Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Disruption of tRNA threonylation triggers RIG-I mediated anti-tumour immune response
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 February 2026

Disruption of tRNA threonylation triggers RIG-I mediated anti-tumour immune response

  • Cléa Dziagwa1,
  • Christian Seca1 na1,
  • Coralie Capron  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8922-31012 na1,
  • Chloe Maurizy3,
  • Ning An1,
  • Denis Heusdens4,
  • Timothy Budden5,6,7,
  • Lorena Martin-Morales  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1970-88722,
  • Miguel Susaeta Ruiz  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0002-6445-98091,
  • Elodie Renaude4,
  • Najla El-Hachem  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4180-30161,
  • Raphael Vanleyssem1,
  • Marine Leclercq  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3974-00601,
  • Arnaud Blomme  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4183-87264,
  • Alain Chariot  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-43473,8,
  • Jochen Utikal9,10,11,
  • Amaya Viros  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5177-50155,6,
  • Francesca Rapino2,8,
  • Sylvain Delaunay1,12 na2 &
  • …
  • Pierre Close  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-96161,8 na2 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Melanoma
  • tRNAs

Abstract

Tumour-induced mechanisms of immune evasion hinder immune response to cancer, particularly in melanoma. mRNA translation, by ensuring accurate protein synthesis, regulates cancer phenotypes and immune response, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we reveal how O-sialoglycoprotein endopeptidase (OSGEP), catalysing the tRNA modification N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t6A), drives protein homeostasis in cancer cells to maintain T-cell exclusion and prevent anti-tumour immune response. t6A-deficient melanoma cells disrupt efficient cytoplasmic translation of ANN codons (trinucleotides with A in the first position and N = any nucleotide), causing specific protein aggregation and the formation of integrated stress response-dependent stress granules. We discovered that OSGEP loss triggers melanoma regression by relocating RIG-I to stress granules, leading to its pathway activation. As a result, T-cells are recruited to the tumour site and orchestrate an anti-tumour immune response. Finally, an OSGEP-driven gene signature in melanoma patients is associated with T-cell infiltration and improved overall survival. Together, our findings position t6A tRNA modification as a promising therapeutic target for melanoma treatment.

Data availability

RNA sequencing data using B16F10 cells are available under the accession number GSE286709. Quantitative proteomics data on protein aggregates are available on PRIDE under the number PXD059835 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/). Spatial transcriptomics dataset is available under the accession number GSE316760. All other sequencing data are deposited on GEO under the accession number GSE286704 for the ribosome profiling and GSE286715 for the RNAseq after Flag-RIG-IP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE286715). Results are in part based on TCGA-SKCM data generated by the TCGA Research Network (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request (Pierre.Close@uliege.be). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

TrimGalore: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ TrimGalore is a Perl wrapper based on two canonical tools (Cutadapt and FastQC) for adapters and quality-based trimming. TrimGalore’s usage improves consistency and repeatability of analysis. No newly generated code is presented. RSamtools: https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Rsamtools.html. R package of Samtools was used for BAM files manipulations in this project (i.e: Metagene plot). No newly generated code is presented. GenomicAlignments: https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/GenomicAlignments.html R/Bioconductor package was used for the storage, manipulation and representation of short genomic alignments. In this project this package allowed us to perform the binning of genomic alignments for the ribosome stalling analysis. No newly generated code is presented. Pysam: https://github.com/pysam-developers/pysam: this used for the manipulation and storage of BAM/SAM files. Here, it was used to store BAM files for the tRNA pools analysis. No newly generated code is presented. ToppGene: https://toppgene.cchmc.org/: ToppGene suite is a canonical tool to perform Gene Ontology analysis, gene set enrichment and candidate gene prioritization. It was used for the RNA-sequencing data analysis. No newly generated code is presented. STAR: https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR: STAR is a canonical software for mapping RNA-seq reads to a reference genome. It was used for the RNA-seq and ribosome profiling in this project. No newly generated code is presented. DESeq2: https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html: it was used for the normalization, visualization, analysis of RNA-seq data and differential expression analysis. Used for the RNA-sequencing and ribosome profiling analysis. No newly generated code is presented. EdgeR: https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/edgeR.html: R package developed for the differential expression analysis of RNA-sequencing data. It was used here for statistical analysis in the ribosome profiling analysis. No newly generated code is presented. GSVA: https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/GSVA.html: Gene Set Variation Analysis R package allowing gene set and pathway enrichment on single samples. No newly generated code is presented. Source data files are provided with this paper in supplementary data files. Gating strategies for FACS analyses is available in the corresponding supplementary figures.

References

  1. Gonzalez, H., Hagerling, C. & Werb, Z. Roles of the immune system in cancer: from tumor initiation to metastatic progression. Genes Dev. 32, 1267–1284 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goto, N. et al. SOX17 enables immune evasion of early colorectal adenomas and cancers. Nature 627, 636–645 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tauriello, D. V. F. et al. TGFbeta drives immune evasion in genetically reconstituted colon cancer metastasis. Nature 554, 538–543 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lim, S. Y. et al. The molecular and functional landscape of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma. Nat. Commun. 14, 1516 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eddy, K. & Chen, S. Overcoming immune evasion in melanoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21238984 (2020).

  6. Boon, T., Coulie, P. G., Van den Eynde, B. J. & van der Bruggen, P. Human T cell responses against melanoma. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24, 175–208 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lacher, S. B. et al. PGE(2) limits effector expansion of tumour-infiltrating stem-like CD8(+) T cells. Nature 629, 417–425 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suresh, S. et al. eIF5B drives integrated stress response-dependent translation of PD-L1 in lung cancer. Nat. Cancer 1, 533–545 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cerezo, M. et al. Translational control of tumor immune escape via the eIF4F-STAT1-PD-L1 axis in melanoma. Nat. Med. 24, 1877–1886 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cerezo, M., Robert, C., Liu, L. & Shen, S. The role of mRNA translational control in tumor immune escape and immunotherapy resistance. Cancer Res. 81, 5596–5604 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wan, L. et al. Translation stress and collided ribosomes are co-activators of cGAS. Mol. Cell 81, 2808–2822 e2810 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robichaud, N., Sonenberg, N., Ruggero, D. & Schneider, R. J. Translational control in cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a032896 (2019).

  13. Xu, Y. et al. Translation control of the immune checkpoint in cancer and its therapeutic targeting. Nat. Med. 25, 301–311 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rapino, F. et al. Codon-specific translation reprogramming promotes resistance to targeted therapy. Nature 558, 605–609 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mercier, R. & LaPointe, P. The role of cellular proteostasis in antitumor immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 101930 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Delaunay, S., Helm, M. & Frye, M. RNA modifications in physiology and disease: towards clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 104–122 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rapino, F., Delaunay, S., Zhou, Z., Chariot, A. & Close, P. tRNA modification: is cancer having a wobble? Trends Cancer 3, 249–252 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frye, M., Harada, B. T., Behm, M. & He, C. RNA modifications modulate gene expression during development. Science 361, 1346–1349 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Delaunay, S. & Frye, M. RNA modifications regulating cell fate in cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 552–559 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deutsch, C., El Yacoubi, B., de Crecy-Lagard, V. & Iwata-Reuyl, D. Biosynthesis of threonylcarbamoyl adenosine (t6A), a universal tRNA nucleoside. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 13666–13673 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thiaville, P. C. et al. Global translational impacts of the loss of the tRNA modification t(6)A in yeast. Micro. Cell 3, 29–45 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. El Yacoubi, B. et al. The universal YrdC/Sua5 family is required for the formation of threonylcarbamoyladenosine in tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 2894–2909 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Su, C., Jin, M. & Zhang, W. Conservation and diversification of tRNA t(6)A-modifying enzymes across the three domains of life. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113600 (2022).

  24. Beenstock, J. et al. A substrate binding model for the KEOPS tRNA modifying complex. Nat. Commun. 11, 6233 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Arrondel, C. et al. Defects in t(6)A tRNA modification due to GON7 and YRDC mutations lead to Galloway-Mowat syndrome. Nat. Commun. 10, 3967 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Braun, D. A. et al. Mutations in KEOPS-complex genes cause nephrotic syndrome with primary microcephaly. Nat. Genet. 49, 1529–1538 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Edvardson, S. et al. tRNA N6-adenosine threonylcarbamoyltransferase defect due to KAE1/TCS3 (OSGEP) mutation manifest by neurodegeneration and renal tubulopathy. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 25, 545–551 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rehwinkel, J. & Gack, M. U. RIG-I-like receptors: their regulation and roles in RNA sensing. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 537–551 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kato, H. et al. Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses. Nature 441, 101–105 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kowalinski, E. et al. Structural basis for the activation of innate immune pattern-recognition receptor RIG-I by viral RNA. Cell 147, 423–435 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yoneyama, M. et al. The RNA helicase RIG-I has an essential function in double-stranded RNA-induced innate antiviral responses. Nat. Immunol. 5, 730–737 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jiang, X. et al. Intratumoral delivery of RIG-I agonist SLR14 induces robust antitumor responses. J. Exp. Med. 216, 2854–2868 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heidegger, S. et al. RIG-I activating immunostimulatory RNA boosts the efficacy of anticancer vaccines and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade. eBioMedicine 41, 146–155 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Duewell, P. et al. RIG-I-like helicases induce immunogenic cell death of pancreatic cancer cells and sensitize tumors toward killing by CD8(+) T cells. Cell Death Differ. 21, 1825–1837 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang, Y. et al. Exploiting RIG-I-like receptor pathway for cancer immunotherapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 16, 8 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nedialkova, D. D. & Leidel, S. A. Optimization of codon translation rates via tRNA modifications maintains proteome integrity. Cell 161, 1606–1618 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rapino, F. et al. Wobble tRNA modification and hydrophilic amino acid patterns dictate protein fate. Nat. Commun. 12, 2170 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cappannini, A. et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modifications and related information. 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D239–D244 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, J. T. et al. Commonality and diversity in tRNA substrate recognition in t6A biogenesis by eukaryotic KEOPSs. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 2223–2239 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mosely, S. I. et al. Rational selection of syngeneic preclinical tumor models for immunotherapeutic drug discovery. Cancer Immunol. Res. 5, 29–41 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang, J., Saffold, S., Cao, X., Krauss, J. & Chen, W. Eliciting T cell immunity against poorly immunogenic tumors by immunization with dendritic cell-tumor fusion vaccines. J. Immunol. 161, 5516–5524 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kohli, K., Pillarisetty, V. G. & Kim, T. S. Key chemokines direct migration of immune cells in solid tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 29, 10–21 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Oelkrug, C. & Ramage, J. M. Enhancement of T cell recruitment and infiltration into tumours. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 178, 1–8 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cui, A. et al. Dictionary of immune responses to cytokines at single-cell resolution. Nature 625, 377–384 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Man, S. M. & Jenkins, B. J. Context-dependent functions of pattern recognition receptors in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 22, 397–413 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Loo, Y. M. & Gale, M. Jr. Immune signaling by RIG-I-like receptors. Immunity 34, 680–692 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Thoresen, D. et al. The molecular mechanism of RIG-I activation and signaling. Immunol. Rev. 304, 154–168 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rak, R. et al. Dynamic changes in tRNA modifications and abundance during T cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106556118 (2021).

  49. Arragain, S. et al. Identification of eukaryotic and prokaryotic methylthiotransferase for biosynthesis of 2-methylthio-N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine in tRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 28425–28433 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dieterich, D. C., Link, A. J., Graumann, J., Tirrell, D. A. & Schuman, E. M. Selective identification of newly synthesized proteins in mammalian cells using bioorthogonal noncanonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103, 9482–9487 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wu, X. et al. Threonine fuels glioblastoma through YRDC-mediated codon-biased translational reprogramming. Nat. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-024-00748-7 (2024).

  52. Costa-Mattioli, M. & Walter, P. The integrated stress response: From mechanism to disease. Science 368, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat5314 (2020).

  53. McEwen, E. et al. Heme-regulated inhibitor kinase-mediated phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 inhibits translation, induces stress granule formation, and mediates survival upon arsenite exposure. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 16925–16933 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yerlikaya, A., Kimball, S. R. & Stanley, B. A. Phosphorylation of eIF2alpha in response to 26S proteasome inhibition is mediated by the haem-regulated inhibitor (HRI) kinase. Biochem. J. 412, 579–588 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mukherjee, T. et al. The eIF2alpha kinase HRI triggers the autophagic clearance of cytosolic protein aggregates. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 100050 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Campos-Melo, D., Hawley, Z. C. E., Droppelmann, C. A. & Strong, M. J. The integral role of RNA in stress granule formation and function. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 621779 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yang, P. et al. G3BP1 is a tunable switch that triggers phase separation to assemble stress granules. Cell 181, 325–345 e328 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Thoresen, D. T., Galls, D., Gotte, B., Wang, W. & Pyle, A. M. A rapid RIG-I signaling relay mediates efficient antiviral response. Mol. Cell 83, 90–104 e104 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Onomoto, K. et al. Critical role of an antiviral stress granule containing RIG-I and PKR in viral detection and innate immunity. PLoS ONE 7, e43031 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kim, S. S., Sze, L., Liu, C. & Lam, K. P. The stress granule protein G3BP1 binds viral dsRNA and RIG-I to enhance interferon-beta response. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 6430–6438 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sidrauski, C., McGeachy, A. M., Ingolia, N. T. & Walter, P. The small molecule ISRIB reverses the effects of eIF2alpha phosphorylation on translation and stress granule assembly. eLife 4, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05033 (2015).

  62. Vabret, N. et al. Y RNAs are conserved endogenous RIG-I ligands across RNA virus infection and are targeted by HIV-1. iScience 25, 104599 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ranoa, D. R. et al. Cancer therapies activate RIG-I-like receptor pathway through endogenous non-coding RNAs. Oncotarget 7, 26496–26515 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhao, Y., Ye, X., Dunker, W., Song, Y. & Karijolich, J. RIG-I like receptor sensing of host RNAs facilitates the cell-intrinsic immune response to KSHV infection. Nat. Commun. 9, 4841 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Du, J. et al. Transposable elements potentiate radiotherapy-induced cellular immune reactions via RIG-I-mediated virus-sensing pathways. Commun. Biol. 6, 818 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Jiang, M. et al. Self-recognition of an inducible host lncRNA by RIG-I feedback restricts innate immune response. Cell 173, 906–919 e913 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wang, L. et al. m(6) A RNA methyltransferases METTL3/14 regulate immune responses to anti-PD-1 therapy. EMBO J. 39, e104514 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gao, Y. et al. m(6)A modification prevents formation of endogenous double-stranded RNAs and deleterious innate immune responses during hematopoietic development. Immunity 52, 1007–1021 e1008 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Paget, M. et al. Stress granules are shock absorbers that prevent excessive innate immune responses to dsRNA. Mol. Cell 83, 1180–1196 e1188 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Li, K. et al. RiboDiPA: a novel tool for differential pattern analysis in Ribo-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 12016–12029 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ghanem Ghanem and Ahmad Najem for the access to MM lines, and Lionel Larue for the access to M1014 cells. We are grateful to the GIGA-proteomics, imaging, genomics, bio-informatics and viral vector facilities for their assistance. This study was supported by the Belgian foundation against Cancer (2020-068; 2024-148), the Walloon Excellence in Life Sciences and Biotechnology (WEL Research Institute, WELBIO to P. Close), the FNRS (PDR T.0244.18; EOS O.0020.22), the University of Liege, and the “Foundation Leon Fredericq”. CD was supported by a FNRS Télévie grant. SD was supported by a FNRS research fellow grant, by a Cancer Research UK institute award (C5759/27412) and a Royal Society research grant (RGS/R2/252386), AB and FR are Research Associates, AC and PC are Research Directors at the FNRS, respectively. TB and AV were supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) (NIHR203308), Cancer Research UK RCCASF-May23/100001 Cancer Research UK Advanced Clinician Scientist, a core funded grant to the Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (C5759/A27412), Melanoma Research Alliance and Rosetrees Trust Young Investigator Award (#825648). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. This article is based upon work from COST Action TRANSLACORE CA21154, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Christian Seca, Coralie Capron.

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Sylvain Delaunay, Pierre Close.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Cancer Signaling, GIGA-Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

    Cléa Dziagwa, Christian Seca, Ning An, Miguel Susaeta Ruiz, Najla El-Hachem, Raphael Vanleyssem, Marine Leclercq, Sylvain Delaunay & Pierre Close

  2. Laboratory of Cancer Stemness, GIGA-Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

    Coralie Capron, Lorena Martin-Morales & Francesca Rapino

  3. Laboratory of Cancer biology, GIGA-Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

    Chloe Maurizy & Alain Chariot

  4. Laboratory of Metabolic Regulation, GIGA-Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

    Denis Heusdens, Elodie Renaude & Arnaud Blomme

  5. Skin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Timothy Budden & Amaya Viros

  6. Department of Dermatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Timothy Budden & Amaya Viros

  7. Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Timothy Budden

  8. WELBIO department, WEL Research Institute, Wavre, Belgium

    Alain Chariot, Francesca Rapino & Pierre Close

  9. Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

    Jochen Utikal

  10. Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

    Jochen Utikal

  11. DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Centre Mannheim, Germany Cancer Research Centre – Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany

    Jochen Utikal

  12. Laboratory of RNA dynamics in Cancer, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Sylvain Delaunay

Authors
  1. Cléa Dziagwa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Seca
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Coralie Capron
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chloe Maurizy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ning An
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Denis Heusdens
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Timothy Budden
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lorena Martin-Morales
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Miguel Susaeta Ruiz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Elodie Renaude
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Najla El-Hachem
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Raphael Vanleyssem
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Marine Leclercq
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Arnaud Blomme
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Alain Chariot
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Jochen Utikal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Amaya Viros
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Francesca Rapino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Sylvain Delaunay
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Pierre Close
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.D. designed, performed and analysed in vitro and in vivo experiments, and wrote the manuscript. C.S. assisted with orthotopic transplantation assays, FACS and analyses. C.C. and F.R. performed computational analyses of the RNA sequencing, Ribosome profiling, Proteomics and RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing data. C.M. and A.C. performed and analysed histological staining of tumour samples. A.B., N.A., D.H., R.V. performed immunoblotting experiments. N.E.-H. performed polysome sequencing. T.B. and A.V. generated and analysed the spatial transcriptomics dataset. L.M.-M. and F.R. performed ribosome profiling experiments. E.R. supported in vivo experiments. M.S.R. performed Nicoletti assays. M.L. performed computational analyses using TCGA patient data. J.U. and A.V. provided expertise for human clinical data. S.D. and P.C. supervised the work, designed and analysed experiments, and wrote the manuscript. P.C. acquired and secured funding. All authors discussed the results and commented the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Close.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P.C. and F.R. are co-founders and scientific advisors at THERAtRAME SA. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Isaia Barbieri and the other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Dataset 1

Supplementary Dataset 2

Supplementary Dataset 3

Supplementary Dataset 4

Supplementary Dataset 5

Supplementary Dataset 6

Supplementary Dataset 7

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dziagwa, C., Seca, C., Capron, C. et al. Disruption of tRNA threonylation triggers RIG-I mediated anti-tumour immune response. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69964-2

Download citation

  • Received: 26 February 2025

  • Accepted: 12 February 2026

  • Published: 25 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69964-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing