Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Target-stabilized base editors enable robust high-fidelity RNA editing
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 February 2026

Target-stabilized base editors enable robust high-fidelity RNA editing

  • Taian Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8455-864X1,2 na1,
  • Yunping Lin1,2,3 na1,
  • Qiwei Liu1,
  • Wenhui Liao1,
  • Yunyi Lin1,
  • Yujing Zhang1,
  • Jianqing Zhang1,
  • Wenhua Cao1,
  • Lixin Yang1,
  • Zexuan Hong1,4 &
  • …
  • Zhonghua Lu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7102-59561,2,3,5 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Animal disease models
  • RNA editing
  • Targeted gene repair

Abstract

RNA base editing using engineered deaminases represents a powerful tool to correct mutations at the RNA level. However, widespread off-target effects, primarily arising from dissociated free deaminases, remain a significant challenge. Here, we devise the RECODE (RNA editing with conditionally stable and enhanced ADAR1 deaminase variants) system, which employs designer degron-tagged ADAR1 deaminase (ADAR1d) with guide RNA (gRNA)-regulated stability. By promoting degradation of gRNA-unbound ADAR1d, RECODE markedly reduces transcriptome-wide edits while maintaining high on-target efficacy. Engineering gRNA for target RNA-induced conformational switching confines ADAR1d stabilization to intended editing sites, further enhancing editing precision. With structure-guided rational engineering of ADAR1d, RECODE efficiently corrects an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-relevant FUS mutation and installs a therapeutic mutation to Angptl3 in vivo, which mitigate FUS mislocalization to neuronal axons and lower plasma lipids, respectively. These findings establish RECODE as a highly stringent and efficient RNA editing technology and underscore a general principle for enhancing the specificity of RNA-guided protein effectors.

Data availability

The data supporting the results in this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information. Raw RNA-seq data for Fig. 3j and Fig. 5h can be accessed at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BioProject under the accession code: PRJNA1393754 or The Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession code: SRP658796. Source data are provided in this paper.

Code availability

No original code was generated in this study.

References

  1. Crick, F. Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227, 561–563 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Manning, K. S. & Cooper, T. A. The roles of RNA processing in translating genotype to phenotype. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 102–114 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moore, M. J. & Proudfoot, N. J. Pre-mRNA processing reaches back to transcription and ahead to translation. Cell 136, 688–700 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wright, C. J., Smith, C. W. J. & Jiggins, C. D. Alternative splicing as a source of phenotypic diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 697–710 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tian, B. & Manley, J. L. Alternative polyadenylation of mRNA precursors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 18–30 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nishikura, K. Functions and regulation of RNA editing by ADAR deaminases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 321–349 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenberg, E. & Levanon, E. Y. A-to-I RNA editing - immune protector and transcriptome diversifier. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 473–490 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liddicoat, B. J. et al. RNA editing by ADAR1 prevents MDA5 sensing of endogenous dsRNA as nonself. Science 349, 1115–1120 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mannion, N. M. et al. The RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 controls innate immune responses to RNA. Cell Rep. 9, 1482–1494 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pestal, K. et al. Isoforms of RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 independently control nucleic acid sensor MDA5-driven autoimmunity and multi-organ development. Immunity 43, 933–944 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garrett, S. & Rosenthal, J. J. C. RNA editing underlies temperature adaptation in K+ channels from Polar Octopuses. Science 335, 848–851 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yablonovitch, A.L. et al. Regulation of gene expression and RNA editing in adapting to divergent microclimates. Nat. Commun. 8, 1570 (2017).

  13. Pullirsch, D. & Jantsch, M. F. Proteome diversification by adenosine to inosine RNA-editing. RNA Biol. 7, 205–212 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dadush, A. et al. DNA and RNA base editors can correct the majority of pathogenic single nucleotide variants. Npj Genom. Med. 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-024-00397-w (2024).

  15. Booth, B. J. et al. RNA editing: Expanding the potential of RNA therapeutics. Mol. Ther. 31, 1533–1549 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Qu, L. et al. Programmable RNA editing by recruiting endogenous ADAR using engineered RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1059–1069 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Katrekar, D. et al. Efficient in vitro and in vivo RNA editing via recruitment of endogenous ADARs using circular guide RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 938–945 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yi, Z. Y. et al. Engineered circular ADAR-recruiting RNAs increase the efficiency and fidelity of RNA editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 946–955 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wettengel, J., Reautschnig, P., Geisler, S., Kahle, P. J. & Stafforst, T. Harnessing human ADAR2 for RNA repair - Recoding a PINK1 mutation rescues mitophagy. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 2797–2808 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reautschnig, P. et al. CLUSTER guide RNAs enable precise and efficient RNA editing with endogenous ADAR enzymes in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 759–768 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merkle, T. et al. Precise RNA editing by recruiting endogenous ADARs with antisense oligonucleotides. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 133–138 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reautschnig, P. et al. Precise in vivo RNA base editing with a wobble-enhanced circular CLUSTER guide RNA. Nat. Biotechnol.43, 545–557 (2024).

  23. Monian, P. et al. Endogenous ADAR-mediated RNA editing in non-human primates using stereopure chemically modified oligonucleotides. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1093–1102 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yi, Z. Y. et al. Utilizing AAV-mediated LEAPER 2.0 for programmable RNA editing in non-human primates and nonsense mutation correction in humanized Hurler syndrome mice. Genome Biol. 24, 243 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Y. R., Park, S. & Beal, P. A. Selective recognition of RNA substrates by ADAR deaminase domains. Biochemistry 57, 1640–1651 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zambrano-Mila, M.S. et al. Dissecting the basis for differential substrate specificity of ADAR1 and ADAR2. Nat. Commun. 14, 8212 (2023).

  27. Uhlen, M. et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015).

  28. Tan, M. H. et al. Dynamic landscape and regulation of RNA editing in mammals. Nature 550, 249–254 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Abudayyeh, O. O. et al. A cytosine deaminase for programmable single-base RNA editing. Science 365, 382–386 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huang, X.X. et al. Programmable C-to-U RNA editing using the human APOBEC3A deaminase. Embo J. 39, https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020104741 (2020).

  31. Buchumenski, I. et al. Global quantification exposes abundant low-level off-target activity by base editors. Genome Res. 31, 2354–2361 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Katrekar, D. et al. In vivo RNA editing of point mutations via RNA-guided adenosine deaminases. Nat. Methods 16, 239–242 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cox, D. B. T. et al. RNA editing with CRISPR-Cas13. Science 358, 1019–1027 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marina, R.J., Brannan, K.W., Dong, K.D., Yee, B.A. & Yeo, G.W. Evaluation of engineered CRISPR-Cas-mediated systems for site-specific RNA editing. Cell Rep. 33, 108350 (2020).

  35. Xu, C. L. et al. Programmable RNA editing with compact CRISPR-Cas13 systems from uncultivated microbes. Nat. Methods 18, 499–506 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liu, Y.J. et al. REPAIRx, a specific yet highly efficient programmable A > I RNA base editor. Embo J. 39, https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020104748 (2020).

  37. Yan, H. & Tang, W.X. Programmed RNA editing with an evolved bacterial adenosine deaminase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 1361–1370 (2024).

  38. Wu, J. H. et al. Live imaging of mRNA using RNA-stabilized fluorogenic proteins. Nat. Methods 16, 862–865 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shaner, N. C. et al. A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Nat. Methods 10, 407–409 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gadella, T. W. J. et al. mScarlet3: a brilliant and fast-maturing red fluorescent protein. Nat. Methods 20, 541–545 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Guharoy, M., Bhowmick, P., Sallam, M. & Tompa, P. Tripartite degrons confer diversity and specificity on regulated protein degradation in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat. Commun. 7, 10239 (2016).

  42. Crowe, C. et al. Mechanism of degrader-targeted protein ubiquitinability. Sci. Adv. 10, eado6492 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fu, H. L., Yang, Y. X., Wang, X. B., Wang, H. & Xu, Y. DeepUbi: a deep learning framework for prediction of ubiquitination sites in proteins. Bmc Bioinform. 20, 86 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yeh, C. W. et al. The C-degron pathway eliminates mislocalized proteins and products of deubiquitinating enzymes. Embo J. 40, e105846 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Koren, I. et al. The eukaryotic proteome is shaped by E3 ubiquitin ligases targeting C-terminal degrons. Cell 173, 1622–1635 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Smith, C. A., Calabro, V. & Frankel, A. D. An RNA-Binding chameleon. Mol. Cell 6, 1067–1076 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Smith, C. A., Crotty, S., Harada, Y. & Frankel, A. D. Altering the context of an RNA bulge switches the binding specificities of two viral Tat proteins. Biochemistry 37, 10808–10814 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).

  49. Calabro, V., Daugherty, M. D. & Frankel, A. D. A single intermolecular contact mediates intramolecular stabilization of both RNA and protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6849–6854 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rogers, S., Wells, R. & Rechsteiner, M. Amino-acid-sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins - the pest hypothesis. Science 234, 364–368 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Iwamoto, M., Björklund, T., Lundberg, C., Kirik, D. & Wandless, T. J. A general chemical method to regulate protein stability in the mammalian central nervous system. Chem. Biol. 17, 981–988 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lee, D. H. & Goldberg, A. L. Proteasome inhibitors: valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends Cell Biol. 8, 397–403 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, Y. R., Havel, J. & Beal, P. A. A phenotypic screen for functional mutants of human adenosine deaminase acting on RNA. Acs Chem. Biol. 10, 2512–2519 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Litke, J. L. & Jaffrey, S. R. Highly efficient expression of circular RNA aptamers in cells using autocatalytic transcripts. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 667–675 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Matthews, M. M. et al. Structures of human ADAR2 bound to dsRNA reveal base-flipping mechanism and basis for site selectivity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 426–433 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Montiel-González, M.F., Vallecillo-Viejo, I.C. & Rosenthal, J.J.C. An efficient system for selectively altering genetic information within mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw738 (2016).

  57. Wang, X. et al. Develop a compact RNA base editor by fusing ADAR with engineered EcCas6e. Adv. Sci. 10, 2206813 (2023).

  58. Lehmann, K. A. & Bass, B. L. Double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminases ADAR1 and ADAR2 have overlapping specificities. Biochemistry 39, 12875–12884 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tyagi, S. & Kramer, F. R. Molecular beacons: Probes that fluoresce upon hybridization. Nat. Biotechnol. 14, 303–308 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhou, W. J. et al. Genetically encoded sensor enables endogenous RNA imaging with conformation-switching induced fluorogenic proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 14394–14401 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hofacker, I. L. Vienna RNA secondary structure server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3429–3431 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Thomas, J.M. & Beal, P.A. How do ADARs bind RNA? New protein-RNA structures illuminate substrate recognition by the RNA editing ADARs. Bioessays 39, https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201600187 (2017).

  63. Park, S. et al. High-throughput mutagenesis reveals unique structural features of human ADAR1. Nat. Commun. 11, 5130 (2020).

  64. Yan, Z. et al. Next-generation IEDB tools: a platform for epitope prediction and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, W526–W532 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Vance, C. et al. ALS mutant FUS disrupts nuclear localization and sequesters wild-type FUS within cytoplasmic stress granules. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 2676–2688 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Shang, Y. L. & Huang, E. J. Mechanisms of FUS mutations in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Res. 1647, 65–78 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  67. López-Erauskin, J. et al. ALS/FTD-linked mutation in FUS suppresses infra-axonal protein synthesis and drives disease without nuclear loss-of-function of FUS. Neuron 100, 1–15 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wu, Z. J., Yang, H. Y. & Colosi, P. Effect of genome size on AAV vector packaging. Mol. Ther. 18, 80–86 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Braak, H. et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-a model of corticofugal axonal spread. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 9, 708–714 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wroe, R., Butler, A. W. L., Andersen, P. M., Powell, J. F. & Al-Chalabi, A. ALSOD: The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis online database. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 9, 249–250 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D862–D868 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ono, M. et al. Protein region important for regulation of lipid metabolism in angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) -: ANGPTL3 is cleaved and activated. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 41804–41809 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Romeo, S. et al. Rare loss-of-function mutations in family members contribute to plasma triglyceride levels in humans. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 70–79 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Davis, J. R. et al. Efficient in vivo base editing via single adeno-associated viruses with size-optimized genomes encoding compact adenine base editors. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 1272–1283 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Bergmark, B. A. et al. Effect of Vupanorsen on non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Statin-treated patients with elevated cholesterol: TRANSLATE-TIMI 70. Circulation 145, 1377–1386 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kozak, M. An analysis of 5’-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger-rnas. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 8125–8148 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Miller, T. M. et al. Trial of antisense oligonucleotide Tofersen for ALS. New Engl. J. Med. 387, 1099–1110 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Snyder, M. P. et al. The human body at cellular resolution: the NIH Human Biomolecular Atlas Program. Nature 574, 187–192 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Porebski, B. T. & Buckle, A. M. Consensus protein design. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 29, 245–251 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Chunshan Deng, Dr. Yinqing Li, and members of the Lu laboratory for helpful discussions and comments. This research was supported by Shenzhen Medical Research Fund grants B2504002 (Z.L.), B2402029 (Z.L.), and B2302053 (Z.L.), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences grant XDB0930000 (Z.L.), National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 32400927 (Z.H.) and 82327805 (Z.L.), Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission grant KQTD20210811090117032 (Z.L.), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation grant 2023M743681 (Z.H.), and Guangdong Basic and Applied Research Foundation grant 2023A1515110864 (Z.H.).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Taian Liu, Yunping Lin.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Primate Neuromodulation and Neuroimaging, Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China

    Taian Liu, Yunping Lin, Qiwei Liu, Wenhui Liao, Yunyi Lin, Yujing Zhang, Jianqing Zhang, Wenhua Cao, Lixin Yang, Zexuan Hong & Zhonghua Lu

  2. Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China

    Taian Liu, Yunping Lin & Zhonghua Lu

  3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Yunping Lin & Zhonghua Lu

  4. Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China

    Zexuan Hong

  5. State Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging Science and System, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China

    Zhonghua Lu

Authors
  1. Taian Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yunping Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qiwei Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenhui Liao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yunyi Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yujing Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jianqing Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wenhua Cao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lixin Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zexuan Hong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhonghua Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.L. and Z.L. conceived the project. T.L., Yunping Lin, Q.L., W.L., Yunyi Lin, Y.Z., J.Z., and W.C. developed methods and performed experiments. T.L., Yunping Lin, Q.L., L.Y., and Z.H. analyzed data. Z.L. supervised the project. T.L., Yunping Lin, Z.H., and Z.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Taian Liu or Zhonghua Lu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

T.L., Z.L., Yunping Lin, and Z.H. are co-inventors on a provisional patent that is being filed for this technology (PCT/CN2025/098018). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Hayase Hakariyav, who co-reviewed with Davide Fumagalli; and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source Data 1

Source Data 2

Source Data 3

Source Data 4

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, T., Lin, Y., Liu, Q. et al. Target-stabilized base editors enable robust high-fidelity RNA editing. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69835-w

Download citation

  • Received: 13 June 2025

  • Accepted: 10 February 2026

  • Published: 25 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69835-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing