Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
The genetic landscape of human functional brain connectivity
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 February 2026

The genetic landscape of human functional brain connectivity

  • Bernardo de APC Maciel  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-87011,
  • Marijn Schipper  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5170-27961,
  • Cato Romero2,
  • Christiaan de Leeuw  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1076-98281,
  • Koen Helwegen1,
  • Danielle Posthuma1,3,
  • Jeanne E. Savage  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-83411 &
  • …
  • Martijn P. van den Heuvel  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-11951,2 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Genetic association study
  • Genetics of the nervous system

Abstract

Investigating the genetic underpinnings of functional brain connectivity is essential to understand how genetic variation influences brain health and disease. Here, a mass-univariate approach was adopted to study the genetic architecture of functional brain circuitry (Ntotal = 28,159 subjects) with high spatial resolution (82 brain regions). Common genetic variants explained individual differences in 33% of all 3321 inter-regional functional pathways with 72 significant associations reflecting widespread, pleiotropic effects across the connectome. These associations were mapped to five genes—PAX8, EphA3, SLC39A12, THBS1 and APOE—with known associations with brain phenotypes and which converged in biological processes related to neurodevelopment and cardiovascular and cognitive traits (enrichment minimum p = 3.0 × 10−6 and p = 1.6 × 10−5, respectively). Our findings show that the genetic component of individual differences in functional brain connectivity is largely shared throughout the brain, highlighting the importance of genetic variation in large-scale brain organisation and its relationship with cognitive function and overall health.

Similar content being viewed by others

Common variants contribute to intrinsic human brain functional networks

Article 07 April 2022

Genetic overlap between multivariate measures of human functional brain connectivity and psychiatric disorders

Article 08 January 2024

Environmental effects on brain functional networks in a juvenile twin population

Article Open access 09 March 2023

Data availability

The genome-wide summary statistics data generated in this study can be accessed through https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1842946089. The imaging and genotyping data are protected and are not available due to data privacy. The Source data used to plot each figure are provided with this paper. The following data have been used to perform the analyses on this manuscript: LD reference for LDSC, https://www.internationalgenome.org/category/reference/; RSN Annotation Files, https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011; MNI template: https://nist.mni.mcgill.ca/mni-average-brain-305-mri/; FLAMES pathway-naïve feature set: https://zenodo.org/records/10409723; Case-control disease sumstats: https://pgc.unc.edu/for-researchers/download-results/. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

All used software tools and code are publicly available: CATO, http://www.dutchconnectomelab.nl/CATO/; FUMA, http://fuma.ctglab.nl/; MAGMA, https://ctg.cncr.nl/software/magma; LDSC, https://github.com/bulik/ldsc; PLINK, https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/; FlashPCA2, https://github.com/gabraham/flashpca; FLAMES, https://github.com/Marijn-Schipper/FLAMES; FINEMAP & LDStore2, http://www.christianbenner.com/; coloc R package, https://chr1swallace.github.io/coloc/.

References

  1. Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petersen, S. E. & Sporns, O. Brain networks and cognitive architectures. Neuron 88, 207–219 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. van den Heuvel, M. P. & Sporns, O. A cross-disorder connectome landscape of brain dysconnectivity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 435–446 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fornito, A., Zalesky, A. & Breakspear, M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 159–172 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gu, Z., Jamison, K. W., Sabuncu, M. R. & Kuceyeski, A. Heritability and interindividual variability of regional structure-function coupling. Nat. Commun. 12, 4894 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glahn, D. C. et al. Genetic control over the resting brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 1223–1228 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reineberg, A. E., Hatoum, A. S., Hewitt, J. K., Banich, M. T. & Friedman, N. P. Genetic and environmental influence on the human functional connectome. Cereb. Cortex 30, 2099–2113 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tissink, E. et al. The genetic architectures of functional and structural connectivity properties within cerebral resting-state networks. eNeuro 10, (2023).

