Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj biofilms and microbiomes
  3. articles
  4. article
Modeling diet-gut microbiome interactions and prebiotic responses in Thai adults
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 January 2026

Modeling diet-gut microbiome interactions and prebiotic responses in Thai adults

  • Nachon Raethong1,
  • Preecha Patumcharoenpol2,3 &
  • Wanwipa Vongsangnak3 

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1452 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Microbial communities
  • Microbiome

Abstract

The impact of diet on gut microbial metabolism is essential for advancing microbiome-based health interventions. This study introduces a novel systems biology pipeline that integrates genome-scale metabolic models (GSMMs) with Thai dietary intake data to simulate gut microbiome metabolism and assess prebiotic responses. Utilizing metagenomic data from healthy Thai adults and an average Thai diet derived from national surveys, community-scale metabolic models (CSMMs) were developed and simulated under both typical dietary and prebiotic-supplemented condition. Flux variability analysis was employed to assess metabolic capacities, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production in relation to microbial taxonomy. The results promisingly revealed inter-individual variability in SCFA profiles, with Bacteroides and Phocaeicola notably linked to isobutyrate production and Bifidobacterium emerged as a key responder to prebiotic supplementation. This integrative framework offers biological insights into diet-gut microbiome interactions and provides a foundation for the development of precision nutrition strategies tailored to the Thai population.

Similar content being viewed by others

Microbial community-scale metabolic modelling predicts personalized short-chain fatty acid production profiles in the human gut

Article 24 June 2024

Inter-species Metabolic Interactions in an In-vitro Minimal Human Gut Microbiome of Core Bacteria

Article Open access 08 April 2022

Gut microbiota diversity in obese rats treated with intermittent fasting, probiotic-fermented camel milk with or without dates and their combinations

Article Open access 23 April 2025

Data availability

The sequencing data used in the project are openly available from SRA. Raw data supporting the findings (e.g., nutrient-derived metabolites in the average Thai diet and CSMM statistics for Thai adults) are provided as Supplementary Material.

Code availability

Codes and models developed and used in this study are available at https://github.com/nachonase/ThaiCSMMs.

References

  1. Gentile, C. L. & Weir, T. L. The gut microbiota at the intersection of diet and human health. Science 362, 776–780 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hindle, V. K., Veasley, N. M. & Holscher, H. D. Microbiota-focused dietary approaches to support health: a systematic review. J. Nutr. 155, 381–401 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hitch, T. C. A. et al. Microbiome-based interventions to modulate gut ecology and the immune system. Mucosal Immunol. 15, 1095–1113 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chung, Y. W. et al. Functional dynamics of bacterial species in the mouse gut microbiome revealed by metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses. PLoS ONE 15, e0227886 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Patumcharoenpol, P. et al. Exploring longitudinal gut microbiome towards metabolic functional changes associated in atopic dermatitis in early childhood. Biology 12, 1262 (2023).

  6. Kingkaw, A. et al. Analyzing predominant bacterial species and potential short-chain fatty acid-associated metabolic routes in human gut microbiome using integrative metagenomics. Biology 12, 21 (2022).

  7. Patumcharoenpol, P. et al. MetGEMs Toolbox: metagenome-scale models as integrative toolbox for uncovering metabolic functions and routes of human gut microbiome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008487 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raethong, N. et al. Analysis of human gut microbiome: taxonomy and metabolic functions in Thai adults. Genes 12, 331 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yachida, S. et al. Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses reveal distinct stage-specific phenotypes of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 25, 968–976 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zierer, J. et al. The fecal metabolome as a functional readout of the gut microbiome. Nat. Genet. 50, 790–795 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Noecker, C. et al. Defining and evaluating microbial contributions to metabolite variation in microbiome-metabolome association studies. mSystems 4, e00579–19 (2019).

  12. Shaffer, M. et al. Microbiome and metabolome data integration provides insight into health and disease. Transl. Res. 189, 51–64 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Magnúsdóttir, S. et al. Generation of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for 773 members of the human gut microbiota. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 81–89 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baldini, F. et al. The microbiome modeling toolbox: from microbial interactions to personalized microbial communities. Bioinformatics 35, 2332–2334 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heinken, A. & Thiele, I. Microbiome modelling toolbox 2.0: efficient, tractable modelling of microbiome communities. Bioinformatics 38, 2367–2368 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shaaban, R. et al. Personalized modeling of gut microbiome metabolism throughout the first year of life. Commun. Med. 4, 281 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heinken, A. et al. Systematic assessment of secondary bile acid metabolism in gut microbes reveals distinct metabolic capabilities in inflammatory bowel disease. Microbiome 7, 75 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Basile, A. et al. Longitudinal flux balance analyses of a patient with episodic colonic inflammation reveals microbiome metabolic dynamics. Gut Microbes 15, 2226921 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martinelli, F. et al. Whole-body metabolic modelling reveals microbiome and genomic interactions on reduced urine formate levels in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 14, 6095 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vangay, P. et al. US immigration westernizes the human gut microbiome. Cell 175, 962–972.e10 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ministry of Social, D. & T. Human Security, National Food Consumption Survey Report. (2015).

  22. Judprasong, K. et al. Thai Food Composition Database, Online version 2. (Institute of Nutrition, 2015).

  23. Noronha, A. et al. The virtual metabolic human database: integrating human and gut microbiome metabolism with nutrition and disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D614–d624 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bureau of Nutrition, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health. Dietary Reference Intake Tables for Thais (Bangkok, Thailand, 2020).

  25. Hertel, J. et al. Integration of constraint-based modeling with fecal metabolomics reveals large deleterious effects of Fusobacterium spp. on community butyrate production. Gut Microbes 13(1), 1–23 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sathitkowitchai, W. et al. A randomized trial to evaluate the impact of copra meal hydrolysate on gastrointestinal symptoms and gut microbiome. PeerJ 9, e12158 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rios Garza, D. et al. Metabolic models of human gut microbiota: advances and challenges. Cell Syst. 14, 109–121 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ivanovitch, K. et al. The intake of energy and selected nutrients by Thai urban sedentary workers: an evaluation of adherence to dietary recommendations. J. Nutr. Metab. 2014, 145182 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tjahyo, A. S. et al. Shifting trend of protein consumption in Southeast Asia: toward health, innovation, and sustainability. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 8, 104443 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krongdang, S. et al. Edible insects in Thailand: an overview of status, properties, processing, and utilization in the food industry. Foods 12 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112162 (2023).

  31. Chailimpamontree, W. et al. Estimated dietary sodium intake in Thailand: a nationwide population survey with 24-h urine collections. J. Clin. Hypertens. 23, 744–754 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yongsmith, B. and W. Malaphan Traditional Fermented Foods in Thailand, in Traditional Foods: General and Consumer Aspects, (eds Kristbergsson K. & Oliveira J.) p. 31–59 (Springer, 2016).

  33. Cook, N. R. et al. Long term effects of dietary sodium reduction on cardiovascular disease outcomes: observational follow-up of the trials of hypertension prevention (TOHP). BMJ 334, 885–8 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bromage, S. et al. Development and validation of a novel food-based global diet quality score (GDQS). J. Nutr. 151, 75S–92S (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bromage, S. et al. Performance of the global diet quality score (GDQS) App in predicting nutrient adequacy and metabolic risk factors among Thai adults. J. Nutr. 153, 3576–3594 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Huttenhower, C. et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486(7402), 207–214 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Almeida, A. et al. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature 568, 499–504 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. La-Ongkham, O. et al. Age-related changes in the gut microbiota and the core gut microbiome of healthy Thai humans. Biotechnology 10, 276 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lopez-Siles, M. et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: from microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics. ISME J. 11, 841–852 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schaus, S. R. et al. Ruminococcus torques is a keystone degrader of intestinal mucin glycoprotein, releasing oligosaccharides used by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. mBio 15, e0003924 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sung, J. et al. Global metabolic interaction network of the human gut microbiota for context-specific community-scale analysis. Nat. Commun. 8, 15393 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. LeBlanc, J. G. et al. Beneficial effects on host energy metabolism of short-chain fatty acids and vitamins produced by commensal and probiotic bacteria. Microb. Cell Factories 16, 79 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. den Besten, G. et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 54, 2325–40 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Furusawa, Y. et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature 504, 446–50 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. He, J. et al. Short-chain fatty acids and their association with signalling pathways in inflammation, glucose and lipid metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 6356 (2020).

  46. Aguirre, M. et al. Diet drives quick changes in the metabolic activity and composition of human gut microbiota in a validated in vitro gut model. Res. Microbiol. 167, 114–25 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zarling, E. J. & Ruchim, M. A. Protein origin of the volatile fatty acids isobutyrate and isovalerate in human stool. J. Lab Clin. Med. 109, 566–70 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Smith, E. A. & Macfarlane, G. T. Enumeration of amino acid fermenting bacteria in the human large intestine: effects of pH and starch on peptide metabolism and dissimilation of amino acids. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 25, 355–368 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Procházková, N. et al. Advancing human gut microbiota research by considering gut transit time. Gut 72, 180 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rodríguez-Romero, J. J. et al. What we know about protein gut metabolites: Implications and insights for human health and diseases. Food Chem. X 13, 100195 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Duizer, C. & de Zoete, M. R. The role of microbiota-derived metabolites in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 8024 (2023).

  52. Prescott, S. L. et al. Biodiversity, the human microbiome and mental health: moving toward a new clinical ecology for the 21st century? Int. J. Biodivers. 2016, 2718275 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gibson, G. R. et al. Expert consensus document: the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14, 491–502 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nguyen, N. K. et al. Gut microbiota modulation with long-chain corn bran arabinoxylan in adults with overweight and obesity is linked to an individualized temporal increase in fecal propionate. Microbiome 8, 118 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rodriguez, J. et al. Discovery of the gut microbial signature driving the efficacy of prebiotic intervention in obese patients. Gut 69, 1975–1987 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Prayoonthien, P. et al. In vitro fermentation of copra meal hydrolysate by human fecal microbiota. Biotechnology 9, 93 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kraikaew, J., Morakul, S. & Keawsompong, S. Nutritional improvement of copra meal using mannanase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology 10, 274 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Pomyen, Y. et al. Gut dysbiosis in Thai intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 13, 11406 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Aroney, S. et al. CoverM: read alignment statistics for metagenomics. Bioinformatics 41, btaf147 (2025).

  60. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Heirendt, L. et al. Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0. Nat. Protoc. 14, 639–702 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is funded by National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT): Contract number N42A660907 and N42A650235. The authors gratefully acknowledge the faculty members and research staffs from the Food and Nutrition Database Unit, Institute of Nutrition, for their insightful feedback and problem-solving suggestions, which significantly contributed to the research implementation. Their support also included access to software tools, food composition databases, and national FCS reports. Lastly, appreciation is extended to the Galaxy server (https://usegalaxy.eu), maintained by the Freiburg Galaxy Team, for offering storage space and high-performance computing resources that enabled the efficient analysis of large-scale microbiome datasets. We also would like to thank Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, SciKU Biodata Server for computing facilities, Postdoctoral Fellowship Program at Kasetsart University, and Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

    Nachon Raethong

  2. Division of Medical Bioinformatics, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Preecha Patumcharoenpol

  3. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Preecha Patumcharoenpol & Wanwipa Vongsangnak

Authors
  1. Nachon Raethong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Preecha Patumcharoenpol
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wanwipa Vongsangnak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.R. performed the computational experiments, visualized the data, interpreted the results, and prepared the manuscript. P.P. assisted with data curation and contributed to data interpretation. N.R. and W.V. conceived the study, acquired funding, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nachon Raethong or Wanwipa Vongsangnak.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary materials

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raethong, N., Patumcharoenpol, P. & Vongsangnak, W. Modeling diet-gut microbiome interactions and prebiotic responses in Thai adults. npj Biofilms Microbiomes (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-026-00921-z

Download citation

  • Received: 28 April 2025

  • Accepted: 18 January 2026

  • Published: 28 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-026-00921-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes (npj Biofilms Microbiomes)

ISSN 2055-5008 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology