Fig. 7: Consistency validation of reasoning paths using the generator–discriminator mechanism.

This figure illustrates the consistency evaluation between the original reasoning path generated by the generator and the reconstructed path produced by the discriminator after masking the final structured output. Trajectory 1 is classified as “Consistent” due to alignment with the original content, while Trajectory 2 is marked as “Inconsistent” due to mismatched values for PrO₂ and ThO₂. The results highlight the discriminator’s effectiveness in detecting semantic deviations and ensuring output reliability.