleration of a mass-limited foil target. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 045001 (2013).
Gompertz, B. P. et al. The case for a minute-long merger-driven gamma-ray burst from fast-cooling synchrotron emission. Nat. Astron. 7, 67–79 (2023).
Ahdida, C. et al. New capabilities of the FLUKA multi-purpose code. Front. Phys. 9, 788253 (2022).
Derouillat, J. et al. Smilei: a collaborative, open-source, multi-purpose particle-in-cell code for plasma simulation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 222, 351–373 (2018).
Shou, Y. et al. Source data of laser-driven proton acceleration beyond 100 MeV by radiation pressure and Coulomb repulsion in a conduction-restricted plasma, Figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28191497, (2025).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Institute for Basic Science, Korea under project code IBS-R012-D1, by the Ultrashort Quantum Beam Facility (UQBF) operation program (No. 140011) through APRI, GIST, by the National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2023-00218180), and by the National Grand Instrument Project, China (2019YFF01014402). Z. Gong would like to thank HPC Cluster of ITP-CAS for providing computational resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I.W.C. and C.H.N. conducted the work. The experiments were performed by Y.S., G.E.A., S.Y.K., X.W., S.H.K., J.W.Y., J.H.S., S.K.L. and I.W.C. Y.S., X.W. and K.H.P. carried out all the simulations. Some details of the physics were clarified by Z.G. and X.Y. The manuscript was written by Y.S. and reformed by I.W.C. and C.H.N. All the authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Jan Psikal and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shou, Y., Wu, X., Pae, K.H. et al. Laser-driven proton acceleration beyond 100 MeV by radiation pressure and Coulomb repulsion in a conduction-restricted plasma. Nat Commun 16, 1487 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56667-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56667-3