Table 1 Field trials of foliar spraying and traditional spreading of N-Fe fertilizer

From: Nature variations of OsNLP4 responsible for nitrogen use efficiency divergence in the two rice subspecies

Fertilization method

Plants

Group

Tiller (per plant)

Tiller change

Yield (per plot/kg)

Yield change

NUE

NUE change

Foliar spraying

XS134

H2O (Control)

8.75 ± 0.41c

0

2.08 ± 0.05c

0

34.74 ± 0.88c

0

N+Fe

9.99 ± 0.26b

14.1%

2.31 ± 0.05b

10.8%

38.48 ± 0.81b

10.8%

NIL-2

H2O (Control)

9.68 ± 0.48b

10.6%

2.44 ± 0.11b

16.9%

40.62 ± 1.84b

16.9%

N+Fe

11.13 ± 0.58a

27.2%

2.72 ± 0.10a

30.8%

45.40 ± 1.73a

30.8%

Traditional spreading

XS134

N (Control)

10.68 ± 0.34c

0

1.93 ± 0.06 d

0

29.84 ± 0.98 d

0

N+Fe

11.74 ± 0.42b

10.0%

2.10 ± 0.04c

8.9%

32.46 ± 0.57c

8.9%

NIL-2

N (Control)

12.41 ± 0.77b

16.2%

2.33 ± 0.11b

20.5%

35.94 ± 1.71b

20.5%

N+Fe

13.77 ± 0.94a

28.9%

2.56 ± 0.07a

32.4%

39.51 ± 1.05a

32.4%

  1. Field trials of foliar spraying were conducted in Lingshui, Hainan Province, China, and the field trials of traditional spreading were conducted in Hefei, Anhui Province, China. The values are the means ± SDs (n = 4 replicates, 100 plants per replicate for foliar spraying and 80 plants per replicate for traditional spreading). Different letters above the bars denote significant differences (P < 0.05) according to a two-sided Duncan’s multiple range test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.