Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Materials Degradation
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj materials degradation
  3. articles
  4. article
Toward the performance assessment of advanced nuclear waste forms: temperature dependence of lanthanide borosilicate glass dissolution
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 February 2026

Toward the performance assessment of advanced nuclear waste forms: temperature dependence of lanthanide borosilicate glass dissolution

  • Jeffrey R. McLachlan1,2,
  • Dalton A. Stanley1,3,
  • Justine A. Garcia3,4,
  • Ta-Chun Wang2,
  • Leslie G. Castro1,3,
  • Ethan Bates5,
  • Stefan Finsterle6,
  • Jesse Sloane7,
  • Per F. Peterson2,
  • Raluca O. Scarlat2 &
  • …
  • Rebecca J. Abergel1,2,3 

npj Materials Degradation , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 203 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Chemistry
  • Materials science

Abstract

Lanthanide borosilicate (LaBS) glasses are among the most promising waste forms for the immobilization of high-level radioactive waste generated from advanced nuclear fuel cycles. However, the temperature dependence of their dissolution kinetics remains poorly understood and constrained, limiting the integration of these materials into established performance assessment models. Here, we investigate the dissolution behavior of the legacy AmCm2-19 LaBS glass and the benchmark alkali aluminoborosilicate ISG-1 in deionized water between 50 °C and 250 °C using ASTM C1285 (Product Consistency Test-B) protocols. For AmCm2-19 LaBS glass, normalized elemental release rates for boron and silicon increase with temperature before plateauing near 150 °C, consistent with solubility-limited behavior. From data obtained at 50 °C and 100 °C, Arrhenius analysis yields activation energies of Ea(B) = 24.8 ± 0.3 kJ mol⁻¹ and Ea(Si) = 14.4 ± 0.2 kJ mol⁻¹, similar or slightly lower than those previously reported for two other compositions of LaBS glasses. No secondary phases or alteration layers were detected by SEM-EDX or pXRD. These results establish one of the first temperature-dependent kinetic datasets for LaBS glass dissolution, providing quantitative parameters to inform mechanistic corrosion models and predictive simulations of glass degradation in geological disposal environments.

Similar content being viewed by others

Impact of B and Al on the initial and residual dissolution rate of alumino-borosilicate glasses. Part I: kinetic data

Article Open access 27 March 2025

Operando observation of dissolution kinetics and alteration layer formation of heavy ion irradiated borosilicate glass

Article Open access 12 February 2026

Corrosion of ternary borosilicate glass in acidic solution studied in operando by fluid-cell Raman spectroscopy

Article Open access 09 July 2021

Data availability

All data are available in the manuscript and supplementary information file or can be obtained from the corresponding authors upon request.

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency. Roadmap for Implementing a Geological Disposal Programme. Report No. NW-T-1.43. (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2024).

  2. King, F. et al. Review of the modelling of corrosion processes and lifetime prediction for HLW/SF containers—part 2: performance assessment models. Corros. Mater. Degrad. 5, 289–339 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruiz-Fresneda, M. A. et al. Impact of microbial processes on the safety of deep geological repositories for radioactive waste. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1134078 (2023).

  4. Morales-Hidalgo, M. et al. Insights into the impact of physicochemical and microbiological parameters on the safety performance of deep geological repositories. Microorganisms 12, 1025 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andrews, N. C. et al. Mechanistic Source Term Considerations for Advanced Non-LWRs. Report No. SAND2021-2668. (Sandia National Laboratories, 2021).

  6. Jantzen, C. M. & Ojovan, M. I. On selection of matrix (wasteform) material for higher activity nuclear waste immobilization (review). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 64, 1611–1624 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thorpe, C. L. et al. Forty years of durability assessment of nuclear waste glass by standard methods. npj Mater. Degrad. 5, 61 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frankel, G. S. et al. Recent advances in corrosion science applicable to disposal of high-level nuclear waste. Chem. Rev. 121, 12327–12383 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gin, S., Jollivet, P., Tribet, M., Peuget, S. & Schuller, S. Radionuclides containment in nuclear glasses: an overview. Radiochim. Acta 105, 927–959 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gin, S. et al. Insights into the mechanisms controlling the residual corrosion rate of borosilicate glasses. npj Mater. Degrad. 4, 41 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fournier, M., Gin, S. & Frugier, P. Resumption of nuclear glass alteration: state of the art. J. Nucl. Mater. 448, 348–363 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vienna, J. D., Neeway, J. J., Ryan, J. V. & Kerisit, S. N. Impacts of glass composition, pH, and temperature on glass forward dissolution rate. npj Mater. Degrad. 2, 22 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grambow, B. A general rate equation for nuclear waste glass corrosion. MRS Online Proc. Libr. 44, 15 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oelkers, E. H. General kinetic description of multioxide silicate mineral and glass dissolution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65, 3703–3719 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frugier, P. et al. SON68 nuclear glass dissolution kinetics: current state of knowledge and basis of the new GRAAL model. J. Nucl. Mater. 380, 8–21 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frugier, P., Minet, Y., Rajmohan, N., Godon, N. & Gin, S. Modeling glass corrosion with GRAAL. npj Mater. Degrad. 2, 35 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Minet, Y., Bonin, B., Gin, S. & Frugier, P. Analytic implementation of the GRAAL model: application to a R7T7-type glass package in a geological disposal environment. J. Nucl. Mater. 404, 178–202 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Delcroix, M., Frugier, P., Geiger, E. & Noiriel, C. The GRAAL2 glass alteration model: initial qualification on a simple chemical system. npj Mater. Degrad. 9, 38 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strachan, D. Defense HLW Glass Degradation Model. Report No. ANL-EBS-MD-000016. (U.S. Department of Energy Offi ce of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, 2004).

  20. Yucca Mountain Repository License Application Safety Analysis Report. Report No. DOE/RW-0573. (U.S. Department of Energy Offi ce of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, 2008).

  21. Curti, E. Aqueous Corrosion of Vitrified Nuclear Waste: Current Process Understanding, Literature Review and Recommended Rates. Report No. NAB 23-09. (National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste, 2022).

  22. Kelly, J. E. Generation IV International Forum: a decade of progress through international cooperation. Prog. Nucl. Energy 77, 240–246 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Generation IV Nuclear Reactors - World Nuclear Association. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/generation-iv-nuclear-reactors (2025).

  24. Bibler, N. E., Ramsey, W. G., Meaker, T. F. & Pareizs, J. M. Durabilities and Microstructures of Radioactive Glasses for Immobilization of Excess Actinides at the Savannah River Site. MRS Online Proc. Libr. (OPL) 412, 65 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Crawford, C. L., Marra, J. C. & Bibler, N. E. Glass fabrication and product consistency testing of lanthanide borosilicate glass for plutonium disposition. J. Alloy. Compd. 444–445, 569–579 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peeler, D. Composition/Property Relationship for the Phase 2 Am-Cm Glass Variability Study. Report No. WSRC-TR-99-00393. (Savannah River Site, 2000).

  27. Peeler, D. K. et al. Composition/Property Relationships for the Phase 1 Am/Cm Glass Variability Study. Report No. WSRC-TR-99-00055. (Savannah River Site, 1999).

  28. Marra, J. C., Peeler, D. K. & Jantzen, C. M. Development of an Alternative Glass Formulation for Vitrification of Excess Plutonium. Report No. WSRC-TR-2006-00031. (Savannah River National Laboratory, 2006).

  29. Peeler, D. K. et al. Results of an Inter-Laboratory Study of Glass Formulation for the Immobilization of Excess Plutonium. Report No. SRT-PUM-97-0017. (Savannah River Site, 1997).

  30. Riley, B. J. Electrochemical salt wasteform development: a review of salt treatment and immobilization options. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59, 9760–9774 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Riley, B. J. & Chong, S. Glass waste form options for rare-earth fission products from electrochemical reprocessing. J. Non Cryst. Solids 545, 120161 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fox, K. M., Marra, J. C., Edwards, T. B., Hoffman, E. N. & Crawford, C. L. Plutonium feed impurity testing in lanthanide borosilicate (LaBS) glass. MRS Online Proc. Libr. 1107, 397 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fox, K. M. et al. Variability Study to Determine the Solubility of Impurities in Plutonium-Bearing, Lanthanide Borosilicate Glass. Report No. WSRC-STI-2007-00477. (Savannah River National Laboratory, 2007).

  34. Daniel, W. E. & Best, D. R. Am/Cm Target Glass Durability Dependence on pH (U). Report No. WSRC-MS-96-0165. (Savannah River Site, 1996).

  35. Ebert, W. L. Corrosion Testing of a Plutonium-Loaded Lanthanide Borosilicate Glass Made with Frit B. Report No. ANL-06/35. (Argonne National Laboratory, 2006).

  36. Daniel, W. E. & Best, D. R. Time, Temperature, and Compositional Study of Am/Cm Target Glass Durability. Report No. WSRC-MS-96-0163. (Savannah River Site, 1996).

  37. Deschanels, X., Peuget, S., Cachia, J. N. & Charpentier, T. Plutonium solubility and self-irradiation effects in borosilicate glass. Prog. Nucl. Energy 49, 623–634 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fabian, M., Pinakidou, F., Tolnai, I., Czompoly, O. & Osan, J. Lanthanide (Ce, Nd, Eu) environments and leaching behavior in borosilicate glasses. Sci. Rep. 11, 13272 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fabian, M. et al. Structural investigation of borosilicate glasses containing lanthanide ions. Sci. Rep. 10, 7835 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tolnai, I. et al. Structural characterization of uranium and lanthanide loaded borosilicate glass matrix. Sci. Rep. 15, 28352 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mabrouk, A., Vaills, Y., Pellerin, N. & Bachar, A. Structural study of lanthanum sodium aluminoborosilicate glasses by NMR spectroscopy. Mater. Chem. Phys. 254, 123492 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kim, M., Ha, M. G., Um, W., Kim, H. G. & Hong, K.-S. Relationship between leaching behavior and glass structure of calcium-aluminoborate waste glasses with various La2O3 contents. J. Nucl. Mater. 539, 152331 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Malchukova, E., Levitskii, V., Tyurnina, N. & Tyurnina, Z. Structure and optical behavior of mixed lanthanides aluminoborosilicate glasses. Ceram. Int. 51, 9570–9576 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nicoleau, E. et al. Rare-earth silicate crystallization in borosilicate glasses: effect on structural and chemical durability properties. J. Non Cryst. Solids 438, 37–48 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ryan, J. V. et al. ISG-2: properties of the second International Simple Glass. npj Mater. Degrad. 7, 47 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jiménez, J. A., Crawford, C. L., Lascola, R. J., Christian, J. H. & Foley, B. J. Physico-chemical properties of γ-irradiated International Simple Glass (ISG) nuclear waste simulants with low levels of iron impurities. Chem. Phys. Impact 6, 100233 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jiménez, J. A., Crawford, C. L. & Lascola, R. J. Physico-chemical properties of international simple glass (ISG) nuclear waste simulants: luminescence baseline study. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 105, 4009–4026 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Li, L., Strachan, D. M., Li, H., Davis, L. L. & Qian, M. Crystallization of gadolinium- and lanthanum-containing phases from sodium alumino-borosilicate glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 272, 46–56 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fortner, J. A., Mertz, C. J., Chamberlain, D. C. & Bates, J. K. Plutonium Alteration Phases from Lanthanide Borosilicate Glass. Report No. ANL/CMT/CP--92880. (Argonne National Laboratory, 1997).

  50. Gaddam, A., Fernandes, H. R., Tulyaganov, D. U. & Ferreira, J. M. F. The structural role of lanthanum oxide in silicate glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 505, 18–27 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hordieiev, Yu. S. & Zaichuk, A. V. Study of the influence of R2O3 (R = Al, La, Y) on the structure, thermal and some physical properties of magnesium borosilicate glasses. J. Inorg. Organomet Polym. 33, 591–598 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Angeli, F. et al. Influence of lanthanum on borosilicate glass structure: a multinuclear MAS and MQMAS NMR investigation. J. Non Cryst. Solids 376, 189–198 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Molières, E. et al. Chemical durability of lanthanum-enriched borosilicate glass. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 4, 383–394 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Peeler, D. K., Marra, J. E., Reamer, I. A., Vienna, J. D. & Li, H. Development of the Am/Cm Batch Vitrification Process. Report No. WRSC-MS-99-00657. (Westinghouse Savannah River Company, 1999).

  55. Deshpande, V. K. & Taikar, R. N. Effect of cerium oxide addition on electrical and physical properties of alkali borosilicate glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 172, 6–8 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mekki, A. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of CeO2–Na2O–SiO2 glasses. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 142, 75–81 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Inagaki, Y., Kikunaga, T., Idemitsu, K. & Arima, T. Initial dissolution rate of the international simple glass as a function of pH and temperature measured using microchannel flow-through test method. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 4, 317–327 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Neeway, J. J., Rieke, P. C., Parruzot, B. P., Ryan, J. V. & Asmussen, R. M. The dissolution behavior of borosilicate glasses in far-from equilibrium conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 226, 132–148 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gervasio, V. et al. Liquidus Temperature: Assessing Standard Glasses for Furnace Calibration. Report No. PNNL-29312. (Pacifi c Northwest National Laboratory, 2019).

  60. Standard Test Methods for Determining Chemical Durability of Nuclear, Hazardous, and Mixed Waste Glasses and Multiphase Glass Ceramics: The Product Consistency Test (PCT). Report No. ASTM C1285-21. (American Society for Testing and Materials, 2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE; ARPA-E Grant No. DE-AR0001621); part of the research was conducted at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, a U.S. DOE Office of Science national laboratory managed by the University of California (UC) under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The authors thank Dr. Brian Riley, Dr. Vivianaluxa Gervasio, Dr. Benjamin Parruzot, and Dr. Joelle Reiser of the Radiological Materials group at PNNL for fruitful discussion and for providing samples of ISG-1 and AmCm2-19 glass. The authors thank John Grimsich from the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at UC Berkeley for his guidance with SEM imaging and EDX measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Jeffrey R. McLachlan, Dalton A. Stanley, Leslie G. Castro & Rebecca J. Abergel

  2. Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Jeffrey R. McLachlan, Ta-Chun Wang, Per F. Peterson, Raluca O. Scarlat & Rebecca J. Abergel

  3. Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Dalton A. Stanley, Justine A. Garcia, Leslie G. Castro & Rebecca J. Abergel

  4. Department of Chemistry, California State University, Hayward, CA, USA

    Justine A. Garcia

  5. Cambrian Nuclear Inc, Union City, CA, USA

    Ethan Bates

  6. Finsterle GeoConsulting LLC, Kensington, CA, USA

    Stefan Finsterle

  7. Deep Isolation Nuclear Inc, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Jesse Sloane

Authors
  1. Jeffrey R. McLachlan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dalton A. Stanley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Justine A. Garcia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ta-Chun Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Leslie G. Castro
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ethan Bates
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefan Finsterle
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jesse Sloane
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Per F. Peterson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Raluca O. Scarlat
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Rebecca J. Abergel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.R.M. – Conceptualization (equal); formal analysis; investigation; methodology (lead); project administration; supervision; visualization; data curation; writing – original draft. D.A.S. – Investigation; methodology (supporting); writing – review and editing. J.A.G. – Investigation; methodology (supporting). T.W. – Investigation; methodology (supporting). L.G.C. – Investigation. E.B. – Conceptualization (equal); writing – review and editing. S.F. – Conceptualization (equal); writing – review and editing. J.S. – Conceptualization (equal); funding acquisition (equal); writing – review and editing. R.S. – Conceptualization (equal); funding acquisition (equal); writing – review and editing. P.F.P. – Conceptualization (equal); funding acquisition (equal); supervision; writing – review and editing. R.J.A. - Conceptualization (equal); funding acquisition (equal); resources; supervision; writing – review and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jeffrey R. McLachlan or Rebecca J. Abergel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P.F.P. declares financial interest in Deep Isolation Nuclear, Inc, and both he and the company could benefit from commercialization of products, the development of which is supported by this research. All other authors declare no competing financial or non-financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

LaBSTempStudy_SI_Revised 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLachlan, J.R., Stanley, D.A., Garcia, J.A. et al. Toward the performance assessment of advanced nuclear waste forms: temperature dependence of lanthanide borosilicate glass dissolution. npj Mater Degrad (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-026-00756-1

Download citation

  • Received: 30 October 2025

  • Accepted: 03 February 2026

  • Published: 18 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-026-00756-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Corrosion and Degradation in Nuclear Materials

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the partner
  • Q&As with our Editors-in-Chief

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Materials Degradation (npj Mater Degrad)

ISSN 2397-2106 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing