Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathologic factors based on HER2 status after 1:2 propensity score matching

From: Prognostic difference between early breast cancer patients with HER2 low and HER2 zero status

Variables

All patients (N = 1152)

p

HER2-zero (N = 707)

HER2-low (N = 445)

Age, years (mean ± SD)

50.9 ± 10.6

51.4 ± 10.0

0.469

Breast surgery

  

0.153

 Breast conservation

421 (59.5)

274 (61.6)

 

 Mastectomy

286 (40.5)

169 (38.0)

 

 Unknown

2 (0.4)

 

Pathologic tumor stage

  

0.999

 T1

417 (59.0)

262 (58.9)

 

 T2

255 (36.1)

161 (36.2)

 

 T3

35 (4.9)

22 (4.9)

 

Pathologic nodal stage

  

0.952

 N0

478 (67.6)

305 (68.5)

 

 N1

149 (21.1)

94 (21.1)

 

 N2

45 (6.4)

27 (6.1)

 

 N3

35 (4.9)

19 (4.3)

 

Hormone receptor status

  

0.556

 Positive

557 (78.8)

357 (80.2)

 

 Negative

150 (21.2)

88 (19.8)

 

Histologic grade

  

0.638

 1

158 (22.3)

88 (19.8)

 

 2

327 (46.3)

217 (48.8)

 

 3

187 (26.4)

114 (25.6)

 

 Unknown

35 (5.0)

26 (5.8)

 

Chemotherapy

  

0.101

 Yes

655 (92.6)

400 (89.9)

 

 No

52 (7.4)

45 (10.1)

 

Radiotherapy

  

0.728

 Yes

482 (68.2)

299 (67.2)

 

 No

225 (31.8)

146 (32.8)

 

Hormone therapy

  

0.862

 Yes

545 (77.1)

345 (77.5)

 

 No

162 (22.9)

100 (22.5)

 
  1. aVariables are indicated as frequency (%) or mean ± standard deviation (SD)
  2. bAge, pathologic tumor stage, pathologic nodal stage, histologic grade, hormone receptor status, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy were adjusted using propensity score matching.
  3. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2