Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Decoding phantom limb movements from intraneural recordings
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 08 February 2026

Decoding phantom limb movements from intraneural recordings

  • Cecilia Rossi  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0001-4422-40361,
  • Marko Bumbasirevic2,
  • Paul Čvančara  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-44133,
  • Thomas Stieglitz  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7349-42543,
  • Stanisa Raspopovic  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-90514,5,
  • Elisa Donati  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-12981 na1 &
  • …
  • Giacomo Valle  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-80076 na1 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3617 Accesses

  • 15 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomedical engineering
  • Motor neuron
  • Somatic system
  • Translational research

Abstract

Limb loss causes severe sensorimotor deficits and often necessitates prosthetic devices, particularly in lower-limb amputees. Although direct neural recording from residual nerves offers a biomimetic route for prosthetic control, low signal amplitudes and challenges in nerve interfacing have limited adoption. Intraneural multichannel electrodes provide a potential solution by enabling access to motor signals from muscles lost after amputation. Here, we report intraneural recordings from two transfemoral amputees using transversal intrafascicular multichannel electrodes implanted in distal branches of the sciatic nerve. We identified multiunit activity associated with volitional phantom movements of the knee, ankle, and toes, exhibiting joint- and direction-specific modulation distributed across electrodes. A Spiking Neural Network–based decoder outperformed conventional methods in predicting attempted movements, with further gains achieved by integrating intraneural and intermuscular signals. Motor and sensory maps showed minimal overlap, indicating early segregation within the sciatic nerve. These findings pave the way for bidirectional, neurally-controlled prosthetic systems.

Similar content being viewed by others

Extra-neural signals from severed nerves enable intrinsic hand movements in transhumeral amputations

Article Open access 17 June 2022

A low-power stretchable neuromorphic nerve with proprioceptive feedback

Article 15 August 2022

Mechanoneural interfaces for bionic integration

Article 19 February 2024

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary files. Individual de-identified participant data experimental data supporting the findings are immediately and indefinitely available at https://github.com/rossicecilia/intraneural_phantom_leg.git for anyone who wishes to access the data for any purpose. Source data are also provided in this paper. Any additional requests for information can be directed to and will be fulfilled by the corresponding authors. Protocol for human clinical trials is given as part of the reporting summary. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Custom code used for analysis is publicly available through https://github.com/rossicecilia/intraneural_phantom_leg.git. Code used for data collection can be made available upon request to the study PIs.

References

  1. Kim, Y. C., Park, C. I., Kim, D. Y., Kim, T. S. & Shin, J. C. Statistical analysis of amputations and trends in Korea. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 20, 88–95 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ziegler-Graham, K., MacKenzie, E. J., Ephraim, P. L., Travison, T. G. & Brookmeyer, R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 89, 422–429 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Waters, R. L., Perry, J., Antonelli, D. & Hislop, H. J. Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. The journal of bone and joint surgery. American ume 58, 42–46 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Raspopovic, S., Valle, G. & Petrini, F. M. Sensory feedback for limb prostheses in amputees. Nat. Mater. 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-00966-9 (2021).

  5. Johansson, J. L., Sherrill, D. M., Riley, P. O., Bonato, P. & Herr, H. A clinical comparison of variable-damping and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84, 563 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cimolato, A. et al. EMG-driven control in lower limb prostheses: a topic-based systematic review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 19, 43 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hefferman, G. M., Zhang, F., Nunnery, M. J. & Huang, H. Integration of surface electromyographic sensors with the transfemoral amputee socket: a comparison of four differing configurations. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 39, 166–173 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grison, A. et al. Multidimensional motoneuron control using intramuscular microelectrode arrays in tetraplegic spinal cord injury. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.17.25331429 (2025).

  9. Pasquina, P. F. et al. First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand. J. Neurosci. Methods 244, 85–93 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrante, L. et al. Implanted microelectrode arrays in reinnervated muscles allow separation of neural drives from transferred polyfunctional nerves. Nat. Biomed. Eng 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01537-y (2025).

  11. Shu, T., Herrera-Arcos, G., Taylor, C. R. & Herr, H. M. Mechanoneural interfaces for bionic integration. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 374–391 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vu, P. P. et al. A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaay2857 (2020).

  13. Kuiken, T. A. et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA 301, 619–628 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Mastinu, E., Sassu, P., Aszmann, O. & Brånemark, R. Self-contained neuromusculoskeletal arm prostheses. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1732–1738 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hargrove, L. J. et al. Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1237–1242 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clites, T. R. et al. Proprioception from a neurally controlled lower-extremity prosthesis. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaap8373 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Song, H. et al. Continuous neural control of a bionic limb restores biomimetic gait after amputation. Nat. Med. 30, 2010–2019 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shu, T. et al. Tissue-integrated bionic knee restores versatile legged movement after amputation. Science 389, eadv3223 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Srinivasan, S. S. et al. Agonist-antagonist myoneural interface amputation preserves proprioceptive sensorimotor neurophysiology in lower limbs. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eabc5926 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perry, S. D., McIlroy, W. E. & Maki, B. E. The role of plantar cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the control of compensatory stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable, multi-directional perturbation. Brain Res. 877, 401–406 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roll, R., Kavounoudias, A. & Roll, J.-P. Cutaneous afferents from human plantar sole contribute to body posture awareness. Neuroreport 13, 1957–1961 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, D., Triolo, R. & Charkhkar, H. Plantar somatosensory restoration enhances gait, speed perception, and motor adaptation. Sci. Robot. 8, eadf8997 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Charkhkar, H., Christie, B. P. & Triolo, R. J. Sensory neuroprosthesis improves postural stability during sensory organization test in lower-limb amputees. Sci. Rep. 10, 6984 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Petrini, F. M. et al. Sensory feedback restoration in leg amputees improves walking speed, metabolic cost and phantom pain. Nat. Med. 25, 1356–1363 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Petrini, F. M. et al. Enhancing functional abilities and cognitive integration of the lower limb prosthesis. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaav8939 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Valle, G. et al. Mechanisms of neuro-robotic prosthesis operation in leg amputees. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd8354 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Preatoni, G., Valle, G., Petrini, F. M. & Raspopovic, S. Lightening the perceived weight of a prosthesis with cognitively integrated neural sensory feedback. Curr. Biol. 31, 1–7 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Valle, G. et al. Biomimetic computer-to-brain communication enhancing naturalistic touch sensations via peripheral nerve stimulation. Nat. Commun. 15, 1151 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Davis, T. S. et al. Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves. J. Neural Eng. 13, 036001 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Petrini, F. M. et al. Microneurography as a tool to develop decoding algorithms for peripheral neuro-controlled hand prostheses. Biomed. Eng. Online 18, 44 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cracchiolo, M. et al. Computational approaches to decode grasping force and velocity level in upper-limb amputee from intraneural peripheral signals. J. Neural Eng. 18, 055001 (2021).

  32. Cracchiolo, M. et al. Decoding of grasping tasks from intraneural recordings in trans-radial amputee. J. Neural Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ab8277 (2020).

  33. Wendelken, S. et al. Restoration of motor control and proprioceptive and cutaneous sensation in humans with prior upper-limb amputation via multiple Utah slanted electrode arrays (USEAs) implanted in residual peripheral arm nerves. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 14, 121 (2017).

  34. Donati, E. & Indiveri, G. Neuromorphic bioelectronic medicine for nervous system interfaces: from neural computational primitives to medical applications. Prog. Biomed. Eng. 5, 013002 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Donati, E. & Valle, G. Neuromorphic hardware for somatosensory neuroprostheses. Nat. Commun. 15, 556 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pillastrini, P., Marchetti, M. & Abbruzzese, G. Neurofisiologia del movimento. Anatomia, biomeccanica, chinesiologia, clinica, 2nd edn (Piccin-Nuova Libraria, Padova, 2020).

  37. Rigoard, P. Atlas of Anatomy of the Peripheral Nerves: The Nerves of the Limbs–Expert Edition (Springer International Publishing, 2020).

  38. Herdin, M., Czink, N., Ozcelik, H. & Bonek, E. Correlation matrix distance, a meaningful measure for evaluation of non-stationary MIMO channels. In Proc. 2005 IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference Vol. 1, 136–140 (IEEE, 2005).

  39. Yavuz, U. Ş, Negro, F., Diedrichs, R. & Farina, D. Reciprocal inhibition between motor neurons of the tibialis anterior and triceps surae in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 119, 1699–1706 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bian, S., Donati, E. & Magno, M. Evaluation of encoding schemes on ubiquitous sensor signal for spiking neural network. IEEE Sens. J. 24, 35008–35018 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sava, R., Donati, E. & Indiveri, G. Feed-forward and recurrent inhibition for compressing and classifying high dynamic range biosignals in spiking neural network architectures. In Proc. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/BioCAS58349.2023.10388963 (2023).

  42. Hong, K.-S., Aziz, N. & Ghafoor, U. Motor-commands decoding using peripheral nerve signals: a review. J. Neural Eng. 15, 031004 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Goncharova, I. I., McFarland, D. J., Vaughan, T. M. & Wolpaw, J. R. EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 1580–1593 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schone, H. R. et al. Stable cortical body maps before and after arm amputation. Nat Neurosci 28, 2015–2021 (2025).

  45. Raspopovic, S., Petrini, F. M., Zelechowski, M. & Valle, G. Framework for the development of neuroprostheses: from basic understanding by sciatic and median nerves models to bionic legs and hands. Proc. IEEE 105, 34–49 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zelechowski, M., Valle, G. & Raspopovic, S. A computational model to design neural interfaces for lower-limb sensory neuroprostheses. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 17, 24 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Warchoł, Ł, Walocha, J. A., Mizia, E., Liszka, H. & Bonczar, M. Comparison of the histological structure of the tibial nerve and its terminal branches in the fresh and fresh-frozen cadavers. Folia Morphol. 80, 542–548 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jankowska, E. & Roberts, W. J. Synaptic actions of single interneurones mediating reciprocal Ia inhibition of motoneurones. J. Physiol. 222, 623–642 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Shindo, M., Harayama, H., Kondo, K., Yanagisawa, N. & Tanaka, R. Changes in reciprocal Ia inhibition during voluntary contraction in man. Exp. Brain Res. 53, 400–408 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  50. De Luca, C. J. & Mambrito, B. Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. J. Neurophysiol. 58, 525–542 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dietz, V. & Sinkjaer, T. Spastic movement disorder: impaired reflex function and altered muscle mechanics. Lancet Neurol. 6, 725–733 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Reilly, K. T., Mercier, C., Schieber, M. H. & Sirigu, A. Persistent hand motor commands in the amputees’ brain. Brain 129, 2211–2223 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Enoka, R. M. & Duchateau, J. Rate coding and the control of muscle force. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 7, a029702 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Macefield, V. G., Fuglevand, A. J., Howell, J. N. & Bigland-Ritchie, B. Discharge behaviour of single motor units during maximal voluntary contractions of a human toe extensor. J. Physiol. 528, 227–234 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Barberi, F. et al. Early decoding of walking tasks with minimal set of EMG channels. J. Neural Eng. 20, 026038 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  56. De Luca, C., Tincani, M., Indiveri, G. & Donati, E. A neuromorphic multi-scale approach for real-time heart rate and state detection. npj Unconv. Comput. 2, 6 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Baracat, F., Mazzoni, A., Micera, S., Indiveri, G. & Donati, E. Decoding gestures from intraneural recordings of a transradial amputee using event-based processing. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.170719069.94594142/v2 (2024).

  58. Katic, N. et al. Modeling foot sole cutaneous afferents: FootSim. iScience 26, 105874 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Delgado-Martínez, I., Badia, J., Pascual-Font, A., Rodríguez-Baeza, A. & Navarro, X. Fascicular topography of the human median nerve for neuroprosthetic surgery. Front. Neurosci. 10, 286 (2016).

  60. Dhillon, G. S., Lawrence, S. M., Hutchinson, D. T. & Horch, K. W. Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: implications for neural control of artificial limbs. J. Hand Surg. Am. 29, 605–615 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Seyedali, M., Czerniecki, J. M., Morgenroth, D. C. & Hahn, M. E. Co-contraction patterns of trans-tibial amputee ankle and knee musculature during gait. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 9, 29 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Valle, G. et al. Multifaceted understanding of human nerve implants to design optimized electrodes for bioelectronics. Biomaterials 291, 121874 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Aiello, G., Valle, G. & Raspopovic, S. Recalibration of neuromodulation parameters in neural implants with adaptive Bayesian optimization. J. Neural Eng. 20, 026037 (2023).