  9. Elliott, L. T. et al. Genome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank. Nature 562, 210–216 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, B. et al. Common variants contribute to intrinsic human brain functional networks. Nat. Genet. 54, 508–517 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sha, Z., Wager, T. D., Mechelli, A. & He, Y. Common dysfunction of large-scale neurocognitive networks across psychiatric disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 85, 379–388 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, S. M. et al. An expanded set of genome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 737–745 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brouwer, R. M. et al. Genetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 421–432 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Régy, M. et al. The role of dementia in the association between APOE4 and all-cause mortality: pooled analyses of two population-based cohort studies. Lancet Healthy Longev. 5, e422–e430 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Romero, C. et al. Exploring the genetic overlap between twelve psychiatric disorders. Nat. Genet. 54, 1795–1802 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grotzinger, A. D. et al. Genetic architecture of 11 major psychiatric disorders at biobehavioral, functional genomic and molecular genetic levels of analysis. Nat. Genet. 54, 548–559 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roelfs, D. et al. Shared genetic architecture between mental health and the brain functional connectome in the UK Biobank. BMC Psychiatry 23, 461 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. van der Meer, D. et al. Understanding the genetic determinants of the brain with MOSTest. Nat. Commun. 11, 3512 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tissink, E. P. et al. Abundant pleiotropy across neuroimaging modalities identified through a multivariate genome-wide association study. Nat. Commun. 15, 2655 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mekki, Y. et al. The genetic architecture of language functional connectivity. NeuroImage 249, 118795 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Foo, H. et al. Novel genetic variants associated with brain functional networks in 18,445 adults from the UK Biobank. Sci. Rep. 11, 14633 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bell, S., Tozer, D. J. & Markus, H. S. Genome-wide association study of the human brain functional connectome reveals strong vascular component underlying global network efficiency. Sci. Rep. 12, 14938 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bulik-Sullivan, B. K. et al. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Oberhuber, M. et al. Four functionally distinct regions in the left supramarginal gyrus support word processing. Cereb. Cortex 26, 4212–4226 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Davey, J. et al. Exploring the role of the posterior middle temporal gyrus in semantic cognition: Integration of anterior temporal lobe with executive processes. Neuroimage 137, 165–177 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Seoane, S., Modroño, C., González-Mora, J. L. & Janssen, N. Medial temporal lobe contributions to resting-state networks. Brain Struct. Funct. 227, 995–1012 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schipper, M. et al. Prioritizing effector genes at trait-associated loci using multimodal evidence. Nat. Genet. 57, 323–333 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fernández-Calle, R. et al. APOE in the bullseye of neurodegenerative diseases: impact of the APOE genotype in Alzheimer’s disease pathology and brain diseases. Mol. Neurodegener. 17, 62 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Watson, H. J. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa. Nat. Genet. 51, 1207–1214 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wightman, D. P. et al. A genome-wide association study with 1,126,563 individuals identifies new risk loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 53, 1276–1282 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Trubetskoy, V. et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature 604, 502–508 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004219 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Watanabe, K., Taskesen, E., van Bochoven, A. & Posthuma, D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat. Commun. 8, 1826 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D638–D646 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xue, A. et al. Unravelling the complex causal effects of substance use behaviours on common diseases. Commun. Med. 4, 43 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. de Leeuw, C., Savage, J., Bucur, I. G., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. Understanding the assumptions underlying Mendelian randomization. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 30, 653–660 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Petrovski, S., Wang, Q., Heinzen, E. L., Allen, A. S. & Goldstein, D. B. Genic intolerance to functional variation and the interpretation of personal genomes. PLOS Genet. 9, e1003709 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lisabeth, E. M., Falivelli, G. & Pasquale, E. B. Eph receptor signaling and ephrins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a009159 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Donoghue, M. J. & Rakic, P. Molecular gradients and compartments in the embryonic primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 9, 586–600 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jayasena, C. S., Flood, W. D. & Koblar, S. A. High EphA3 expressing ophthalmic trigeminal sensory axons are sensitive to ephrin-A5-Fc: Implications for lobe-specific axon guidance. Neuroscience 135, 97–109 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wainberg, M. et al. Genetic architecture of the structural connectome. Nat. Commun. 15, 1962 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Di Palma, T. et al. Characterization of a novel loss-of-function mutation of PAX8 associated with congenital hypothyroidism. Clin. Endocrinol. 73, 808–814 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mansouri, A., Chowdhury, K. & Gruss, P. Follicular cells of the thyroid gland require Pax8 gene function. Nat. Genet. 19, 87–90 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Son, S. M. et al. Thrombospondin-1 prevents amyloid beta-mediated synaptic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 36, 3214–3227 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li, Z., Shue, F., Zhao, N., Shinohara, M. & Bu, G. APOE2: protective mechanism and therapeutic implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 15, 63 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kulminski, A. M., Philipp, I., Shu, L. & Culminskaya, I. Definitive roles of TOMM40-APOE-APOC1 variants in the Alzheimer’s risk. Neurobiol. Aging 110, 122–131 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ken-Dror, G., Talmud, P. J., Humphries, S. E. & Drenos, F. APOE/C1/C4/C2 gene cluster genotypes, haplotypes and lipid levels in prospective coronary heart disease risk among UK healthy men. Mol. Med. 16, 389–399 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Blake, S. M. et al. Thrombospondin-1 binds to ApoER2 and VLDL receptor and functions in postnatal neuronal migration. EMBO J. 27, 3069–3080 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sensi, S. L., Paoletti, P., Bush, A. I. & Sekler, I. Zinc in the physiology and pathology of the CNS. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 780–791 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Chowanadisai, W., Graham, D. M., Keen, C. L., Rucker, R. B. & Messerli, M. A. Neurulation and neurite extension require the zinc transporter ZIP12 (slc39a12). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 9903–9908 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Scarr, E. et al. Increased cortical expression of the zinc transporter SLC39A12 suggests a breakdown in zinc cellular homeostasis as part of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Npj Schizophr. 2, 1–7 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Karczewski, K. J. et al. Systematic single-variant and gene-based association testing of thousands of phenotypes in 394,841 UK Biobank exomes. Cell Genom. 2, 100168 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Friston, K. J. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2, 56–78 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Faskowitz, J., Betzel, R. F. & Sporns, O. Edges in brain networks: contributions to models of structure and function. Netw. Neurosci. 6, 1–28 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Foo, H. et al. Genetic influence on ageing-related changes in resting-state brain functional networks in healthy adults: a systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 113, 98–110 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. van der Meer, D. et al. Boosting schizophrenia genetics by utilizing genetic overlap with brain morphology. Biol. Psychiatry 92, 291–298 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Cao, H., Zhou, H. & Cannon, T. D. Functional connectome-wide associations of schizophrenia polygenic risk. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 2553–2561 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sha, Z., Schijven, D., Fisher, S. E. & Francks, C. Genetic architecture of the white matter connectome of the human brain. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd2870 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Carnevale, L. et al. Brain functional magnetic resonance imaging highlights altered connections and functional networks in patients with hypertension. Hypertension 76, 1480–1490 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hussein, A. et al. The association between resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and aortic pulse-wave velocity in healthy adults. Hum. Brain Mapp. 41, 2121–2135 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Chang, C. et al. Association between heart rate variability and fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity. NeuroImage 68, 93–104 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wei, Y. et al. Associated Genetics and Connectomic Circuitry in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 94, 174–183 (2023).

