Fig. 4: Catalytic performance of the paired CO2RR//FOR system.

a Schematic illustrations of the CO2RR//FOR and CO2RR//OER systems with half-cell equilibrium potentials (E0)28,38. b Comparison of LSV curves for the CO2RR//FOR and CO2RR//OER systems at a scan rate of 20 mV s–1. Voltages are non-iR corrected. c, d HCOO– FEs (c) and HCOO– formation rates (d) for the CO2RR//FOR system at various cell voltages without iR compensation. Data are presented as mean ± s.d. Error bars represent s.d. from three independent measurements. e Performance comparison of paired CO2RR and representative anodic reaction systems for the bipolar HCOO– formation based on performance metrics as jtotal, HCOO– FE, and cell voltage in a flow-type or MEA electrolyzer. Details are given in Supplementary Table 5. f Plant-gate levelized cost per tonne of HCOOH and the corresponding quantity of H2 produced on the CO2RR//FOR and CO2RR//OER systems at a jtotal of 500 mA cm–2. The total reference price of HCOOH and H2 is marked by the dashed line. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.