Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
The landscape of tissue-resident microbiota across normal, polyp, and colorectal cancer tissues
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 February 2026

The landscape of tissue-resident microbiota across normal, polyp, and colorectal cancer tissues

  • Haoyi Xiang  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-0151-13531,2,3 na1,
  • Baining Shen4 na1,
  • Weifeng Lao1,2,3,
  • Bingjun Bai1,2,3,
  • Min Chen1,2,3,
  • Leqi Zhou5,
  • Guanyu Yu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-35595,
  • Wei Zhang5,
  • Huan Chen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8005-56906,
  • Yuhao Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-37207,
  • Hangjin Jiang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-73254 &
  • …
  • Zhangfa Song1,2,3 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 15 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Predictive markers
  • Surgical oncology
  • Tumour biomarkers

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that tissue-resident microbiota (TRM) is associated with tumor biology; however, their distribution and compositional characteristics across different colorectal tissue types remain incompletely defined. Here, we conducted a comprehensive cross-sectional analysis of TRM distribution and abundance across 1134 clinical specimens, including normal mucosa, precancerous polyps, and colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues. Our results reveal distinct microbial profiles among these diagnostic groups, with consistent differences in community composition between normal, polyps, and CRC samples. Integrative analyses further identified microbial signatures capable of distinguishing tissue categories and reflected differences in the local tumor microenvironment. In contrast, intratumoral microbiota composition showed subtle variation across established tumor stages and was not associated with clinical outcomes. These findings define diagnostic group-associated patterns of TRM in colorectal tissues and establish a foundation for future mechanistic investigations into the biological roles of TRM in colorectal cancer.

Data availability

The data generated in this study is available at https://github.com/Lingning927/microbioInCRC. The raw sequence data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2021) in the National Genomics Data Center (Nucleic Acids Res 2022), China National Center for Bioinformation / Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GSA: CRA025367) that are publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa. The fecal sample cohort of CRC patients was sourced from the NCBI database, with accession code PRJEB10878, PRJEB27928 [DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0406-6], PRJEB7774, PRJEB12449, PRJDB4176, PRJEB6070 and PRJNA447983. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

All R scripts used for the analysis and plotting in this study are available in the GitHub repository (https://github.com/Lingning927/microbioInCRC) and are permanently archived on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18015706).

References

  1. Sung, H. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garrett, W. S. Cancer and the microbiota. Science 348, 80–86 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cao, Y. et al. Commensal microbiota from patients with inflammatory bowel disease produce genotoxic metabolites. Science 378, eabm3233 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maddocks, O. D., Scanlon, K. M. & Donnenberg, M. S. An Escherichia coli effector protein promotes host mutation via depletion of DNA mismatch repair proteins. mBio 4, e00152–00113 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abed, J. et al. Fap2 Mediates Fusobacterium nucleatum Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Enrichment by Binding to Tumor-Expressed Gal-GalNAc. Cell Host Microbe 20, 215–225 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rubinstein, M. R. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/beta-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe 14, 195–206 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dejea, C. M. et al. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis harbor colonic biofilms containing tumorigenic bacteria. Science 359, 592–597 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nejman, D. et al. The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type-specific intracellular bacteria. Science 368, 973–980 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Y. et al. Bacterial Genotoxin Accelerates Transient Infection-Driven Murine Colon Tumorigenesis. Cancer Discov. 12, 236–249 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pleguezuelos-Manzano, C. et al. Mutational signature in colorectal cancer caused by genotoxic pks(+) E. coli. Nature 580, 269–273 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dohlman, A. B. et al. A pan-cancer mycobiome analysis reveals fungal involvement in gastrointestinal and lung tumors. Cell 185, 3807–3822.e3812 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gnanasekaran, J. et al. Intracellular Porphyromonas gingivalis Promotes the Tumorigenic Behavior of Pancreatic Carcinoma Cells. Cancers 12 (2020).

  13. Yang, L., Li, A., Wang, Y. & Zhang, Y. Intratumoral microbiota: roles in cancer initiation, development and therapeutic efficacy. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 8, 35 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fu, A. et al. Tumor-resident intracellular microbiota promotes metastatic colonization in breast cancer. Cell 185, 1356–1372 e1326 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Choi, J. K. et al. Cross-talk between cancer and Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediates tumor suppression. Commun. Biol. 6, 16 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hayashi, N. et al. Extracellular Signals of a Human Epithelial Colorectal Adenocarcinoma (Caco-2) Cell Line Facilitate the Penetration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Strain through the Mucin Layer. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol 7, 415 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bullman, S. et al. Analysis of Fusobacterium persistence and antibiotic response in colorectal cancer. Science 358, 1443–1448 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Serna, G. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum persistence and risk of recurrence after preoperative treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 31, 1366–1375 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xue, M. et al. Effects of fucoidan on gut flora and tumor prevention in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colorectal carcinogenesis. J. Nutr. Biochem. 82, 108396 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Drewes, J. L. et al. Human colon cancer-derived clostridioides difficile strains drive colonic Tumorigenesis in Mice. Cancer Discov. 12, 1873–1885 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Magdy, A. et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC): Does it have a role in colorectal tumourigenesis? A Prospective Cohort Study. Int J. Surg. 18, 169–173 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andrew Maltez, T. et al. Metagenomic analysis of colorectal cancer datasets identifies cross-cohort microbial diagnostic signatures and a link with choline degradation. Nat. Med. 25, 667–678 (2019).

  23. Georg, Z. et al. Potential of fecal microbiota for early-stage detection of colorectal cancer. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 766 (2014).

  24. Kenneth, K. et al. The Sequence Read Archive: a decade more of explosive growth. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D387-D390 (2021).

  25. Emily, V. et al. Colorectal cancer and the human gut microbiome: reproducibility with whole-genome shotgun sequencing. PLoS One 11, e0155362 (2016).

  26. Qiang, F. et al. Gut microbiome development along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Nat. Commun. 6, 6528 (2015).

  27. Jakob, W. et al. Meta-analysis of fecal metagenomes reveals global microbial signatures that are specific for colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 25, 679–689 (2019).

  28. Jun, Y. et al. Metagenomic analysis of faecal microbiome as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Gut 66, 70–78 (2015).

  29. NaNa, K. & Edward, G. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 713–732 (2019).

  30. Petra, L., Georgina, L. H. & Harry, J. F. The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 661–672 (2014).

  31. Guo, P. et al. FadA promotes DNA damage and progression of Fusobacterium nucleatum-induced colorectal cancer through up-regulation of chk2. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 39, 202 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rubinstein, M. R. et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal cancer by inducing Wnt/beta-catenin modulator Annexin A1. EMBO Rep. 20, e47638 (2019).

  33. Karpinski, T. M., Ozarowski, M. & Stasiewicz, M. Carcinogenic microbiota and its role in colorectal cancer development. Semin Cancer Biol. 86, 420–430 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fu, K. et al. Streptococcus anginosus promotes gastric inflammation, atrophy, and tumorigenesis in mice. Cell 187, 882–896 e817 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cui, W. et al. Gut microbial metabolite facilitates colorectal cancer development via ferroptosis inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol. 26, 124–137 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tsoi, H. et al. Peptostreptococcus anaerobius Induces Intracellular Cholesterol Biosynthesis in Colon Cells to Induce Proliferation and Causes Dysplasia in Mice. Gastroenterology 152, 1419–1433.e1415 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vyara, M. et al. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science 359, 104–108 (2018).

  38. Wang, L. et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurised bacterium blunts colitis associated tumourigenesis by modulation of CD8(+) T cells in mice. Gut 69, 1988–1997 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, L. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila inhibits tryptophan metabolism via the AhR/beta-catenin signaling pathway to counter the progression of colorectal cancer. Int J. Biol. Sci. 19, 4393–4410 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Riquelme, E. et al. Tumor microbiome diversity and composition influence pancreatic cancer outcomes. Cell 178, 795–806.e712 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hezaveh, K. et al. Tryptophan-derived microbial metabolites activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in tumor-associated macrophages to suppress anti-tumor immunity. Immunity 55, 324–340.e328 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. He, Z. et al. Campylobacter jejuni promotes colorectal tumorigenesis through the action of cytolethal distending toxin. Gut 68, 289–300 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Torbjørn, R., Tomáš, F., Ben, N., Christopher, Q. & Frédéric, M. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).

  44. Robert, C. E. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460-1 (2010).

  45. Christian, Q. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res, 41, D590-6 (2012).

  46. Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P. & O’Hara, R. B.…. Wagner, H.(2016). vegan: Community Ecology Package Software. (2016).

  47. GOWER, J. C. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53, 325–338 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  48. CLARKE, K. R. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18, 117–143 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Anderson, M. J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26, 32–46 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Oksanen, J., Blanchet, G. F., Kindt, R., Legendre, P. & Stevens, H. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-10. The R Project. (2013).

  51. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2023).

  52. Liu, C., Cui, Y., Li, X. & Yao, M. microeco: An R package for data mining in microbial community ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. (2020).

  53. Kruskal, W. H. & Wallis, W. A. Errata: Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Publ. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 583–621 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wilcoxon, F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometr. Bull. 1, 80–83 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B: Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cochran, W. C. Some methods for strengthening the common 2 tests. Biometrics 10, 417 (1954).

  57. Kolde, R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12. The R Project. (2019).

  58. Ma, S. et al. Population structure discovery in meta-analyzed microbial communities and inflammatory bowel disease using MMUPHin. Genome Biol. 23, 208 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Huang, L. & Shyamal Das, P. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat Commun 11, 3514 (2020).

  60. Paulson, J. N., Stine, O. C., Bravo, H. C. & Pop, M. Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat. Methods 10, 1200–1202 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mcmurdie, P. J., Holmes, S. & Mchardy, A. C. Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol.,10,4(2014-4-3) 10, e1003531 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kuhn, M. Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 1–26 (2008).

  63. Breiman, L. Random forests, machine learning 45. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2, 199–228 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Peterson, C. B., Saha, S. & Do, K. A. Analysis of microbiome data. Ann. Rev. Stat. Appl. vol. 5 11, 483–504 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tibshirani, R. & Hastie, W. T. Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 63, 411–423 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 82273265, 32271213 and 32471189), Department of Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province (2023C03065 and 2025C02128), Zhejiang Provincial Major Medical and Health Science and Technology Program (WKJ-ZJ-2504), Zhejiang Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine co-constructs scientific and technological projects (GZY-ZJ-KJ-23029), and High-level Talent Special Support Program of Zhejiang Province.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Haoyi Xiang, Baining Shen.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Haoyi Xiang, Weifeng Lao, Bingjun Bai, Min Chen & Zhangfa Song

  2. Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Haoyi Xiang, Weifeng Lao, Bingjun Bai, Min Chen & Zhangfa Song

  3. Key Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Research on Anorectal Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Haoyi Xiang, Weifeng Lao, Bingjun Bai, Min Chen & Zhangfa Song

  4. Center for Data Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Baining Shen & Hangjin Jiang

  5. Colorectal Surgery Department, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China

    Leqi Zhou, Guanyu Yu & Wei Zhang

  6. Zhejiang provincial engineering research center of New technologies and applications for targeted therapy of major diseases, Hangzhou Digital-Micro Biotech Co. Ltd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Huan Chen

  7. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease of The First Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Yuhao Wang

Authors
  1. Haoyi Xiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Baining Shen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weifeng Lao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bingjun Bai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Min Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Leqi Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guanyu Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wei Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Huan Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yuhao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hangjin Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zhangfa Song
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.S. and Y.W. designed the study. Z.S., Y.W., H.J., and H.C. initiated and directed the project. W.L., M.C., B.B., and H.X. collected the samples. H.C. managed the 16S rRNA sequencing library construction. H.X. and B.S. completed the experiment, performed the bioinformatic analyses, and prepared the figures. W.Z., G.Y,. and L.Z. provided samples of the Changhai cohort. All authors contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huan Chen, Yuhao Wang, Hangjin Jiang or Zhangfa Song.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Transparent Peer Review file

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiang, H., Shen, B., Lao, W. et al. The landscape of tissue-resident microbiota across normal, polyp, and colorectal cancer tissues. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69705-5

Download citation

  • Received: 18 June 2025

  • Accepted: 04 February 2026

  • Published: 24 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69705-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer