Table 1 Summary table of the results found in the systematic literature analysis

From: MiRNA expression as outcome predictor in pediatric AML: systematic evaluation of a new model

miRNA/miRNA signature

Article

Pediatric AML patients

Data origin

Association with hazard (OS)

Log rank test p-value (OS)

Association with hazard (EFS)

Log rank test p-value (EFS)

Multivariate Cox regression analysis

Multivariate Cox p-value (OS)

Multivariate Cox p-value (EFS)

miR4 signature (4 miRNAs)

R. Zhu et al. 28

n = 229 (miRNA-seq)

TARGET project, USA.

Positive

No

Positive

0.033

Yes

<0.001

No

miR3 signature (3 miRNAs)

R. Zhu et al. 29

n = 59 (CN-AML) (miRNA-seq)

Positive

<0.001

Positive

<0.001

Yes

0.003

<0.001

AMLmiR36 signature (36 miRNAs)

Lim et al. 30

n = 1362 (miRNA-seq)

AAML0531, AAML03P1, CCG-2961 and AAML1031 (data later became TARGET), USA.

No

No

Positive

<0.001

Yes

No

<0.001

miR24 signature (24 miRNAs)

Esperanza-Cebollada et al. 26

n = 39 (RT-qPCR) + n = 447 (miRNA-seq)

Hospital Sant Joan de Déu (HSJD), Spain, and TARGET project, USA, respectively.

Positive

0.024

Positive

0.003

Yes

0.043

0.008

miR-199a

Qi and Zhang15

n = 71 (APL excluded) (RT-qPCR)

Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, China.

Negative

Negative

0.021

No

No

No

miR-381

Zhang et al. 31

n = 102 (RT-qPCR)

Linyi People Hospital, China.

Negative

0.011

Negative

0.004

Yes

0.011

No

miR-206

Liu et al. 16

n = 73 (RT-qPCR)

Daqing Longnan Hospital, China.

Negative

0.028

Negative

0.041

No

No

No

miR-193b-3p

Bhayadia et al. 32

n = 161 (RT-qPCR)

Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG); AML ‘Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster’ Study Group (AML-BFM-SG); Czech Pediatric Hematology Group (CPH); St. Louis Hospital in Paris.

Negative

0.002

Negative

0.018

Yes

0.018

0.016

miR-139-5p

Emmrich et al. 17

n = 165 (RT-qPCR)

Negative

0.001

Negative

No

No

No

miR-100

Kuai et al. 33

n = 106 (RT-qPCR)

Huai’an First People’s Hospital, China.

Positive

0.006

Positive

0.008

Yes

0.01

0.03

miR-195

Hong et al. 34

Negative

0.001

Negative

0.001

Yes

0.02

0.02

miR-375

Wang et al. 35

Positive

0.001

Positive

0.001

Yes

0.01

0.01

miR-335

Lin et al. 36

Positive

0.001

Positive

0.001

Yes

0.01

0.01

miR-370

Lin et al. 37

Negative

0.001

Negative

0.001

Yes

0.01

0.01

miR-29a

C. Zhu et al. 38

Negative

0.008

Negative

0.001

Yes

0.005

0.001

miR-34b

Qi et al. 44

n = 72 (RT-qPCR)

Negative

0.001

No

No

No

No

No

miR-122

Yang et al. 39

n = 116 (RT-qPCR)

Huai’an Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical College, Huai’an First People’s Hospital and Huai’an Second People’s Hospital. China.

Negative

0.001

Negative

0.001

Yes

0.006

0.02

miR-192

Tian et al. 40

n = 97 (RT-qPCR)

Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, China.

Negative

0.024

Negative

0.013

Yes

0.011

0.008

miR-155

Narayan et al. 14

n = 60 (RT-qPCR)

Royal Children’s Hospital and the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia.

Positive

Positive

No

No

No

Ramamurthy et al. 41

n = 198 (RT-qPCR)

Children’s Oncology Group (AAML0531), USA.

Positive

0.002

Positive

0.001

Yes

0.022

0.019

L. H. Xu et al. 42

n = 83 (RT-qPCR)

Children’s Hospital of Soochow University, China.

Positive

0.011

No

No

No

No

No

miR-196b

L. Xu et al. 43

Positive

<0.001

No

No

No

No

No

  1. Positive association with Hazard (hazard ratio > 1) indicates that a higher miRNA expression or signature coefficient is associated with poor overall survival (OS) or Event-free survival (EFS). Not significant associations (p-value > 0.05) are marked as an n-dash (–). Summary table of the results found in the systematic literature analysis.