Fig. 5: Analysis on temperature-dependent orbital transport.
From: Nonlocal electrical detection of reciprocal orbital Edelstein effect

a Fitting of the temperature-dependent 2ΔRDOEE data with Eq. (1). Here, tCu = 40 nm and FM = Co25Fe75. The solid curves represent the fitting results. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of R after the magnetization is saturated. b Fitting result of λo for 2ΔRDOEE (blue squares) and 2ΔRIOEE (red squares) as functions of temperature. The error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals from fitting results. All the results obey Onsager’s reciprocal relations. c Schematic of the proposed mechanism for the temperature-dependent orbital propagation. At low temperatures (upper panel), hopping between the localized states in the oxidized Cu (CuOx layer) is limited, so the itinerant electrons (green arrow) are confined to the unoxidized Cu layer without carrying OAM (L = 0). Thus, continuous orbital Rashba bands are not forming. At high temperature (lower panel), the localized states are thermally broadened, establishing the conductive channel in the CuOx layer. The electron wavefunctions are extended into the CuOx layer, creating hybridized states with OAM (L ≠ 0), which form the continuous orbital Rashba bands and allow the long-range orbital propagation.