Table 1 Generalization performance of the BAAS on studies 7–16

Study index	Comparison	t	DoF	P value	95% CI	Cohen’s d
7	Pleasant music vs baseline	2.81	31	0.01	[0.02, 0.12]	0.50
8	Pleasant music vs baseline	2.62	19	0.02	[0.07, 0.67]	0.59
9	Appetitive food vs baseline	2.72	18	0.01	[0.02, 0.14]	0.62
10	Appetitive food vs baseline	6.41	29	5.21 ×10⁻⁷	[0.09, 0.17]	1.17
11	Erotic images vs baseline	3.36	10	0.01	[0.18, 0.89]	1.01
12	Erotic images vs baseline	8.46	17	1.70 ×10⁻⁷	[0.27, 0.45]	1.99
13	Reward cues vs baseline	3.30	23	3.13 ×10⁻³	[0.08, 0.33]	0.67
14	Parametric modulation of reward	1.97	15	0.07	[−0.00, 0.07]	0.49
15	Videos of own baby vs baseline	2.46	22	0.02	[0.02, 0.24]	0.51
16	Social images vs baseline	6.21	30	7.81 ×10⁻⁷	[0.57, 1.12]	1.12

For each contrast we tested the BAAS responses using one-sample t-test (two-sided, uncorrected). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
DoF degrees of freedom, CI Confidence Intervals.

Quick links

Search