Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Tumor cell villages define the co-dependency of tumor and microenvironment in liver cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 February 2026

Tumor cell villages define the co-dependency of tumor and microenvironment in liver cancer

  • Meng Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-41161,
  • Maria O. Hernandez2,
  • Darko Castven3,
  • Hsin-Pei Lee1,
  • Wenqi Wu1,
  • Limin Wang4,
  • Marshonna Forgues  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2101-75174,
  • Jonathan M. Hernandez5,
  • Jens U. Marquardt  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8314-26823 &
  • …
  • Lichun Ma  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-775X1,6 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Liver cancer
  • Tumour heterogeneity

Abstract

Spatial cellular context is crucial in shaping intratumor heterogeneity. However, understanding how each tumor establishes its unique spatial landscape and what factors drive the landscape for tumor fitness remains significantly challenging. Here, we analyze over 2 million cells from 50 tumor biospecimens using spatial single-cell imaging and single-cell RNA sequencing. We develop a deep learning-based strategy to spatially map tumor cell states and their surrounding environmental architecture, and find that different tumor cell states can be organized into distinct clusters, or “villages,” each supported by unique microenvironments. Notably, tumor cell villages exhibit village-specific molecular co-dependencies between tumor cells and their microenvironment and are associated with patient outcomes. Perturbation of molecular co-dependencies via random spatial shuffling of the microenvironment results in destabilization of the corresponding villages. We validate our findings using single-cell, spatial, and bulk transcriptome data from 740 liver cancer patients. This study provides insights into understanding tumor spatial landscape and its impact on tumor aggressiveness.

Similar content being viewed by others

Spatial landscapes of cancers: insights and opportunities

Article 23 July 2024

Multiregional single-cell dissection of tumor and immune cells reveals stable lock-and-key features in liver cancer

Article Open access 07 December 2022

The single-cell spatial landscape of stage III colorectal cancers

Article Open access 07 April 2025

Data availability

The single-cell spatial transcriptome data generated from this study have been deposited in Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.13773977). The processed scRNA-seq data of the patients in this study are available through the Gene Expression Omnibus (accession number GSE189903). Raw sequencing data are considered protected information and are therefore available under restricted access through dbGaP under accession number phs003117.v1.p1. Access via the NCI’s dbGaP can be requested by qualified senior or principal investigators overseeing the research. The NCI’s Data Access Committee reviews such requests within 3 months and will make data available for up to 12 months. The publicly available 10X genomics visium datasets used in this study include samples from Liu et al.38 (Mendeley Data: skrx2fz79n, https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/skrx2fz79n), Wu et al.6 (http://lifeome.net/supp/livercancer-st/data.htm), Zhang et al.39 (GEO accession: GSE238264, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE238264), and Mo et al.42 (HTAN DCC Portal under the HTAN WUSTL Atlas, https://data.humantumoratlas.org/). Other publicly available data include bulk transcriptomic data of GSE14520 (LCI)43, GSE144269 (Mongolia, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE144269)44, and the TCGA database (TCGA-LIHC, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov) and scRNA-seq data of GSE151530, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE1515301.

Code availability

Code used in this project have been deposited in github (https://github.com/MengLiu1/Tumor-cell-villages).

References

  1. Ma, L. et al. Single-cell atlas of tumor cell evolution in response to therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepatol. 75, 1397–1408 (2021.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marjanovic, N. D. et al. Emergence of a high-plasticity cell state during lung cancer evolution. Cancer cell 38, 229–246.e213 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peng, J. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intra-tumoral heterogeneity and malignant progression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cell Res. 29, 725–738 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gavish, A. et al. Hallmarks of transcriptional intratumour heterogeneity across a thousand tumours. Nature 618, 598–606 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barkley, D. et al. Cancer cell states recur across tumor types and form specific interactions with the tumor microenvironment. Nat. Genet. 54, 1192–1201 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu, R. et al. Comprehensive analysis of spatial architecture in primary liver cancer. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg3750 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Denisenko, E. et al. Spatial transcriptomics reveals discrete tumour microenvironments and autocrine loops within ovarian cancer subclones. Nat. Commun. 15, 2860 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ravi, V. M. et al. Spatially resolved multi-omics deciphers bidirectional tumor-host interdependence in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 40, 639–655.e613 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwald, A. C. et al. Integrative spatial analysis reveals a multi-layered organization of glioblastoma. Cell 187, 2485–2501.e2426 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cui Zhou, D. et al. Spatially restricted drivers and transitional cell populations cooperate with the microenvironment in untreated and chemo-resistant pancreatic cancer. Nat. Genet. 54, 1390–1405 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Zuani, M. et al. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics analysis of non-small cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 15, 4388 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirschenbaum, D. et al. Time-resolved single-cell transcriptomics defines immune trajectories in glioblastoma. Cell 187, 149–165.e123 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seferbekova, Z., Lomakin, A., Yates, L. R. & Gerstung, M. Spatial biology of cancer evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 295–313 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yeh, C. Y. et al. Mapping spatial organization and genetic cell-state regulators to target immune evasion in ovarian cancer. Nat. Immunol. 25, 1943–1958 (2024).

  15. Ma, L. et al. Tumor cell biodiversity drives microenvironmental reprogramming in liver cancer. Cancer Cell 36, 418–430.e416 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ma, L. & Wang, X. W. Dissecting liver tumor heterogeneity to improve health equity. Trends cancer 8, 286–290 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ma, L., Khatib, S., Craig, A. J. & Wang, X. W. Toward a liver cell atlas: understanding liver biology in health and disease at single-cell resolution. Semin Liver Dis. 41, 321–330 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng, H. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals cancer stem cell heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 68, 127–140 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. He, S. S. et al. High-plex imaging of RNA and proteins at subcellular resolution in fixed tissue by spatial molecular imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 40 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01483-z (2022).

  20. Ma, L. et al. Multiregional single-cell dissection of tumor and immune cells reveals stable lock-and-key features in liver cancer. Nat. Commun. 13, 7533 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Denisenko, E. et al. Systematic assessment of tissue dissociation and storage biases in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows. Genome Biol. 21, 1–25 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Axelrod, M. L., Cook, R. S., Johnson, D. B. & Balko, J. M. Biological consequences of MHC-II expression by tumor cells in cancer. Clin. cancer Res. 25, 2392–2402 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289-+ (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, C. et al. Arteries are formed by vein-derived endothelial tip cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5758 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Siemerink, M. J. et al. CD34 marks angiogenic tip cells in human vascular endothelial cell cultures. Angiogenesis 15, 151–163 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, J. et al. Pan-cancer integrative analyses dissect the remodeling of endothelial cells in human cancers. Natl. Sci. Rev. 11, nwae231 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goveia, J. et al. An integrated gene expression landscape profiling approach to identify lung tumor endothelial cell heterogeneity and angiogenic candidates. Cancer Cell 37, 21–36.e13 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guo, B., Wen, X., Yu, S. & Yang, J. Single-cell sequencing reveals PHLDA1-positive smooth muscle cells promote local invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Transl. Oncol. 55, 102301 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ma, R. Y., Black, A. & Qian, B. Z. Macrophage diversity in cancer revisited in the era of single-cell omics. Trends Immunol. 43, 546–563 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ma, L., Li, C. C. & Wang, X. W. Roles of cellular neighborhoods in hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 20, 169–192 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Maestri, E. et al. Spatial proximity of tumor-immune interactions predicts patient outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 10, 1097 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pastushenko, I. et al. Identification of the tumour transition states occurring during EMT. Nature 556, 463–468 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Belfiore, A. et al. IGF2: a role in metastasis and tumor evasion from immune surveillance? Biomedicines 11, 229 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pastushenko, I. & Blanpain, C. EMT transition states during tumor progression and metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 212–226 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dunn, G. P., Koebel, C. M. & Schreiber, R. D. Interferons, immunity and cancer immunoediting. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 836–848 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pichlmair, A. et al. IFIT1 is an antiviral protein that recognizes 5′-triphosphate RNA. Nat. Immunol. 12, 624–630 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou, Z. et al. Antiviral activities of ISG20 in positive-strand RNA virus infections. Virology 409, 175–188 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, Y. et al. Identification of a tumour immune barrier in the HCC microenvironment that determines the efficacy of immunotherapy. J. Hepatol. 78, 770–782 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, S. et al. Spatial transcriptomics analysis of neoadjuvant cabozantinib and nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma identifies independent mechanisms of resistance and recurrence. Genome Med. 15, 72 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gargiulo, G., Serresi, M. & Marine, J.-C. Cell states in cancer: drivers, passengers, and trailers. Cancer Discov. 14, 610–614 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Velickovic, P. et al. Graph attention networks. Stat 1050, 10–48550 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mo, C. K. et al. Tumour evolution and microenvironment interactions in 2D and 3D space. Nature 634 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08087-4 (2024).

  43. Roessler, S. et al. A unique metastasis gene signature enables prediction of tumor relapse in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Res. 70, 10202–10212 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Candia, J. et al. The genomic landscape of Mongolian hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 11, 4383 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. St Croix, B. et al. Genes expressed in human tumor endothelium. Science 289, 1197–1202 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ateeq, B. et al. Therapeutic targeting of SPINK1-positive prostate cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 72ra17–72ra17 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ozaki, N. et al. Serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 promotes proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells through the epidermal growth factor receptor. Mol. Cancer Res. 7, 1572–1581 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hambardzumyan, D. & Bergers, G. Glioblastoma: defining tumor niches. Trends Cancer 1, 252–265 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA a Cancer J.clin.74, 229–263 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Toh, M. R. et al. Global epidemiology and genetics of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 164, 766–782 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Revsine, M. et al. Lineage and ecology define liver tumor evolution in response to treatment. Cell Rep. Med. 5, 101394 (2024).

  52. Chaisaingmongkol, J. et al. Common molecular subtypes among Asian hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer cell 32, 57–70.e53 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ohmuraya, M. et al. Autophagic cell death of pancreatic acinar cells in serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 3—deficient mice. Gastroenterology 129, 696–705 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Man, K.-F. et al. SPINK1-induced tumor plasticity provides a therapeutic window for chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 14, 7863 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Neftel, C. et al. An integrative model of cellular states, plasticity, and genetics for glioblastoma. Cell 178, 835–849.e821 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Puram, S. V. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of primary and metastatic tumor ecosystems in head and neck cancer. Cell 171, 1611–1624.e1624 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ji, A. L. et al. Multimodal analysis of composition and spatial architecture in human squamous cell carcinoma. Cell 182, 497–514.e422 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cords, L. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast classification in single-cell and spatial proteomics data. Nat. Commun. 14, 4294 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang, M. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic architecture and intercellular crosstalk of human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepatol. 73, 1118–1130 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Morgan, D. & Tergaonkar, V. Unraveling B cell trajectories at single cell resolution. Trends Immunol. 43, 210–229 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yang, Y. et al. Pan-cancer single-cell dissection reveals phenotypically distinct B cell subtypes. Cell 187, 4790–4811.e4722 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang, Z. et al. Landscape of infiltrating B cells and their clinical significance in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncoimmunology 8, e1571388 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Guo, X. et al. Global characterization of T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer by single-cell sequencing. Nat. Med. 24, 978–985 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang, L. et al. Lineage tracking reveals dynamic relationships of T cells in colorectal cancer. Nature 564, 268–272 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zheng, C. H. et al. Landscape of infiltrating T cells in liver cancer revealed by single-cell sequencing. Cell 169, 1342 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Shiao, S. L. et al. Single-cell and spatial profiling identify three response trajectories to pembrolizumab and radiation therapy in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Cell 42, 70–84.e78 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Cang, Z. et al. Screening cell-cell communication in spatial transcriptomics via collective optimal transport. Nat. Methods 20, 218–228 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Xin Wei Wang, Eytan Ruppin, and Tom Misteli for helpful comments on the manuscript; Dr. Yuuki Ohara for assistance in interpreting the histology images; the patients, families, and nurses for contribution to this study. This work was supported by grants (ZIA BC 012079 [L.M.] and ZIA BC 012083 [L.M.]) from the intramural research program of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute of the United States. J.U.M. is supported by grants from the Wilhelm Sander Foundation (2021.089.1). The contributions of the NIH authors were made as part of their official duties as NIH federal employees, are in compliance with agency policy requirements, and are considered Works of the United States Government. However, the findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Funding

Open access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Meng Liu, Hsin-Pei Lee, Wenqi Wu & Lichun Ma

  2. Spatial Imaging Technology Resource, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Maria O. Hernandez

  3. Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center, Lübeck, Germany

    Darko Castven & Jens U. Marquardt

  4. Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Limin Wang & Marshonna Forgues

  5. Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Jonathan M. Hernandez

  6. Liver Cancer Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Lichun Ma

Authors
  1. Meng Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria O. Hernandez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Darko Castven
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hsin-Pei Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenqi Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Limin Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marshonna Forgues
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jonathan M. Hernandez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jens U. Marquardt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lichun Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.M. developed study concept; J.U.M. directed clinical study; M.L. performed computational analysis; M.O.H. conducted experiments; D.C., H.P.L., W.W., L.W., M.F., and J.M.H. conducted additional experiments and data analysis; M.L. and L.M. interpreted data; L.M. and M.L. wrote the manuscript with help from M.O.H. and D.C. All authors read, edited, and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jens U. Marquardt or Lichun Ma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Ruidong Xue, Flavio Maina and Lei Chen for their contribution to the peer review of this work. [A peer review file is available].

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Supplementary Data 7

Supplementary Data 8

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Hernandez, M.O., Castven, D. et al. Tumor cell villages define the co-dependency of tumor and microenvironment in liver cancer. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69797-z

Download citation

  • Received: 10 March 2025

  • Accepted: 09 February 2026

  • Published: 21 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69797-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer