Table 1 Summary of datasets utilized in the analyses
From: Striatal arbitration between choice strategies guides few-shot adaptation
Source | Species | Task | Data | Result section | Figure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rat | The two-step task | Behavior | “RL models fail to predict animals’ choice behavior after an unexpected event” and “Event-type-specific behavioral dynamics underlying few-shot adaptation” sections | Fig. 2 | |
Supplementary Fig. 1 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 2 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 3 | |||||
“Computational model for event-type-dependent action-selection strategy” section | Fig. 3 | ||||
“The SSCS model explains rat’s few-shot adaptation” section | Fig. 4 | ||||
Supplementary Fig. 4 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 5 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 6 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 7 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 8 | |||||
Mouse | The two-armed bandit task | Behavior | “The SSCS model characterizes the behavior of different species in simpler tasks” section | Fig. 5 | |
Supplementary Fig. 9 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 10 | |||||
Rat | The T-maze task | Behavior neural recordings | “The SSCS model explains the activity of medium-spiny neurons” section | Fig. 6 | |
Supplementary Fig. 11 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 12 | |||||
Mouse | The two-armed bandit task | Behavior before and after the inactivation | “Mice exhibit event-type dependent action-selection strategy, independent from MSN inactivations” section | Fig. 7 | |
Supplementary Fig. 13 | |||||
“The SSCS model replicates type-specific contributions of MSNs to the action-selection strategy after the conflict event” section | Fig. 8 | ||||
Supplementary Fig. 14 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 15 | |||||
Supplementary Fig. 16 |
