Fig. 2 : The Li–O polyhedra, topological pathways and comparison of CLi, Ce and experimental ionic conductivity (σexp) in cubic garnet structure. | npj Computational Materials

Fig. 2 : The Li–O polyhedra, topological pathways and comparison of CLi, Ce and experimental ionic conductivity (σexp) in cubic garnet structure.

From: Direct calculation of effective mobile ion concentration in lithium superionic conductors

Fig. 2

a Li–O polyhedra in the crystal structure. b Different types of ions and pathways identified through percolation analysis. c The comparison of the varying trends of \({C}_{{\rm{Li}}}\), \({C}_{{\rm{e}}}\) and the experimental ionic conductivity (\({\sigma }_{\exp }\)) relative to Li content (\({x}_{{\rm{Li}}}\)) in garnet structures. The simulation conditions are \({E}_{{\rm{nn}}}\) = 0.06 eV, \(\triangle {E}_{{\rm{site}}}\) = 0.12 eV and T = 300 K. The insert plot provides a more direct comparison of \({C}_{{\rm{e}}}\) and \({\sigma }_{\exp }\) after normalization, demonstrating a high R2 value of 0.901. The values of \({\sigma }_{\exp }\) are adapted from the following compositions: Li3Er3Te2O12, Li5La3Bi2O12, Li6La3Zr1.5W0.5O12, Li6.2La3Zr1.2Sb0.8O12, Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12, Li6.5La3Zr1.75Te0.25O12, Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12, Li7La3Zr2O12 and Li7.5La2.5Sr0.5Zr2O12, all of which are measured at room-temperature except for Li3Er3Te2O12 (measured at 450 °C) due to the measurement difficulty of its negligible room-temperature ionic conductivity13,16,39.

Back to article page