Table 4 Comparison of materials, applications, and performance characteristics of biosensors obtained through microfabrication

From: Mechanics and bio-interface engineering in flexible biosensors for continuous health monitoring

Ref

Materials

Monitoring aim

Specifications

Advantages

Disadvantages

139

Tyrosinase enzyme, Conductive silver epoxy, L-DOPA, Nafion

Levodopa in ISF

Enzymatic sensitivity: 0.048 nA/μM

Multimodal detection

Not yet validated in long-term on-body human studies

141

PLA, GOx, Nafion, AuNPs, OPPy

Glucose

Glucose sensitivity: 8.09 μA/mM

Good stability (≥90% after 2 weeks)

Only in vitro testing

142

SWCNTs, PEDOT: PSS, GOx

Glucose

Glucose LOD: 0.225 mM

High sensitivity

Complex fabrication method

143

PMMA, PI, PDMS, silver ink, stainless steel

In-stent restenosis

Capacitance change at 5% strain: 18% (avg), 26% (max)

Advanced miniaturization

Only in vitro testing

145

PI-PET film, MPA, Au nanodots

Dopamine in organoids (for Parkinson treatment)

Dopamine signal: 1.4× increased

High signal selectivity

Only in vitro testing

146

SWCNT/MWCNT in SU-8 array

Dopamine

Sensitivity: 0.453 nA/nM LOD:0.77 nM

Good selectivity

SU-8 not fully biocompatible, High cost

147

PDMS, Eco-flex

Blood pressure

Sensitivity: 32% (−6 dB, 7.5 MHz)

Measurement depth

Power consumption

148

Parylene, Pt

Physiological pressure

Resolution: 1 mmHg (0.13 kPa)

High resolution

Limited device lifetime

149

PDMS,Mg, PI, Ti, Pt

Water permeation

Sensitivity: 3.3 × 10⁻⁸ g/m²/day at 25 °C

Low power consumption, wireless

Limited long-term stability

150

Si, Cr-Au film, Photoresist AZ MIR 701

Acceleration

Sensitivity: 0.5–15 Hz, ~1 g

Energy savings

Long-term reliability