  64. Chen, W., Liu, X., Wan, P., Chen, Z. & Chen, Y. Anti-artifacts techniques for neural recording front-ends in closed-loop brain-machine interface ICs. Front. Neurosci. 18, 1393206 (2024).

  65. Dosen, S., Schaeffer, M.-C. & Farina, D. Time-division multiplexing for myoelectric closed-loop control using electrotactile feedback. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 138 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Chateaux, M. et al. New insights into muscle activity associated with phantom hand movements in transhumeral amputees. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 18, 1443833(2024).

  67. Jarrassé, N. et al. Phantom-mobility-based prosthesis control in transhumeral amputees without surgical reinnervation: a preliminary study. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6, 164 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Čvančara, P. et al. Bringing sensation to prosthetic hands—chronic assessment of implanted thin-film electrodes in humans. npj Flex. Electron. 7, 1–14 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Rey, H. G., Pedreira, C. & Quian Quiroga, R. Past, present and future of spike sorting techniques. Brain Res. Bull. 119, 106–117 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Stimberg, M., Brette, R. & Goodman, D. F. Brian 2, an intuitive and efficient neural simulator. eLife 8, e47314 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  71. van Schaik, A., Fragniere, E. & Vittoz, E. An analogue electronic model of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. In Proc. of Fifth International Conference on Microelectronics for Neural Networks 52–59, https://doi.org/10.1109/MNNFS.1996.493772 (1996).

  72. Zanghieri, M., Benatti, S., Benini, L. & Donati, E. Event-based low-power and low-latency regression method for hand kinematics from surface EMG. In Proc. 9th International Workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces (IWASI) 293–298, https://doi.org/10.1109/IWASI58316.2023.10164372 (2023).

  73. Eshraghian, J. K. et al. Training spiking neural networks using lessons from deep learning. Proc. IEEE 111, 1016–1054 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Neftci, E. O., Mostafa, H. & Zenke, F. Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networks: Bringing the Power of Gradient-Based Optimization to Spiking Neural Networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 36, 51–63 (2019).

  75. Valle, G. et al. A psychometric platform to collect somatosensory sensations for neuroprosthetic use. Front. Med. Technol. 3, 8 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are deeply grateful to the three subjects who freely donated months of their life for the advancement of knowledge and for a better future for leg amputees. The funder had no role in the experimental design, analysis, or manuscript preparation or submission. All authors had complete access to the data. All authors authorized the submission of the manuscript, but the final submission decision was made by the corresponding authors. This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (FeelAgain grant agreement no. 759998, S.R.).

Funding

Open access funding provided by Chalmers University of Technology.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Elisa Donati, Giacomo Valle.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Cecilia Rossi & Elisa Donati

  2. Orthopaedic Surgery Department, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

    Marko Bumbasirevic

  3. Department of Microsystems Engineering–IMTEK, IMBIT // NeuroProbes, BrainLinks-BrainTools Center, Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    Paul Čvančara & Thomas Stieglitz

  4. Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Stanisa Raspopovic

  5. Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Stanisa Raspopovic

  6. Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Giacomo Valle

Authors
  1. Cecilia Rossi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marko Bumbasirevic
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Čvančara
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas Stieglitz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stanisa Raspopovic
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elisa Donati
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Giacomo Valle
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.R. analyzed the neural data, implemented and tested the SNN-based motor decoders, prepared the figures and wrote the paper; T.S. and P.C. developed the TIME and delivered technical assistance for the human implantation and explanation procedures and reviewed the manuscript; M.B. performed the human surgeries and was responsible for all the clinical aspects of the human study; S.R. designed the study, performed and supervised the human experiments and reviewed the manuscript; E.D., supervised all the analyses, and wrote the paper; G.V. developed the recording software for human experiments, performed the human experiments, supervised all the analyses, prepared the figures and wrote the paper. All authors edited and proofread the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elisa Donati or Giacomo Valle.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

G.V. holds shares of “MYNERVA AG”, a start-up company dealing with the potential commercialization of noninvasive stimulating wearable for treating neuropathic pain. G.V. serves as a consultant for NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation (USA). The other authors do not have anything to disclose.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Jozina De Graaf and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review File

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossi, C., Bumbasirevic, M., Čvančara, P. et al. Decoding phantom limb movements from intraneural recordings. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69297-0

Download citation

  • Received: 18 August 2025

  • Accepted: 25 January 2026

  • Published: 08 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69297-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research