  64. Sjögren, M. et al. Tau and Aβ42 in cerebrospinal fluid from healthy adults 21–93 years of age: establishment of reference values. Clin. Chem. 47, 1776–1781 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Slot, R. E. R. et al. Apolipoprotein A1 in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma and progression to Alzheimer’s disease in non-demented elderly. J. Alzheimers Dis. 56, 687–697 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yu, M., Sporns, O. & Saykin, A. J. The human connectome in Alzheimer disease—relationship to biomarkers and genetics. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 17, 545–563 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Fry, A. et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186, 1026–1034 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Power, J. D. et al. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. NeuroImage 84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048 (2014).

  69. Liu, T. T. & Falahpour, M. Vigilance effects in resting-state fMRI. Front. Neurosci. 14, (2020).

  70. Birn, R. M. et al. The influence of physiological noise correction on test–retest reliability of resting-state functional connectivity. Brain Connect 4, 511–522 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Botvinik-Nezer, R. et al. Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature 582, 84–88 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Jansen, P. R. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of brain volume identifies genomic loci and genes shared with intelligence. Nat. Commun. 11, 5606 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nielsen, R., Paul, J. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Song, Y. S. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 443–451 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Smith, S., Alfaro-Almagro, F. & Miller, K. L. UK Biobank Brain Imaging Documentation Version 1.9. (2022).

  75. de Lange, S. C., Helwegen, K. & van den Heuvel, M. P. Structural and functional connectivity reconstruction with CATO—a connectivity analysis TOolbox. NeuroImage 273, 120108 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W. & Smith, S. M. FSL. NeuroImage 62, 782–790 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Fischl, B. et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33, 341–355 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Desikan, R. S. et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral-based regions of interest. NeuroImage 31, 968–980 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage 59, 2142–2154 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Alfaro-Almagro, F. et al. Confound modelling in UK Biobank brain imaging. NeuroImage 224, 117002 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Abraham, G., Qiu, Y. & Inouye, M. FlashPCA2: principal component analysis of Biobank-scale genotype datasets. Bioinformatics 33, 2776–2778 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Giambartolomei, C. et al. Bayesian test for colocalisation between pairs of genetic association studies using summary statistics. PLOS Genet. 10, e1004383 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Benner, C. et al. Prospects of fine-mapping trait-associated genomic regions by using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101, 539–551 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Benner, C. et al. FINEMAP: efficient variable selection using summary data from genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 32, 1493–1501 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Weeks, E. M. et al. Leveraging polygenic enrichments of gene features to predict genes underlying complex traits and diseases. Nat. Genet. 55, 1267–1276 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinforma 27, 1739–1740 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  88. MacArthur, J. et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D896–D901 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  89. de Azevedo Pinto Castro Maciel, B. et al. Summary statistics data for ‘The genetic landscape of human functional brain connectivity’ by Maciel et al. (2026). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18429460 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

B.A.P.C.M., D.P., C.R., M.P.vd.H., and M.S. were funded by a Dutch Research Council (NWO) Gravitation grant: BRAINSCAPES: A Roadmap from Neurogenetics to Neurobiology (grant no. 024.004.012 [to D.P.]). D.P. and C.d.L. were funded by a European Research Council advanced grant (grant no. ERC-2018-AdG GWAS2FUNC 834057 [to D.P.]). M.P.vd.H. and K.H. were funded by an European Research Council Consolidator grant: CONNECT (grant no. 101001062 [to M.P.vd.H]). M.P.vd.H. was funded by a Dutch Research Council (NWO) VICI grant: BrainDiversity (grant no. VI.C.241.074). J.E.S. is supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) VENI Grant 201G-064. This manuscript was submitted as a preprint to medRxiv. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank resource under application 16406. We thank the numerous participants, researchers, and staff who collected and contributed to the data. We thank SURF for the support in using the National Supercomputers Snellius and LISA. Part of the work in this manuscript was carried out with the support of the SURF Cooperative using grant EINF-14888. We thank Dr Rachel M. Brouwer, Dr Sophie van der Sluis and Ilan Libedinsky for all the feedback. Finally, we would also like to acknowledge Dr Elleke P. Tissink and Dr Siemon C. de Lange, who preprocessed the MRI data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Bernardo de APC Maciel, Marijn Schipper, Christiaan de Leeuw, Koen Helwegen, Danielle Posthuma, Jeanne E. Savage & Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  2. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Section Complex Trait Genetics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Cato Romero & Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  3. Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Complex Trait Genetics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Danielle Posthuma

Authors
  1. Bernardo de APC Maciel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marijn Schipper
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cato Romero
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christiaan de Leeuw
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Koen Helwegen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Danielle Posthuma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jeanne E. Savage
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Martijn P. van den Heuvel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.d.A.P.C.M.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing, Visualisation. M.S.: Formal Analysis, Feedback. C.R.: Visualisation, Feedback. C.d.L.: Methodology, Feedback. K.H.: Feedback. D.P.: Funding acquisition, Feedback. J.E.S.: Methodology, Supervision, Feedback. M.P.v.d.H: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Project Administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martijn P. van den Heuvel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.P.v.d.H. works as a consultant for Hoffman-La Roche and is part of the editorial team of Wiley Human Brain Mapping; they had no role in this study. The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Supplementary Data 7

Supplementary Data 8

Supplementary Data 9

Supplementary Data 10

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maciel, B.d.A., Schipper, M., Romero, C. et al. The genetic landscape of human functional brain connectivity. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69442-9

Download citation

  • Received: 09 May 2025

  • Accepted: 30 January 2026

  • Published: 24 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69442-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing